AzTrials
AzTrials

TMJ Disc Displacement With ReductionNCT07535073

Ultrasound-guided Versus Arthroscopic Guided PRF Injection for TMJ Disc Displacement.

A study testing ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injection and Arthroscopic guided platelet rich Fibrin injection in people with TMJ Disc Displacement With Reduction, run by Cairo University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus arthroscopic guided platelet rich fibrin injection in the management of anterior disc displacement with reduction of the temporomandibular joint, in terms of pain reduction, improvement of mandibular function, and patient-reported outcomes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
TMJ Disc Displacement With Reduction
What is being tested?
ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injection and Arthroscopic guided platelet rich Fibrin injection
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
18 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
7 May 2026to 7 Jun 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients aged 18-60 years.
  • Clinically and radiographically diagnosed temporomandibular joint disc displacemet with reduction.
  • Presence of TMJ pain exacerbated by mandibular movement.
  • Limited mandibular function and/or reduced maximum mouth opening.
  • Symptoms persisting for at least 3 months.
  • Failure of conservative treatment (e.g. occlusal splint, physiotherapy, NSAIDs). -Ability to understand the study protocol and provide informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Previous TMJ surgery or arthroscopic intervention.
  • Intra-articular injection in the TMJ within the last 6 months.
  • Systemic inflammatory or autoimmune joint diseases.
  • Coagulation disorders or current anticoagulant therapy.
  • Active local infection at the injection site.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Severe degenerative joint disease (advanced osteoarthritis).
  • Known allergy or contraindication to ( PRF) preparation.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Khalid Atef Elhayes, PhD contact

+20 1030000360

khaled.atef@dentistry.cu.edu.eg

About this study

Official title: Ultrasound Guided Versus Arthroscopic Guided PRF Injection in Management of Temporomandibular Joint Disc Displacement With Reduction: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials

To compare the clinical effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus arthroscopic guided platelet rich fibrin injection in the management of anterior disc displacement with reduction of the temporomandibular joint, in terms of pain reduction, improvement of mandibular function, and patient-reported outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Internal derangements of the temporomandibular joint, particularly disc displacement with reduction, represent a significant proportion of temporomandibular disorders. Conventional conservative treatments may not always achieve satisfactory symptom resolution, leading to increased interest in minimally invasive interventions. PRF has gained attention for its ability to promote tissue regeneration, reduce inflammation, and enhance healing through the sustained release of growth factors. Image-guided injection techniques are essential for ensuring accurate delivery of PRF into the targeted joint structures. Arthroscopic-guided injection allows direct visualization of intra-articular anatomy but is invasive, technically demanding, and associated with higher cost and procedural complexity. In contrast, ultrasound-guided injection is a non-invasive, radiation-free, and cost- effective technique that enables real-time visualization of soft tissues and needle placement. Despite these advantages, the comparative clinical efficacy of ultrasound-guided versus arthroscopic-guided PRF injection remains inadequately explored, particularly in patients with TMJ disc displacement with reduction.

Being tested
ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injection, Arthroscopic guided platelet rich Fibrin injection
Keywords
temporomandibular joint, Tmj disc displacement, PRF

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injectionDevice

    1. A high-frequency linear ultrasound probe will be used to identify the TMJ space.
    2. A sterile syringe containing 1 mL of PRF will be inserted into the superior joint space under real-time ultrasound guidance.
    3. PRF will be injected slowly with continuous confirmation of needle position.
  • Arthroscopic guided platelet rich Fibrin injectionDevice

    1. TMJ arthroscopy will be performed under local or general anesthesia following standard aseptic preparation.
    2. The superior joint space will be visualized using a 1.9 mm arthroscope.
    3. A sterile syringe containing 1 mL of PRF will be introduced through a lateral portal under direct arthroscopic visualization.
    4. PRF will be injected slowly into the superior joint space.
Study groups in NCT07535073
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injection.ExperimentalPatient receive PRF injection under ultrasound guidance
Receives: Device: ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injection
Arthroscopic guided platelet-rich fibrin injection.ExperimentalPatient receive PRF injection under arsothscopic guidance
Receives: Device: Arthroscopic guided platelet rich Fibrin injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Maximum mouth opening

    Maximum interincisal distance measured using digital caliper in millimeters (mm) between upper and lower central incisors, Unit of measure: millimeters (mm). Minimum value: 0 mm. Maximum value: 60 mm. Higher values represent a better outcome.

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pain intensity

    Pain intensity assessed using 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). 0 = no pain; 10 = worst pain imaginable. Unit of measure: points (0-10). Minimum value: 0. Maximum value: 10. Higher scores represent a worse outcome.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Apr 2026
  2. Study start7 May 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion7 Feb 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion7 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
18 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07535073
Sponsor's protocol ID
OMFS-TMJ-PRF-RCT01
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
2 Apr 2026
Last updated
16 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No IPD sharing plan at this time due to data sensitivity, ongoing sponsor review, and lack of established infrastructure.

Publications

  • Gonzalez LV, Lopez JP, Diaz-Baez D, Orjuela MP, Chavez M. Clinical outcomes of operative arthroscopy and temporomandibular medical infiltration with platelet-rich fibrin in upper and lower articular space. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2021 Dec;49(12):1162-1168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2021.07.001. Epub 2021 Aug 3.

    PubMed 34384651
  • Chaudhary FA, Ahmad B, Butt DQ, Hameed S, Bashir U. Normal range of maximum mouth opening in Pakistani population: A cross-sectional study. J Int Oral Health. 2019;11(6):353-356. doi:10.4103/jioh.jioh_127_19.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ultrasound guided platelet rich fibrin injection and Arthroscopic guided platelet rich Fibrin injection in people with TMJ Disc Displacement With Reduction, run by Cairo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Sami Faiz Kahwaji, DDS (+20 1096094940, sami.kahwaji@dentistry.cu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Maximum mouth opening (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07535073, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in