Hepatic MalignanciesNCT07537569
Preoperative Oncogeriatric Assessment in Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy
A study testing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in people with Hepatic Malignancies and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
This study aims to bridge the gap between geriatric medicine and surgical oncology. The findings will provide valuable insights into optimizing perioperative care for older adults, enhancing surgical safety, and improving long-term recovery trajectories, thereby supporting a more patient-centered, multidisciplinary… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 70 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatic Malignancies, Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, Hepatectomy
- What is being tested?
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 242 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 9 Apr 2026to Sep 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 70 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged ≥ 70 years
- Diagnosed hepatic malignancies requiring hepatectomy
- Eligible for curative surgery as determined by multidisciplinary team
- Ability to provide informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Ineligibility for surgery due to advanced disease or severe comorbidities
- Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score < 18)
- Refusal to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Simone Vani, Bsc contact
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
Roma, RM, 00168
Chiara Schipa, MD, +39 0630154386, chiara.schipa@policlinicogemelli.it
Felice Giuliante, MD
About this study
Official title: Impact of Preoperative Oncogeriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hepatectomy
This study aims to bridge the gap between geriatric medicine and surgical oncology. The findings will provide valuable insights into optimizing perioperative care for older adults, enhancing surgical safety, and improving long-term recovery trajectories, thereby supporting a more patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach in the management of elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy
- Being tested
- Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)Other
The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is conducted using a structured approach integrating validated tools into routine preoperative evaluation: frailty assessed by Fried Frailty Criteria; functional status by Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL); cognitive function by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); comorbidity burden by Charlson Comorbidity Index; nutritional status by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA); psychological status by Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Based on CGA findings, participants may receive individualized preoperative interventions including nutritional optimization, physical prehabilitation, medical optimization, and psychosocial or educational support.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) Group | Experimental | Subjects undergo Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) assessing frailty, functional status, cognition, comorbidities, nutritional and mental health status using validated tools (Fried Criteria, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Charlson Comorbidity Index, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Geriatric Depression Scale).
Subjects receive targeted preoperative interventions (nutritional support, prehabilitation, medical optimization, psychosocial support). Receives: Other: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) |
| Standard of Care Group | No intervention | Subjects receive standard preoperative care including anesthesia, surgical procedures, and postoperative management according to institutional protocols |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Major Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III)
Number of participants experiencing major postoperative complications, defined as grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification ranges from grade I (minor complications) to grade V (death), with higher grades indicating more severe complications, assessed within 30 days after surgery.
Measured: From surgery to 30 days after surgery
Secondary outcomes (6)
Overall Survival
Overall survival (OS), defined as the time from enrollment to death from any cause, assessed at 12 months
Measured: From enrollment to 12 months after surgery
Quality of Life Assessed at 3 and 6 Months
Change from baseline in quality of life scores measured using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30). The questionnaire includes multiple domains scored from 0 to 100. For functional scales and global health status, higher scores indicate better quality of life; for symptom scales, higher scores indicate worse symptoms
Measured: From enrollment to 3 and 6 months after surgery
Lenght of hospital stay
Length of hospital stay, defined as the number of days from the date of surgery to the date of hospital discharge
Measured: From date of surgery to hospital discharge (up to 90 days postoperatively)
Hospital readmission
30-day readmission
Measured: From discharge date to 30 days after surgery
Functional Status Assessed by Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Functional status measured using the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale. ADL scores range from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating greater independence. Change from baseline will be assessed at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Measured: From baseline (preoperative) to 3 and 6 months after surgery
Functional Status Assessed by Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Functional status measured using the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) scale. IADL scores range from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater independence. Change from baseline will be assessed at 3 and 6 months after surgery
Measured: From baseline (preoperative) to 3 and 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2026
- Study start9 Apr 2026
- Primary completionApr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionSep 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Hepatic MalignanciesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 242 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Felice Giuliante, MD, Principal investigator, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07537569
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 8205
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Schipa C, Luca E, Ripa M, Sollazzi L, Aceto P. Preoperative evaluation of the elderly patient. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Oct-Dec;17(4):482-490. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_613_23. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
PubMed 37779566Steenblock J, Braisch U, Brefka S, Thomas C, Eschweiler GW, Rapp M, Metz B, Maurer C, von Arnim CAF, Herrmann ML, Wagner S, Denkinger M, Dallmeier D. Frailty index and its association with the onset of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03663-7.
PubMed 36774453Kumar C, Salzman B, Colburn JL. Preoperative Assessment in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Approach. Am Fam Physician. 2018 Aug 15;98(4):214-220.
PubMed 30215973Chen L, Zong W, Luo M, Yu H. The impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in elderly surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0306308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306308. eCollection 2024.
PubMed 39197016Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):274-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.
PubMed 25531451Neuman MD, Silber JH, Magaziner JS, Passarella MA, Mehta S, Werner RM. Survival and functional outcomes after hip fracture among nursing home residents. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1273-80. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2362.
PubMed 25055155Oresanya LB, Lyons WL, Finlayson E. Preoperative assessment of the older patient: a narrative review. JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2110-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4573.
PubMed 24867014Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF; American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; American Geriatrics Society. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):453-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 21. No abstract available.
PubMed 22917646Partridge JS, Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:8-16. doi: 10.1111/anae.12494.
PubMed 24303856
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact of Preoperative Oncogeriatric Assessment in Elderly Patients Undergoing Surgery for Hepatectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07537569
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 8205
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 242 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCSUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Apr 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Sep 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to bridge the gap between geriatric medicine and surgical oncology. The findings will provide valuable insights into optimizing perioperative care for older adults, enhancing surgical safety, and improving long-term recovery trajectories, thereby supporting a more patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach in the management of elderly patients undergoing hepatectomy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) Group | Experimental | Other: Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)Subjects undergo Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) assessing frailty, functional status, cognition, comorbidities, nutritional and mental health status using validated tools (Fried Criteria, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Charlson Comorbidity Index, Mini Nutritional Assessment, Geriatric Depression Scale). Subjects receive targeted preoperative interventions (nutritional support, prehabilitation, medical optimization, psychosocial support). |
| Standard of Care Group | No intervention | –Subjects receive standard preoperative care including anesthesia, surgical procedures, and postoperative management according to institutional protocols |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 70 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients aged ≥ 70 years
- Diagnosed hepatic malignancies requiring hepatectomy
- Eligible for curative surgery as determined by multidisciplinary team
- Ability to provide informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Ineligibility for surgery due to advanced disease or severe comorbidities
- Severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score < 18)
- Refusal to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA)The Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is conducted using a structured approach integrating validated tools into routine preoperative evaluation: frailty assessed by Fried Frailty Criteria; functional status by Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL); cognitive function by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) or Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA); comorbidity burden by Charlson Comorbidity Index; nutritional status by Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA); psychological status by Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Based on CGA findings, participants may receive individualized preoperative interventions including nutritional optimization, physical prehabilitation, medical optimization, and psychosocial or educational support. | Other | Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) Group |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Major Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III)
Time frame: From surgery to 30 days after surgery
Number of participants experiencing major postoperative complications, defined as grade III or higher according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification of Surgical Complications. The Clavien-Dindo classification ranges from grade I (minor complications) to grade V (death), with higher grades indicating more severe complications, assessed within 30 days after surgery.
6 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: From enrollment to 12 months after surgery
Quality of Life Assessed at 3 and 6 Months
Time frame: From enrollment to 3 and 6 months after surgery
Lenght of hospital stay
Time frame: From date of surgery to hospital discharge (up to 90 days postoperatively)
Hospital readmission
Time frame: From discharge date to 30 days after surgery
Functional Status Assessed by Activities of Daily Living (ADL)
Time frame: From baseline (preoperative) to 3 and 6 months after surgery
Functional Status Assessed by Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL)
Time frame: From baseline (preoperative) to 3 and 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37779566Schipa C, Luca E, Ripa M, Sollazzi L, Aceto P. Preoperative evaluation of the elderly patient. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Oct-Dec;17(4):482-490. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_613_23. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
- Background: PubMed 36774453Steenblock J, Braisch U, Brefka S, Thomas C, Eschweiler GW, Rapp M, Metz B, Maurer C, von Arnim CAF, Herrmann ML, Wagner S, Denkinger M, Dallmeier D. Frailty index and its association with the onset of postoperative delirium in older adults undergoing elective surgery. BMC Geriatr. 2023 Feb 11;23(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03663-7.
- Background: PubMed 30215973Kumar C, Salzman B, Colburn JL. Preoperative Assessment in Older Adults: A Comprehensive Approach. Am Fam Physician. 2018 Aug 15;98(4):214-220.
- Background: PubMed 39197016Chen L, Zong W, Luo M, Yu H. The impact of comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in elderly surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2024 Aug 28;19(8):e0306308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0306308. eCollection 2024.
- Background: PubMed 25531451Hoffmann TC, Del Mar C. Patients' expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):274-86. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6016.
- Background: PubMed 25055155Neuman MD, Silber JH, Magaziner JS, Passarella MA, Mehta S, Werner RM. Survival and functional outcomes after hip fracture among nursing home residents. JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Aug;174(8):1273-80. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.2362.
- Background: PubMed 24867014Oresanya LB, Lyons WL, Finlayson E. Preoperative assessment of the older patient: a narrative review. JAMA. 2014 May;311(20):2110-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.4573.
- Background: PubMed 22917646Chow WB, Rosenthal RA, Merkow RP, Ko CY, Esnaola NF; American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; American Geriatrics Society. Optimal preoperative assessment of the geriatric surgical patient: a best practices guideline from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and the American Geriatrics Society. J Am Coll Surg. 2012 Oct;215(4):453-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 21. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24303856Partridge JS, Harari D, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. The impact of pre-operative comprehensive geriatric assessment on postoperative outcomes in older patients undergoing scheduled surgery: a systematic review. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jan;69 Suppl 1:8-16. doi: 10.1111/anae.12494.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hepatic Malignancies
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
SBRT With Immunotherapy and Atezo-Bev in HCC With Major Portal Vein Thrombosis
HCC
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Assess the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Revumenib in Participants With Advanced Cancer and Hepatic or Renal Impairment
Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Hematologic Malignancies, Acute Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
Not yet recruiting
RAPID for Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases
Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRCLM), Colorectal Neoplasms
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Simone Vani, Bsc contact
Felice Giuliante, MD principal investigator
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) in people with Hepatic Malignancies and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, run by Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Chiara Schipa, MD (+39 0630154386, chiara.schipa@policlinicogemelli.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Major Postoperative Complications (Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥ III) (time frame: From surgery to 30 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07537569, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.