Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder PainNCT07632729
Effects of Knowledge of Results Intervention in Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain
A study testing Knowledge of Results and Standart Rehabilitation in people with Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain and Augmented Feedback, run by Elif Turgut at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Previous research demonstrates that augmented feedback effectively enhances motor skills and performance in both healthy individuals and those with neurological conditions. However, while the role of Knowledge of Results (KR)-a specific augmented feedback strategy-in supporting motor learning is well-established, its… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain, Augmented Feedback, Rehabilitation
- What is being tested?
- Knowledge of Results and Standart Rehabilitation
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 5 May 2026to 1 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged between 18 and 35 years;
- Presence of unilateral shoulder pain lasting for at least 3 months;
- Confirmed diagnosis of at least one of the following conditions by a physician, based on clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasonography (USG) findings: subacromial impingement syndrome, subacromial bursitis, rotator cuff tendinopathy, or partial rotator cuff tear (< 1 cm);
- Presence of a positive painful arc during flexion or abduction, at least one positive impingement test (Neer or Hawkins-Kennedy), and provocation of symptoms during resisted humeral external rotation, abduction, or scapular plane elevation at 90° of elevation;
- A physical activity score of 5 or higher according to the Tegner Activity Level Scale.
Who cannot join
- Presence of bilateral shoulder pain;
- Presence of a full-thickness or massive rotator cuff tear;
- History of shoulder trauma, fracture, or instability;
- Restriction in passive range of motion;
- Receipt of any injection to the shoulder joint within the previous 6 weeks;
- History of previous shoulder surgery or dislocation;
Show all 13Show fewer
- Pregnancy;
- Presence of cervical radiculopathy symptoms or peripheral nerve entrapment syndromes;
- A score of 14 or higher on the Beck Depression Inventory-II;
- Diagnosis of hypertension, cardiovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, history of deep vein thrombosis, neurological disorders, systemic inflammation, diabetes, cancer, or rheumatological diseases;
- Presence of obesity or metabolic syndrome;
- Participation in any rehabilitation program for a shoulder problem within the past year;
- Unwillingness to participate in the study (or failure to provide informed consent).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Hacettepe University, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation,, Ankara, Sıhhıye 06100
Ankara, Sıhhıye, 06100
About this study
Official title: Effects of Knowledge of Results as an Augmented Feedback Intervention on Clinical Outcomes, Physical Performance and Psychosocial Parameters in Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Previous research demonstrates that augmented feedback effectively enhances motor skills and performance in both healthy individuals and those with neurological conditions. However, while the role of Knowledge of Results (KR)-a specific augmented feedback strategy-in supporting motor learning is well-established, its efficacy in improving rehabilitation outcomes remains unclear. Notably, there is a lack of studies in the current literature investigating the effects of augmented feedback strategies in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP). Given the complex and multidimensional pain neurophysiology associated with RCRSP, a KR intervention is hypothesized to hold significant potential for restoring motor control, correcting pain-driven maladaptive movement patterns, alleviating pain, and recovering function in this population. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of a KR intervention on clinical outcomes, physical performance, and psychosocial parameters in individuals with RCRSP. The study is designed as a two-arm, prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to either the intervention (n = 28; standard rehabilitation program+ KR intervention)or control group (n = 28; standard rehabilitation program) using computer-based randomization software (www.sealedenvelope.com). Both groups will undergo the same routine exercise-based treatment protocol over an 8-week period, consisting of one physiotherapist-supervised session per week and a home exercise program on the remaining days. While the control group will solely receive the standard rehabilitation program, the intervention group will additionally receive the KR intervention, wherein their assessment results will be regularly shared throughout the treatment process. Conversely, these data will only be disclosed to the control group participants at the conclusion of the 8-week intervention.
Read the detailed description
A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment protocol will be conducted to evaluate the clinical, neuromuscular, sensorimotor, and psychosocial effects of the intervention. To ensure consistency, all measurements will be performed by the same physiotherapist. Pain intensity (VAS), disability (SPADI), active and pain-free range of motion (using a smartphone inclinometer for flexion, abduction, and internal/external rotation), isometric external rotation strength (via a handheld dynamometer), and the Global Rating of Change (GROC) will be recorded at baseline and continuously monitored prior to each supervised session. Additionally, at baseline and after the 8-week intervention, further pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted. These include isometric external rotation, internal rotation, and scaption strength using a strap-fixated handheld dynamometer (EasyForce), with strength tests being terminated if pain exceeds 5/10 on the VAS. Sensorimotor function will be evaluated by measuring shoulder proprioception via Active Joint Position Sense (AJPS) at a 45° target angle in a 90°/90° position, alongside posterior shoulder endurance tested in a prone position holding 2% of body weight. Psychosocial and behavioral parameters will also be assessed, including kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), avoidance behaviors (ADAP-TR and ASAP-Shoulder scales), patient satisfaction (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation - SANE), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire - PSEQ).
Both groups will undergo an 8-week multimodal, evidence-based shoulder rehabilitation program consisting of one supervised clinical session per week and a home exercise program performed three times daily. The protocol includes patient education focusing on pathophysiology, pain management, and activity modification to improve posture and restrict heavy overhead activities. It also incorporates cryotherapy as needed, and targeted manual therapy involving soft tissue release for the long head of the biceps, pectoralis minor, posterior capsule, and supraspinatus. Furthermore, a structured, pain-guided (VAS < 4/10) bilateral progressive exercise therapy program will be implemented. This comprises stretching of the upper trapezius, pectoralis minor, and posterior capsule for 3 sets of 30 seconds, alongside a specific regimen of progressive strengthening and neuromuscular control exercises. The exercise protocol specifically includes bilateral scapular retraction, internal and external rotation, the push-up plus, the full can exercise, bilateral external rotation with elevation using a resistance band, the lawnmower with diagonal squat, the robbery with squat, and proprioceptive exercises utilizing a laser pointer (Motion Guidance). Exercises will be performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions during weeks 1 to 4, and progressed to 3 sets of 12 repetitions during weeks 5 to 8. Resistance is established using 30% of 1-Repetition Maximum (1-RM) for free weights or an OMNI-RES EB score of 3-5 for elastic bands. To optimize muscle activation and minimize compensation, movements will initially be restricted to under 90° of elevation, with the full range of motion restored before any increase in external load.
The Knowledge of Results intervention will be administered exclusively to the intervention group once a week for 8 weeks, immediately prior to each supervised treatment session, whereas the control group will receive no such augmented feedback. The objective of this intervention is to systematically provide participants with objective, quantifiable data regarding their task results, enabling them to recognize their performance and cumulative progress through concrete metrics. Upon the completion of the routine assessments the physiotherapist will verbally and numerically report the patient's results for pain intensity (VAS), disability (SPADI), pain-free range of motion, isometric external rotation strength, and perceived recovery (GROC). To maximize patient focus and emphasize the importance of the information, this feedback will be delivered immediately after each assessment set using a clear, emphasized, and slightly elevated tone of voice to distinguish it from ambient noise. For physical performance metrics (range of motion and strength), participants will perform three repetitions; once the joint is returned to the starting position, the physiotherapist will calculate and disclose the arithmetic mean of the three trials, alongside the absolute change compared to the previous week's measurement. Similarly, for clinical parameters (pain, disability, and GROC), both the current scores and the calculated weekly differences will be explicitly communicated. This standardized approach ensures that participants receive immediate, explicit insight into both their current session performance and their longitudinal weekly improvements. For example, "your pain level this week is 4 out of 10, which is a 10% decrease compared to last week."
- Being tested
- Knowledge of Results, Standart Rehabilitation
- Keywords
- augmented feedback, knowledge of results, rotator cuff, shoulder pain, rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Shoulder Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Knowledge of ResultsBehavioural
Knowledge of Results (KR) is an augmented feedback strategy designed to provide patients with objective, quantifiable data regarding their clinical and physical progress. In this study, the KR intervention will be administered weekly, immediately prior to each supervised treatment session. After the completion of routine pre-session assessments (including pain intensity, disability level, range of motion, isometric strength, and GROC), the physiotherapist will verbally and numerically communicate the patient's current scores, alongside the absolute change recorded compared to the previous week. To maximize the patient's focus on their cumulative recovery, this feedback will be delivered directly and explicitly using a clear, emphasized tone of voice. For example, "your pain level this week is 4 out of 10, which is a 10% decrease compared to last week".
Standart RehabilitationOther
Participants allocated to the control group will solely undergo the standard 8-week shoulder rehabilitation program, which comprises patient education, targeted manual therapy, and the structured progressive exercise regimen, identical to the intervention group. To isolate the effects of the augmented feedback, the physiotherapist will strictly withhold the current measurement results and any information regarding their weekly progress.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Standart rehabilitation + Knowledge of Results | Experimental | All participants will undergo an 8-week standard shoulder rehabilitation program comprising patient education, manual therapy, and structured progressive exercise. In addition to this standard protocol, the intervention group will receive a KR intervention, administered immediately prior to each weekly supervised session. Accordingly, parameters routinely assessed before each session-namely, pain intensity (VAS), disability level (SPADI), active and pain-free range of motion, isometric external rotation strength, and the Global Rating of Change (GROC)-will be analyzed in real-time. Immediately following the completion of these assessments, the physiotherapist will verbally and numerically communicate the current measurement results to the patient, alongside the absolute change recorded compared to the previous week. To ensure the patient's full attention is directed toward the data, this feedback will be delivered using a clear and emphasized tone of voice. Receives: Behavioral: Knowledge of Results; Other: Standart Rehabilitation |
| Standart rehabilitation | Active comparator | Participants allocated to the control group will solely undergo the standard 8-week shoulder rehabilitation program, which comprises patient education, targeted manual therapy, and the structured progressive exercise regimen, identical to the intervention group. Although these participants will attend the same weekly supervised sessions and undergo the exact same routine pre-session assessments-including pain intensity (VAS), disability level (SPADI), active and pain-free range of motion, isometric external rotation strength, and the Global Rating of Change (GROC)-they will not receive the Knowledge of Results (KR) intervention. All clinical and physical performance data will only be disclosed to the control group participants upon the full completion of the 8-week intervention period. Receives: Other: Standart Rehabilitation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Intensity
Participants' pain intensity at rest, at night, and during activity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10-cm continuous horizontal line, anchored by "0 = no pain" at the left extremity and "10 = worst imaginable pain" at the right extremity. Participants will be instructed to place a mark on the line that corresponds to their perceived level of pain.
Measured: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Disability
Participants' disability levels will be evaluated using The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). SPADI is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess pain severity and the level of functional limitation in activities of daily living among individuals experiencing shoulder pain. The instrument consists of a total of 13 items divided into two subscales: pain (5 items) and disability (8 items). Each item is evaluated using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no pain or no difficulty) to 10 (worst imaginable pain or extreme difficulty).
Measured: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Secondary outcomes (10)
Perceived Recovery
The perceived rate of recovery will be evaluated using the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale. The GROC is an instrument designed to assess the change in a patient's clinical condition over time-indicating deterioration, no change, or improvement-and quantitatively expresses the magnitude of perceived change following treatment. The scale consists of a 15-point Likert-type structure ranging from -7 ("much worse") to +7 ("much better"), with a score of 0 representing "no change."
Measured: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Range of Motion
Participants' active and pain-free active shoulder range of motion will be evaluated using a smartphone inclinometer.
Measured: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Shoulder Muscle Strength
Isometric strength of the participants' shoulder internal and external rotators, as well as scapular plane elevation (scaption), will be measured using the EasyForce handheld dynamometer (Meloq Devices, Stockholm, Sweden). The EasyForce is a strap-fixated handheld dynamometer that continuously records tension force. Each test will be performed for 3 repetitions lasting 5 seconds each, and the mean peak force will be recorded in Newtons (N). Additionally, the internal-to-external rotation strength ratio (IR/ER) will be calculated.
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Proprioception
Shoulder proprioception will be evaluated bilaterally via the Active Joint Position Sense (AJPS) method using a smartphone inclinometer. Measurements for internal and external rotation will be conducted in a supine position with the shoulder at 90° of abduction and the elbow at 90° of flexion (the 90°/90° position), utilizing a 45° target angle.
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Posterior Shoulder Endurance
To evaluate participants' shoulder muscle endurance, the Posterior Shoulder Endurance Test will be administered. The test will be performed with the participant in a prone position, with the shoulder in 90° of abduction and external rotation. Participants will be instructed to lift a dumbbell corresponding to 2% of their body weight with their thumb pointing upward, and to maintain this position for as long as possible. The time elapsed from the initial contact with the target until the moment the participant can no longer maintain that contact will be recorded in seconds.
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Kinesiophobia
Kinesiophobia is defined as the fear of movement or re-injury. To evaluate the kinesiophobia levels of the participants, the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) will be utilized. The scale consists of 17 items that assess parameters including fear, avoidance, and the perceived risk of injury or re-injury during physical and work-related activities. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 ("strongly disagree") to 4 ("strongly agree").
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing
The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) will be used to evaluate participants' negative thoughts and emotions regarding pain. The PCS is a 13-item self-report questionnaire comprising three subscales: helplessness, magnification, and rumination. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("all the time"). The total score is calculated by summing the responses of all items, yielding a possible score range of 0 to 52.
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Avoidance Behavior
- evaluate participants' avoidance behaviors in daily and sports activities due to shoulder pain, the "Avoidance of Daily Activities Photo Scale for Patients with Shoulder Pain (ADAP-TR Scale)" and the "Avoidance of Sports Activities Photo Scale (ASAP Shoulder Scale)" will be utilized.
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Patient Satisfaction
Patient satisfaction will be evaluated using the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE). This metric is determined by the patient's response to the following question: "How would you rate your shoulder today as a percentage of normal? (0% = completely abnormal, 100% = completely normal)." Patients will be instructed to provide their response by reflecting on the condition of their shoulder throughout the rehabilitation program.
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Self-Efficacy
Participants' confidence levels in performing specific activities despite experiencing pain will be evaluated using the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ). The PSEQ is an instrument designed to measure individuals' self-confidence in maintaining various activities despite pain. This questionnaire consists of 10 items and assesses multiple dimensions of self-efficacy related to both social and physical functioning. Each item is scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("not at all confident") to 6 ("completely confident").
Measured: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jun 2026
- Study start5 May 2026
- Primary completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A two-arm, prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Elif Turgut
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Elif Turgut, Hacettepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07632729
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FTREK26/28
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 16 May 2026
- Last updated
- 8 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data will not be shared because the informed consent obtained from the participants and the ethics committee approval do not cover the public sharing of raw data.
Publications
Moinuddin A, Goel A, Sethi Y. The Role of Augmented Feedback on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2021 Nov 18;13(11):e19695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19695. eCollection 2021 Nov.
PubMed 34976475
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Knowledge of Results as an Augmented Feedback Intervention on Clinical Outcomes, Physical Performance and Psychosocial Parameters in Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07632729
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FTREK26/28
- Keywords
- augmented feedback, knowledge of results, rotator cuff, shoulder pain, rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Elif TurgutUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 5 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Previous research demonstrates that augmented feedback effectively enhances motor skills and performance in both healthy individuals and those with neurological conditions. However, while the role of Knowledge of Results (KR)-a specific augmented feedback strategy-in supporting motor learning is well-established, its efficacy in improving rehabilitation outcomes remains unclear. Notably, there is a lack of studies in the current literature investigating the effects of augmented feedback strategies in individuals with rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP). Given the complex and multidimensional pain neurophysiology associated with RCRSP, a KR intervention is hypothesized to hold significant potential for restoring motor control, correcting pain-driven maladaptive movement patterns, alleviating pain, and recovering function in this population. Therefore, the primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of a KR intervention on clinical outcomes, physical performance, and psychosocial parameters in individuals with RCRSP. The study is designed as a two-arm, prospective, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Eligible participants meeting the inclusion criteria will be randomly allocated to either the intervention (n = 28; standard rehabilitation program+ KR intervention)or control group (n = 28; standard rehabilitation program) using computer-based randomization software (www.sealedenvelope.com). Both groups will undergo the same routine exercise-based treatment protocol over an 8-week period, consisting of one physiotherapist-supervised session per week and a home exercise program on the remaining days. While the control group will solely receive the standard rehabilitation program, the intervention group will additionally receive the KR intervention, wherein their assessment results will be regularly shared throughout the treatment process. Conversely, these data will only be disclosed to the control group participants at the conclusion of the 8-week intervention.
Detailed description
A comprehensive, multidimensional assessment protocol will be conducted to evaluate the clinical, neuromuscular, sensorimotor, and psychosocial effects of the intervention. To ensure consistency, all measurements will be performed by the same physiotherapist. Pain intensity (VAS), disability (SPADI), active and pain-free range of motion (using a smartphone inclinometer for flexion, abduction, and internal/external rotation), isometric external rotation strength (via a handheld dynamometer), and the Global Rating of Change (GROC) will be recorded at baseline and continuously monitored prior to each supervised session. Additionally, at baseline and after the 8-week intervention, further pre- and post-intervention assessments will be conducted. These include isometric external rotation, internal rotation, and scaption strength using a strap-fixated handheld dynamometer (EasyForce), with strength tests being terminated if pain exceeds 5/10 on the VAS. Sensorimotor function will be evaluated by measuring shoulder proprioception via Active Joint Position Sense (AJPS) at a 45° target angle in a 90°/90° position, alongside posterior shoulder endurance tested in a prone position holding 2% of body weight. Psychosocial and behavioral parameters will also be assessed, including kinesiophobia (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia), pain catastrophizing (Pain Catastrophizing Scale), avoidance behaviors (ADAP-TR and ASAP-Shoulder scales), patient satisfaction (Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation - SANE), and self-efficacy (Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire - PSEQ).
Both groups will undergo an 8-week multimodal, evidence-based shoulder rehabilitation program consisting of one supervised clinical session per week and a home exercise program performed three times daily. The protocol includes patient education focusing on pathophysiology, pain management, and activity modification to improve posture and restrict heavy overhead activities. It also incorporates cryotherapy as needed, and targeted manual therapy involving soft tissue release for the long head of the biceps, pectoralis minor, posterior capsule, and supraspinatus. Furthermore, a structured, pain-guided (VAS < 4/10) bilateral progressive exercise therapy program will be implemented. This comprises stretching of the upper trapezius, pectoralis minor, and posterior capsule for 3 sets of 30 seconds, alongside a specific regimen of progressive strengthening and neuromuscular control exercises. The exercise protocol specifically includes bilateral scapular retraction, internal and external rotation, the push-up plus, the full can exercise, bilateral external rotation with elevation using a resistance band, the lawnmower with diagonal squat, the robbery with squat, and proprioceptive exercises utilizing a laser pointer (Motion Guidance). Exercises will be performed for 3 sets of 10 repetitions during weeks 1 to 4, and progressed to 3 sets of 12 repetitions during weeks 5 to 8. Resistance is established using 30% of 1-Repetition Maximum (1-RM) for free weights or an OMNI-RES EB score of 3-5 for elastic bands. To optimize muscle activation and minimize compensation, movements will initially be restricted to under 90° of elevation, with the full range of motion restored before any increase in external load.
The Knowledge of Results intervention will be administered exclusively to the intervention group once a week for 8 weeks, immediately prior to each supervised treatment session, whereas the control group will receive no such augmented feedback. The objective of this intervention is to systematically provide participants with objective, quantifiable data regarding their task results, enabling them to recognize their performance and cumulative progress through concrete metrics. Upon the completion of the routine assessments the physiotherapist will verbally and numerically report the patient's results for pain intensity (VAS), disability (SPADI), pain-free range of motion, isometric external rotation strength, and perceived recovery (GROC). To maximize patient focus and emphasize the importance of the information, this feedback will be delivered immediately after each assessment set using a clear, emphasized, and slightly elevated tone of voice to distinguish it from ambient noise. For physical performance metrics (range of motion and strength), participants will perform three repetitions; once the joint is returned to the starting position, the physiotherapist will calculate and disclose the arithmetic mean of the three trials, alongside the absolute change compared to the previous week's measurement. Similarly, for clinical parameters (pain, disability, and GROC), both the current scores and the calculated weekly differences will be explicitly communicated. This standardized approach ensures that participants receive immediate, explicit insight into both their current session performance and their longitudinal weekly improvements. For example, "your pain level this week is 4 out of 10, which is a 10% decrease compared to last week."
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A two-arm, prospective, parallel-group randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Standart rehabilitation + Knowledge of Results | Experimental | Behavioral: Knowledge of Results, Other: Standart RehabilitationAll participants will undergo an 8-week standard shoulder rehabilitation program comprising patient education, manual therapy, and structured progressive exercise. In addition to this standard protocol, the intervention group will receive a KR intervention, administered immediately prior to each weekly supervised session. Accordingly, parameters routinely assessed before each session-namely, pain intensity (VAS), disability level (SPADI), active and pain-free range of motion, isometric external rotation strength, and the Global Rating of Change (GROC)-will be analyzed in real-time. Immediately following the completion of these assessments, the physiotherapist will verbally and numerically communicate the current measurement results to the patient, alongside the absolute change recorded compared to the previous week. To ensure the patient's full attention is directed toward the data, this feedback will be delivered using a clear and emphasized tone of voice. |
| Standart rehabilitation | Active comparator | Other: Standart RehabilitationParticipants allocated to the control group will solely undergo the standard 8-week shoulder rehabilitation program, which comprises patient education, targeted manual therapy, and the structured progressive exercise regimen, identical to the intervention group. Although these participants will attend the same weekly supervised sessions and undergo the exact same routine pre-session assessments-including pain intensity (VAS), disability level (SPADI), active and pain-free range of motion, isometric external rotation strength, and the Global Rating of Change (GROC)-they will not receive the Knowledge of Results (KR) intervention. All clinical and physical performance data will only be disclosed to the control group participants upon the full completion of the 8-week intervention period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged between 18 and 35 years;
- Presence of unilateral shoulder pain lasting for at least 3 months;
- Confirmed diagnosis of at least one of the following conditions by a physician, based on clinical evaluation and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or ultrasonography (USG) findings: subacromial impingement syndrome, subacromial bursitis, rotator cuff tendinopathy, or partial rotator cuff tear (< 1 cm);
- Presence of a positive painful arc during flexion or abduction, at least one positive impingement test (Neer or Hawkins-Kennedy), and provocation of symptoms during resisted humeral external rotation, abduction, or scapular plane elevation at 90° of elevation;
- A physical activity score of 5 or higher according to the Tegner Activity Level Scale.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Presence of bilateral shoulder pain;
- Presence of a full-thickness or massive rotator cuff tear;
- History of shoulder trauma, fracture, or instability;
- Restriction in passive range of motion;
- Receipt of any injection to the shoulder joint within the previous 6 weeks;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Knowledge of ResultsKnowledge of Results (KR) is an augmented feedback strategy designed to provide patients with objective, quantifiable data regarding their clinical and physical progress. In this study, the KR intervention will be administered weekly, immediately prior to each supervised treatment session. After the completion of routine pre-session assessments (including pain intensity, disability level, range of motion, isometric strength, and GROC), the physiotherapist will verbally and numerically communicate the patient's current scores, alongside the absolute change recorded compared to the previous week. To maximize the patient's focus on their cumulative recovery, this feedback will be delivered directly and explicitly using a clear, emphasized tone of voice. For example, "your pain level this week is 4 out of 10, which is a 10% decrease compared to last week". | Behavioural | Standart rehabilitation + Knowledge of Results |
| Standart RehabilitationParticipants allocated to the control group will solely undergo the standard 8-week shoulder rehabilitation program, which comprises patient education, targeted manual therapy, and the structured progressive exercise regimen, identical to the intervention group. To isolate the effects of the augmented feedback, the physiotherapist will strictly withhold the current measurement results and any information regarding their weekly progress. | Other | Standart rehabilitation, Standart rehabilitation + Knowledge of Results |
Primary outcome
Pain Intensity
Time frame: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Participants' pain intensity at rest, at night, and during activity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS consists of a 10-cm continuous horizontal line, anchored by "0 = no pain" at the left extremity and "10 = worst imaginable pain" at the right extremity. Participants will be instructed to place a mark on the line that corresponds to their perceived level of pain.
Disability
Time frame: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Participants' disability levels will be evaluated using The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI). SPADI is a self-reported questionnaire designed to assess pain severity and the level of functional limitation in activities of daily living among individuals experiencing shoulder pain. The instrument consists of a total of 13 items divided into two subscales: pain (5 items) and disability (8 items). Each item is evaluated using a visual analog scale ranging from 0 (no pain or no difficulty) to 10 (worst imaginable pain or extreme difficulty).
10 secondary outcomes
Perceived Recovery
Time frame: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Range of Motion
Time frame: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks
Shoulder Muscle Strength
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Proprioception
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Posterior Shoulder Endurance
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Kinesiophobia
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Pain Catastrophizing
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Avoidance Behavior
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Patient Satisfaction
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Self-Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline and at 8 weeks
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Jun 2026.
- Results publication: PubMed 34976475Moinuddin A, Goel A, Sethi Y. The Role of Augmented Feedback on Motor Learning: A Systematic Review. Cureus. 2021 Nov 18;13(11):e19695. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19695. eCollection 2021 Nov.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data will not be shared because the informed consent obtained from the participants and the ethics committee approval do not cover the public sharing of raw data.
Related trials for Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotype and Response to Corticosteroid Injection in Patients With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Nociplastic Pain in Patients Diagnosed With Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS)
Subacromial Pain Syndrome, Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
Recruiting
Latissimus Dorsi Strengthening Exercises in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain, Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy
Not yet recruiting
Implementation of Shoulder School in Albania
Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain
Not yet recruiting
Personalised Education Versus Usual Physiotherapy for Acute Rotator Cuff-Related Shoulder Pain
Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain, Shoulder Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Knowledge of Results and Standart Rehabilitation in people with Rotator Cuff-related Shoulder Pain and Augmented Feedback, run by Elif Turgut at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Intensity (time frame: Baseline, up to 8 weeks, at 8 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07632729, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Jun 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 26 Oct 2026.