AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring HemodialysisNCT07413315

Benefits of a Renal Rehabilitation Program Adapted to Uremic Patients on Daily Hemodialysis at Low Dialysate Flow Rate.

A study testing Low flow rate hemodialysis and Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program in people with Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis and Sarcopenia, run by Brugmann University Hospital at 1 site in Belgium.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The concept of renal rehabilitation has become increasingly important with the increasing age of patients with severe or even terminal chronic kidney disease (CKD). It combines physical exercise and nutritional monitoring programs for patients with terminal CKD who are most often treated with conventional hemodialysis… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Low flow rate hemodialysis and Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
1 siteBelgium
Study dates
13 Aug 2024to 31 Dec 2027
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • patient with terminal chronic kidney disease requiring hemodialysis treatment
  • patient recently hospitalized for an acute medical event.

Who cannot join

  • dementia/mild cognitive impairment (MMSE < 20/30)
  • decompensated psychiatric pathology and/or behavioral disorders
  • pregnant woman
  • recovery of renal function allowing interruption of helodialysis sessions
  • candidate for neurological rehabilitation
  • patient with recent spinal cord injury
Show all 22Show fewer
  • patient with absolute and/or relative contraindication to performing a stress test
  • severe or poorly tolerated cardiac rhythm disorder
  • severe or symptomatic obstruction to left ventricular ejection
  • decompensated heart failure
  • acute myocarditis, pericarditis or endocarditis
  • acute aortic dissection
  • high-risk emboligenic intracardiac thrombus
  • significant stenosis of the common trunk
  • ventricular aneurysm
  • supraventricular tachycardia with poorly controlled ventricular rate, acquired high-degree or complete block
  • obstructive cardiomyopathy with high resting gradient
  • recent stroke or TIA
  • acute venous thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism
  • poorly controlled clinical condition, such as marked anemia, significant electrolyte disturbance, hyperthyroidism, etc.
  • lack of cooperation from the patient
  • Blood pressure > 200/110 mmHg

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Belgium1 site, 1 recruiting
  • CHU Brugmann

    Brussels, 1020

    Joris Vanparys, MD, +3227455264, Joris.VANPARYS@chu-brugmann.be

    Joris Vanparys, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

The concept of renal rehabilitation has become increasingly important with the increasing age of patients with severe or even terminal chronic kidney disease (CKD). It combines physical exercise and nutritional monitoring programs for patients with terminal CKD who are most often treated with conventional hemodialysis (HD) at a rate of 3 sessions of 4 hours per week.

Sarcopenia is a very common phenomenon in patients with CKD. The prevalence found in recent meta-analyses varies between 25.6 and 28.5% in patients treated with dialysis. It is even higher in patients treated with HD than in patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Younger and more active patients will more often choose PD. The conventional HD modality preserves residual renal function less well, which is important for better elimination of uremic toxins bound to plasma proteins. Conventional HD requires a higher immobilization time and causes more post-dialysis symptoms, leaving less time for the patient to be physically active.

Read more

The phenomenon of sarcopenia is not insignificant. It is associated in dialysis patients with a higher mortality rate (risk x 1.8) and a higher incidence of cardiovascular events (risk x 3.8). The association with higher mortality is well demonstrated for the 2 main components of sarcopenia, namely reduced muscle mass and reduced muscle strength. Sarcopenia also increases the risk of falls and fractures, it decreases the physical performance of patients and their ability to perform activities of daily living. The quality of life of patients is reduced and the probability of social placement is high.

The phenomena of sarcopenia and physical deconditioning are even more problematic in patients in HD after an acute medical problem. The need for rehabilitation is even higher. "Classical" HD treatment can be a burden for these patients, leaving no room for integrating a complete rehabilitation program.

Daily low dialysate flow rate hemodialysis (LDF) is a type of hemodialysis in which patients benefit from more frequent but shorter and hemodynamically better tolerated HD sessions. This new technique potentially presents certain advantages over conventional HD, particularly at the cardiovascular level: better blood pressure control and better reduction of left ventricular hypertrophy. LDF also allows better control of hyperphosphatemia with a reduced need for phosphorus binders. Thanks to more frequent dialysis (5 to 6 sessions per week), inter-dialytic weight gain is often less significant, allowing less aggressive ultrafiltration, with better hemodynamic tolerance, and better post-dialysis recovery. In this perspective, this study aims to examine the interest of integrating HDQ dialysis into a renal rehabilitation program in patients with terminal CKD whose dialysis must continue after an acute event requiring hospitalization. The investigators want to study whether this technique allows the implementation of a more effective rehabilitation program, while maintaining the same dialysis efficiency as with the conventional HD technique. To the investigator's knowledge, no study concerning patients under HDQ has been conducted during their renal rehabilitation phase.

The objectives of the current study are:

  • To study the interest of integrating HDQ dialysis into a renal rehabilitation program in patients with terminal CKD.
  • To study the efficacy and tolerance of HDQ dialysis and the rehabilitation program in these patients.
Being tested
Low flow rate hemodialysis, Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program
Medical subject headings
Sarcopenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Low flow rate hemodialysisProcedure or surgery

    Low flow rate hemodialysis five times per week

  • Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programOther

    Tailor made rehabilitation program

Study groups in NCT07413315
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hemodialysis patientsExperimentalPatients under hemodialysis
Receives: Procedure: Low flow rate hemodialysis; Other: Multidisciplinary rehabilitation program

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hand grip test

    Grip strength (measured by means of a dynamometer) is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength. Low grip strength is a powerful predictor of poor patient outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased functional limitations, poor health-related quality of life and death.

    Cut-off points for men <27 kg Cut-off points for women <16 kg

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  2. Hand grip test

    Grip strength (measured by means of a dynamometer) is recommended as a good simple measure of muscle strength. Low grip strength is a powerful predictor of poor patient outcomes such as longer hospital stays, increased functional limitations, poor health-related quality of life and death.

    Cut-off points for men <27 kg Cut-off points for women <16 kg

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

Secondary outcomes (16)
  1. Short physical performance battery test (SPPB)

    The short physical performance battery (SPPB) is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand and balance tests. It has been used as a predictive tool for possible disability. The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). The SPPB has been shown to have predictive validity showing a gradient of risk for mortality, nursing home admission, and disability. The maximum score is 12 points, and a score of ≤ 8 points indicates poor physical performance.

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  2. Short physical performance battery test (SPPB)

    The short physical performance battery (SPPB) is a group of measures that combines the results of the gait speed, chair stand and balance tests. It has been used as a predictive tool for possible disability. The scores range from 0 (worst performance) to 12 (best performance). The SPPB has been shown to have predictive validity showing a gradient of risk for mortality, nursing home admission, and disability. The maximum score is 12 points, and a score of ≤ 8 points indicates poor physical performance.

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  3. Six minutes walking test (6 MWT)

    The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional exercise capacity. It evaluates the functional capacity of the individual and it provides information over the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, blood circulation, neuromuscular system, body metabolism, and peripheral circulation. An increase in the distance walked indicates improvement in basic mobility. In the geriatric population: Small meaningful change 20 m, Substantial meaningful change 50 m.

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  4. Six minutes walking test (6 MWT)

    The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is a commonly used test to assess functional exercise capacity. It evaluates the functional capacity of the individual and it provides information over the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, blood circulation, neuromuscular system, body metabolism, and peripheral circulation. An increase in the distance walked indicates improvement in basic mobility. In the geriatric population: Small meaningful change 20 m, Substantial meaningful change 50 m.

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  5. Muscle ultrasound conclusion

    Assessment of pennate muscles such as the quadriceps femoris can detect a decrease in muscle thickness and cross-sectional area within a relatively short period of time, the use of ultrasound has been expanded in clinical practice to support the diagnosis of sarcopenia in older adults.

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  6. Muscle ultrasound conclusion

    Assessment of pennate muscles such as the quadriceps femoris can detect a decrease in muscle thickness and cross-sectional area within a relatively short period of time, the use of ultrasound has been expanded in clinical practice to support the diagnosis of sarcopenia in older adults.

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  7. SF-36

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Standardised questionnaire measuring quality of life, reporting a physical componant summary score and a mental componant summary score, both ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more disability and higher scores indicating less disability.

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  8. SF-36

    Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Standardised questionnaire measuring quality of life, reporting a physical componant summary score and a mental componant summary score, both ranging from 0 to 100, with lower scores indicating more disability and higher scores indicating less disability.

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  9. Kt/V

    Blood test evaluating the quality of the dialysis on weekly basis

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  10. Kt/V

    Blood test evaluating the quality of the dialysis on weekly basis

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  11. Myostatin blood levels

    Blood levels of Myostatin (sarcopenia biomarker)

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  12. Myostatin blood levels

    Blood levels of Myostatin (sarcopenia biomarker)

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  13. Activin A blood levels

    Blood levels of Activin A (sarcopenia biomarker)

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  14. Activin A blood levels

    Blood levels of Activin A (sarcopenia biomarker)

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

  15. IGF1 blood levels

    Blood levels of IGF1 (biomarker)

    Measured: At admission in the rehabilitation ward

  16. IGF1 blood levels

    Blood levels of IGF1 (biomarker)

    Measured: At discharge from the rehabilitation ward, in general up to 24 weeks after admission

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Feb 2026
  2. Study start13 Aug 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07413315
Sponsor's protocol ID
REVADIAL
Status last verified
Feb 2026
First submitted
25 Nov 2025
Last updated
17 Feb 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in