Gastrostomy ComplicationsNCT07300865
Does the Thickness of the Gastrostomy Affect the Incidence of Complications? A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study in Children
A study testing 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/button and 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/button in people with Gastrostomy Complications and Gastrostomy Size, run by Therese Hössjer at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
The goal of this interventional study is to compare two different sizes of a gastrostomy tube in children and the incidence of complications three months postoperatively. The study is questionnare-based and both the family and health care personel will fill in the formula about complications at the re-visit when the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 15 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastrostomy Complications, Gastrostomy Size, Food Intolerance
- What is being tested?
- 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/button and 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/button
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- 20 Nov 2025to 1 Jan 2030
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 15 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Scheduled for laparoscopic gastrostomy at Dep Pediatric Surgery Uppsala Akademiska University Hospital
Who cannot join
- Any specific reasons to avoid one size or the other (children who are supposed to get mixed food or a special medication that can obstruate the tube will recieve a thicker tube)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Sweden1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Barnkirurgi/Pediatric surgery
Uppsala, 75185
Therese NL Hössjer, MD, PhD-student, 018674613, therese.hossjer@uu.se
Johan Danielson, MD, Docent, therese.hossjer@uu.se
About this study
The goal of this interventional study is to compare two different sizes of a gastrostomy tube in children and the incidence of complications three months postoperatively. The study is questionnare-based and both the family and health care personel will fill in the formula about complications at the re-visit when the tube is changed the first time at three months postoperatively. Complications requested are: granuloma, infection, pain, dislocation and leakage.
Read the detailed description
Project plan Does gastrostomy tube thickness affect incidence of complications?
Hypothesis A 12 Fr gastrostomy tube is associated with fewer complications than a 14 Fr tube.
Aim To investigate if the rate of postoperative complications is reduced when a 12 Fr gastrostomy is used instead of a 14 Fr.
Overview Placement of a gastrostomy is indicated in children with long term need of enteral nutrition where oral intake is inadequate and there is at least a partially functioning digestive tract [1]. The operative procedure includes creation of a channel through the stomach- and abdominal wall with placement of a tube. The tube keeps the channel open and enables feeding of and medication to the patient. There are different ways of establishing a gastrostomy: laparoscopic, percutaneous, radiologically assisted and open techniques. Some researchers consider the laparoscopic approach to be the most preferable and safe option while others prefer the percutaneous or open technique [2,3,4,5].
In Sweden approximately 300-400 children (0-18 years) receive a gastrostomy yearly, and it is one of the most common inpatient care interventions in children. The majority of patients have an underlying neurological disease with multiple somatic and/or cognitive impairments. Other indications include failure to thrive, nausea during cancer treatment, metabolic disorders, and gastrointestinal failure [6].
For most of the children and families the gastrostomy facilitates their everyday life and improve their well-being. Unfortunately, gastrostomies are associated with several minor complications which cause repeated contacts with healthcare providers in this already vulnerable patient group. Common complications are granuloma, infection, leakage, pain and dislocation, where granulomas are as common as 42-60% [3,4,7]. A granuloma, or granulation tissue, is formed in response to inflammation or a wound. It is a type of vascular connective tissue consisting of lymphoid cells, macrophages and plasma cells, which bleeds easily and produces exudate [8].
Today there is a lack of evidence on what size of gastrostomies should be used. Most commonly used thicknesses are 12 Fr and 14 Fr. One retrospective study showed that a 12 Fr gastrostomy tube were four times as likely to dislocate, than a 14 Fr gastrostomy [9]. In a previously published observational study we could not see that relation [10]. Instead, we found that a 12 Fr tube seems to be associated with fewer complications than other thicknesses. Since data seems to disperse, we aim to conduct this prospective randomised single-centre study to find out whether a 12 Fr tube thickness can reduce post-operative complications after gastrostomy compared to a 14 Fr.
Method
All children 0-15 years planned for a gastrostomy at Dep Pediatric Surgery in Uppsala will be invited to the study. After oral and written information, patient or caregivers will be asked to sign the form of consent. On the day of operation, the patient will be randomized to either 12 Fr or 14 Fr tube size of the gastrostomy. The surgeon will fill in the tube size in a questionary presented in appendix 2.1.
After three months the gastrostomy button should be changed to a new one, according to National guidelines for gastrostomies, which is done as an out patient visit at a nurse. Questionaries, including information about complications, will be filled out both by the nurse and the patient or caregivers.
The information from the three questionaries will be stored by the principal researcher at each clinic, and deidentified data will be filled out in an excel-file. The main researcher and doctoral student will then compile the data and perform statistical analyses. The results will be presented in a scientific journal.
Importance of project Gastrostomies are commonly encumbered with minor complications, and there is a lack of evidence and guidelines on what size of gastrostomy tube that should be used. Today, local traditions or the surgeons' choice, will determine the size of the gastrostomy tube. Previously done studies are few, and to our knowledge not randomized or prospective. This study will hopefully clear the question if the size matters.
References
- Braegger C, Decsi T, Dias JA, Hartman C, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Koletzko S, Mihatsch W, Moreno L, Puntis J, Shamir R, Szajewska H, Turck D, van Goudoever J, ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition (2010) Practical Approach to Paediatric Enteral Nutrition: A Comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Paediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51(1):110-122
- Akay B, Capizzani TR, Lee AM, Drongowski RA, Geiger JD, Hirschl RB, Mychaliska GB (2010) Gastrostomy tube placement in infants and children: is there a preferred technique? J Ped Surg 45(6):1147-1152
- Jones VS, La Hei ER, Shun A (2007) Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 23(11):1085-1089
- Angsten G, Danielson J, Kassa AM, Engstrand Lilja H (2015) Outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Sug Int 31:1067-1072
- Merli L, De Marco EA, Fedele C, Mason EJ, Taddei A, Paradiso FV, Catania VD, Nanni L (2016) Gastrostomy Placement in children: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy or Laparoscopic Gastrostomy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25(5):381-384
- Danielson J, Rutqvist J, Göthberg G, Arnbjörnsson E (2018) Gastrostomi hos barn - följ nationella riktlinjer. Läkartidningen 115:E6U6
- Franken J, Mauritz FA, Suksamanapun N, Hulsker CCC, van der See DC, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom MYA (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: results of large cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:1545-1552
- Townley A, Wincentak J, Krog K, Schippke J, Kingsnorth S (2017) Paediatric gastrostomy stoma complications and treatments: A rapid scoping review. J Clin Nurs 27:1369-1380
- Jeziorczak PM, Frenette RS, Lee J, Coe SC, Aprahamian CJ (2021) Size Matters: Early Gastrostomy Tube Dislodgment in Children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Sep 6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0352. Online ahead of print
- Hössjer T, Göthberg G, Arnbjörnsson E, Rutqvist J, Perris F, Bartik Z, Almström M, Backman T and Danielson J (2023) Complication rate after gastrostomy placement in children can be reduced by simple surgical steps. Acta Paediatr. 2023;00;1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16792
- Being tested
- 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/button, 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/button
- Keywords
- laparoscopic gastrostomy, complications, pediatric surgery, children, granuloma
- Medical subject headings
- Food Intolerance, Granuloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
12 Fr gastrostomy tube/buttonDevice
Also called 12 Fr
Patients in this arm will recieve 12 Fr size gastrostomy tube/ button
14 Fr gastrostomy tube/buttonDevice
Also called 14 Fr
Patients in this arm will recieve 14 Fr size gastrostomy tube/ button
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Children recieving 12 Fr gastrostomy tube | Other | Not described Receives: Device: 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/button |
| Children recieving 14 Fr gastrostomy tube | Other | Not described Receives: Device: 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/button |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Granuloma
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Infection
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Observed pain by caretakers/health care personel
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Dislocation
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Leakage
Measured: 3 months postoperatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2025
- Study start20 Nov 2025
- Primary completion1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Gastrostomy ComplicationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Therese Hössjer
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Therese Hössjer, Uppsala University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07300865
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-03305-01
- Other IDs
- 2025
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Does the Thickness of the Gastrostomy Affect the Incidence of Complications? A Prospective Randomized Single-Center Study in Children
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07300865
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025-03305-01
- Keywords
- laparoscopic gastrostomy, complications, pediatric surgery, children, granuloma
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Therese HössjerUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital
- Study start
- 20 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Jan 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this interventional study is to compare two different sizes of a gastrostomy tube in children and the incidence of complications three months postoperatively. The study is questionnare-based and both the family and health care personel will fill in the formula about complications at the re-visit when the tube is changed the first time at three months postoperatively. Complications requested are: granuloma, infection, pain, dislocation and leakage.
Detailed description
Project plan Does gastrostomy tube thickness affect incidence of complications?
Hypothesis A 12 Fr gastrostomy tube is associated with fewer complications than a 14 Fr tube.
Aim To investigate if the rate of postoperative complications is reduced when a 12 Fr gastrostomy is used instead of a 14 Fr.
Overview Placement of a gastrostomy is indicated in children with long term need of enteral nutrition where oral intake is inadequate and there is at least a partially functioning digestive tract [1]. The operative procedure includes creation of a channel through the stomach- and abdominal wall with placement of a tube. The tube keeps the channel open and enables feeding of and medication to the patient. There are different ways of establishing a gastrostomy: laparoscopic, percutaneous, radiologically assisted and open techniques. Some researchers consider the laparoscopic approach to be the most preferable and safe option while others prefer the percutaneous or open technique [2,3,4,5].
In Sweden approximately 300-400 children (0-18 years) receive a gastrostomy yearly, and it is one of the most common inpatient care interventions in children. The majority of patients have an underlying neurological disease with multiple somatic and/or cognitive impairments. Other indications include failure to thrive, nausea during cancer treatment, metabolic disorders, and gastrointestinal failure [6].
For most of the children and families the gastrostomy facilitates their everyday life and improve their well-being. Unfortunately, gastrostomies are associated with several minor complications which cause repeated contacts with healthcare providers in this already vulnerable patient group. Common complications are granuloma, infection, leakage, pain and dislocation, where granulomas are as common as 42-60% [3,4,7]. A granuloma, or granulation tissue, is formed in response to inflammation or a wound. It is a type of vascular connective tissue consisting of lymphoid cells, macrophages and plasma cells, which bleeds easily and produces exudate [8].
Today there is a lack of evidence on what size of gastrostomies should be used. Most commonly used thicknesses are 12 Fr and 14 Fr. One retrospective study showed that a 12 Fr gastrostomy tube were four times as likely to dislocate, than a 14 Fr gastrostomy [9]. In a previously published observational study we could not see that relation [10]. Instead, we found that a 12 Fr tube seems to be associated with fewer complications than other thicknesses. Since data seems to disperse, we aim to conduct this prospective randomised single-centre study to find out whether a 12 Fr tube thickness can reduce post-operative complications after gastrostomy compared to a 14 Fr.
Method
All children 0-15 years planned for a gastrostomy at Dep Pediatric Surgery in Uppsala will be invited to the study. After oral and written information, patient or caregivers will be asked to sign the form of consent. On the day of operation, the patient will be randomized to either 12 Fr or 14 Fr tube size of the gastrostomy. The surgeon will fill in the tube size in a questionary presented in appendix 2.1.
After three months the gastrostomy button should be changed to a new one, according to National guidelines for gastrostomies, which is done as an out patient visit at a nurse. Questionaries, including information about complications, will be filled out both by the nurse and the patient or caregivers.
The information from the three questionaries will be stored by the principal researcher at each clinic, and deidentified data will be filled out in an excel-file. The main researcher and doctoral student will then compile the data and perform statistical analyses. The results will be presented in a scientific journal.
Importance of project Gastrostomies are commonly encumbered with minor complications, and there is a lack of evidence and guidelines on what size of gastrostomy tube that should be used. Today, local traditions or the surgeons' choice, will determine the size of the gastrostomy tube. Previously done studies are few, and to our knowledge not randomized or prospective. This study will hopefully clear the question if the size matters.
References
- Braegger C, Decsi T, Dias JA, Hartman C, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, Koletzko S, Mihatsch W, Moreno L, Puntis J, Shamir R, Szajewska H, Turck D, van Goudoever J, ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition (2010) Practical Approach to Paediatric Enteral Nutrition: A Comment by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition. J Paediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 51(1):110-122
- Akay B, Capizzani TR, Lee AM, Drongowski RA, Geiger JD, Hirschl RB, Mychaliska GB (2010) Gastrostomy tube placement in infants and children: is there a preferred technique? J Ped Surg 45(6):1147-1152
- Jones VS, La Hei ER, Shun A (2007) Laparoscopic gastrostomy: the preferred method of gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Surg Int 23(11):1085-1089
- Angsten G, Danielson J, Kassa AM, Engstrand Lilja H (2015) Outcome of laparoscopic versus open gastrostomy in children. Pediatr Sug Int 31:1067-1072
- Merli L, De Marco EA, Fedele C, Mason EJ, Taddei A, Paradiso FV, Catania VD, Nanni L (2016) Gastrostomy Placement in children: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy or Laparoscopic Gastrostomy? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 25(5):381-384
- Danielson J, Rutqvist J, Göthberg G, Arnbjörnsson E (2018) Gastrostomi hos barn - följ nationella riktlinjer. Läkartidningen 115:E6U6
- Franken J, Mauritz FA, Suksamanapun N, Hulsker CCC, van der See DC, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom MYA (2015) Efficacy and adverse events of laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children: results of large cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:1545-1552
- Townley A, Wincentak J, Krog K, Schippke J, Kingsnorth S (2017) Paediatric gastrostomy stoma complications and treatments: A rapid scoping review. J Clin Nurs 27:1369-1380
- Jeziorczak PM, Frenette RS, Lee J, Coe SC, Aprahamian CJ (2021) Size Matters: Early Gastrostomy Tube Dislodgment in Children. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A Sep 6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2021.0352. Online ahead of print
- Hössjer T, Göthberg G, Arnbjörnsson E, Rutqvist J, Perris F, Bartik Z, Almström M, Backman T and Danielson J (2023) Complication rate after gastrostomy placement in children can be reduced by simple surgical steps. Acta Paediatr. 2023;00;1-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.16792
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Children recieving 12 Fr gastrostomy tube | Other | Device: 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/button |
| Children recieving 14 Fr gastrostomy tube | Other | Device: 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/button |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 15 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Scheduled for laparoscopic gastrostomy at Dep Pediatric Surgery Uppsala Akademiska University Hospital
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Any specific reasons to avoid one size or the other (children who are supposed to get mixed food or a special medication that can obstruate the tube will recieve a thicker tube)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/buttonAlso: 12 FrPatients in this arm will recieve 12 Fr size gastrostomy tube/ button | Device | Children recieving 12 Fr gastrostomy tube |
| 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/buttonAlso: 14 FrPatients in this arm will recieve 14 Fr size gastrostomy tube/ button | Device | Children recieving 14 Fr gastrostomy tube |
Primary outcome
Granuloma
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Infection
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Observed pain by caretakers/health care personel
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Dislocation
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Leakage
Time frame: 3 months postoperatively
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Dec 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastrostomy Complications
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Comparison of Sedated and Unsedated PEG in Elderly ASA IV Patients
Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy, Enteral Nutrition Feeding
RecruitingPhase 4
The Use of High Bile-binding Foods to Reduce Upper Gastrointestinal Bile Acid Concentrations (Aim 1)
Feeding Difficulties, Aspiration
Not yet recruitingObservational study
The Use of High Bile-Binding Foods to Reduce Upper Gastrointestinal Bile Acid Concentrations (Aim 3)
Feeding Difficulties, Gastrostomy
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
The Use of High Bile-binding Foods to Reduce Upper Gastrointestinal Bile Acid Concentrations (Aim 2)
Feeding Difficulties, Gastrostomy
Recruiting
Pediatric Percutaneous Ultrasound Gastrostomy Technique
Gastrostomy, Gastrostomy Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 12 Fr gastrostomy tube/button and 14 Fr gastrostomy tube/button in people with Gastrostomy Complications and Gastrostomy Size, run by Therese Hössjer at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Therese NL Hössjer, MD, PhD-student (+4618674613, therese.hossjer@uu.se), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Granuloma (time frame: 3 months postoperatively). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Dec 2025.