Knee OsteoarthritisPRP-NLRNCT07617233
Blood Cell Ratios as Predictors of Response to Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis
An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis and Osteoarthritis, run by Utku Gürhan at 1 site in Cyprus.
Trial summary
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is a widely used treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but patients respond to it very differently and there is currently no simple, inexpensive way to predict who will benefit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 40 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis
- How many people
- 120 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCyprus
- Study dates
- Sep 2026to Jul 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 40 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Study population: Adult patients aged 40 to 60 years presenting to the orthopedic clinic of the University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital, with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3, who are candidates for and scheduled to receive a course of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma for the index knee.
Who may be able to join
- Age 40 to 60 years
- Symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3 on weight-bearing radiographs
- Body mass index below 40
- Candidate for and scheduled to receive a course of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma for the index knee
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to attend the 6-month follow-up schedule
Who cannot join
- Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune disease
- Active acute infection at the time of enrollment
- Current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, or current or recent chemotherapy
- Any contraindication to platelet-rich plasma per the 2025 GRIIP recommendations
- Intra-articular injection of the index knee within the previous 6 months
- Inability to comply with the planned follow-up schedule
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Cyprus1 site
University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital - Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
Kyrenia
Utku Gurhan, MD, utkugrhn@gmail.com
Utku Gurhan, MD
About this study
Official title: Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Related Complete Blood Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices as Predictors of Clinical Response to Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is a widely used treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but patients respond to it very differently and there is currently no simple, inexpensive way to predict who will benefit. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and related indices derived from a routine complete blood count reflect a person's baseline inflammatory state. This prospective single-arm observational cohort study investigates whether the baseline NLR, together with the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), predicts the clinical response to intra-articular PRP in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3 knee osteoarthritis. The investigators will enroll 120 patients aged 40 to 60 years, each of whom receives a standardized course of three leukocyte-poor PRP injections one week apart. Patients are followed for 6 months, and the primary clinical outcome is the change in the WOMAC osteoarthritis index at 6 months. Outcome assessors are blinded to patients' blood-count values. If a baseline blood ratio predicts response, it could become a low-cost tool to guide patient selection for PRP.
Read the detailed description
Background and Rationale: Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, but the clinical response is highly variable and no inexpensive, routinely available biomarker currently guides patient selection. Recent work indicates that the peripheral-blood inflammatory phenotype is associated with PRP response (Tonutti et al., 2025) and that the absolute neutrophil count is an independent early-response predictor (De Luca et al., 2025). However, simple complete-blood-count-derived ratios such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have not been tested prospectively for this purpose. This study addresses that gap with a pragmatic, low-cost translational biomarker design.
Design: Prospective, single-arm, observational cohort study. Outcome assessors are blinded to patients' blood-count values; patients are not informed of their NLR; statistical analysis is conducted blinded.
Population and Setting: 120 patients aged 40 to 60 years with symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3 knee osteoarthritis and a body mass index below 40, recruited over a 4-month window (target 30 enrollments per month) from the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital. Approximately 180 patients are anticipated to be screened, with a target of 102 completed, analyzable participants after an estimated 15 percent attrition.
Intervention (uniform, per protocol): Each participant receives three leukocyte-poor PRP injections at one-week intervals. PRP is prepared by manual double-spin centrifugation (soft spin 1500 rpm for 5 minutes, then hard spin 3300 rpm for 10 minutes) from 20 mL of whole blood per session (total 60 mL per patient across the three sessions), anticoagulated with 8.5 percent ACD-A, without exogenous activation, targeting a 4 to 6 fold platelet concentration. Injections are delivered under ultrasound guidance via a superolateral approach with skin infiltration of 1 percent lidocaine. A 48-hour restriction on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is applied after each injection.
Biomarkers: The primary predictor is the baseline NLR. Secondary predictors are PLR, SII, and MLR; tertiary predictors are C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All are derived from a routine baseline complete blood count.
Outcomes: The primary clinical outcome is the change in WOMAC total score at 6 months. Treatment response is defined a priori as at least 30 percent improvement in WOMAC together with fulfilment of the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. Clinical assessments occur at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months.
PRP Product Characterization: Quality control is performed in two tiers. Tier 1 (all 120 patients, all 360 batches) records the final platelet concentration, the total leukocyte count, and the final volume. Tier 2, a pre-specified validation subset of approximately 40 patients (the first 20 consecutive patients plus every fifth subsequent patient, approximately 120 batches), additionally records the leukocyte differential and erythrocyte contamination.
Statistical Analysis and Sample Size: The primary analysis is a multivariable linear regression of 6-month WOMAC change on baseline NLR, adjusted for age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and baseline WOMAC. A secondary analysis evaluates the discriminative performance of baseline NLR for responder status by receiver operating characteristic analysis. For the primary regression (alpha 0.05, power 0.80, one numerator degree of freedom, five predictors, effect size f-squared 0.10), 82 participants are required; the secondary analysis requires 95. To satisfy both, the enrollment target is 120, anticipating 102 completers.
Ethics and Reporting: Ethics approval is sought from the Girne University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Reporting follows the STROBE and REMARK recommendations, and the protocol follows SPIRIT guidance.
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- platelet-rich plasma, PRP, knee osteoarthritis, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, NLR, systemic immune-inflammation index, biomarker, predictor, intra-articular injection, WOMAC, inflammatory index
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in WOMAC total score at 6 months
Change from baseline in the total score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months after the first injection. The primary analysis is a multivariable linear regression testing the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as the predictor of interest, adjusted for age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and baseline WOMAC score.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Treatment response at 6 months (responder versus non-responder)
Treatment response is defined a priori as at least 30 percent improvement in WOMAC total score together with fulfilment of the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. The discriminative performance of the baseline NLR for responder status is assessed by receiver operating characteristic analysis with the optimal threshold identified by the Youden index.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months
Predictive value of PLR, SII, and MLR for 6-month WOMAC change
Association of the baseline platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) with the change in WOMAC total score at 6 months, evaluated by multivariable regression.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months
Change in WOMAC total score at 1 and 3 months
Change from baseline in WOMAC total score at the 1-month and 3-month assessments, describing the trajectory of clinical response.
Measured: Baseline to 1 month and to 3 months
Change in knee pain on a Visual Analogue Scale
Change from baseline in knee pain on a Visual Analogue Scale at the 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month assessments.
Measured: Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months
Change in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Change from baseline in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) subscale scores at 6 months.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months
Association of baseline CRP and ESR with treatment response
Exploratory association of the baseline C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) with 6-month treatment response.
Measured: Baseline to 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jun 2026
- Study startSep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionJul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Knee OsteoarthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Utku Gürhan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Utku Gürhan, University of Kyrenia
- Investigators
- Utku Gurhan, MD, Principal investigator, University of KyreniaFazli Levent Umur, MD, Sub-investigator, University of KyreniaEnes Sari, MD, Sub-investigator, Near East UniversityYakup Kahve, MD, Sub-investigator, Ankara City Hospital Bilkent
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07617233
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRP-NLR-2026
- Acronym
- PRP-NLR
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 20 May 2026
- Last updated
- 23 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Tonutti et al. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118674
De Luca et al. Nutrients. 2025. doi:10.3390/nu17193134
Lee et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07475-1
Zhang et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026. doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1787872
Louis et al. Arthroscopy. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.074
GRIIP recommendations on intra-articular orthobiologics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025. doi:10.1002/ksa.12682
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Related Complete Blood Count-Derived Inflammatory Indices as Predictors of Clinical Response to Intra-Articular Platelet-Rich Plasma in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Prospective Single-Arm Cohort Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07617233
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRP-NLR / PRP-NLR-2026
- Conditions
- Knee Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis
- Keywords
- platelet-rich plasma, PRP, knee osteoarthritis, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, NLR, systemic immune-inflammation index, biomarker, predictor
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 120 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Utku GürhanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Jun 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is a widely used treatment for knee osteoarthritis, but patients respond to it very differently and there is currently no simple, inexpensive way to predict who will benefit. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and related indices derived from a routine complete blood count reflect a person's baseline inflammatory state. This prospective single-arm observational cohort study investigates whether the baseline NLR, together with the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and the monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), predicts the clinical response to intra-articular PRP in patients with Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3 knee osteoarthritis. The investigators will enroll 120 patients aged 40 to 60 years, each of whom receives a standardized course of three leukocyte-poor PRP injections one week apart. Patients are followed for 6 months, and the primary clinical outcome is the change in the WOMAC osteoarthritis index at 6 months. Outcome assessors are blinded to patients' blood-count values. If a baseline blood ratio predicts response, it could become a low-cost tool to guide patient selection for PRP.
Detailed description
Background and Rationale: Intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is increasingly used for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis, but the clinical response is highly variable and no inexpensive, routinely available biomarker currently guides patient selection. Recent work indicates that the peripheral-blood inflammatory phenotype is associated with PRP response (Tonutti et al., 2025) and that the absolute neutrophil count is an independent early-response predictor (De Luca et al., 2025). However, simple complete-blood-count-derived ratios such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have not been tested prospectively for this purpose. This study addresses that gap with a pragmatic, low-cost translational biomarker design.
Design: Prospective, single-arm, observational cohort study. Outcome assessors are blinded to patients' blood-count values; patients are not informed of their NLR; statistical analysis is conducted blinded.
Population and Setting: 120 patients aged 40 to 60 years with symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 3 knee osteoarthritis and a body mass index below 40, recruited over a 4-month window (target 30 enrollments per month) from the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital. Approximately 180 patients are anticipated to be screened, with a target of 102 completed, analyzable participants after an estimated 15 percent attrition.
Intervention (uniform, per protocol): Each participant receives three leukocyte-poor PRP injections at one-week intervals. PRP is prepared by manual double-spin centrifugation (soft spin 1500 rpm for 5 minutes, then hard spin 3300 rpm for 10 minutes) from 20 mL of whole blood per session (total 60 mL per patient across the three sessions), anticoagulated with 8.5 percent ACD-A, without exogenous activation, targeting a 4 to 6 fold platelet concentration. Injections are delivered under ultrasound guidance via a superolateral approach with skin infiltration of 1 percent lidocaine. A 48-hour restriction on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is applied after each injection.
Biomarkers: The primary predictor is the baseline NLR. Secondary predictors are PLR, SII, and MLR; tertiary predictors are C-reactive protein and erythrocyte sedimentation rate. All are derived from a routine baseline complete blood count.
Outcomes: The primary clinical outcome is the change in WOMAC total score at 6 months. Treatment response is defined a priori as at least 30 percent improvement in WOMAC together with fulfilment of the OMERACT-OARSI responder criteria. Clinical assessments occur at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months.
PRP Product Characterization: Quality control is performed in two tiers. Tier 1 (all 120 patients, all 360 batches) records the final platelet concentration, the total leukocyte count, and the final volume. Tier 2, a pre-specified validation subset of approximately 40 patients (the first 20 consecutive patients plus every fifth subsequent patient, approximately 120 batches), additionally records the leukocyte differential and erythrocyte contamination.
Statistical Analysis and Sample Size: The primary analysis is a multivariable linear regression of 6-month WOMAC change on baseline NLR, adjusted for age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and baseline WOMAC. A secondary analysis evaluates the discriminative performance of baseline NLR for responder status by receiver operating characteristic analysis. For the primary regression (alpha 0.05, power 0.80, one numerator degree of freedom, five predictors, effect size f-squared 0.10), 82 participants are required; the secondary analysis requires 95. To satisfy both, the enrollment target is 120, anticipating 102 completers.
Ethics and Reporting: Ethics approval is sought from the Girne University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Reporting follows the STROBE and REMARK recommendations, and the protocol follows SPIRIT guidance.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 40 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
- Study population
- Adult patients aged 40 to 60 years presenting to the orthopedic clinic of the University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital, with symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis of Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3, who are candidates for and scheduled to receive a course of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma for the index knee.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 40 to 60 years
- Symptomatic primary knee osteoarthritis, Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3 on weight-bearing radiographs
- Body mass index below 40
- Candidate for and scheduled to receive a course of intra-articular platelet-rich plasma for the index knee
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent and to attend the 6-month follow-up schedule
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune disease
- Active acute infection at the time of enrollment
- Current anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy, or current or recent chemotherapy
- Any contraindication to platelet-rich plasma per the 2025 GRIIP recommendations
- Intra-articular injection of the index knee within the previous 6 months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Change in WOMAC total score at 6 months
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change from baseline in the total score of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) at 6 months after the first injection. The primary analysis is a multivariable linear regression testing the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as the predictor of interest, adjusted for age, body mass index, Kellgren-Lawrence grade, and baseline WOMAC score.
6 secondary outcomes
Treatment response at 6 months (responder versus non-responder)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Predictive value of PLR, SII, and MLR for 6-month WOMAC change
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Change in WOMAC total score at 1 and 3 months
Time frame: Baseline to 1 month and to 3 months
Change in knee pain on a Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: Baseline to 1, 3, and 6 months
Change in the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Association of baseline CRP and ESR with treatment response
Time frame: Baseline to 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Jun 2026.
- BackgroundTonutti et al. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118674
- BackgroundDe Luca et al. Nutrients. 2025. doi:10.3390/nu17193134
- BackgroundLee et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024. doi:10.1186/s12891-024-07475-1
- BackgroundZhang et al. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026. doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1787872
- BackgroundLouis et al. Arthroscopy. 2021. doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2021.03.074
- BackgroundGRIIP recommendations on intra-articular orthobiologics. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2025. doi:10.1002/ksa.12682
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Knee Osteoarthritis
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Utku Gurhan, MD principal investigator
University of Kyrenia
Fazli Levent Umur, MD sub-investigator
University of Kyrenia
Enes Sari, MD sub-investigator
Near East University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Knee Osteoarthritis and Osteoarthritis, run by Utku Gürhan at 1 site in Cyprus.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Cyprus. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Utku Gurhan, MD (+90 539 112 6898, utkugrhn@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in WOMAC total score at 6 months (time frame: Baseline to 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07617233, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2026.