AzTrials
AzTrials

AphasiatDCS implementNCT07535788

Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting

An observational study of Aphasia and Stroke, run by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aphasia, Stroke
What is being tested?
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 May 2026to 30 May 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: adult stroke patients with aphasia of inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Who may be able to join

  • ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
  • aphasia

Who cannot join

  • not a patient at either inpatient and outpatient settings of Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Caroline Schnakers, PhD contact

3108061443 ext. 3038

cschnakers@casacolina.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare

    Pomona, California, 91767

    Caroline Schnakers, PhD, 909/596-7733 ext. 3038, cschnakers@casacolina.org

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in an Acute Rehabilitation Setting

This study looks at whether transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) can be effectively implemented in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation settings during routine speech therapy for people who recently had a stroke and now have aphasia (difficulty speaking or understanding language)

Read the detailed description

Aphasia affects many stroke survivors and can impact communication, independence, and quality of life. Speech therapy helps, but recovery can be slow. Earlier research in people with long-term aphasia shows that adding gentle brain stimulation (tDCS) can improve both speech and comprehension when paired with language therapy. This study will explore how well tDCS can be integrated into everyday care for patients who are still early in their recovery.

Before starting the study, identified Speech-Language Pathologist (SLP) will be trained for the use of tDCS (BrainDriver v2.1 device, that has already been approved by Casa Colina Infection Control). The following workflow will be used for tDCS implementation with the SLP team: 1) Upon speech assessment, the SLP team will determine if an adult stroke patient meets criteria for aphasia, 2) Within 3 days, communication order will be obtained from physician for tDCS, 3) The tDCS equipment will be reserved for each session, 4) Equipment to be maintained in a locked cabinet, 4) tDCS equipment will be cleaned after each use, 5) patient label will be affixed on plastic bag holding sponges and placed in folder located in a locked cabinet, 6) tDCS treatment document will be filled on daily notes.

Patients will receive a 20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions). Since this is a feasibility study where the goal is to identify usability issues, workflow integration, and initial reactions. We will involve 5 SLP staff members who will use the device in around 30patients (6 patients/therapist).

This prospective implementation study will use a RE-AIM framework which has been previously used to implement medical devices in clinical settings. This framework includes 5 domains of assessment:

  • REACH: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of individuals who are selected to participate in this study (eg, comparing participants to non-participants). These information will be collected in the hospital database.
  • EFFECTIVENESS/EFFICACY: The impact of an intervention on important individual outcomes, including potential negative effects; and variability across subgroups (generalizability or heterogeneity of effects). Effectiveness will be assessed using the Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr) and the Adverse Event Questionnaire (AEQ). The WABr is a part of the clinical routine and data will be extracted from the hospital database. The AEQ will be added in a log.
  • IMPLEMENTATION: At the setting level, implementation refers to the intervention agents' fidelity to the various elements of an intervention's key functions or components, including consistency of delivery as intended and the time and cost of the intervention. Importantly, it also includes adaptations made to interventions and implementation strategies. Consistency of implementation will be collected using a log. Barriers and facilitators will also be identified based on a tailored Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire. Cost of intervention in terms of time and money will be assessed using the Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) and Cost Effective Analysis (CEA), respectively.
  • ADOPTION: The absolute number, proportion, and representativeness of intervention agents (staff who deliver the program) who are willing to initiate a program, and why. Data will be extracted post-study based on who participated.
  • MAINTENANCE: At the setting level, the extent to which a program or policy becomes institutionalized or part of the routine organizational practices and policies. This aspect will be assessed with the implementation in 2 settings (inpatient and outpatient) with follow-up interviews at 6 months.

The staff will be interviewed using the NTI and a tailored TDF questionnaire (30 minutes). All the data related to adverse events (AEQ) and consistency of delivery will be collected in a log that the therapist will use during each session. All other information will be extracted from the hospital database. All the data will be collected at 3 timepoints (every 3 patients; 3patients/therapist). An additional timepoint at baseline will be added only for the TDF questionnaire. Descriptive analyses (proportion, frequency, percentage) will be used to analyze the results to our survey. Qualitative analyses will also be used for addressing the open-ended questions of our survey.

Conditions
Aphasia, Stroke
Being tested
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Medical subject headings
Aphasia, Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Device

    20 minute anodal tDCS (1mA) to the left inferior frontal (Broca) area, concurrent with speech and language therapy by a trained speech language pathologist (SLP) over their stay (during at least 5 sessions)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Nasa Taskload Index (NTI)

    The NASA Task Load Index (NTI) is a widely used tool for measuring how demanding a task feels to a person. It captures subjective workload, meaning it asks individuals to rate how challenging a task was for them. It was developed by NASA researchers in the 1980s to better understand how mental and physical demands affect performance

    Measured: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)

  2. Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF) questionnaire

    The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) is a structured approach used to understand why people do or do not change behavior in healthcare and other settings. It brings together key concepts from multiple behavior-change theories into a single framework to help identify barriers and facilitators to implementing new practices.

    Measured: at baseline, as well as 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Western Aphasia Battery Revised (WABr)

    The Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (WAB-R) is a standardized assessment used to identify the presence, type, and severity of aphasia in adults with acquired brain injury, most commonly stroke. It evaluates multiple language skills, including speech production, comprehension, repetition, and naming, as well as reading and writing.

    Measured: at patient's admission and discharge (around 3 weeks after admission)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Apr 2026
  2. Study start4 May 2026
  3. Primary completion4 May 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 May 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07535788
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB#23721124
Acronym
tDCS implement
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
1 Apr 2026
Last updated
26 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Data will be collected as part of routine clinical care and implementation activities, and participants will not provide consent for public data sharing. Data access is therefore restricted to protect participant privacy and confidentiality, in accordance with institutional policies and ethical guidelines.

Publications

  • Williams EER, Sghirripa S, Rogasch NC, Hordacre B, Attrill S. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the treatment of post-stroke aphasia: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2024 Aug;46(17):3802-3826. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2023.2259299. Epub 2023 Oct 13.

    PubMed 37828899
  • Picano C, Quadrini A, Pisano F, Marangolo P. Adjunctive Approaches to Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Review on Efficacy and Safety. Brain Sci. 2021 Jan 2;11(1):41. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11010041.

    PubMed 33401678
  • Breining BL, Sebastian R. Neuromodulation in post-stroke aphasia treatment. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2020 Jun;8(2):44-56. doi: 10.1007/s40141-020-00257-5. Epub 2020 Feb 22.

    PubMed 33344066
  • Khan A, Yuan K, Bao SC, Ti CHE, Tariq A, Anjum N, Tong RK. Can Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Facilitate Post-stroke Cognitive Rehabilitation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Feb 10;3:795737. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.795737. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36188889

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Aphasia and Stroke, run by Casa Colina Hospital and Centers for Healthcare at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Caroline Schnakers, PhD (3108061443 ext. 3038, cschnakers@casacolina.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Nasa Taskload Index (NTI) (time frame: 3 months, 6 months and 1 year (after the start of data collection, approximately)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07535788, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in