Hoarding DisorderNCT07483021
Detection of Hoarding Disorder and Related Psychopathology
A study testing Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection team in people with Hoarding Disorder and Hoarding, run by Andreas Rosén Rasmussen at 1 site in Denmark.
Trial summary
Hoarding disorder is characterized by excessive amassment of objects in the home and difficulty of getting rid of the objects. It is associated with a high level of somatic and psychiatric comorbidity, suicidality, social marginalization, damage to property and risk of eviction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hoarding Disorder, Hoarding
- What is being tested?
- Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection team
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteDenmark
- Study dates
- 2 Mar 2026to 1 Jun 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Presence of hoarding disorder according to DSM-5 and age above 18 years.
- Current contact with The Housing Advisors, Copenhagen Municipality.
Who cannot join
- Recent contact with mental health services (within last 6 months).
- Previously known organic brain disorder (including mental retardation and dementia).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Denmark1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Mental Health Center Amager
Copenhagen S, 2300
Line Aalykke, MD, +45813430, line.aalykke@regionh.dk
Annick Parnas, MD, PhD, Clin. Assoc. Prof., annik.francoise.parnas@regionh.dk
About this study
Official title: Hoarding Disorder and Related Psychopathology: A Clinical Study and Cross-sectoral Intervention
Hoarding disorder is characterized by excessive amassment of objects in the home and difficulty of getting rid of the objects. It is associated with a high level of somatic and psychiatric comorbidity, suicidality, social marginalization, damage to property and risk of eviction. Previous clinical studies have mainly been in help-seeking groups. However, social services engage severe cases with poor insight, whereas few as 10% have contact with mental health services.
This study investigates:
Read more
- The prevalence of severe mental illness and comorbidities among 60 individuals with hoarding disorder that have led to contact with social services at Copenhagen Municipality
- the effect of a cross-sectoral intervention aiming to establish contact with regional mental health services for these individuals. The intervention consists of an outreach team of clinicians and municipal social workers who refer participants to clinical services based on a systematic clinical assessment.
Primary outcomes are 1) primary and comorbid diagnoses assigned at the clinical assessment and 2) contact with mental health services after the intervention, at 3- and 6-months follow-up.
Six to 12 months after the baseline assessment, a qualitative follow-up interview will be carried out, including approximately 14 participants. The aim is to explore the participants' experience of the intervention and subsequent clinical and social services to provide a more nuanced understanding of the quantitative outcomes of the study.
The hypotheses of the study are
- more than 75% of the participants will be identified to have comorbid diagnoses including more than 50% with associated severe mental illness (schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and periodic depression). It is expected that 10% will suffer from underlying organic disorders of dementia or mental retardation.
- Fifty percent of the sample will establish contact with mental health services within 3 months after attempt of referral, and 30% of the sample will remain in contact for more than 6 months
Read the detailed description
The cross-sectoral intervention:
The intervention consists of an outreach (assertive and flexible) team of clinicians and municipal social workers targeting individuals with hoarding disorder who have ongoing contact with The Housing Advisors, Copenhagen Municipality. The clinical team includes the PhD student, the primary supervisor, and the co-supervisor, both clinical associate professors and senior consultants.
The Housing Advisors is a unit that provides support to citizens with housing-related difficulties. Their work focuses on preventing evictions and severe violations of fire and other safety regulations, and otherwise helping citizens to maintain their housing in cases involving hoarding, The Housing Advisors offers advice and guidance, support for solving hoarding related difficulties, and arranges municipality funded cleaning. Citizens acceptance or decline to participate in the research project will not affect the work carried out by The Housing Advisors or citizens' right to receive help from The Housing Advisors now or in the future.
Based on the clinical assessment, the team facilitates referrals of research participants to the appropriate regional mental health services, if referral is relevant. Referrals will take place after informed consent and are expected to primarily involve Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT), which is standard of care in Capital Region Denmark for patients with persistent psychiatric disorders and low level of functioning. For other patients, referral to specialized clinics offering cognitive behavioral therapy will be relevant. Somatic complaints will be referred to the patient's GP or secondary somatic services. The team will communicate diagnosis and the plan for referral to the participant. Family members and significant others will be involved if desired by the participant.
The task of the social workers in the intervention will be the same as their current function in The Housing Advisors as outgoing case managers regarding the social issues of their clients. Moreover, the social workers will participate in the recruitment of the approximately 60 research participants.
As part of the research project, conferences between the research team and The Housing Advisors will be held, where information from the clinical assessment will be shared, including any relevant psychiatric history, current symptoms, diagnosis established in the research project and the plan for outpatient psychiatric treatment, with the aim of contributing with knowledge that could support the work of The Housing Advisors. The participants have the possibility to decline sharing clinical information with The Housing Advisors, by crossing yes or no in the consent form, without any consequences for their participation in the project.
The intervention is pragmatic and relatively low-cost. It is based on existing clinical and municipality structures but adds an integrated cross-sectoral and outgoing approach for initial clinical assessment. It is designed as a single-group, pretest-posttest trial, and will not include a control group. First, the investigators find it ethically correct to offer the intervention to all potential participants, sinceThe Housing Advisors estimate that only 10% of the target group currently receives treatment. Second, there is little empirical literature about non-help-seeking people with severe hoarding. By providing the intervention to the whole group, the project can gather comprehensive data which can inform future interventions and studies.
Baseline assessment:
The clinical interviews will be carried out by a PhD-student. Consultations will take place at municipality facilities, at research facilities or in the participants' home according to the preferences of the participant.
The interviews will be semi-structured and will include a psychosocial and illness history, the Present State Examination (PSE), which addresses general psychopathology and is a well-established instrument for a diagnostic assessment, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), which targets the severity of positive, negative, and general symptomatology, the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview (HRS), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale - Split version (GAF) and the Personal and social Performance scale (PSP). For assessment of schizotypal symptomatology, the assessment includes the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) and an extended checklist of symptoms and expressive features and behavior described in previous studies. Moreover, the PhD student will obtain the Saving Inventory-revised (SIR), which is a self-rating measure used in most clinical investigations of hoarding disorder, the Clutter Image Rating scale (CIR) which is a photographic self-rating scale, the Home Environment Assessment Tool for Hoarding (HEATH),which is a tool to assess the home for health and safety risks, and the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) will be used for screening for cognitive impairment as part of the clinical assessment of dementia. Finally, the investigators will assess intellectual functioning using three subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelli-gence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): Similarities, Vocabulary, and Information. Scores from these subtests will be combined to derive the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), which provides an estimate of verbal intellectual functioning.
Furthermore, a qualitative phenomenological substudy will be conducted in a subgroup of particpants to elucidate the onset, progression, and thematic elements of the participants' hoarding behavior, as well as its overlap with different psychopathology.
Finally, the investigators will assess the somatic status of the patient, by making a systems enquiry and conducting a physical examination. No invasive procedures will be made.
Qualitative follow-up interview:
Approximately 6-12 months after the baseline assessment, a pre-graduate research assistant (PGRA) will carry out a qualitative interview (estimated 1.5-hour duration). The purpose of this interview is to qualitatively explore the participants' experience of the intervention and subsequent clinical and social services to provide a more nuanced understanding of the quantitative outcomes of the study. The aim is to include 14 participants in this follow-up interview (among participants that have been referred to clinical services) to represent the expected broad range of comorbidities and diversity in the sample and yet balancing this priority with the in-depth and time-consuming nature of a qualitative research project.
The interview will explore. 1) participants narration of the development of their hoarding behavior, quality of life, interpersonal relations and functioning over the last 6 months after the principal intervention; 2) their experience of the research intervention and subsequent process of transition to clinical services, including the coordination or lack of such between the clinical researchers, social workers and clinical services; 3) an overall narration of the participants experience of clinical services; treatment, clinical approach to hoarding and relations to clinicians and other partners such as municipality workers or other agents; 4) reasons for terminating or sustaining contact with clinical services. Moreover, the PGRA will re-administer the SIR, CIR, MANSA self-rating scales and the PSP and HEATH assessment.
Ethics Individuals with hoarding disorder is a marginalized group in society and this study aims to better the conditions for this group. Hoarding disorder is underexamined in the European as well as international literature and no studies of integrated approaches working across sectors have yet been carried out.
With this in consideration, and the fact that the only side expected side-effect is fatigue after the interviews, the investigators do find that the therapeutic and supporting benefits for the participants and future patients warrants the study and overweighs the effort the participants engage in the study. Hopefully, the study will contribute to a better understanding of hoarding disorder and improve treatment for this group, to the benefit of the participants, future patients, the scientific environment and society in general, as well as creating the foundation for future research about hoarding disorder and the implementing off a cross-sectorial approach for vulnerable, non-help seeking groups of patients.
Funding:
The study has been financed by The Independent Research Fund Denmark.
- Conditions
- Hoarding Disorder, Hoarding
- Being tested
- Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection team
- Keywords
- Hoarding, Hoarding disorder, Hoarding behavior, Clutter, Cross-sectoral, Comorbidity, detection of mental illness
- Medical subject headings
- Hoarding Disorder, Hoarding, Speech Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection teamDiagnostic test
The intervention consists in an outgoing (assertive and flexible) team of clinicians (the PhD student, primary supervisor and co-supervisor who are both clinical associate professors and senior consultants) and municipality social workers, directed towards people with hoarding disorder and an ongoing contact with The Housing Advisors, Copenhagen Municipality. The clinicians will do the clinical assessment, and based on this, the team facilitates referrals of research participants to the appropriate regional mental health services, if referral is relevant. The task of the social workers in the intervention will be the same as their current function in The Housing Advisors as outgoing case managers regarding the social issues of their clients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Participants receive a clinical assessment, followed by referral planning by an assertive cross-sectoral team consisting of clinicians and social service professionals Receives: Diagnostic Test: Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection team |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Primary and comorbid psychiatric diagnosis
ICD-10, ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnoses
Measured: Primary and comorbid diagnosis is assessed at baseline.
Contact or not with mental health services at a 3- and 6-months follow up
Data obtained through review of files and Nationwide register-data from the National Patient Register and Danish Psychiatric Central Register
Measured: The participants get referred at baseline, and contact or no contact will be measured at 3 and 6 months follow-up
Secondary outcomes (5)
Clutter Image Rating Scale (CIR)
Photographic self-measurement scale. The participant have to look at a photographic scale for 3 types of rooms which is living room, kitchen and bedroom. The score goes from one to nine, and the participants has to choose the photo that is closest to being accurate. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 3- and 6-months follow-up.
Saving Inventory - Revised (SIR)
Self-rating measure consisting of 23 items, subdivided in 3 subscales with 7-9 items in each. The scale goes from 0 to 4. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
The subscales are:
Clutter Subscale (9 Items) Difficulty Discarding/ Saving Subscale (7 items) Acquisition Subscale (7 items)
The total score is the sum of all items.
Measured: Assessed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of life (MANSA)
Quality of life self-rating scale. The participants have to answer 15 questions on a Likert-scale from 1-7, where one is the worst and seven is the best. The lower the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: Assessed at baseline and at 6-months follow-up
Home Environment Assessment Tool for Hoarding (HEATH)
Clinician-rated scale assessing the home for health and safety risks. Consists of five subscales, which will be rated from zero to two. Zero is low risk and 2 is high risk. The total score is the sum of the five subscales. The higher the score, the worse the outcome.
Measured: Assessed at baseline and 6 months follow-up
Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)
Clinician-rated scale for psychosocial functioning. Consist of four domaines:
Socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care and disruptive/aggressive behavior.
Each domaine is rated from one to six, where one is "not present" and six is very severe.
After rating the four domaines, the clinician choose a total score, on a scale from 1 til 100 with 10-points intervals. The higher the total score, the better the outcome.
Measured: Assessed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Mar 2026
- Study start2 Mar 2026
- Primary completion1 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hoarding DisorderStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- This is a single-group interventional pretest-posttest study. All participants will receive the same intervention. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline prior to the intervention and again at 3 and 6 months follow-up. There is no randomization and no control group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Andreas Rosén Rasmussen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen Municipality, Denmark
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Andreas Rosén Rasmussen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre
- Investigators
- Andreas Rosén Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Principal investigator, Psychiatry EAST, Central and Western Zealand Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07483021
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-25063773
- Status last verified
- Mar 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Mar 2026
- Last updated
- 19 Mar 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: If accepted the data will be deposited by the Danish National Archives.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Mar 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Hoarding Disorder and Related Psychopathology: A Clinical Study and Cross-sectoral Intervention
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07483021
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-25063773
- Conditions
- Hoarding Disorder, Hoarding
- Keywords
- Hoarding, Hoarding disorder, Hoarding behavior, Clutter, Cross-sectoral, Comorbidity, detection of mental illness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Andreas Rosén RasmussenUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Copenhagen Municipality, Denmark
- Study start
- 2 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Aug 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 Mar 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Hoarding disorder is characterized by excessive amassment of objects in the home and difficulty of getting rid of the objects. It is associated with a high level of somatic and psychiatric comorbidity, suicidality, social marginalization, damage to property and risk of eviction. Previous clinical studies have mainly been in help-seeking groups. However, social services engage severe cases with poor insight, whereas few as 10% have contact with mental health services.
This study investigates:
- The prevalence of severe mental illness and comorbidities among 60 individuals with hoarding disorder that have led to contact with social services at Copenhagen Municipality
- the effect of a cross-sectoral intervention aiming to establish contact with regional mental health services for these individuals. The intervention consists of an outreach team of clinicians and municipal social workers who refer participants to clinical services based on a systematic clinical assessment.
Primary outcomes are 1) primary and comorbid diagnoses assigned at the clinical assessment and 2) contact with mental health services after the intervention, at 3- and 6-months follow-up.
Six to 12 months after the baseline assessment, a qualitative follow-up interview will be carried out, including approximately 14 participants. The aim is to explore the participants' experience of the intervention and subsequent clinical and social services to provide a more nuanced understanding of the quantitative outcomes of the study.
The hypotheses of the study are
- more than 75% of the participants will be identified to have comorbid diagnoses including more than 50% with associated severe mental illness (schizophrenia, other psychotic disorders, bipolar disorder and periodic depression). It is expected that 10% will suffer from underlying organic disorders of dementia or mental retardation.
- Fifty percent of the sample will establish contact with mental health services within 3 months after attempt of referral, and 30% of the sample will remain in contact for more than 6 months
Detailed description
The cross-sectoral intervention:
The intervention consists of an outreach (assertive and flexible) team of clinicians and municipal social workers targeting individuals with hoarding disorder who have ongoing contact with The Housing Advisors, Copenhagen Municipality. The clinical team includes the PhD student, the primary supervisor, and the co-supervisor, both clinical associate professors and senior consultants.
The Housing Advisors is a unit that provides support to citizens with housing-related difficulties. Their work focuses on preventing evictions and severe violations of fire and other safety regulations, and otherwise helping citizens to maintain their housing in cases involving hoarding, The Housing Advisors offers advice and guidance, support for solving hoarding related difficulties, and arranges municipality funded cleaning. Citizens acceptance or decline to participate in the research project will not affect the work carried out by The Housing Advisors or citizens' right to receive help from The Housing Advisors now or in the future.
Based on the clinical assessment, the team facilitates referrals of research participants to the appropriate regional mental health services, if referral is relevant. Referrals will take place after informed consent and are expected to primarily involve Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT), which is standard of care in Capital Region Denmark for patients with persistent psychiatric disorders and low level of functioning. For other patients, referral to specialized clinics offering cognitive behavioral therapy will be relevant. Somatic complaints will be referred to the patient's GP or secondary somatic services. The team will communicate diagnosis and the plan for referral to the participant. Family members and significant others will be involved if desired by the participant.
The task of the social workers in the intervention will be the same as their current function in The Housing Advisors as outgoing case managers regarding the social issues of their clients. Moreover, the social workers will participate in the recruitment of the approximately 60 research participants.
As part of the research project, conferences between the research team and The Housing Advisors will be held, where information from the clinical assessment will be shared, including any relevant psychiatric history, current symptoms, diagnosis established in the research project and the plan for outpatient psychiatric treatment, with the aim of contributing with knowledge that could support the work of The Housing Advisors. The participants have the possibility to decline sharing clinical information with The Housing Advisors, by crossing yes or no in the consent form, without any consequences for their participation in the project.
The intervention is pragmatic and relatively low-cost. It is based on existing clinical and municipality structures but adds an integrated cross-sectoral and outgoing approach for initial clinical assessment. It is designed as a single-group, pretest-posttest trial, and will not include a control group. First, the investigators find it ethically correct to offer the intervention to all potential participants, sinceThe Housing Advisors estimate that only 10% of the target group currently receives treatment. Second, there is little empirical literature about non-help-seeking people with severe hoarding. By providing the intervention to the whole group, the project can gather comprehensive data which can inform future interventions and studies.
Baseline assessment:
The clinical interviews will be carried out by a PhD-student. Consultations will take place at municipality facilities, at research facilities or in the participants' home according to the preferences of the participant.
The interviews will be semi-structured and will include a psychosocial and illness history, the Present State Examination (PSE), which addresses general psychopathology and is a well-established instrument for a diagnostic assessment, the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS), which targets the severity of positive, negative, and general symptomatology, the Hoarding Rating Scale-Interview (HRS), the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale - Split version (GAF) and the Personal and social Performance scale (PSP). For assessment of schizotypal symptomatology, the assessment includes the Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience (EASE) and an extended checklist of symptoms and expressive features and behavior described in previous studies. Moreover, the PhD student will obtain the Saving Inventory-revised (SIR), which is a self-rating measure used in most clinical investigations of hoarding disorder, the Clutter Image Rating scale (CIR) which is a photographic self-rating scale, the Home Environment Assessment Tool for Hoarding (HEATH),which is a tool to assess the home for health and safety risks, and the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA). Brief assessment of impaired cognition (BASIC) will be used for screening for cognitive impairment as part of the clinical assessment of dementia. Finally, the investigators will assess intellectual functioning using three subtests from the Wechsler Adult Intelli-gence Scale, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV): Similarities, Vocabulary, and Information. Scores from these subtests will be combined to derive the Verbal Comprehension Index (VCI), which provides an estimate of verbal intellectual functioning.
Furthermore, a qualitative phenomenological substudy will be conducted in a subgroup of particpants to elucidate the onset, progression, and thematic elements of the participants' hoarding behavior, as well as its overlap with different psychopathology.
Finally, the investigators will assess the somatic status of the patient, by making a systems enquiry and conducting a physical examination. No invasive procedures will be made.
Qualitative follow-up interview:
Approximately 6-12 months after the baseline assessment, a pre-graduate research assistant (PGRA) will carry out a qualitative interview (estimated 1.5-hour duration). The purpose of this interview is to qualitatively explore the participants' experience of the intervention and subsequent clinical and social services to provide a more nuanced understanding of the quantitative outcomes of the study. The aim is to include 14 participants in this follow-up interview (among participants that have been referred to clinical services) to represent the expected broad range of comorbidities and diversity in the sample and yet balancing this priority with the in-depth and time-consuming nature of a qualitative research project.
The interview will explore. 1) participants narration of the development of their hoarding behavior, quality of life, interpersonal relations and functioning over the last 6 months after the principal intervention; 2) their experience of the research intervention and subsequent process of transition to clinical services, including the coordination or lack of such between the clinical researchers, social workers and clinical services; 3) an overall narration of the participants experience of clinical services; treatment, clinical approach to hoarding and relations to clinicians and other partners such as municipality workers or other agents; 4) reasons for terminating or sustaining contact with clinical services. Moreover, the PGRA will re-administer the SIR, CIR, MANSA self-rating scales and the PSP and HEATH assessment.
Ethics Individuals with hoarding disorder is a marginalized group in society and this study aims to better the conditions for this group. Hoarding disorder is underexamined in the European as well as international literature and no studies of integrated approaches working across sectors have yet been carried out.
With this in consideration, and the fact that the only side expected side-effect is fatigue after the interviews, the investigators do find that the therapeutic and supporting benefits for the participants and future patients warrants the study and overweighs the effort the participants engage in the study. Hopefully, the study will contribute to a better understanding of hoarding disorder and improve treatment for this group, to the benefit of the participants, future patients, the scientific environment and society in general, as well as creating the foundation for future research about hoarding disorder and the implementing off a cross-sectorial approach for vulnerable, non-help seeking groups of patients.
Funding:
The study has been financed by The Independent Research Fund Denmark.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- This is a single-group interventional pretest-posttest study. All participants will receive the same intervention. Outcomes will be assessed at baseline prior to the intervention and again at 3 and 6 months follow-up. There is no randomization and no control group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention group | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection teamParticipants receive a clinical assessment, followed by referral planning by an assertive cross-sectoral team consisting of clinicians and social service professionals |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Presence of hoarding disorder according to DSM-5 and age above 18 years.
- Current contact with The Housing Advisors, Copenhagen Municipality.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Recent contact with mental health services (within last 6 months).
- Previously known organic brain disorder (including mental retardation and dementia).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection teamThe intervention consists in an outgoing (assertive and flexible) team of clinicians (the PhD student, primary supervisor and co-supervisor who are both clinical associate professors and senior consultants) and municipality social workers, directed towards people with hoarding disorder and an ongoing contact with The Housing Advisors, Copenhagen Municipality. The clinicians will do the clinical assessment, and based on this, the team facilitates referrals of research participants to the appropriate regional mental health services, if referral is relevant. The task of the social workers in the intervention will be the same as their current function in The Housing Advisors as outgoing case managers regarding the social issues of their clients. | Diagnostic test | Intervention group |
Primary outcome
Primary and comorbid psychiatric diagnosis
Time frame: Primary and comorbid diagnosis is assessed at baseline.
ICD-10, ICD-11 and DSM-5 diagnoses
Contact or not with mental health services at a 3- and 6-months follow up
Time frame: The participants get referred at baseline, and contact or no contact will be measured at 3 and 6 months follow-up
Data obtained through review of files and Nationwide register-data from the National Patient Register and Danish Psychiatric Central Register
5 secondary outcomes
Clutter Image Rating Scale (CIR)
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 3- and 6-months follow-up.
Saving Inventory - Revised (SIR)
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of life (MANSA)
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 6-months follow-up
Home Environment Assessment Tool for Hoarding (HEATH)
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and 6 months follow-up
Personal and Social Performance Scale (PSP)
Time frame: Assessed at baseline and at 6 months follow-up
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Mar 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. If accepted the data will be deposited by the Danish National Archives.
Related trials for Hoarding Disorder
Not yet recruiting
A Test of Acceptance-based Bibliotherapy for Hoarding Disorder
Hoarding Disorder
Active, not recruiting
Self-Help Group for the Treatment of Hoarding Disorder
Hoarding Disorder
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Neural Mechanisms of Decision Making in Hoarding Disorder
Hoarding Disorder
Recruiting
Rapid Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Hoarding Disorder
Hoarding Disorder, Hoarding
Active, not recruiting
In-home Decluttering Augmentation of Group CBT for HD
Hoarding Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Andreas Rosén Rasmussen, MD, PhD, Associate Professor principal investigator
Psychiatry EAST, Central and Western Zealand Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Assertive and supportive diagnostic detection team in people with Hoarding Disorder and Hoarding, run by Andreas Rosén Rasmussen at 1 site in Denmark.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Line Aalykke, MD (+4524813430, line.aalykke@regionh.dk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Primary and comorbid psychiatric diagnosis (time frame: Primary and comorbid diagnosis is assessed at baseline.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Mar 2026.