Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring HemodialysisNCT06997042
Creation of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis Using the End-to-side Anastomotic Technique vs. Piggyback.
A study testing Terminolateral anastomotic technique and Piggyback anastomotic technique in people with Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This study is designed to compare two surgical techniques used to create arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), which are necessary for hemodialysis in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). AVFs are preferred over other forms of vascular access because they last longer and have fewer complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis
- What is being tested?
- Terminolateral anastomotic technique and Piggyback anastomotic technique
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 May 2025to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age > 18 years
- Able to meet protocol requirements, including follow-up.
- Incident or prevalent patient with advanced chronic kidney disease in the hemodialysis stage (stage 5D).
- In predialysis patients (stage 5), if renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis) is anticipated to be required within the next 6 months (based on standard clinical criteria).
- Who, based on their associated pathology and according to medical criteria, can withstand the initial surgery and arteriovenous access maintenance procedures.
- Have a current ultrasound with preoperative venous and arterial mapping.
Show all 16Show fewer
- Meet the anatomical requirements for AVF creation:
- Wrist: artery >2 mm, vein >2 mm in diameter
- Elbow: artery >3 mm, vein >3 mm in diameter
- Absence of arterial calcification or occlusion, or other aberrant arterial anatomy.
- Adequate arterial and venous patency.
- Vein-to-skin distance <5 mm.
- Candidate for creation of a native arteriovenous fistula for hemodialysis, either distal (radiocephalic) or proximal (humerocephalic or humerobasilic).
- No immediate transplant scheduled within the next 60 days (inclusion on the kidney transplant waiting list is not a contraindication for entry into the study, nor for the creation of an arteriovenous fistula).
- No prior arteriovenous surgeries in the same or proximal location.
- Correct understanding of the study conditions and acceptance to participate.
Who cannot join
- Pregnant women.
- Life expectancy <1 year.
- Arteriovenous prostheses (non-native fistulas), previous arteriovenous fistula repairs, arteriovenous accesses created in the lower extremities, and unusual (exotic) accesses.
- Known or suspected central venous stenosis/occlusion on the side of the planned access.
- Repair of previous arteriovenous accesses (proximal reanastomoses).
- Biological immunosuppression.
Show all 11Show fewer
- History or evidence of serious systemic illness, including:
- Cardiac disease (New York Heart Association functional class III or IV, as evidenced by the inability to lie still), myocardial infarction within 6 weeks prior to randomization, ventricular tachyarrhythmia requiring ongoing treatment, or unstable angina.
- Suspected or documented hypercoagulable or hypocoagulable state or Clinically significant active infection (White blood count > 15,000 cells/mm3) other than the use of a treated CVC.
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, prevents an adequate evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the study or poor compliance.
- Patient unwilling or unable to attend follow-up follow-ups.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
Barcelona, Barcelona, 08018
Adrián López, Medical Doctor, 932 27 54 00, lopez74@clinic.cat
About this study
Official title: Creation of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis Using the End-to-side Anastomotic Technique vs. Piggyback. Randomized Clinical Trial
This study is designed to compare two surgical techniques used to create arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), which are necessary for hemodialysis in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). AVFs are preferred over other forms of vascular access because they last longer and have fewer complications. However, many AVFs fail to mature properly, making them unusable for dialysis.
The two techniques being studied are the traditional End-to-Side (ETS) method and a newer technique called Piggyback Straight Line Onlay Technique (pSLOT). Early studies suggest that pSLOT may reduce complications like narrowing (stenosis), clotting (thrombosis), and failure of the AVF, but more robust data from randomized clinical trials is needed.
Read more
Patients aged 18 or older with stage 4 or 5 CKD, who are eligible for a new AVF and meet health criteria, may participate. During the operation, participants are randomly assigned to receive either the ETS or pSLOT technique. The procedure is done under local or regional anesthesia. Follow-up appointments are scheduled at 1 and 12 months to assess fistula maturation, blood flow, and whether it can be successfully used for dialysis. Remote follow-ups are allowed if needed.
Participation is voluntary, requires informed consent, and all data is kept strictly confidential. The study follows national and international ethical standards and has been approved by an ethics committee.
Read the detailed description
Creation of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: End-to-Side vs. Piggyback Anastomosis - A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Background and Rationale Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) affects an estimated 15.1% of the Spanish population and is a growing public health concern, especially due to its progression to advanced stages requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Hemodialysis is the most common RRT, and the quality of vascular access significantly influences outcomes in these patients. Among vascular access options, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred over central venous catheters (CVCs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), due to superior durability, fewer complications, and lower hospitalization rates. However, AVFs suffer from high early failure rates, with maturation failures occurring in up to 60% of cases. Traditionally, the end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis is the gold standard for AVF creation. In recent years, an alternative technique called the Piggyback Straight Line Onlay Technique (pSLOT) has shown potential benefits, including improved hemodynamics, reduced stenosis, and lower rates of thrombosis and dysfunction. Despite promising retrospective data and small prospective studies, no robust randomized controlled trial has conclusively determined whether pSLOT offers superior outcomes compared to the classical ETS technique.
- Study Hypothesis The null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference between ETS and pSLOT techniques in terms of:
- Clinical and ultrasound-based maturation at 1 month
- Clinical and ultrasound-based maturation, patency, and functionality at 12 months
- Study Objectives Primary Objective To compare the rate of clinical and ultrasonographic maturation at 1 month, and the combined rate of maturation, patency, and functionality at 12 months between ETS and pSLOT groups. Secondary Objectives To compare:
- Juxta-anastomotic stenosis rate
- Thrombosis rate
- Reintervention rate
- Fistula blood flow
- Maturation and surgery times
- Wound-related complications
- Methods and Study Design This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial with two parallel groups:
- Group A: ETS technique
- Group B: pSLOT technique Randomization occurs intraoperatively (1:1 allocation) using a centralized system. The patient is blinded to the allocation. The surgical team is not blinded due to the nature of the procedure, and follow-up staff are aware of the technique due to its visibility on ultrasound. The trial will enroll 130 patients to account for a 15% dropout rate, aiming for 56 evaluable patients per group. This sample size is based on previous data indicating differences in juxta-anastomotic stenosis rates (16.7% vs. 40.3%).
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Inclusion
- Adults ≥18 years
- CKD stage 4 or 5 (pre-dialysis or on hemodialysis)
- Anatomically suitable for native AVF creation
- No prior AVFs in the same or proximal site
- Informed consent provided Exclusion
- Pregnant women
- Life expectancy <1 year
- Central vein stenosis or occlusion
- Known coagulopathy, active infection, or severe systemic disease
- Scheduled kidney transplant within 60 days
- Previous upper extremity vascular surgery in the planned site
- Procedure and Follow-Up Preoperative Assessment
- Clinical history and physical examination
- Duplex ultrasound mapping of arteries and veins in both upper limbs
- Eligibility based on standard anatomical criteria
- Consent obtained post-screening Surgical Procedure
- Performed under local/regional anesthesia
- Intraoperative data: type of fistula (distal/proximal), duration, success, Doppler flow, diameter, and complications Follow-up Visits
- 1 Month: Clinical and Doppler ultrasound to assess maturation and flow
- 12 Months: Same assessments plus record of any interventions or complications Remote follow-up may be permitted if patients cannot attend physically.
- Definitions of Key Outcomes
- Clinical Maturation: Fistula suitable for two-needle cannulation and achieving dialysis flow
- Ultrasound Maturation: Diameter >5mm, depth <5mm, and flow >500 ml/min
- Functionality: Used for regular dialysis with adequate flow
- Patency: Defined as primary, assisted primary, or secondary per European Vascular Society guidelines
- Statistical Analysis
- Software: SPSS v23
- Descriptive statistics for demographics and clinical variables
- Chi-square for proportions
- Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test for time-to-event analysis
- Multivariate regression for confounders: age, sex, diabetes, vessel diameter, fistula location Significance threshold: p < 0.05
- Ethics and Regulatory Aspects
- Protocol complies with Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and Spanish Biomedical Research Law (14/2007)
- Approved by institutional ethics committee
- Data anonymized and managed per EU Regulation 2016/679
- Participation is voluntary, with informed consent required
- Being tested
- Terminolateral anastomotic technique, Piggyback anastomotic technique
- Keywords
- hemodialysis, vascular access, arteriovenous fistula, piggyback
- Medical subject headings
- Arteriovenous Fistula
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Terminolateral anastomotic techniqueProcedure or surgery
Suturing the vein and artery of the arteriovenous fistula with a terminolateral anastomotic suture.
Piggyback anastomotic techniqueProcedure or surgery
Suturing the vein and artery of the arteriovenous fistula with a piggyback anastomotic technique.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Terminolateral anastomosis | Placebo comparator | Patients assigned to this arm of intervention will have an anastomosis performed with the terminolateral anastomosis technique described in the protocol. Receives: Procedure: Terminolateral anastomotic technique |
| Piggyback anastomosis | Active comparator | Patients assigned to this arm of intervention will be have an anastomosis performed with the piggyback anastomosis technique described in the protocol. Receives: Procedure: Piggyback anastomotic technique |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of clinical and echographic maduration of the fistula
Measured: 1 month and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
Percentage juxta-anastomotic stenosis, thrombosis, reinterventions, fistula flow, maduration time, surgical time, wound complications
Measured: 1 and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted30 May 2025
- Study start1 May 2025
- Primary completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring HemodialysisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Adrián López, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
- Investigators
- Gaspar Mestres, Medicine, Principal investigator, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06997042
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCB/2025/0087
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 21 May 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: It is planned to share individual participant data (IPD) from this study with other qualified researchers. Shared data will include anonymized information related to demographics, surgical technique, AVF maturation, complications, and follow-up outcomes. Data will be available upon reasonable request after publication and with approval from the study investigators, in compliance with ethical guidelines and data protection regulations.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Creation of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis Using the End-to-side Anastomotic Technique vs. Piggyback. Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06997042
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCB/2025/0087
- Keywords
- hemodialysis, vascular access, arteriovenous fistula, piggyback
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital Clinic of BarcelonaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 30 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is designed to compare two surgical techniques used to create arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs), which are necessary for hemodialysis in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). AVFs are preferred over other forms of vascular access because they last longer and have fewer complications. However, many AVFs fail to mature properly, making them unusable for dialysis.
The two techniques being studied are the traditional End-to-Side (ETS) method and a newer technique called Piggyback Straight Line Onlay Technique (pSLOT). Early studies suggest that pSLOT may reduce complications like narrowing (stenosis), clotting (thrombosis), and failure of the AVF, but more robust data from randomized clinical trials is needed.
Patients aged 18 or older with stage 4 or 5 CKD, who are eligible for a new AVF and meet health criteria, may participate. During the operation, participants are randomly assigned to receive either the ETS or pSLOT technique. The procedure is done under local or regional anesthesia. Follow-up appointments are scheduled at 1 and 12 months to assess fistula maturation, blood flow, and whether it can be successfully used for dialysis. Remote follow-ups are allowed if needed.
Participation is voluntary, requires informed consent, and all data is kept strictly confidential. The study follows national and international ethical standards and has been approved by an ethics committee.
Detailed description
Creation of Arteriovenous Fistulas for Hemodialysis: End-to-Side vs. Piggyback Anastomosis - A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Background and Rationale Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) affects an estimated 15.1% of the Spanish population and is a growing public health concern, especially due to its progression to advanced stages requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). Hemodialysis is the most common RRT, and the quality of vascular access significantly influences outcomes in these patients. Among vascular access options, arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are preferred over central venous catheters (CVCs) and arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), due to superior durability, fewer complications, and lower hospitalization rates. However, AVFs suffer from high early failure rates, with maturation failures occurring in up to 60% of cases. Traditionally, the end-to-side (ETS) anastomosis is the gold standard for AVF creation. In recent years, an alternative technique called the Piggyback Straight Line Onlay Technique (pSLOT) has shown potential benefits, including improved hemodynamics, reduced stenosis, and lower rates of thrombosis and dysfunction. Despite promising retrospective data and small prospective studies, no robust randomized controlled trial has conclusively determined whether pSLOT offers superior outcomes compared to the classical ETS technique.
- Study Hypothesis The null hypothesis is that there will be no significant difference between ETS and pSLOT techniques in terms of:
- Clinical and ultrasound-based maturation at 1 month
- Clinical and ultrasound-based maturation, patency, and functionality at 12 months
- Study Objectives Primary Objective To compare the rate of clinical and ultrasonographic maturation at 1 month, and the combined rate of maturation, patency, and functionality at 12 months between ETS and pSLOT groups. Secondary Objectives To compare:
- Juxta-anastomotic stenosis rate
- Thrombosis rate
- Reintervention rate
- Fistula blood flow
- Maturation and surgery times
- Wound-related complications
- Methods and Study Design This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial with two parallel groups:
- Group A: ETS technique
- Group B: pSLOT technique Randomization occurs intraoperatively (1:1 allocation) using a centralized system. The patient is blinded to the allocation. The surgical team is not blinded due to the nature of the procedure, and follow-up staff are aware of the technique due to its visibility on ultrasound. The trial will enroll 130 patients to account for a 15% dropout rate, aiming for 56 evaluable patients per group. This sample size is based on previous data indicating differences in juxta-anastomotic stenosis rates (16.7% vs. 40.3%).
- Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria Inclusion
- Adults ≥18 years
- CKD stage 4 or 5 (pre-dialysis or on hemodialysis)
- Anatomically suitable for native AVF creation
- No prior AVFs in the same or proximal site
- Informed consent provided Exclusion
- Pregnant women
- Life expectancy <1 year
- Central vein stenosis or occlusion
- Known coagulopathy, active infection, or severe systemic disease
- Scheduled kidney transplant within 60 days
- Previous upper extremity vascular surgery in the planned site
- Procedure and Follow-Up Preoperative Assessment
- Clinical history and physical examination
- Duplex ultrasound mapping of arteries and veins in both upper limbs
- Eligibility based on standard anatomical criteria
- Consent obtained post-screening Surgical Procedure
- Performed under local/regional anesthesia
- Intraoperative data: type of fistula (distal/proximal), duration, success, Doppler flow, diameter, and complications Follow-up Visits
- 1 Month: Clinical and Doppler ultrasound to assess maturation and flow
- 12 Months: Same assessments plus record of any interventions or complications Remote follow-up may be permitted if patients cannot attend physically.
- Definitions of Key Outcomes
- Clinical Maturation: Fistula suitable for two-needle cannulation and achieving dialysis flow
- Ultrasound Maturation: Diameter >5mm, depth <5mm, and flow >500 ml/min
- Functionality: Used for regular dialysis with adequate flow
- Patency: Defined as primary, assisted primary, or secondary per European Vascular Society guidelines
- Statistical Analysis
- Software: SPSS v23
- Descriptive statistics for demographics and clinical variables
- Chi-square for proportions
- Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank test for time-to-event analysis
- Multivariate regression for confounders: age, sex, diabetes, vessel diameter, fistula location Significance threshold: p < 0.05
- Ethics and Regulatory Aspects
- Protocol complies with Declaration of Helsinki (2013) and Spanish Biomedical Research Law (14/2007)
- Approved by institutional ethics committee
- Data anonymized and managed per EU Regulation 2016/679
- Participation is voluntary, with informed consent required
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Terminolateral anastomosis | Placebo comparator | Procedure: Terminolateral anastomotic techniquePatients assigned to this arm of intervention will have an anastomosis performed with the terminolateral anastomosis technique described in the protocol. |
| Piggyback anastomosis | Active comparator | Procedure: Piggyback anastomotic techniquePatients assigned to this arm of intervention will be have an anastomosis performed with the piggyback anastomosis technique described in the protocol. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Age > 18 years
- Able to meet protocol requirements, including follow-up.
- Incident or prevalent patient with advanced chronic kidney disease in the hemodialysis stage (stage 5D).
- In predialysis patients (stage 5), if renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis) is anticipated to be required within the next 6 months (based on standard clinical criteria).
- Who, based on their associated pathology and according to medical criteria, can withstand the initial surgery and arteriovenous access maintenance procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Pregnant women.
- Life expectancy <1 year.
- Arteriovenous prostheses (non-native fistulas), previous arteriovenous fistula repairs, arteriovenous accesses created in the lower extremities, and unusual (exotic) accesses.
- Known or suspected central venous stenosis/occlusion on the side of the planned access.
- Repair of previous arteriovenous accesses (proximal reanastomoses).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Terminolateral anastomotic techniqueSuturing the vein and artery of the arteriovenous fistula with a terminolateral anastomotic suture. | Procedure or surgery | Terminolateral anastomosis |
| Piggyback anastomotic techniqueSuturing the vein and artery of the arteriovenous fistula with a piggyback anastomotic technique. | Procedure or surgery | Piggyback anastomosis |
Primary outcome
Percentage of clinical and echographic maduration of the fistula
Time frame: 1 month and 12 months
1 secondary outcome
Percentage juxta-anastomotic stenosis, thrombosis, reinterventions, fistula flow, maduration time, surgical time, wound complications
Time frame: 1 and 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Sep 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. It is planned to share individual participant data (IPD) from this study with other qualified researchers. Shared data will include anonymized information related to demographics, surgical technique, AVF maturation, complications, and follow-up outcomes. Data will be available upon reasonable request after publication and with approval from the study investigators, in compliance with ethical guidelines and data protection regulations.
Related trials for Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis
Recruiting
DIALysis With EXpanded Solute Removal
Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis, End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD)
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study to Evaluate Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of AP306 at Fixed Doses in Dialysis Participants With Hyperphosphatemia
Hyperphosphatemia, Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis
Recruiting
Technology Assisted Collaborative Care Intervention to Improve Patient-centered Outcomes in Dialysis Patients
Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis
Recruiting
Incremental Hemodialysis for Veterans in the First Year of Dialysis (IncHVets)
Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Stage 5, Kidney Dysfunction Requiring Dialysis (KDRD)
Recruiting
Pumpkin Seed Oil as a Nutraceutical for Hemodialysis Patients
End Stage Renal Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Chronic Dialysis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Gaspar Mestres, Medicine principal investigator
Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Terminolateral anastomotic technique and Piggyback anastomotic technique in people with Chronic Kidney Disease Requiring Hemodialysis, run by Hospital Clinic of Barcelona at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Adrián López, Medicine (+34 93 227 54 00, lopez74@clinic.cat), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of clinical and echographic maduration of the fistula (time frame: 1 month and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Sep 2025.