AzTrials
AzTrials

Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585)USG-SPINENCT07789756

Ultrasound Versus Palpation for Determining Spinal Puncture Level in Cesarean Section

A study testing Preprocedural ultrasound level identification and Landmark palpation level identification in people with Cesarean Section (MeSH: D002585) and Anesthesia, Spinal (MeSH: D000775), run by Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This study compares two methods of identifying the correct intervertebral level before performing spinal anesthesia in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery. In current practice, anesthesiologists locate the puncture site by feeling anatomical landmarks on the lower back (palpation of Tuffier's line). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Preprocedural ultrasound level identification and Landmark palpation level identification
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
1 Sep 2026to Sep 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
  • Age 18 to 45 years
  • ASA physical status II or III
  • Singleton pregnancy
  • No contraindication to spinal anesthesia
  • Normotensive
  • Provides written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Emergency cesarean section
  • Morbid obesity (body mass index 40 kg/m² or higher)
  • History of lumbar spine surgery
  • Severe spinal deformity
  • Local infection at the puncture site
  • Coagulopathy or ongoing anticoagulant therapy
  • Anatomical abnormality expected to require multiple puncture attempts

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Feyza Çalışır, MD contact

+905056492875

fbolcal@hotmail.com

Betül Bağrıaçık, MD contact

fbolcal@hotmail.com

Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
  • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital

    Kahramanmaraş, Onikişubat, 46040

    Feyza Çalışır, 05056492875, fbolcal@hotmail.com

    Feyza Çalışır, MD, fbolcal@hotmail.com

  • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital

    Kahramanmaraş, Onikişubat, 46100

    Feyza Çalışır, MD, 05056492875, fbolcal@hotmail.com

    Betül Bağrıaçık, MD

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Ultrasound and Palpation for Determining the Level of Entry in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Section: Technical Success, Level Accuracy and Maternal Hemodynamic Response - A Randomized Controlled Trial

This study compares two methods of identifying the correct intervertebral level before performing spinal anesthesia in women undergoing elective cesarean delivery.

In current practice, anesthesiologists locate the puncture site by feeling anatomical landmarks on the lower back (palpation of Tuffier's line). Ultrasound imaging offers an alternative in which the spine is scanned and the intended level is marked on the skin before the needle is inserted. It is not yet clear whether this additional step improves the success of the procedure or affects the mother's blood pressure and heart rate after the block.

Read more

Sixty pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean section will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. In one group, the puncture level will be determined by preprocedural ultrasound marking; in the other, by conventional landmark palpation. All other aspects of anesthetic care, including drug doses, will be identical in both groups.

The main outcome is the proportion of patients in whom the subarachnoid space is entered successfully at the first attempt with a single skin puncture, producing a block adequate for surgery. Additional outcomes include the number of needle passes, procedure duration, changes in maternal blood pressure and heart rate, vasopressor requirement, sensory block level, and complications such as headache or back pain within 24 hours after surgery.

Read the detailed description

Detailed Description - teknik açıklama, 32.000 karakter sınırı var. Brief Summary'de olmayan yöntem detayları buraya girer. Metin:

Background and Rationale

Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for elective cesarean delivery. The intended puncture site is conventionally identified by palpating Tuffier's line, an imaginary line joining the iliac crests, which is assumed to cross the L4 vertebral body or the L4-L5 interspace. Anatomical studies and imaging data have shown that this assumption is unreliable, particularly in pregnancy, where lumbar lordosis, soft tissue changes and altered pelvic tilt shift the landmark cephalad in a substantial proportion of women. Levels selected by palpation are therefore frequently one or more interspaces higher than intended.

Preprocedural ultrasound allows direct visualization of the sacrum and the lumbar interlaminar spaces, and the selected level can be marked on the skin before needle insertion. Whether the improvement in level accuracy translates into clinically meaningful differences in technical success and maternal hemodynamic response has not been established consistently in the obstetric population.

Study Design

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, single-center trial conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University Health Practice and Research Hospital.

Sixty ASA II-III women aged 18-45 years with singleton pregnancies scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be enrolled after written informed consent. Randomization will be performed using computer-generated block randomization with an allocation ratio of 1:1 (30 per group).

Interventions

Ultrasound group: Before the procedure, the lumbar spine will be scanned with a low-frequency curvilinear probe in the patient's sitting position. The sacrum will be identified in the paramedian sagittal oblique plane and interspaces counted cephalad. The target interspace will be marked on the skin, and the transverse midline plane will be used to confirm the midline. Spinal anesthesia will then be performed at the marked level.

Palpation group: The puncture level will be determined by palpation of Tuffier's line according to standard clinical practice, without ultrasound assistance.

In both groups, spinal anesthesia will be performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle. Hyperbaric bupivacaine with fentanyl will be administered as a single dose, calculated according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted; if unsuccessful, the case will be managed at the discretion of the attending anesthesiologist and recorded as a failure of the allocated technique.

After completion of the block, and without any modification of clinical management, ultrasonography will be used in both groups purely for observational purposes to verify the intervertebral level at which the dural puncture was performed. This exploratory assessment allows quantification of level accuracy in both arms.

Measurements

Baseline maternal characteristics (age, height, weight, body mass index, gestational age, ASA class, parity) will be recorded. Procedure-related variables include the number of skin punctures, number of needle redirections, and procedure duration measured from needle-skin contact to visualization of cerebrospinal fluid.

Non-invasive blood pressure and heart rate will be recorded at baseline and every 3 minutes thereafter until delivery and subsequently until the end of surgery. Hypotension is defined as a mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg or a decrease of 20% or more from the baseline value, and will be treated with intravenous ephedrine according to institutional protocol; total ephedrine dose will be recorded.

Sensory block level will be assessed bilaterally at 10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting, paresthesia during needle insertion, bloody tap, incomplete block, requirement for supplemental analgesia, and conversion to general anesthesia will be documented. Patients will be assessed at 24 hours postoperatively for post-dural puncture headache, back pain, and satisfaction using a visual analogue scale.

Sample Size

The sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1, based on success rates reported by Li et al. (2019). For the comparison of proportions between two independent groups using Fisher's exact test, with a significance level of 0.05, power of 0.80, and an effect size of h = 0.79, a minimum of 30 participants per group is required, giving a total of 60 participants.

Statistical Analysis

Distribution of continuous variables will be assessed with the Shapiro-Wilk test and visual methods. Normally distributed data will be presented as mean ± standard deviation and non-normally distributed data as median with interquartile range. Between-group comparisons will use the independent samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, and the chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Changes in hemodynamic parameters over time will be analyzed using repeated measures analysis (mixed model or repeated measures ANOVA, according to assumption checks). Statistical significance will be accepted at p < 0.05. Analyses will primarily follow the intention-to-treat principle, and missing data will be reported.

Being tested
Preprocedural ultrasound level identification, Landmark palpation level identification
Keywords
preprocedural ultrasound, neuraxial anesthesia, Tuffier's line, landmark palpation, obstetric anesthesia, first-attempt success
Medical subject headings
Hypotension

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Preprocedural ultrasound level identificationProcedure or surgery

    Ultrasound-assisted identification and skin marking of the target intervertebral level before spinal needle insertion. Spinal anesthesia is performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle, with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl dosed according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted.

  • Landmark palpation level identificationProcedure or surgery

    Identification of the target intervertebral level by palpation of Tuffier's line. Spinal anesthesia is performed with the patient seated, using a midline approach and a pencil-point spinal needle, with hyperbaric bupivacaine and fentanyl dosed according to the Harten table based on maternal height. A maximum of three puncture attempts is permitted.

Study groups in NCT07789756
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound GroupExperimentalPreprocedural ultrasound scanning of the lumbar spine in the sitting position with a low-frequency curvilinear probe. The sacrum is identified in the paramedian sagittal oblique plane, interspaces are counted cephalad, and the target interspace is marked on the skin. Spinal anesthesia is then performed at the marked level.
Receives: Procedure: Preprocedural ultrasound level identification
Palpation GroupActive comparatorPuncture level determined by palpation of Tuffier's line according to standard clinical practice, without ultrasound assistance. Spinal anesthesia is performed at the palpated level.
Receives: Procedure: Landmark palpation level identification

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. First-attempt success rate

    Successful dural puncture (CSF flow) with a single skin puncture at the selected level, with adequate surgical block and no need for supplemental analgesia or GA.

    Measured: During spinal procedure (up to 30 minutes)

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Number of skin punctures and needle redirections

    Number of skin punctures and number of needle redirections required to achieve dural puncture

    Measured: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes

  2. Procedure duration

    Time from needle-skin contact to visualization of cerebrospinal fluid

    Measured: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes

  3. Incidence of hypotension

    Mean arterial pressure below 65 mmHg or a decrease of 20% or more from baseline

    Measured: From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes

  4. Total ephedrine dose

    Measured: From intrathecal injection to end of surgery, up to 90 minutes

  5. Sensory block level

    Assessed bilaterally by pinprick

    Measured: 10 and 15 minutes after intrathecal injection

  6. Incidence of nausea and vomiting

    Measured: Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes

  7. Incidence of paresthesia during needle insertion

    Measured: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes

  8. Incidence of bloody tap

    Measured: During the spinal procedure, up to 30 minutes

  9. Incidence of incomplete block requiring supplemental analgesia or conversion to general anesthesia

    Measured: Intraoperative period, up to 90 minutes

  10. Incidence of post-dural puncture headache

    Measured: Within 24 hours after surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Aug 2026
  2. Study start1 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Two-arm parallel-group design with 1:1 allocation. Participants are randomized to either preprocedural ultrasound-assisted level identification or conventional landmark palpation prior to spinal anesthesia. There is no crossover between arms; each participant receives only the allocated technique. All other aspects of anesthetic management, including drug selection and dosing, are identical across arms.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
66 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07789756
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026/01
Acronym
USG-SPINE
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
24 Jul 2026
Last updated
27 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be made publicly available. De-identified data supporting the published results may be provided by the corresponding author upon reasonable request, subject to approval by the institutional ethics committee and in accordance with national data protection legislation.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in