AzTrials
AzTrials

Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)NCT07443462

Evaluation of the Effects of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Inflammatory Knee Osteoarthritis

A study testing Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy in people with Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA), run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will assess the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in patients with inflammatory knee osteoarthritis confirmed by MRI-detected effusion-synovitis. Fifty participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 55 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
What is being tested?
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Sep 2026to 31 Dec 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 55 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Knee visual analogue scale (VAS) pain of <40 mm (0-100 mm)
  • Effusion-synovitis or Hoffa synovitis MRI semi-quantitative score of ≥2 (used to determine inflammatory subtype KOA);
  • Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade II and III
  • Patients can listen, speak, read, and understand Chinese; understand the pilot study's requirements and are willing to cooperate with the investigator in conducting the pilot study
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Other inflammatory arthritis (e.g., gout, reactive arthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, and seronegative spondyloarthropathy) and systemic lupus erythematosus.
  • Participants with usual KOA interventions/ treatments
  • History of knee trauma
  • Contraindications to MRI
  • Administration of intra-articular, intramuscular, and oral glucocorticoids within the last 4
  • Pregnancy and lactation

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Study to Assess the Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field on Inflammatory Knee Osteoarthritis

This study will assess the efficacy of pulsed electromagnetic field therapy in patients with inflammatory knee osteoarthritis confirmed by MRI-detected effusion-synovitis. Fifty participants will be randomly allocated into two groups. One group will receive active PEMF therapy at a specific optimized parameter twice a week for 8 weeks, while the other group will receive sham treatment using the same device without PEMF signal. The primary outcome is the change in WOMAC pain score, and secondary outcomes include knee function, stiffness, quality of life, and MRI-quantified structural changes.

Read the detailed description

Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a leading cause of pain and disability, posing a significant socioeconomic burden. Current treatments often focus on pain relief with safety concerns, and no disease-modifying drugs are available. Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy is a non-invasive and safe physical modality with potential anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. However, existing evidence for its efficacy in KOA is inconsistent, likely because KOA is a heterogeneous disease, and previous studies have not targeted specific subtypes. The inflammatory KOA subtype, identifiable via MRI, is the most prevalent and represents a critical target for precise intervention.

Methods This study is a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot trial. Fifty patients with inflammatory KOA, confirmed by the presence of effusion-synovitis on MRI will be recruited. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either active PEMF therapy at a specific, optimized parameter or sham treatment twice a week for 8 weeks. The primary outcome is the change in the WOMAC pain score at 3 months after treatment. Secondary outcomes include knee function and stiffness (WOMAC), quality of life (SF-12), and quantitatively assessed structural changes on MRI (e.g., effusion synovitis volume).

Expected Results The investigators anticipate that the group receiving active PEMF therapy will show a statistically significant and clinically important greater reduction in WOMAC pain scores compared to the sham treatment group.The investigators also expect to observe improvements in secondary outcomes, including better knee function and reduced signs of inflammation on MRI in the treatment group.

Conclusion This will be the first clinical trial to evaluate PEMF therapy specifically for the inflammatory subtype of KOA. Positive findings will provide crucial evidence for a novel, non-invasive, and precise therapeutic strategy for KOA management. This has the potential to improve patient care, alleviate the disease burden, and reduce healthcare costs.

Being tested
Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy, Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Treatments
Keywords
Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, Knee osteoarthritis, Inflammatory subtype
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Knee

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) TherapyDevice

    Assigned Interventions

  • Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) TreatmentsDevice

    Matching device without active electromagnetic field) administered twice a week for 8 weeks

Study groups in NCT07443462
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PEMF Therapy Intervention Patients with inflammatory KOA receive active PEMF therapy with optimizedExperimentalActive Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy Active PEMF therapy at specific optimized parameters, administered twice a week for 8 weeks
Receives: Device: Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy
: Sham PEMF Treatment Patients with inflammatory KOA receive sham PEMF treatment (no effective electPlacebo comparatorSham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Treatments treatment (matching device without active electromagnetic field) administered twice a week for 8 weeks
Receives: Device: Sham Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Treatments

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility outcome:adherence

    Adherence will be calculated as the actual number of completed exercise days relative to the prescribed total.

    Measured: 3 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Serum Levels of Inflammatory Markers and Adipokines

    The serum concentrations of the following biomarker: Interleukin-6 (picograms per milliliter, pg/mL).

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  2. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain score

    The primary outcome will be the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) pain score. This scale consists of 5 questions assessing knee joint pain, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = no pain, 4 = extreme pain). The total score of the pain subscale ranges from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating a more severe degree of pain.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  3. Measurement of biomarkers on MRI images of the knee

    Cartilage defects (grades 0-4). A higher score indicates more severe pathology.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  4. Ultrousound measurement

    The severity of the following pathologies will be assessed via ultrasonography using semi-quantitative scoring systems: Synovitis(0-3), Osteophytes(0-3), Cartilage damage(0-3). A higher score indicates more severe pathology.

    Measured: Baseline, 1and 3 months after treatment

  5. Six-Minute Walk Distance

    The total distance walked during the Six-Minute Walk Test, measured in meters (m).

    Measured: Baseline;3 months after treatment

  6. 30-Second Chair Stand Test Repetitions

    The maximum number of repetitions of rising fully from a standard-height chair without using arms, sitting back down, and fully rising again, completed within 30 seconds.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment]

  7. Timed Up and Go Test Time

    The time required to complete the Timed Up and Go Test (rising from a chair, walking 3 meters, turning around, walking back, and sitting down), measured in seconds (s).

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  8. 12-Item Short Form Health Survey Score

    Assesses overall health-related quality of life. This scale comprises 12 items, which are aggregated into summary scores for physical and mental health. The scores are transformed to a range of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  9. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Score

    Assesses the severity of depressive symptoms. This scale consists of 9 items, each scored from 0 to 3. The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  10. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score

    Assesses the severity of knee stiffness. This subscale contains 2 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none, 4 = extreme). The total subscale score ranges from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating worse stiffness.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  11. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score

    Assesses knee-related difficulty in performing daily activities. This subscale contains 17 items, each rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = none, 4 = extreme). The total subscale score ranges from 0 to 68, with higher scores indicating worse physical function.

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

  12. Serum Levels of Interleukin-6

    The serum concentrations of the following biomarkers will be measured: Interleukin-6 (picograms per milliliter, pg/mL)

    Measured: Baseline; 3 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Mar 2026
  2. Study start15 Sep 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07443462
Sponsor's protocol ID
HESEARS20231113002
Other IDs
12231596
Status last verified
Jan 2026
First submitted
10 Dec 2025
Last updated
22 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) Therapy in people with Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA), run by The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Ye LI (+85227664842, ye-julie.li@polyu.edu.hk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility outcome:adherence (time frame: 3 months after treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in