AzTrials
AzTrials

Fibrous Dysplasia of BonePAINDYSNCT07476768

PAINDYS_Characterizing Pain in Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone/McCune-Albright Syndrome: an Exploratory Pilot Study

A study testing Visit 1 at the center in people with Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone and McCune Albright Syndrome, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Fibrous dysplasia of bone (FD) / McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is a rare congenital bone disorder affecting one or multiple bones, caused by a mosaic somatic mutation of the GNAS gene. In some cases, it may be associated with endocrine or cutaneous abnormalities. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Visit 1 at the center
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
39 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
8 Apr 2026to 17 Jun 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • For patients :
  • Male or female over 18 years of age with fibrous dysplasia/McCune-Albright syndrome diagnosed by a rheumatologist.
  • Mentally and legally able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Affiliated with a health insurance system.
  • For healthy volunteers :
  • Male or female over 18 years of age.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Matched to patients by age and sex.
  • Mentally and legally able to provide informed consent to participate in the study.
  • Affiliated with a health insurance system.

Who cannot join

  • For patients :
  • Medical and/or surgical history considered by the investigator or delegated physician to be incompatible with study procedures (e.g., amputation or physical limitation preventing completion of pain assessment tests).
  • Recurrent pain at sites planned for stimulation during thermal and mechanical testing (forearms or palms).
  • Presence of anxiety and/or depression defined as Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) score >11.
  • Use of analgesic medication within the week preceding inclusion.
  • Use of complementary treatments for analgesic purposes (e.g., vitamins, herbal products, cannabinoids).
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Individuals under legal protection (guardianship or trusteeship) or deprived of liberty.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Refusal to participate.
  • For heathly volunteers :
  • Medical and/or surgical history considered by the investigator or delegated physician to be incompatible with study procedures (e.g., amputation or physical limitation preventing completion of pain assessment tests).
  • Presence of sleep disorders defined as Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) score >5.
  • Presence of anxiety and/or depression defined as HADS score >11.
  • Use of analgesic medication within the week preceding inclusion.
  • Use of complementary treatments for analgesic purposes (e.g., vitamins, herbal products, cannabinoids).
  • Individuals under legal protection (guardianship or trusteeship) or deprived of liberty.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Refusal to participate.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • CHU clermont-Ferrand

    Clermont-Ferrand

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Characterizing Pain in Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone/McCune-Albright Syndrome: an Exploratory Pilot Study

Fibrous dysplasia of bone (FD) / McCune-Albright syndrome (MAS) is a rare congenital bone disorder affecting one or multiple bones, caused by a mosaic somatic mutation of the GNAS gene. In some cases, it may be associated with endocrine or cutaneous abnormalities. The spectrum of bone disease is broad, ranging from isolated monostotic fibrous dysplasia to complete skeletal involvement. Functional prognosis can be complex due to pain, bone deformities, and fracture risk. The disease may initially be identified through non-specific clinical signs such as pain. Indeed, bone pain has been reported in up to 81% of adults and 49% of children, mainly affecting the lower limbs and the spine, with highly variable pain intensity that does not always correlate with the extent of bone lesions. This pain may persist throughout life and impact patients' daily activities.

In the general population, it is well known that chronic musculoskeletal pain following events such as surgery or fractures can be associated with central sensitization, a neurophysiological phenomenon characterized by hyperreactivity of the central nervous system, along with impaired modulation of pain through descending inhibitory pathways, a normally protective mechanism that becomes reduced. The pathophysiology of bone pain in FD/MAS remains poorly studied and poorly understood. The presence of central sensitization, reduced pain modulation, and hypersensitivity to everyday stimuli are rarely described but suggested by the existence of chronic pain often lasting many years. The mixed characteristics of pain experienced (nociceptive, neuropathic, inflammatory, or nociplastic) are also poorly defined. To date, no study has explored pain in FD/MAS using a psychophysical approach in comparison with a control population.

Our hypothesis is that patients with FD/MAS exhibit central sensitization with reduced pain modulation. This exploratory pilot study aims to investigate, through psychophysical approaches, the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying pain in FD/MAS.

Read the detailed description

This exploratory pilot study aims to compare central pain sensitization in adults with FD/MAS to that observed in age- and sex-matched healthy volunteers. The primary objective is to assess differences in conditioned pain modulation (CPM), a measure of descending inhibitory pain control and central pain modulation capacity. Secondary objectives include characterization of pain intensity and phenotype, clinical description of FD/MAS manifestations, comparison of thermal and mechanical pain sensitivity thresholds, identification of pain mechanisms (nociceptive, neuropathic, inflammatory, or nociplastic), and comparison of quality of life, sleep quality, anxiety/depression levels, and pain catastrophizing between patients and healthy controls. Blood biomarkers related to bone metabolism will also be compared between groups.

Patients regularly followed in the Rheumatology Department will be informed about the study during routine clinical visits. Patients not requiring regular hospital follow-up may be contacted by their rheumatologist, who will present the study and provide written information. A reflection period of at least seven days will be respected before scheduling the study visit. Participation remains voluntary, and informed consent will be obtained prior to any study procedures.

Healthy volunteers will be preselected from the Clinical Investigation Center volunteer registry and contacted to assess interest in participation. Eligible volunteers will receive study information and will benefit from the same reflection period before inclusion procedures.

Both groups of participants will attend a single visit at the center. During this visit, the objectives and procedures of the study will be explained by the physician. After verification of eligibility criteria and once written informed consent has been obtained, the following assessments will be performed:

  • A medical examination and inclusion-related questionnaires (including medical history and clinical characteristics, comorbidities, medication treatments, the WPI and the Kosek nociplastic pain algorithm).
  • A blood sample to assess bone biological markers (Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 (FGF23) and C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTX)).
  • A pain assessment including the visual analog scale, the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), DN4, the PainDetect questionnaire, psychophysical pain assessment (thermal pain thresholds for heat and cold, mechanical pain thresholds, Sudoscan), and evaluation of central sensitization using the conditioned pain modulation (CPM) test, as well as the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).
  • Quality-of-life-related questionnaires including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the SF-36 quality of life questionnaire, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Being tested
Visit 1 at the center
Keywords
Pain Modulation, Pain, Fibrous Dysplasia, Pain Caracterization, Central pain sensitization
Medical subject headings
Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone, Fibrous Dysplasia, Polyostotic, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Visit 1 at the centerOther

    Pain assessment and quality of life evaluation

Study groups in NCT07476768
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
fibrous dysplasiaExperimentalNot described
Receives: Other: Visit 1 at the center
healthy volunteerActive comparatorHealthy volunteer matched for age and sex
Receives: Other: Visit 1 at the center

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Central sensitization tests, measurement of the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) effect

    The patients are seated, the ATS thermode associated with the Pathway is applied to the dominant forearm. From the baseline value of 32°C, the Pathway delivers a "Pain 60 / Test stimulus" for 10 seconds, and the patient scores the pain on a visual numerical scale from 0 to 100. Then, the Pathway delivers a "Pain 60 / Test stimulus" for 30 seconds, and the patient scores the pain on the same scale. Fifteen minutes after the end of the two stimulations, the patient immersed the non-dominant arm for 60 seconds in a water bath at 46.5°C. Then a second identical sequence of 10 and 30 second stimulations was performed, with the scores recorded after each stimulation on the visual numerical scale from 0 to 100. The CPM effect is measured by taking the difference between the pain scores on the visual numerical scale before and after immersion.

    Measured: Visit 1 / Day 1

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Visual Analog Scale

    This scale allows the patient to rate the pain on a 100-mm horizontal line with a movable cursor. It ranges from 0 mm (0 cm), corresponding to "no pain," to 100 mm (10 cm), corresponding to "worst pain imaginable." Participants indicate, using the cursor, the point on the line that best represents their level of pain. The distance (in mm or cm) between 0 and the participant's mark determines the intensity of pain.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  2. The Brief Pain Inventory Questionnaire (BPI)

    This self-assessment scale allows the patient to characterize the pain in terms of its intensity and its psychosocial repercussions by means of 11 scales rated from 0 (no pain or does not bother) to 10 (the most horrible pain you can imagine or completely bothers you).

    The BPI also asks the patient to black out the painful areas on a diagram (front and back) and to put an "S" if the pain is on the surface or a "P" if it is deep. The questionnaire also asks the patient to indicate what treatment or medication he or she is taking for the pain and what percentage improvement has been obtained.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  3. Measurement of the threshold of sensitivity and pain perception induced by a thermal stimulus (hot and cold) at the Pathway - Médoc®

    The measurements will be performed using an ATS thermode applied to the dominant arm of the patients. The Pathway-Medoc system associated with the thermode allows, from a base value of 32°C, to deliver adjustable temperature peaks (in the hot or in the cold and according to a regular slope of 1°C) and controlled by fast feedback, which allows to adapt to the different sensitivity thresholds of the C and A fibers. This device will be used to evaluate: the sensitivity threshold to heat, the sensitivity threshold to cold, the pain threshold to heat and the pain threshold to cold. The determination of each threshold will be established by an average of three measurements.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  4. Measurement of mechanical pain thresholds and mechanical temporal summation

    Mechanical pain thresholds and mechanical temporal summation will be assessed using standardized mechanical stimulation. Mechanical pain thresholds will be measured with calibrated PinPrick stimulators using a modified method of limits, with stimuli applied to the palm of the dominant hand (or non-dominant if necessary). Thresholds will be calculated as the geometric mean of ascending and descending series.

    Mechanical temporal summation will be assessed using a 180 g Von Frey filament applied to the forearm. Pain intensity after a single stimulus and after a train of 10 stimuli at 1 Hz will be rated on a 0-10 visual analog scale. The temporal summation ratio will be calculated as the ratio between repeated and single stimulus pain ratings. Matched healthy volunteers will be tested at the same sites as patients.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  5. Pain assessment using the Neuropathic Pain Questionnaire (DN4)

    Neuropathic Pain (DN4): This questionnaire estimates the probability of neuropathic pain in a patient, by means of four questions divided into ten items to be ticked. The practitioner or clinical research associate in charge of the study interviews or examines the patient and fills in the questionnaire himself. Each item is marked with a "yes" or "no" answer. Each "yes" is worth a score of 1, and each "no" is worth a score of 0. The sum of the scores gives the patient's score (out of 10); if the patient's score is equal to or greater than 4/10, the test is positive.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  6. PainDETECT questionnaire

    Neuropathic pain components will be assessed using the PainDETECT questionnaire. This self-administered questionnaire evaluates pain quality, temporal pattern, and radiation to estimate the likelihood of neuropathic pain. The total score allows classification of pain as unlikely, possible, or likely neuropathic

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  7. Small fiber neuropathy assessment (Sudoscan®)

    Small fiber neuropathy will be assessed using Sudoscan® (Impeto Medical, Paris, France), a rapid, non-invasive, and reproducible method for evaluating sudomotor function. The test measures electrochemical skin conductance of the hands and feet, reflecting sweat gland function and small fiber nerve integrity. Participants will be seated comfortably with palms and soles placed on stainless steel electrodes. A low-voltage current (4 V) will be applied for 2 minutes and 40 seconds. Electrochemical skin conductance values (µS) will be recorded for hands and feet, with lower conductance (<40 µS) indicating the presence of small fiber neuropathy and higher conductance (>60 µS) indicating normal function. Measurements will be performed twice, 30 minutes apart.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  8. Dynamic mechanical allodynia

    Dynamic mechanical allodynia will be assessed using a soft brush gently moved back and forth over the non-dominant forearm while the participant is seated comfortably in a quiet room. Pain intensity perceived during brushing will be rated on a 0-100 numerical rating scale.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  9. Presence of inflammatory pain

    Inflammatory pain will be assessed by the investigator during clinical examination according to current clinical criteria. The evaluation will be based on the presence of clinical signs suggestive of inflammation, including warmth, redness, swelling, edema, induration, and pain. The outcome will be reported as the presence or absence of inflammatory pain (Yes/No).

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  10. Nociplastic pain

    Signs of widespread pain will be assessed through clinical interview to calculate the Widespread Pain Index (WPI), commonly used in nociplastic pain conditions.

    In addition, the presence of nociplastic pain will be determined based on an integrative assessment combining results from pain testing and clinical evaluation.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  11. Clinical characteristics

    Clinical characteristics will be collected from the clinical examination and routine care investigations and will include a description of skeletal involvement and extra-skeletal manifestations.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  12. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)

    he PSQI is a self-administered questionnaire with 19 items. It was developed to measure sleep quality in the month prior to the patient interview. This questionnaire includes 7 components: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbance, hypnotic medication use and daytime dysfunction.

    The global score (0 to 21) is obtained by adding the sub-scores of the 7 components, each ranging from 0 to 3 points. In the absence of an answer to one or more questions, the subtotal using this question cannot be calculated and will affect the overall score.

    The higher the overall score, the greater the impairment in sleep quality. An overall score >5 is an indicator of sleep disturbance.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  13. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)

    It is a self-administered questionnaire completed by the patient and based on the Hamilton scale. The HAD scale is a tool for screening for anxiety and depressive disorders. It includes 14 items rated from 0 to 3. Seven questions relate to anxiety (total A) and seven others to the depressive dimension (total D), thus making it possible to obtain two scores (maximum score for each score = 21).

    To screen for anxiety and depressive symptomatology, the following interpretation can be proposed for each of the scores (A and D): ≤ 7: normal case; 8 to 10: borderline case; ≥ 11: abnormal case.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  14. The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36)

    The quality of life of patients is assessed by the general questionnaire 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) which can be administered by self or hetero-questionnaire. The SF-36 questionnaire was developed from the Medical Outcome Study, a 149-item questionnaire that was developed to assess how the American healthcare system affects the outcome of care. The SF-36 questionnaire is composed of 36 items and makes it possible to assess the physical and mental health of an individual using eleven questions relating to eight aspects of health: Physical activity, limitations due to physical state, physical pain, perceived health, vitality, life and relationship with others, limitations due to the mental state and mental health. Scores between 0 and 100 are determined. Scores tending towards 100 indicate a better quality of life.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  15. Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)

    The PCS is a validated 13-item self-report questionnaire assessing catastrophic thoughts and feelings related to pain, including rumination, magnification, and helplessness. Items are rated from 0 to 4, with higher total scores indicating greater pain catastrophizing.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  16. C-terminal telopeptides of collagen type 1 dosage

    Evaluation of the CTX evolution after one year, defined as the difference [after - before], relative to the basal value (µg/L). For this purpose, a blood sample will be taken using 5 mL dry tubes.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

  17. Fibroblast Growth Factor 23 dosage

    The dosage of FGF23 (pg/mL) will be performed in order to evaluate bone remodeling. For this purpose, a blood sample will be taken using 6 mL EDTA tube.

    Measured: Visit 1 - Day 1

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Mar 2026
  2. Study start8 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completion17 Jun 2026
  4. Study completion17 Jun 2026

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Case control study
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
39 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07476768
Sponsor's protocol ID
RBHP 2025 PICKERING_ME 3
Acronym
PAINDYS
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
5 Mar 2026
Last updated
21 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Visit 1 at the center in people with Fibrous Dysplasia of Bone and McCune Albright Syndrome, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Central sensitization tests, measurement of the Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) effect (time frame: Visit 1 / Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in