AzTrials
AzTrials

Aortic StenosisASCENTNCT07450196

A Prospective, Multicenter, Observational Study Evaluating Safety and Effectiveness of SAPIEN 3 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Type-0 Bicuspid Aortic Valve Stenosis Patients in China

An observational study of Aortic Stenosis and AORTIC VALVE DISEASES, run by Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital at 1 site in China.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In China, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents a significantly high proportion of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) population. The application of TAVR in patients with BAV is challenging due to complex anatomy. To date, no prospective study has evaluated the Sapien 3 TAVR in patients with Type-0 BAV. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Aortic Stenosis, AORTIC VALVE DISEASES
What is being tested?
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Type of treatment
Medical device
How many people
170 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Apr 2026to 31 Aug 2029
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: severe symptomatic aortic valve stenosis (AS) patients with type-0 bicuspid anatomy

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥50 years, and after thorough physician-patient discussion and shared decision-making, willing to undergo or accept TAVR.
  • Severe AS, defined as follows:
  • For symptomatic patients: i) Aortic valve area ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), OR mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg, OR Maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest b) For asymptomatic patients: i) Very severe AS with an aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND maximal aortic velocity ≥5.0 m/sec, or mean gradient ≥60 mm Hg by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, OR ii) Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND a mean gradient ≥40 mm Hg or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND an exercise tolerance test that demonstrates a limited exercise capacity, abnormal BP response, or arrhythmia OR iii) Aortic valve area of ≤1.0 cm2 (or aortic valve area index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2), AND mean gradient ≥40 mmHg, or maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/sec by transthoracic echocardiography at rest, AND a left ventricular ejection fraction <50%.
  • Type-0 bicuspid aortic valve anatomy confirmed by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT).
  • The subject and the treating physician agree that the subject will return for all required post-procedure follow-up visits.
  • Adequate iliofemoral access and acceptable level of vessel calcification and tortuosity for safe device implant.
  • The study patient has provided written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Challenging calcification based on physician's experience and discretion
  • Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid valve, congenital Type-1 or Type-2 bicuspid valve, tricuspid or quadricuspid valve
  • Severe femoral, iliac or aortic atherosclerosis, calcification, coarctation, aneurysm or tortuosity, which prevents transfemoral TAVR
  • Need for open heart surgery (including severe aortic regurgitation, mitral regurgitation or stenosis, or tricuspid regurgitation, congenital heart disease, AF, complex coronary artery disease)
  • Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position
  • Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of the screening visit
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Emergency interventional/surgical procedures within 30 days of the valve implant procedure
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with obstruction
  • Ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 30%
  • Cardiac imaging (echo, CT, and/or MRI) evidence of ventricular mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Renal replacement therapy at the time of screening
  • Estimated life expectancy < 12 months
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Observational studies are not considered exclusionary.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Fuwai Hospital, Beijing

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100037

    Xiangbin Pan, MD.PhD, +8688396666, panxiangbin@fuwaihospital.org

    panxiangbin@fuwaihospital.org

Other trials in China

About this study

In China, bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) represents a significantly high proportion of the transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) population. The application of TAVR in patients with BAV is challenging due to complex anatomy. To date, no prospective study has evaluated the Sapien 3 TAVR in patients with Type-0 BAV.

Being tested
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Keywords
Balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve, TAVR, aortic stenosis
Medical subject headings
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Transcatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementDevice

    Also called TAVR

    Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for patients with Type-0 bicuspid aortic stenosis.

Study groups in NCT07450196
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
patients with Type-0 bicuspid aortic stenosispatients with severe, calcific aortic stenosis and with Type-0 bicuspid anatomy confirmed by MDCT.
Receives: Device: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, or rehospitalization

    The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, or rehospitalization

    Measured: At 1 year after procedure

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, or rehospitalization

    The composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, or rehospitalization

    Measured: At 30 days after procedure

  2. The composite of device success

    The composite of device success at 30 days comprising the following: freedom from mortality, successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system, correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location, freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication, intended performance of the valve (mean gradient <20 mmHg, peak velocity <3 m/s, and less than moderate aortic regurgitation), according to the VARC-3 definition

    Measured: At 30 days after procedure

  3. Annular rupture

    Annular rupture

    Measured: At discharge(assessed up to 30 days)

  4. Paravalvular leakage

    Paravalvular leakage

    Measured: At discharge (assessed up to 30 days) , 30 days, 1year

  5. Technical success

    Technical success (at exit from procedure room):

    • freedom from mortality
    • successful access, delivery of the device, and retrieval of the delivery system
    • correct positioning of a single prosthetic heart valve into the proper anatomical location
    • freedom from surgery or intervention related to the device or to a major vascular or access-related, or cardiac structural complication

    Measured: At exit from procedure room

  6. Procedural success

    Procedural success at 30 days defined as meeting all of the following:

    • Device success
    • No device or procedure related SAE's as follows:
    1. Life-threatening bleed (BARC 3b or greater)
    2. Major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery
    3. Stage 2 or 3 AKI (includes new dialysis)
    4. MI or need for PCI/CABG
    5. Severe heart failure or hypotension requiring IV inotrope >12 hours, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support
    6. Prolonged intubation > 48 hours
    7. Need for a permanent pacemaker implant or continuous atrial fibrillation

    Measured: At 30 days

  7. Mortality (all cause & cardiovascular)

    Mortality (all cause \& cardiovascular)

    Measured: At 30 days,1year

  8. Stroke (disabling and nondisabling)

    Stroke (disabling and nondisabling)

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  9. Rehospitalization (procedure, valve and heart failure related)

    Rehospitalization (procedure, valve and heart failure related)

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  10. Major vascular complication

    Major vascular complication

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  11. Major or life-threatening bleeding

    Major or life-threatening bleeding

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  12. Myocardial infarction

    Myocardial infarction

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  13. Acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3

    Acute kidney injury stage 2 or 3

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  14. Need for a permanent pacemaker

    Need for a permanent pacemaker

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  15. New onset atrial fibrillation

    New onset atrial fibrillation

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  16. Valve endocarditis

    Valve endocarditis

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  17. Valve thrombosis

    Valve thrombosis

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  18. New York Heart Association class

    New York Heart Association class

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  19. Patient-prosthesis mismatch

    Patient-prosthesis mismatch

    Measured: At 30 days, 1year

  20. Index hospitalization days

    Index hospitalization days

    Measured: At discharge (assessed up to 30 days)

  21. Health status as evaluated by Quality of Life questionnaires - KCCQ

    Health status as evaluated by Quality of Life questionnaires - KCCQ

    Measured: At baseline, 30 days, 1year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Mar 2026
  2. Study start15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Aug 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
170 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07450196
Sponsor's protocol ID
2026-3064
Acronym
ASCENT
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
27 Feb 2026
Last updated
7 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in