AphasiatDCS implementNCT07535788
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
An observational study of Aphasia and Stroke, run by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language) Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- What is being tested?
- transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 May 2026to 30 May 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: adult stroke patients with aphasia of inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Who may be able to join
- ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- aphasia
Who cannot join
- not a patient at either inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Pomona, California, 91767
Caroline Schnakers, PhD, 909/596-7733 ext. 3038, cschnakers@casacolina.org
About this study
Official title: Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in an Acute Rehabilitation Setting
This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language)
Read the detailed description
Aphasia affects many stroke survivors and can impact communication, independence, and quality of life. Speech therapy helps, but recovery can be slow. Earlier research in people with long-term aphasia shows that adding gentle brain stimulation (tDCS) can improve both speech and comprehension when paired with language therapy. This study will explore how well tDCS can be integrated into everyday care for patients who are still early in their recovery.
Before starting the study, identified Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) will be trained for the use of tDCS (BrainDriver v2.1 device, that has already been approved by Casa Colina Infection Control). The following workflow will be used for tDCS implementation with the SLP team: 1) Upon speech assessment, the SLP team will determine if an adult stroke patient meets criteria for aphasia, 2) Within 3 days, communication order will be obtained from physician for tDCS, 3) The tDCS equipment will be reserved for each session, 4) Equipment to be maintained in a locked cabinet, 4) tDCS equipment will be cleaned after each use, 5) patient label will be affixed on plastic bag holding sponges and placed in folder located in a locked cabinet, 6) tDCS treatment document will be filled on daily notes.
Patients will receive a 20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions). Since this is a feasibility study where the goal is to identify usability issues, workflow integration, and initial reactions. We will involve 5 SLP staff members who will use the device in around 30patients (6 patients/therapist).
This prospective implementation study will use a RE-AIM framework which has been previously used to implement medical devices in clinical settings. This framework includes 5 domains of assessment:
- REACH: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are selected to participate in this study (eg, comparing participants to non-participants). These information will be collected in the hospital database.
- EFFECTIVENESS/EFFICACY: The impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes, including potential negative effects; and variability across subgroups (generalizability or heterogeneity of effects). Effectiveness will be assessed using the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr) and the Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ). The WABr is a part of the clinical routine and data will be extracted from the hospital database. The AEQ will be added in a log.
- IMPLEMENTATION: At the setting level, implementation refers to the intervention agents' fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's key functions or components, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. Importantly, it also includes adaptations made to interventions and implementation strategies. Consistency of implementation will be collected using a log. Barriers and facilitators will also be identified based on a tailored Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire. Cost of intervention in terms of time and money will be assessed using the Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) and Cost Effective Analysis (CEA), respectively.
- ADOPTION: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of intervention agents (staff who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program, and why. Data will be extracted post-study based on who participated.
- MAINTENANCE: At the setting level, the extent to which a program or policy becomes institutionalized or part of the routine organizational practices and policies. This aspect will be assessed with the implementation in 2 settings (inpatient and outpatient) with follow-up interviews at 6 months.
The staff will be interviewed using the NTI and a tailored TDF questionnaire (30 minutes). All the data related to adverse events (AEQ) and consistency of delivery will be collected in a log that the therapist will use during each session. All other information will be extracted from the hospital database. All the data will be collected at 3 timepoints (every 3 patients; 3patients/therapist). An additional timepoint at baseline will be added only for the TDF questionnaire. Descriptive analyses (proportion, frequency, percentage) will be used to analyze the results to our survey. Qualitative analyses will also be used for addressing the open-ended questions of our survey.
- Being tested
- transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
- Medical subject headings
- Aphasia, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Device
20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions)
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nasa Taskload Index (NTI)
The NASA Task Load Index (NTI) is a widely used tool for measuring how demanding a task feels to a person. It captures subjective workload, meaning it asks individuals to rate how challenging a task was for them. It was developed by NASA researchers in the 1980s to better understand how mental and physical demands affect performance
Measured: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)
Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire
The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a structured approach used to understand why people do or do not change behavior in healthcare and other settings. It brings together key concepts from multiple behavior-change theories into a single framework to help identify barriers and facilitators to implementing new practices.
Measured: at baseline, as well as 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr)
The Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) is a standardized assessment used to identify the presence, type, and severity of aphasia in adults with acquired brain injury, most commonly stroke. It evaluates multiple language skills, including speech production, comprehension, repetition, and naming, as well as reading and writing.
Measured: at patient's admission and discharge (around 3 weeks after admission)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Apr 2026
- Study start4 May 2026
- Primary completion4 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AphasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Caroline Schnakers, Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07535788
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB#23721124
- Acronym
- tDCS implement
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2026
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No: Data will be collected as part of routine clinical care and implementation activities, and participants will not provide consent for public data sharing. Data access is therefore restricted to protect participant privacy and confidentiality, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical guidelines.
Publications
Williams EER, Sghirripa S, Rogasch NC, Hordacre B, Attrill S. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):3802-3826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
PubMed 37828899Picano C, Quadrini A, Pisano F, Marangolo P. Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 2;11(1):41. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010041.
PubMed 33401678Breining BL, Sebastian R. Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020 Jun;8(2):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00257-5. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
PubMed 33344066Khan A, Yuan K, Bao SC, Ti CHE, Tariq A, Anjum N, Tong RK. Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Facilitate Post-stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 10;3:795737. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795737. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 36188889
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in an Acute Rehabilitation Setting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07535788
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tDCS implement / IRB#23721124
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for HealthcareUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 4 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 4 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Apr 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language)
Detailed description
Aphasia affects many stroke survivors and can impact communication, independence, and quality of life. Speech therapy helps, but recovery can be slow. Earlier research in people with long-term aphasia shows that adding gentle brain stimulation (tDCS) can improve both speech and comprehension when paired with language therapy. This study will explore how well tDCS can be integrated into everyday care for patients who are still early in their recovery.
Before starting the study, identified Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) will be trained for the use of tDCS (BrainDriver v2.1 device, that has already been approved by Casa Colina Infection Control). The following workflow will be used for tDCS implementation with the SLP team: 1) Upon speech assessment, the SLP team will determine if an adult stroke patient meets criteria for aphasia, 2) Within 3 days, communication order will be obtained from physician for tDCS, 3) The tDCS equipment will be reserved for each session, 4) Equipment to be maintained in a locked cabinet, 4) tDCS equipment will be cleaned after each use, 5) patient label will be affixed on plastic bag holding sponges and placed in folder located in a locked cabinet, 6) tDCS treatment document will be filled on daily notes.
Patients will receive a 20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions). Since this is a feasibility study where the goal is to identify usability issues, workflow integration, and initial reactions. We will involve 5 SLP staff members who will use the device in around 30patients (6 patients/therapist).
This prospective implementation study will use a RE-AIM framework which has been previously used to implement medical devices in clinical settings. This framework includes 5 domains of assessment:
- REACH: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are selected to participate in this study (eg, comparing participants to non-participants). These information will be collected in the hospital database.
- EFFECTIVENESS/EFFICACY: The impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes, including potential negative effects; and variability across subgroups (generalizability or heterogeneity of effects). Effectiveness will be assessed using the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr) and the Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ). The WABr is a part of the clinical routine and data will be extracted from the hospital database. The AEQ will be added in a log.
- IMPLEMENTATION: At the setting level, implementation refers to the intervention agents' fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's key functions or components, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. Importantly, it also includes adaptations made to interventions and implementation strategies. Consistency of implementation will be collected using a log. Barriers and facilitators will also be identified based on a tailored Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire. Cost of intervention in terms of time and money will be assessed using the Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) and Cost Effective Analysis (CEA), respectively.
- ADOPTION: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of intervention agents (staff who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program, and why. Data will be extracted post-study based on who participated.
- MAINTENANCE: At the setting level, the extent to which a program or policy becomes institutionalized or part of the routine organizational practices and policies. This aspect will be assessed with the implementation in 2 settings (inpatient and outpatient) with follow-up interviews at 6 months.
The staff will be interviewed using the NTI and a tailored TDF questionnaire (30 minutes). All the data related to adverse events (AEQ) and consistency of delivery will be collected in a log that the therapist will use during each session. All other information will be extracted from the hospital database. All the data will be collected at 3 timepoints (every 3 patients; 3patients/therapist). An additional timepoint at baseline will be added only for the TDF questionnaire. Descriptive analyses (proportion, frequency, percentage) will be used to analyze the results to our survey. Qualitative analyses will also be used for addressing the open-ended questions of our survey.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- adult stroke patients with aphasia of inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- aphasia
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- not a patient at either inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions) | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Nasa Taskload Index (NTI)
Time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)
The NASA Task Load Index (NTI) is a widely used tool for measuring how demanding a task feels to a person. It captures subjective workload, meaning it asks individuals to rate how challenging a task was for them. It was developed by NASA researchers in the 1980s to better understand how mental and physical demands affect performance
Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire
Time frame: at baseline, as well as 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)
The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a structured approach used to understand why people do or do not change behavior in healthcare and other settings. It brings together key concepts from multiple behavior-change theories into a single framework to help identify barriers and facilitators to implementing new practices.
1 secondary outcome
Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr)
Time frame: at patient's admission and discharge (around 3 weeks after admission)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 37828899Williams EER, Sghirripa S, Rogasch NC, Hordacre B, Attrill S. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):3802-3826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
- Background: PubMed 33401678Picano C, Quadrini A, Pisano F, Marangolo P. Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 2;11(1):41. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010041.
- Background: PubMed 33344066Breining BL, Sebastian R. Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020 Jun;8(2):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00257-5. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
- Background: PubMed 36188889Khan A, Yuan K, Bao SC, Ti CHE, Tariq A, Anjum N, Tong RK. Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Facilitate Post-stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 10;3:795737. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795737. eCollection 2022.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Data will be collected as part of routine clinical care and implementation activities, and participants will not provide consent for public data sharing. Data access is therefore restricted to protect participant privacy and confidentiality, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical guidelines.
Related trials for Aphasia
RecruitingObservational study
Speech and Language Interventions for Italian People With PPA
Primary Progressive Aphasia(PPA)
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Recruiting
Music Therapy for Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Non-fluent Aphasia: the Indian Adaptation
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aphasia, Broca
RecruitingObservational study
ARTFL LEFFTDS Longitudinal Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (ALLFTD)
Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD), Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP)
Recruiting
Sensory-Motor Integration for Speech Rehabilitation in Patients With Post-stroke Aphasia
Aphasia Non Fluent, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Aphasia and Stroke, run by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Caroline Schnakers, PhD (3108061443 ext. 3038, cschnakers@casacolina.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) (time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07535788, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2026.