AzTrials
AzTrials

Lumbar PunctureHELPNCT07612644

Hemorrhage Elimination During Lumbar Puncture Using Ultrasound Measurements (HELPUS)

A study testing ultrasound contrast in people with Lumbar Puncture, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a clinical trial to determine the extent to which ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture using a standardized procedure, including use of ultrasound to ascertain the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at L3 - L5 and the optimal needle insertion distance, increases the acquisition rate of CSF that is… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 day to 12 months
Conditions the study is for
Lumbar Puncture
What is being tested?
ultrasound contrast
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
80 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
16 May 2026to 30 Jun 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 day to 12 months
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • - Neonates and infants (< 12 months)
  • Hemodynamically stable
  • Undergoing a lumbar puncture for diagnostic testing

Who cannot join

  • - Infants > 12 months and 1 day
  • Signs of clinical instability
  • Known spinal anomalies (e.g., spina bifida, meningomyelocele) or previous spinal surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Donald H Arnold, MD, MPH contact

615-936-4498

don.arnold@vumc.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232

    Donald H Arnold, MD, MPH, 615-936-4498, don.arnold@vumc.org

    don.arnold@vumc.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

This is a clinical trial to determine the extent to which ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture using a standardized procedure, including use of ultrasound to ascertain the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at L3 - L5 and the optimal needle insertion distance, increases the acquisition rate of CSF that is interpretable for patient management.

Read the detailed description

Lumbar puncture (LP) is a frequently performed procedure in pediatric emergency departments, most often to evaluate meningitis in hyperthermic, hypothermic, or ill-appearing neonates, infants and children. Older children often present with headaches, meningismus, and/or altered mental status.

The risks of LP include introduction of pathogens, pain, the need for multiple attempts, and failure to obtain interpretable CSF. The latter frequently leads to a spine ultrasound study the following day and, if this does not demonstrate an epidural blood clot, repeat lumbar puncture using fluoroscopic guidance by interventional radiologists.

In evaluating the management of infant sepsis, one study found that the success of the initial LP plays a significant role: infants with unsuccessful initial LPs have longer hospital stays and require more resources. Therefore, ensuring successful LPs on the first attempt is critical for minimizing healthcare utilization, optimizing patient care, and decreasing the emotional burden of this procedure on parents and patients.

Unfortunately, epidural hematoma (EDH) is not uncommon after LP, with U/S diagnosed EDH identified among 40% of patients < 6 months with a traumatic LP and among 31% of unsuccessful but nontraumatic LP's, with complete effacement of the thecal sac in 17%. The spinal canal is wide enough to accommodate EDH with only rare sequelae. However, intramedullary hemorrhage of the conus medullaris resulting in paraplegia in a neonate has been reported.

Since the introduction of the revised febrile neonate guidelines in 2021,4 the number of lumbar punctures performed in young infants has decreased substantially. A consequence of performing fewer lumbar punctures is that clinicians-particularly trainees and early-career practitioners-have fewer opportunities to maintain procedural competence. As procedural skill and confidence decline, the risk of obtaining non-interpretable or traumatic samples increases.

Clearly, improvement of the traditional approach to LP in neonates and infants and young children is needed to prevent these complications. Ultrasound is an imaging modality that is frequently used in the emergency department and does not involve ionizing radiation. Ultrasound can be used prior to lumbar punctures to identify critical anatomical landmarks and needle-insertion distances to avoid the posterior epidural venous plexus and to increase the proportion of LP's with non-traumatic, interpretable CSF. However, an ultrasound technique that is easily learned and that can be applied accurately and efficiently in the emergency department is lacking. Incorporating ultrasound (U/S) into LP training or performance may help clinicians who perform the procedure infrequently to improve success rates and obtain interpretable cerebrospinal fluid samples through identifying optimal intervertebral spaces, visualizing spinal anatomy, and guiding needle placement.

This study employs a standardized, ultrasound-assisted LP approach that integrates pre-procedural identification of spinal anatomy and measurement of the optimal needle insertion distance along the angled trajectory to potentially minimize traumatic taps. Unlike traditional LP methods, this approach provides objective, reproducible guidance that can be given and applied by clinicians. The study is novel in its prospective assessment of ultrasound-guided LP outcomes. By evaluating interpretable CSF yield, this research advances pediatric procedural methodology and has the potential to establish a new standard of care for LP in young infants.

The overarching aim of this research is to determine whether U/S-assisted LP increases the rate of interpretable CSF from the current, approximately 65% to at least 80%.

Primary Aim: To determine the extent to which ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture using a standardized procedure, including use of ultrasound to ascertain the presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at L3 - L5 and the optimal needle insertion distance, increases the acquisition rate of CSF that is interpretable for patient management.

Hypothesis: The standardized, ultrasound-assisted procedure for lumbar puncture in neonates and infants is associated with yield of interpretable CSF of at least 85%.

A Sufficient U/S study includes visualization of the following with each reported by the proceduralist on the data report form:

  1. Lower lumbar and S1 spinous processes visualized
  2. S1 drop-off
  3. L4-5 and/or L3-5 interspaces visualized
  4. Presence of CSF sufficient for LP
  5. Cauda Equina

Inclusion of lumbar punctures for which U/S was not performed:

We will review and record the results of studies performed without U/S guidance, the technique used by clinicians not participating in this study provide a prospectively acquired control group with which to compare outcomes after U/S measurement. This data will be used in the multivariable regression models described below.

Use of Previously Obtained Ultrasound Images:

As part of this study, investigators may utilize ultrasound images that were obtained as part of routine clinical care prior to the performance of lumbar puncture. These ultrasound images will have been acquired independently of, and prior to, study enrollment and will not require any additional imaging procedures for research purposes. When used for research analysis, ultrasound images will be limited to those relevant to the study objectives. Images will be accessed only by authorized study personnel and will be de-identified prior to analysis whenever feasible. No additional risk to participants is anticipated as a result of using these previously obtained clinical images.

Conditions
Lumbar Puncture
Being tested
ultrasound contrast
Keywords
Infant, Meningitis, sepsis, fever, lumbar puncture, ultrasound
Medical subject headings
Meningitis, Sepsis, Fever

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ultrasound contrastDevice

    Ultrasound of spinal canal without contrast. We included the term "ultrasound contrast" because the choices were limited.

Study groups in NCT07612644
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
UltrasoundExperimentalIntervention: Ultrasound of spinal canal
Receives: Device: ultrasound contrast
Control GroupNo interventionInfants undergoing lumbar puncture without ultrasound assist

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Successful LP rate

    Acquisition of CSF sufficient for cell count, culture and meningoencephalitis PCR panel (MEP).

    Measured: Time from lumbar puncture to results of CSF returned by lab, approximately 1 hour.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Unsuccessful ultrasound attempt

    Ultrasound attempt in which the ultrasound operator could not complete the study and, as a result, did not attempt to use ultrasound images to inform LP. Potential causes include but are not limited to infant fussiness, inability to maintain positioning sufficient for ultrasound, and malfunction of the ultrasound machine.

    Measured: Immediately after intervention

  2. Traumatic LP rate

    CSF RBC count > 500 cells/mm, the most widely accepted definition of traumatic LP. 10-12 The rate of traumatic LPs using this definition is 35 - 47% in neonates and 22 - 26% in infants (< 13 months).

    Measured: Time from lumbar puncture to results of CSF returned by lab, approximately 1 hour

  3. Number of attempts/ Number of Fluoroscopy-guided lumbar puncture (LP)

    Number of attempts required for CSF acquisition or need for fluoroscopy-guided LP

    Measured: Immediately after intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2026
  2. Study start16 May 2026
  3. Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Clinical trial to determine whether ultrasound-assisted lumbar puncture in infants increases successful LP rate in comparison with lumbar puncture performed without ultrasound.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
80 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07612644
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB #251901 HELP Study
Acronym
HELP
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
18 May 2026
Last updated
29 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Will consider requests for data sharing individually and with a Data Use Agreement executed and approved by Vanderbilt University Medical Center.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ultrasound contrast in people with Lumbar Puncture, run by Vanderbilt University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Donald H Arnold, MD, MPH (615-936-4498, don.arnold@vumc.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Successful LP rate (time frame: Time from lumbar puncture to results of CSF returned by lab, approximately 1 hour.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in