AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureOPTIMUMNCT07439081

OPTIMUM Study of Remote Patient Monitoring in Ambulatory Heart Failure Care

A study testing Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System in people with Heart Failure and Acute Heart Failure (AHF), run by Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and readmission, particularly among older adults with multiple comorbidities. Traditional outpatient follow-up may be insufficient to detect early clinical deterioration in this vulnerable population. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure, Acute Heart Failure (AHF)
What is being tested?
Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
504 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 1 Jul 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Diagnosis of heart failure
  • Hospitalization for acute heart failure or a cardiac cause OR outpatient evaluation with a history of heart-failure hospitalization within the previous 12 months
  • Enrollment into the OPTIMUM ambulatory heart failure care pathway
  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Agreement to participate in remote patient monitoring

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Refusal to participate in remote patient monitoring or the OPTIMUM care pathway
  • Physical, cognitive, or psychological limitations incompatible with use of the remote monitoring system
  • Treating clinician judged that adherence to telemonitoring would be insufficient
  • Presence of a non-cardiac comorbidity associated with an estimated life expectancy of less than 12 months

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste

    Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, 69100

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: OPTIMUM: OPTIMisation du Parcours de Soins du Patient Insuffisant Cardiaque Chronique

Heart failure is a leading cause of hospitalization and readmission, particularly among older adults with multiple comorbidities. Traditional outpatient follow-up may be insufficient to detect early clinical deterioration in this vulnerable population. Remote patient monitoring (RPM) using non-invasive symptom and weight tracking has been proposed to enhance ambulatory care, but its effectiveness appears to depend on integration within structured care pathways.

The OPTIMUM study evaluated the real-world implementation of an integrated ambulatory heart failure care pathway combining non-invasive RPM with multidisciplinary follow-up in routine clinical practice. Patients enrolled after a recent heart failure hospitalization were managed using the Satelia® Cardio monitoring system, nurse-led therapeutic education, and a planned cardio-geriatric day-hospital reassessment. The study aimed to describe pathway implementation and assess associations with rehospitalizations, mortality, alert activity, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction in an older, frail population.

Read the detailed description

Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of hospitalization and rehospitalization among older adults and represents a substantial burden for healthcare systems. Many readmissions occur after discharge for acute heart failure (AHF), often related to delayed recognition of worsening symptoms. While non-invasive remote patient monitoring (RPM) has been proposed as a strategy to extend surveillance into the home setting, previous studies suggest that monitoring alone may be insufficient without integration into structured, multidisciplinary care.

OPTIMUM was a prospective, single-center,interventional cohort study designed to evaluate the implementation of a structured ambulatory HF care pathway incorporating non-invasive RPM in routine clinical practice. The study was conducted at Médipôle Hôpital Mutualiste in Lyon, France. Adult patients with a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure, or with a history of AHF hospitalization within the prior 12 months, were enrolled into the OPTIMUM care pathway and followed prospectively.

The care pathway combined several coordinated components:

  • Remote patient monitoring (RPM): Patients were monitored using Satelia® Cardio, a non-invasive RPM system based on symptom questionnaires and body-weight measurements. A clinical algorithm generated color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) reflecting estimated risk of decompensation. Alerts were reviewed by healthcare professionals to guide clinical response.
  • Nurse-led therapeutic education: Structured telephone-based education focused on symptom recognition, treatment adherence, diet, fluid management, and self-care behaviors.
  • Cardio-geriatric day-hospital reassessment: A planned multidisciplinary outpatient visit approximately one month after inclusion included cardiology and geriatric evaluation, echocardiography, functional assessment, physiotherapy input, nutritional evaluation, and social support assessment when needed.

Patients were managed according to routine clinical practice, and no experimental interventions were introduced. The study used a pre-post design comparing outcomes during the 12 months before enrollment with those during the 12 months after enrollment in the pathway and during the 5-year-follow-up. The primary outcome was the number of cardiac rehospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included all-cause hospitalizations during 5 years after inclusion, mortality up to 5 years, frequency and distribution of RPM alerts, and patient and healthcare professional satisfaction. Health-related quality of life and frailty measures were also collected descriptively.

OPTIMUM aimed to provide real-world evidence on how RPM can be operationalized within an integrated ambulatory HF care model, particularly in an older, frail population often underrepresented in clinical trials.

Being tested
Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System
Keywords
Remote patient monitoring, Transitional care, Ambulatory care, Disease management, Frailty
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure, Frailty

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring SystemDevice

    A non-invasive remote patient monitoring system based on regular patient-reported symptom questionnaires and body weight measurements. A built-in algorithm generates color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) to support early detection of potential heart failure decompensation. Alerts are reviewed by healthcare professionals as part of routine care.

Study groups in NCT07439081
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Integrated Ambulatory Heart Failure Care PathwayExperimentalPatients with a recent hospitalization for acute heart failure (or prior hospitalization within 12 months) who were enrolled in a structured ambulatory care pathway in routine clinical practice. The pathway included non-invasive remote patient monitoring, nurse-led therapeutic education, and a planned multidisciplinary cardio-geriatric outpatient reassessment.
Receives: Device: Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of Cardiac Rehospitalizations

    Total number of hospital admissions with a primary cardiac diagnosis (ICD-10 codes I50.x) occurring during the 12 months following enrollment in the ambulatory care pathway, compared descriptively with the 12 months preceding enrollment.

    Measured: 1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. All-Cause Hospitalizations

    Total number of hospital admissions for any cause during the 12 months following enrollment and during the 5-year-follow-up compared with the 12 months preceding enrollment.

    Measured: 1 year before enrollment and 5 years after enrollment

  2. All-Cause Mortality

    Death from any cause among enrolled participants

    Measured: Up to 5 years after enrollment

  3. Cardiovascular Mortality

    Death attributed to cardiovascular causes based on clinical records.

    Measured: Up to 5 years after enrollment

  4. Remote Patient Monitoring Alert Activity

    Frequency and distribution of color-coded alerts (green, orange, red) generated by the Satelia® Cardio remote monitoring algorithm during follow-up.

    Measured: 5 years

  5. Patient and Healthcare Professional Satisfaction with the Care Pathway

    Self-reported satisfaction and healthcare professional satisfaction with integrated ambulatory care pathway measured using a 10-point Likert scale questionnaire

    Measured: At the end of follow up or the study period

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Feb 2026
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Interventional study evaluating the clinical benefit of a comprehensive heart failure management program. The multimodal intervention combines remote patient monitoring, regular laboratory monitoring, multidisciplinary ambulatory assessment, and nurse-led therapeutic support in patients with chronic heart failure. The study is conducted as a prospective interventional study (RIPH2, minimal risks and constraints).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
504 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07439081
Sponsor's protocol ID
OPTIMUM
Acronym
OPTIMUM
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
6 Feb 2026
Last updated
16 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Individual participant data will not be made publicly available because the dataset contains sensitive health information from a small, single-center cohort, which could increase the risk of participant re-identification despite de-identification procedures. Data were collected as part of routine clinical care and are subject to French and European data protection regulations (GDPR). Aggregated results are reported in study publications.

Publications

  • Aleyan M, Paradisi-Prieur L, Nisse-Durgeat S, et al. Annales de Cardiologie et d'Angéiologie, Volume 72 - Issue 5, November 2023, 101649. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2023.101649

  • Jourdain P, Pages N, Amara W, Maribas P, Lafitte S, Lemieux H, Barritault F, Seronde MF, Labarre JP, Chaouky H, Bedel C, Betito L, Nisse-Durgeat S, Picard F. Perceptions and satisfaction of patients with chronic heart failure when using a remote monitoring web application named Satelia(R) Cardio. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 2023 Jun;72(3):101606. doi: 10.1016/j.ancard.2023.101606. Epub 2023 May 25. French.

    PubMed 37244215
  • Girerd N, Barbet V, Seronde MF, Benchimol H, Jagu A, Tartiere JM, Hanon O, Picard F, Lafitte S, Lemaitre M, Pages N, Nisse-Durgeat S, Jourdain P. Association of a remote monitoring programme with all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with heart failure: National-scale, real-world evidence from a 3-year propensity score analysis of the TELESAT-HF study. Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Sep;27(9):1658-1669. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3563. Epub 2025 Jan 14.

    PubMed 39807086
  • Pages N, Picard F, Barritault F, Amara W, Lafitte S, Maribas P, Abassade P, Labarre JP, Boulestreau R, Chaouky H, Abdennadher M, Lemieux H, Lasserre R, Bedel C, Betito L, Nisse-Durgeat S, Diebold B. Remote patient monitoring for chronic heart failure in France: When an innovative funding program (ETAPES) meets an innovative solution (Satelia(R) Cardio). Digit Health. 2022 Aug 22;8:20552076221116774. doi: 10.1177/20552076221116774. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

    PubMed 36034602

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Satelia® Cardio Remote Patient Monitoring System in people with Heart Failure and Acute Heart Failure (AHF), run by Médipôle Lyon-Villeurbanne at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of Cardiac Rehospitalizations (time frame: 1 year before enrollment and 1 year after enrollment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07439081, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in