AphasiaPhase 2NCT07397923
Exploratory Evaluation of the Digital Therapeutic Device Zenicom for Subacute Stroke Aphasia
A Phase 2 study testing Zenicog and Conventional Speech Therapy in people with Aphasia and Stroke, run by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.
Trial summary
Clinical Trial Title A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Exploratory Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Digital Therapeutic Device 'Zenicom' for Improving Aphasia in Patients with Subacute Stroke Clinical Trial Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the digital therapeutic… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older
- What is being tested?
- Zenicog and Conventional Speech Therapy
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 10 Dec 2025to 31 Aug 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 19 years or older.
- Confirmed by a specialist to have aphasia caused by a stroke lesion.
- First-ever subacute stroke (within 3 months of onset) diagnosed via radiological examination (CT, MRI).
- Diagnosed with aphasia based on the Speech Assessment (PK-WAB-R).
- Whose native language is Korean.
Who cannot join
- Have progressive or hemodynamically unstable stroke.
- Having other neurological diseases suspected to affect language ability.
- Co-morbid major psychiatric disorders requiring continuous medication (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Dementia).
- Co-morbid major neurogenic diseases other than stroke.
- Confirmed history of degenerative neuropathy.
- Current or past substance or alcohol use disorder.
Show all 9Show fewer
- Visual impairment (Low vision severity: visual acuity of 0.1-0.3 or lower).
- Intellectual disability.
- Illiteracy (unable to read and consent).
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
South Korea3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
Seongnam-si
- Recruiting
Konkuk University Medical Center
Seoul
- Recruiting
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Digital Therapeutic Device Zenicom for Improving Aphasia in Patients With Subacute Stroke and Aphasia (AQ ≥25), a Multicenter, Single-blind, Prospective, Randomized Exploratory Clinical Trial
Clinical Trial Title A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Exploratory Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Digital Therapeutic Device 'Zenicom' for Improving Aphasia in Patients with Subacute Stroke
Clinical Trial Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the digital therapeutic device Zenicom.
Read more
To evaluate the safety of the digital therapeutic device Zenicom.
Clinical Trial Period 6 months from the date of clinical trial plan approval by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS).
Target Condition Patients with aphasia resulting from stroke lesions.
Target Sample Size Total of 20 subjects (10 in the experimental group and 10 in the control group).
Investigational Medical Device Zenicom
Clinical Trial Methodology
- Device Information
- Experimental Device: Digital Speech Therapy Application Group: Performs conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily + additional digital speech therapy program during the 2-week treatment period.
- Control Device: Conventional Speech Therapy Group: Performs only conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily during the 2-week treatment period.
- Treatment Duration: Total 2 weeks (10 working days; total usage of 600 minutes or more).
- Visits:
Total of 3 visits including outpatient and therapy room visits.
Visit 1 (T-1): Screening
Visit 2 (T0): Baseline and Treatment initiation
Visit 3 (T1): Post-treatment assessment
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria Patients who satisfy all of the following criteria: Adults aged 19 years or older. Patients confirmed by a specialist to have aphasia caused by a stroke lesion. Patients with first-ever subacute stroke (within 3 months of onset) diagnosed via radiological examination (CT, MRI). Patients diagnosed with aphasia based on the Speech Assessment (PK-WAB-R). Patients whose native language is Korean. Patients capable of voluntarily consenting to the study.
- Exclusion Criteria Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
Progressive or hemodynamically unstable stroke.
Patients with other neurological diseases suspected to affect language ability.
Co-morbid major psychiatric disorders requiring continuous medication (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Dementia).
Co-morbid major neurogenic diseases other than stroke.
Confirmed history of degenerative neuropathy.
Current or past substance or alcohol use disorder.
Visual impairment (Low vision severity: visual acuity of 0.1-0.3 or lower).
Intellectual disability.
Illiteracy (unable to read and consent).
Patients deemed inappropriate for participation for other reasons.
Refusal to participate in the study.
Suspension and Dropout Criteria
- Suspension Criteria If circumstances observed during the trial make it judged unreasonable to continue the study. Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE).
- Dropout Criteria
The subject requests to stop participation or withdraws consent during the trial.
The investigator determines that the subject cannot continue the trial due to adverse events (e.g., headache, eye fatigue, nausea, dizziness, etc.).
The subject arbitrarily takes medication expected to affect the comparative evaluation of the investigational device during the trial.
The dosage of medication that may affect the comparative evaluation of the investigational device is changed during the trial.
Discovery of major protocol violations, such as violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria.
The subject fails to attend scheduled visits and cannot be contacted.
The subject fails to perform the digital speech therapy program for a total of 600 minutes or more.
The investigator determines that the trial should be stopped for other reasons.
Endpoints (Outcome Measures)
- Primary Efficacy Endpoint Change in PK-WAB-R scores between T0 and T1 between groups.
- Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
Change in K-BNT scores between T0 and T1 between groups.
Change in K-SAQOL-12 scores between T0 and T1 between groups.
Statistical Analysis Methods To evaluate the change in PK-WAB-R between T0 and T1 between groups, an independent two-sample test will be used. Depending on the distribution of the change, a parametric method (Student's t-test) or a non-parametric method (Mann-Whitney U test) will be selected and applied.
To evaluate the changes in K-BNT and K-SAQOL-12 between T0 and T1 between groups, an independent two-sample test will be used. Depending on the distribution of the change, a parametric method (Student's t-test) or a non-parametric method (Mann-Whitney U test) will be selected and applied.
- Being tested
- Zenicog, Conventional Speech Therapy
- Keywords
- digital therapeutics, aphasia treatment, subacute stroke, korean language
- Medical subject headings
- Aphasia, Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ZenicogDevice
This medical device is a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) consisting of a patient application and a patient management web portal for medical staff. It is designed to provide personalized digital therapeutic content to patients with aphasia for the alleviation and improvement of language function symptoms.
The therapeutic mechanism of this device is speech therapy delivered through a personalized content program, intended to improve the language function of aphasia patients. The device's treatment program alleviates and improves language function based on Stimulation-Facilitation Treatment and Functional Communication techniques, which are aphasia speech therapy methods recommended by the Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation (Brain \& Neurorehabilitation).
The training recommendation model applied to this device provides personalized training content based on the subject's performance characteristics and proficiency level. The analyzed performance character
Conventional Speech TherapyOther
Conventional speech therapy is provided for 30 minutes daily in face-to-face by a Speech-Language-Pathologist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Conventional Speech Therapy + Digital Speech Therapy | Experimental | Performs conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily + additional digital speech therapy program during the 2-week treatment period. Receives: Device: Zenicog; Other: Conventional Speech Therapy |
| Control Group: Conventional Speech Therapy | Active comparator | Performs only conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily during the 2-week treatment period. Receives: Other: Conventional Speech Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PK-WAB AQ(Korean Version of PK-WAB-R AQ)
The Aphasia Quotient (AQ) is a weighted composite score derived from the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (or its Korean adaptation, PK-WAB-R). It serves as a primary quantitative index of the severity of spoken language deficits in patients with aphasia.
Measured: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
Secondary outcomes (3)
K-BNT (Korean version of Boston Naming Test)
A standardized neuropsychological assessment tool designed to evaluate confrontation naming ability (lexical retrieval) in individuals with cognitive impairments. It is the linguistically and culturally adapted version of the widely used Boston Naming Test (BNT).
Measured: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
K-SAQoL-12 (Korean version of Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-12)
K-SAQoL-12 is the shortened, validated Korean version of the Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-39 (SAQoL-39). It is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) designed to assess Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) specifically in stroke survivors with aphasia.
Measured: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
Adverse Event
Any adverse event occurred during intervention
Measured: T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Feb 2026
- Study start10 Dec 2025
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for AphasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University Bundang HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- A Multi-center randomized controlled trial
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Konkuk University Hospital, Samsung Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Won Kee Chang, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07397923
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-2506-978-003
- Status last verified
- Feb 2026
- First submitted
- 2 Feb 2026
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of the Digital Therapeutic Device Zenicom for Improving Aphasia in Patients With Subacute Stroke and Aphasia (AQ ≥25), a Multicenter, Single-blind, Prospective, Randomized Exploratory Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07397923
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-2506-978-003
- Keywords
- digital therapeutics, aphasia treatment, subacute stroke, korean language
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Bundang HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Konkuk University Hospital, Samsung Medical Center
- Study start
- 10 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Feb 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Clinical Trial Title A Multicenter, Single-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Exploratory Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Digital Therapeutic Device 'Zenicom' for Improving Aphasia in Patients with Subacute Stroke
Clinical Trial Objectives To evaluate the efficacy of the digital therapeutic device Zenicom.
To evaluate the safety of the digital therapeutic device Zenicom.
Clinical Trial Period 6 months from the date of clinical trial plan approval by the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS).
Target Condition Patients with aphasia resulting from stroke lesions.
Target Sample Size Total of 20 subjects (10 in the experimental group and 10 in the control group).
Investigational Medical Device Zenicom
Clinical Trial Methodology
- Device Information
- Experimental Device: Digital Speech Therapy Application Group: Performs conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily + additional digital speech therapy program during the 2-week treatment period.
- Control Device: Conventional Speech Therapy Group: Performs only conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily during the 2-week treatment period.
- Treatment Duration: Total 2 weeks (10 working days; total usage of 600 minutes or more).
- Visits:
Total of 3 visits including outpatient and therapy room visits.
Visit 1 (T-1): Screening
Visit 2 (T0): Baseline and Treatment initiation
Visit 3 (T1): Post-treatment assessment
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
- Inclusion Criteria Patients who satisfy all of the following criteria: Adults aged 19 years or older. Patients confirmed by a specialist to have aphasia caused by a stroke lesion. Patients with first-ever subacute stroke (within 3 months of onset) diagnosed via radiological examination (CT, MRI). Patients diagnosed with aphasia based on the Speech Assessment (PK-WAB-R). Patients whose native language is Korean. Patients capable of voluntarily consenting to the study.
- Exclusion Criteria Patients meeting any of the following criteria will be excluded:
Progressive or hemodynamically unstable stroke.
Patients with other neurological diseases suspected to affect language ability.
Co-morbid major psychiatric disorders requiring continuous medication (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Dementia).
Co-morbid major neurogenic diseases other than stroke.
Confirmed history of degenerative neuropathy.
Current or past substance or alcohol use disorder.
Visual impairment (Low vision severity: visual acuity of 0.1-0.3 or lower).
Intellectual disability.
Illiteracy (unable to read and consent).
Patients deemed inappropriate for participation for other reasons.
Refusal to participate in the study.
Suspension and Dropout Criteria
- Suspension Criteria If circumstances observed during the trial make it judged unreasonable to continue the study. Occurrence of Serious Adverse Events (SAE).
- Dropout Criteria
The subject requests to stop participation or withdraws consent during the trial.
The investigator determines that the subject cannot continue the trial due to adverse events (e.g., headache, eye fatigue, nausea, dizziness, etc.).
The subject arbitrarily takes medication expected to affect the comparative evaluation of the investigational device during the trial.
The dosage of medication that may affect the comparative evaluation of the investigational device is changed during the trial.
Discovery of major protocol violations, such as violation of inclusion/exclusion criteria.
The subject fails to attend scheduled visits and cannot be contacted.
The subject fails to perform the digital speech therapy program for a total of 600 minutes or more.
The investigator determines that the trial should be stopped for other reasons.
Endpoints (Outcome Measures)
- Primary Efficacy Endpoint Change in PK-WAB-R scores between T0 and T1 between groups.
- Secondary Efficacy Endpoints
Change in K-BNT scores between T0 and T1 between groups.
Change in K-SAQOL-12 scores between T0 and T1 between groups.
Statistical Analysis Methods To evaluate the change in PK-WAB-R between T0 and T1 between groups, an independent two-sample test will be used. Depending on the distribution of the change, a parametric method (Student's t-test) or a non-parametric method (Mann-Whitney U test) will be selected and applied.
To evaluate the changes in K-BNT and K-SAQOL-12 between T0 and T1 between groups, an independent two-sample test will be used. Depending on the distribution of the change, a parametric method (Student's t-test) or a non-parametric method (Mann-Whitney U test) will be selected and applied.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- A Multi-center randomized controlled trial
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental Group: Conventional Speech Therapy + Digital Speech Therapy | Experimental | Device: Zenicog, Other: Conventional Speech TherapyPerforms conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily + additional digital speech therapy program during the 2-week treatment period. |
| Control Group: Conventional Speech Therapy | Active comparator | Other: Conventional Speech TherapyPerforms only conventional speech therapy for 30 minutes daily during the 2-week treatment period. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Aged 19 years or older.
- Confirmed by a specialist to have aphasia caused by a stroke lesion.
- First-ever subacute stroke (within 3 months of onset) diagnosed via radiological examination (CT, MRI).
- Diagnosed with aphasia based on the Speech Assessment (PK-WAB-R).
- Whose native language is Korean.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Have progressive or hemodynamically unstable stroke.
- Having other neurological diseases suspected to affect language ability.
- Co-morbid major psychiatric disorders requiring continuous medication (e.g., Major Depressive Disorder, Schizophrenia, Bipolar Disorder, Dementia).
- Co-morbid major neurogenic diseases other than stroke.
- Confirmed history of degenerative neuropathy.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ZenicogThis medical device is a Software as a Medical Device (SaMD) consisting of a patient application and a patient management web portal for medical staff. It is designed to provide personalized digital therapeutic content to patients with aphasia for the alleviation and improvement of language function symptoms. The therapeutic mechanism of this device is speech therapy delivered through a personalized content program, intended to improve the language function of aphasia patients. The device's treatment program alleviates and improves language function based on Stimulation-Facilitation Treatment and Functional Communication techniques, which are aphasia speech therapy methods recommended by the Korean Clinical Practice Guidelines for Stroke Rehabilitation (Brain \& Neurorehabilitation). The training recommendation model applied to this device provides personalized training content based on the subject's performance characteristics and proficiency level. The analyzed performance character | Device | Experimental Group: Conventional Speech Therapy + Digital Speech Therapy |
| Conventional Speech TherapyConventional speech therapy is provided for 30 minutes daily in face-to-face by a Speech-Language-Pathologist | Other | Control Group: Conventional Speech Therapy, Experimental Group: Conventional Speech Therapy + Digital Speech Therapy |
Primary outcome
PK-WAB AQ(Korean Version of PK-WAB-R AQ)
Time frame: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
The Aphasia Quotient (AQ) is a weighted composite score derived from the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) (or its Korean adaptation, PK-WAB-R). It serves as a primary quantitative index of the severity of spoken language deficits in patients with aphasia.
3 secondary outcomes
K-BNT (Korean version of Boston Naming Test)
Time frame: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
K-SAQoL-12 (Korean version of Stroke and Aphasia Quality of Life Scale-12)
Time frame: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
Adverse Event
Time frame: T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Aphasia
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Restoring Speech With an Intracortical Neuroprosthesis for Post-Stroke Agrammatic Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-02)
Aphasia, ALS
Not yet recruiting
Cerebellar Brain Stimulation Plus Language Therapy for People at Risk of Poor Aphasia Recovery After Stroke
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Zenicog and Conventional Speech Therapy in people with Aphasia and Stroke, run by Seoul National University Bundang Hospital at 3 sites in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Pf. Won Kee Chang, MD, MS (+82-31-787-7737, wkchang@snubh.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PK-WAB AQ(Korean Version of PK-WAB-R AQ) (time frame: T-1: Screening T0: Baseline T1: EOT(end of treatment: 2week after)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2026.