Non-Pharmacological InterventionsNCT07629531
Applied Research on a Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
A study testing non-pharmacological interventions and Waiting List in people with Non-Pharmacological Interventions, run by China Medical University, China.
Trial summary
This study aims to verify the short-term and long-term effects of a group-based non-pharmacological intervention program for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline, and to evaluate its implementation outcomes, through a rigorously designed cluster randomized controlled trial. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions
- What is being tested?
- non-pharmacological interventions and Waiting List
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 218 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 Jun 2026to 1 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Inclusion Criteria Aged ≥60 Community dwelling Subjective memory decline, confirmed by Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire(SCD-Q9)≥5 Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) scores ≥19, 22, or 24 for participants who had primary school, middle school, or higher education, respectively Overall intact activities of daily living No planned exercise or cognitive intervention activities within the past six months Voluntary participants who will be informed of the study objectives by the researcher and will sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria Any other neurodegenerative diseases (such as mild cognitive impairment, dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, etc.) Any severe or unstable internal medical conditions (i.e., unstable or severe asthma or heart disease, liver and kidney diseases, uncontrolled hypertension, severe metabolic diseases, etc.) Severe depressive, anxiety or other psychiatric disorders Movement contraindications Those currently participating in other research trials.
About this study
Official title: Applied Research on a Group-based Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
This study aims to verify the short-term and long-term effects of a group-based non-pharmacological intervention program for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline, and to evaluate its implementation outcomes, through a rigorously designed cluster randomized controlled trial.
Read the detailed description
This study adopts a cluster randomized controlled design to implement a group-based non-pharmacological intervention for older adults with subjective cognitive decline. The effects of the intervention on global cognitive function, episodic memory, executive function, attention, language function, subjective memory function, anxiety, depression, social participation, gait speed, physical activity level, and healthy lifestyle behaviors will be evaluated. In addition, implementation outcomes will be assessed based on the RE-AIM framework and the CFIR framework.
- Conditions
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions
- Being tested
- non-pharmacological interventions, Waiting List
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
non-pharmacological interventionsOther
6 components(social intercourse, cognitive interventions, physical activities interventions, rational diet, understanding and risk management of diseases, emotion management)
Waiting ListOther
To ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Pharmacological Interventions | Experimental | Non-Pharmacological Interventions Receives: Other: non-pharmacological interventions |
| Waiting List Control Group | Other | To ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group. Receives: Other: Waiting List |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Episodic memory
Using the Huashan version of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) for assessment, it is mainly used to evaluate immediate recall, short-delay recall, long-delay recall, and other key components. The test includes 12 words belonging to three semantic categories (4 words per category). The testing procedure is as follows: The examiner reads out the 12 words in sequence, and the subject immediately recalls them. This process is repeated three consecutive times to form the immediate memory test. After an interval of 5 minutes, short-delay recall is conducted, and after 20 minutes, long-delay recall is implemented. The scoring rule is that each correctly recalled word earns 1 point. The immediate memory score is the sum of correct recalls from the first three trials (maximum score 36). This study records the scores for immediate recall, short-delay recall, and long-delay recall, with higher scores indicating better memory function.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Gobal cognitive function
The assessment uses the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Higher scores indicate better performance, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Executive function
The Shape Trail Test (STT) was used to assess executive function. The test consists of two parts: Part A requires participants to connect 25 numbers in ascending order; Part B involves 25 numbers presented within two different shapes. The scoring indicators are the time taken to complete STT-A and STT-B, with shorter completion times indicating better executive function.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Attention
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is used to assess the patient's attention. The subject is required to match the corresponding symbols to the numbers (1-9) as quickly as possible within 90 seconds. Each correctly filled symbol earns 1 point, and a reversed symbol earns 0.5 points. The maximum score for the test is 90.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Linguistic function
Animal verbal fluency is used to assess a patient's language fluency. The test requires the subject to name as many examples as possible within the category of animals in one minute. Scoring is typically based on the total number of correctly named animal names. Lower scores indicate reduced language ability.
Measured: week0,weel12,week24
Secondary outcomes (5)
Depression
The short version of the Geriatric Depression Scale (Geriatric Depression Scale-15, GDS-15) is used for assessment. The total score ranges from 0 to 15, and the score is positively correlated with the severity of depression.
Measured: week0,weel12,week24
Anxiety
The Geriatric Anxiety Inventory-20 (GAI-20) is used for assessment. This scale consists of 20 items, and respondents answer based on their emotional feelings over the past week. A response of "Yes" is scored as 1 point, while "No" is scored as 0 points. The total score ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe anxiety.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Social network
The Lubben Social Network Scale-6 (LSNS-6) is a short version of the Lubben Social Network Scale. It is primarily used to measure an individual's level of social connectedness in two dimensions: family relationships and peer interactions. The scale consists of six assessment items and uses a graded scoring system: 0 points indicate no such social members, 1 point corresponds to 1 person, 2 points to 2 people, 3 points to 3-4 people, 4 points to 5-8 people, and 5 points applies to groups of 9 or more individuals. Lower scores indicate poorer levels of social network connectedness.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Social participation
This study employed the Social Participation Level Assessment Tool revised by Wei Xiuping, which was developed based on national health survey data of the elderly population. The measurement tool comprises two main dimensions: cultural organization participation and family/personal affairs, encompassing a total of 10 specific items. A five-point Likert scale was used for measurement, and the total score is positively correlated with the level of social participation-that is, a higher score indicates a more significant degree of social participation among the respondents.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Timed "Up and Go" test
During the test, the participant sits on a chair with armrests and a backrest. Upon hearing the instruction, they stand up, walk 3 meters forward at their usual gait, then turn around, return to the chair, and sit down. The average of two test trials is recorded.
Measured: week0,week12,week24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2026
- Study start30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Non-Pharmacological InterventionsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- China Medical University, China
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhi Cai, China Medical University, China
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07629531
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 【2026】161
- Status last verified
- Jun 2026
- First submitted
- 20 May 2026
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Applied Research on a Group-based Non-pharmacological Intervention Program for Community-dwelling Older Adults With Subjective Cognitive Decline
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07629531
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 【2026】161
- Conditions
- Non-Pharmacological Interventions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 218 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- China Medical University, ChinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to verify the short-term and long-term effects of a group-based non-pharmacological intervention program for community-dwelling older adults with subjective cognitive decline, and to evaluate its implementation outcomes, through a rigorously designed cluster randomized controlled trial.
Detailed description
This study adopts a cluster randomized controlled design to implement a group-based non-pharmacological intervention for older adults with subjective cognitive decline. The effects of the intervention on global cognitive function, episodic memory, executive function, attention, language function, subjective memory function, anxiety, depression, social participation, gait speed, physical activity level, and healthy lifestyle behaviors will be evaluated. In addition, implementation outcomes will be assessed based on the RE-AIM framework and the CFIR framework.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Non-Pharmacological Interventions | Experimental | Other: non-pharmacological interventionsNon-Pharmacological Interventions |
| Waiting List Control Group | Other | Other: Waiting ListTo ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| non-pharmacological interventions6 components(social intercourse, cognitive interventions, physical activities interventions, rational diet, understanding and risk management of diseases, emotion management) | Other | Non-Pharmacological Interventions |
| Waiting ListTo ensure ethical fairness, the same intervention program will subsequently be provided to the waitlist control group after positive effects are confirmed in the intervention group. | Other | Waiting List Control Group |
Primary outcome
Episodic memory
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
Using the Huashan version of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) for assessment, it is mainly used to evaluate immediate recall, short-delay recall, long-delay recall, and other key components. The test includes 12 words belonging to three semantic categories (4 words per category). The testing procedure is as follows: The examiner reads out the 12 words in sequence, and the subject immediately recalls them. This process is repeated three consecutive times to form the immediate memory test. After an interval of 5 minutes, short-delay recall is conducted, and after 20 minutes, long-delay recall is implemented. The scoring rule is that each correctly recalled word earns 1 point. The immediate memory score is the sum of correct recalls from the first three trials (maximum score 36). This study records the scores for immediate recall, short-delay recall, and long-delay recall, with higher scores indicating better memory function.
Gobal cognitive function
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
The assessment uses the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA). Higher scores indicate better performance, with a minimum score of 0 and a maximum score of 30.
Executive function
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
The Shape Trail Test (STT) was used to assess executive function. The test consists of two parts: Part A requires participants to connect 25 numbers in ascending order; Part B involves 25 numbers presented within two different shapes. The scoring indicators are the time taken to complete STT-A and STT-B, with shorter completion times indicating better executive function.
Attention
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
The Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) is used to assess the patient's attention. The subject is required to match the corresponding symbols to the numbers (1-9) as quickly as possible within 90 seconds. Each correctly filled symbol earns 1 point, and a reversed symbol earns 0.5 points. The maximum score for the test is 90.
Linguistic function
Time frame: week0,weel12,week24
Animal verbal fluency is used to assess a patient's language fluency. The test requires the subject to name as many examples as possible within the category of animals in one minute. Scoring is typically based on the total number of correctly named animal names. Lower scores indicate reduced language ability.
5 secondary outcomes
Depression
Time frame: week0,weel12,week24
Anxiety
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
Social network
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
Social participation
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
Timed "Up and Go" test
Time frame: week0,week12,week24
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Non-Pharmacological Interventions
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality to Advance Dementia Care and Quality of Life
Dementia, Agitation
Recruiting
Virtual Reality Intervention to Improve Psychological Symptom Burden for Cancer Patients Undergoing Treatment
Adjustment Disorder, Anxiety Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality Intervention to Improve Comfort in Hospitalized Hematology Patients.
Hematologic Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Changing Lifestyle to Improve Quality of Life in Spanish Adolescents With Asthma
Asthma (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruiting
Relaxation Exercise Interventions for Individuals Who Have Undergone Urinary Tract Stone Surgery
Urinary Tract Stone Surgery, Relaxation Exercise
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing non-pharmacological interventions and Waiting List in people with Non-Pharmacological Interventions, run by China Medical University, China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Episodic memory (time frame: week0,week12,week24). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2026.