Augmented Renal ClearancePhase 4FLARENCT07643467
Fluorescent Probe for Assessment of Renal Elimination
A Phase 4 study testing Relmapirazin, Iohexol and Medibeacon tGFR monitor in people with Augmented Renal Clearance and Critical Illness, run by Aaron Cook at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Accurate measures of kidney function is important for precision dosing of many medications. The current methods of determining kidney function largely hinge on the use of equations that use common laboratory values such as serum creatinine \& static variables like age \& weight. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Augmented Renal Clearance, Critical Illness
- What is being tested?
- Relmapirazin, Iohexol and Medibeacon tGFR monitor
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 1 Sep 2026to 30 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18-65 years old
- critically ill or acutely ill hospitalized patients admitted to the intensive care unit
- Stable/normal renal function
Who cannot join
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women
- Laboratory evidence of unstable kidney function (KDIGO AKI stage 1-3--This includes subjects with Scr > 1.5x baseline)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
UKHealthCare/University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536
About this study
Accurate measures of kidney function is important for precision dosing of many medications. The current methods of determining kidney function largely hinge on the use of equations that use common laboratory values such as serum creatinine \& static variables like age \& weight. These are helpful for trending over time, but often are inaccurate during times of medical illness. Other more accurate methods of measuring kidney function include urine collection, although this is not commonly used because of various reasons that make the collection inconvenient or unreliable. The new transdermal glomerular filtration (tGFR) device permits accurate, real-time evaluation of kidney function. This novel method has not been rigorously compared with urine collection \& other methods of determining kidney function in hospitalized patients. The goal of the study is to compare tGFR with other accepted methods of determining kidney function.
Read the detailed description
The majority of acutely ill patients exhibit changes in renal function due to inflammation, increased solute generation, and iatrogenic factors such as fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. The pharmacokinetics of renally eliminated medications (eg. levetiracetam, cefepime, vancomycin) are frequently affected by inflammatory processes despite normal estimations in creatinine clearance resulting in suboptimal serum drug concentrations and therapeutic failure. Despite the prevalence of fluctuations in renal function in acute illness, real-time assessment is limited to monitoring of serum biomarkers such as creatinine and cystatin C, as well as urine output, which typically lag behind important changes in function. Furthermore, use of creatinine clearance equations based on anthropomorphic data correlates poorly with actual renal function, potentially misleading clinicians as to the progression of disease and the need for dose adjustment of important medications in this vulnerable population.
Limitations of current approaches for evaluating renal function in the acutely ill Estimation of GFR or creatinine clearance can be accomplished by numerous equations, the majority of which have been validated in non-critically ill adults, usually with a relatively high percent of patients with chronic kidney disease. These equations are often not accurate in patients with acutely worsening renal function. Likewise, while these equations are helpful for categorizing renal function and assessing appropriate medication dosing in otherwise healthy, ambulatory patients. Under-prediction of creatinine clearance values leads clinicians to consistently under-dose critical medications such as beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, or antiseizure medications such as levetiracetam.
Proactive measurement of creatinine clearance can provide a more accurate depiction of GFR but is fraught with complications. Iohexol serum concentrations correlate well with GFR, but requires intravenous administration of iohexol, which has a small risk of infusion reaction and hypersensitivity, and serial blood samples. Measured urine creatinine clearance is also feasible but inconvenient in most hospitalized patients. mClCr requires bladder catheterization for accurate urine volume, consistent storage on ice for the duration of collection (between 8 and 24 hours), and prompt delivery of the large volume container to the local laboratory for creatinine analysis. Each of these criteria introduce variability into the measurement and are often unnoticed or undocumented, introducing inaccuracy into the mClCr values. The lack of a real-time, accurate assessment of creatinine clearance in the acutely ill population is a gap in practice and represents a resolvable problem in the process of individualized and precision dosing of medications in this vulnerable and high-risk population.
This study represents an important innovation in advancing the understanding of fluctuations in renal function during acute illness. The current study will validate the safety of transdermal GFR monitoring to provide real-time measurement of renal function in patients with stable renal function. Further, the reliability of transdermal GFR monitoring will be compared to current standards of renal function assessment. The results of this study will advance the field by validating the use of a real-time physiologic assessment of GFR rather than using labor intensive, invasive tests that may lag behind current renal function. Numerous important gaps remain with this new technology, including use primarily in the ambulatory, stable renal function populations. Thus, this study is potentially the first step in evaluating renal function across the acute care continuum.
- Conditions
- Augmented Renal Clearance, Critical Illness
- Being tested
- Relmapirazin, Iohexol, Medibeacon tGFR monitor, Urine creatinine clearance collection
- Medical subject headings
- Critical Illness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RelmapirazinDrug
IV push of relmapirazin (Lumitrace) prior to use of the tGFR device
IohexolDrug
Small IV push bolus of iohexol as a probe for renal function will be administered prior to use of the tGFR device.
Medibeacon tGFR monitorDevice
The tGFR monitor will be applied to the patient after relmapirazin bolus for measurement of GFR.
Urine creatinine clearance collectionDiagnostic test
8-hour urine creatinine clearance collection will be performed during the study period to compare to tGFR \& other renal function measures.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Relmapirazin; Drug: Iohexol; Device: Medibeacon tGFR monitor; Diagnostic Test: Urine creatinine clearance collection |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (tGFR) Monitoring Accuracy
Accuracy of transdermal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) monitoring compared with measured urine creatinine clearance.
Measured: 8 Hours
Secondary outcomes (2)
Relmapirazin Elimination Half-Life
Elimination half-life of Relmapirazin calculated from serial serum concentration measurements obtained over 12 hours following intravenous administration.
Measured: 12 hours
Iohexol Elimination Half-Life
Elimination half-life of Iohexol calculated from serial serum concentration measurements obtained over 12 hours following intravenous administration.
Measured: 12 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2026
- Study start1 Sep 2026
- Primary completion31 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Augmented Renal ClearanceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aaron Cook
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Aaron Cook, University of Kentucky
- Investigators
- Aaron M Cook, PharmD, Principal investigator, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & ScienceJuan-Carlos Aycinena, MD, Study director, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Nephrology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07643467
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 105008
- Acronym
- FLARE
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 8 May 2026
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Fluorescent Probe for Assessment of Renal Elimination
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07643467
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FLARE / 105008
- Conditions
- Augmented Renal Clearance, Critical Illness
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aaron CookUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Sep 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 May 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accurate measures of kidney function is important for precision dosing of many medications. The current methods of determining kidney function largely hinge on the use of equations that use common laboratory values such as serum creatinine \& static variables like age \& weight. These are helpful for trending over time, but often are inaccurate during times of medical illness. Other more accurate methods of measuring kidney function include urine collection, although this is not commonly used because of various reasons that make the collection inconvenient or unreliable. The new transdermal glomerular filtration (tGFR) device permits accurate, real-time evaluation of kidney function. This novel method has not been rigorously compared with urine collection \& other methods of determining kidney function in hospitalized patients. The goal of the study is to compare tGFR with other accepted methods of determining kidney function.
Detailed description
The majority of acutely ill patients exhibit changes in renal function due to inflammation, increased solute generation, and iatrogenic factors such as fluid resuscitation and vasopressors. The pharmacokinetics of renally eliminated medications (eg. levetiracetam, cefepime, vancomycin) are frequently affected by inflammatory processes despite normal estimations in creatinine clearance resulting in suboptimal serum drug concentrations and therapeutic failure. Despite the prevalence of fluctuations in renal function in acute illness, real-time assessment is limited to monitoring of serum biomarkers such as creatinine and cystatin C, as well as urine output, which typically lag behind important changes in function. Furthermore, use of creatinine clearance equations based on anthropomorphic data correlates poorly with actual renal function, potentially misleading clinicians as to the progression of disease and the need for dose adjustment of important medications in this vulnerable population.
Limitations of current approaches for evaluating renal function in the acutely ill Estimation of GFR or creatinine clearance can be accomplished by numerous equations, the majority of which have been validated in non-critically ill adults, usually with a relatively high percent of patients with chronic kidney disease. These equations are often not accurate in patients with acutely worsening renal function. Likewise, while these equations are helpful for categorizing renal function and assessing appropriate medication dosing in otherwise healthy, ambulatory patients. Under-prediction of creatinine clearance values leads clinicians to consistently under-dose critical medications such as beta-lactam antibiotics, vancomycin, or antiseizure medications such as levetiracetam.
Proactive measurement of creatinine clearance can provide a more accurate depiction of GFR but is fraught with complications. Iohexol serum concentrations correlate well with GFR, but requires intravenous administration of iohexol, which has a small risk of infusion reaction and hypersensitivity, and serial blood samples. Measured urine creatinine clearance is also feasible but inconvenient in most hospitalized patients. mClCr requires bladder catheterization for accurate urine volume, consistent storage on ice for the duration of collection (between 8 and 24 hours), and prompt delivery of the large volume container to the local laboratory for creatinine analysis. Each of these criteria introduce variability into the measurement and are often unnoticed or undocumented, introducing inaccuracy into the mClCr values. The lack of a real-time, accurate assessment of creatinine clearance in the acutely ill population is a gap in practice and represents a resolvable problem in the process of individualized and precision dosing of medications in this vulnerable and high-risk population.
This study represents an important innovation in advancing the understanding of fluctuations in renal function during acute illness. The current study will validate the safety of transdermal GFR monitoring to provide real-time measurement of renal function in patients with stable renal function. Further, the reliability of transdermal GFR monitoring will be compared to current standards of renal function assessment. The results of this study will advance the field by validating the use of a real-time physiologic assessment of GFR rather than using labor intensive, invasive tests that may lag behind current renal function. Numerous important gaps remain with this new technology, including use primarily in the ambulatory, stable renal function populations. Thus, this study is potentially the first step in evaluating renal function across the acute care continuum.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring | Experimental | Drug: Relmapirazin, Drug: Iohexol, Device: Medibeacon tGFR monitor, Diagnostic Test: Urine creatinine clearance collection |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18-65 years old
- critically ill or acutely ill hospitalized patients admitted to the intensive care unit
- Stable/normal renal function
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Prisoners
- Pregnant women
- Laboratory evidence of unstable kidney function (KDIGO AKI stage 1-3--This includes subjects with Scr > 1.5x baseline)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RelmapirazinIV push of relmapirazin (Lumitrace) prior to use of the tGFR device | Drug | MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring |
| IohexolSmall IV push bolus of iohexol as a probe for renal function will be administered prior to use of the tGFR device. | Drug | MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring |
| Medibeacon tGFR monitorThe tGFR monitor will be applied to the patient after relmapirazin bolus for measurement of GFR. | Device | MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring |
| Urine creatinine clearance collection8-hour urine creatinine clearance collection will be performed during the study period to compare to tGFR \& other renal function measures. | Diagnostic test | MediBeacon Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) Monitoring |
Primary outcome
Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (tGFR) Monitoring Accuracy
Time frame: 8 Hours
Accuracy of transdermal glomerular filtration rate (GFR) monitoring compared with measured urine creatinine clearance.
2 secondary outcomes
Relmapirazin Elimination Half-Life
Time frame: 12 hours
Iohexol Elimination Half-Life
Time frame: 12 hours
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
Related trials for Augmented Renal Clearance
RecruitingPhase 4
Adjustment of Antibiotic Dosage in Pediatric Oncology Patients With Febrile Neutropenia and Augmented Renal Clearance
Febrile Neutropenia
RecruitingPhase 4
Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Cefiderocol in Patients With Acute Burn Injuries
Drug Clearance After Severe Burn Injury
Not yet recruitingObservational study
PK/PD Target Attainment of Ceftriaxone for the Prevention of Early Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Neurologically Injured Patients
Early Ventilator Associated Pneumonia, Acute Brain Injuries
RecruitingObservational study
Augmented Renal Clearance in Neurocritical Care
TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury), Status Epilepticus
RecruitingPhase 4
Telavancin Blood and Cerebrospinal Fluid Concentrations in Patients With External Ventricular Drainage
Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Aneurysmal
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Aaron M Cook, PharmD principal investigator
University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacy Practice & Science
Juan-Carlos Aycinena, MD study director
University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Department of Nephrology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Relmapirazin, Iohexol and Medibeacon tGFR monitor in people with Augmented Renal Clearance and Critical Illness, run by Aaron Cook at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Aaron Cook, PharmD (18592578444, amcook0@uky.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Transdermal Glomerular Filtration Rate (tGFR) Monitoring Accuracy (time frame: 8 Hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.