AzTrials
AzTrials

Spinal Cord Injury, AcuteDATSCINCT07280351

Duraplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

A study testing Expansile duraplasty in people with Spinal Cord Injury, Acute and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a procedure called "expansile duraplasty" can improve recovery in adults who have experienced an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Expansile duraplasty
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
66 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
4 May 2026to Jun 2029
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • In initial hospitalization for recent (less than 24 hours) acute, traumatic spinal cord injury at a participating site
  • Diagnosis of acute, traumatic spinal cord injury
  • AIS grade A - C
  • C3 - T10 neurological level of injury on ISNCSCI exam
  • Imaging showing cord compression
  • Surgical decompression initiated within 24 hours after injury
  • At sites where lumbar drain placement is standard of care: placement of lumbar drain
  • Able to cooperate in the completion of standardized neurological examinations

Who cannot join

  • Injury arising from penetrating mechanism
  • Pregnancy
  • In custody
  • Under psychiatric hold
  • Presence of traumatic durotomy severe enough to preclude study treatment or procedures, in the opinion of the treating surgeon
  • Extensive polytrauma as determined by ISS score of >25
Show all 19Show fewer
  • History of prior spinal cord injury
  • Concomitant non-traumatic spinal cord injury (e.g. infection or tumor)
  • Significant concomitant head injury as defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <14 or a clinically significant abnormality on a head CT (head CT required only for patients suspected to have a brain injury at the discretion of the investigator)
  • GCS Motor score < 6
  • Pre-existing neurologic or mental disorder which would preclude accurate evaluation and follow-up (i.e. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, unstable psychiatric disorder with hallucinations and/or delusions or schizophrenia)
  • The treating surgeon deems that an anterior-only approach to decompression and/or stabilization (e.g. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) is the best treatment plan based on the patient's injury pattern
  • Recent history (less than 1 year) of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance that may impact the outcome or study participation, in the opinion of the investigator
  • Active malignancy or history of invasive malignancy within the last five years, with the exception of superficial basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitely treated. Patients with carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated definitely more than 1 year prior to enrollment may enter the study.
  • Thrombocytopenia, defined as less than 100,000 platelets per microliter of blood, that is not correctible by transfusion
  • Coagulopathy, defined as INR > 1.4, that is not correctible by transfusion
  • Allergy to the study material, which may include fetal bovine tissue and collagen.
  • Contraindications for study treatment or procedures
  • Unable to give informed consent prior to their standard of care surgery

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site
  • Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital

    San Francisco, California, 94110

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a procedure called "expansile duraplasty" can improve recovery in adults who have experienced an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does expansile duraplasty work to improve recovery in people with acute traumatic SCI?
  • How safe is the use of expansile duraplasty in people with acute traumatic SCI?
Read more

Researchers will compare the strength, movement, and overall recovery of participants who receive expansile duraplasty to that of participants who do not receive expansile duraplasty to see if the use of expansile duraplasty leads to better recovery for people with acute traumatic SCI.

Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups: an Experimental group and a Control group. Participants in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. Participants in the Control group will not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. All participants will:

  • Provide samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid
  • Undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans
  • Undergo an assessment of the ability to move arms/legs and feel touch or pin prick
  • Answer questionnaires about medical history, pain, health, and independence with activities of daily living
Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial aimed at evaluating safety and effectiveness of expansile duraplasty in people hospitalized for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).

Traumatic SCI remains a challenging clinical problem for which treatment options remain limited, despite significant ongoing efforts by industry, non-profit organizations and academia to unveil the mechanisms behind it. There is currently no clearly beneficial pharmaceutical therapy for SCI, so in the absence of suitable pharmacotherapy, early surgical decompression and optimization of spinal cord perfusion have been emerged as targets for intervention. Common surgical techniques do not address intrathecal compression due to spinal cord swelling. The lack of dural decompression after SCI is in contrast to traumatic brain injury, where dural opening is a routine part of decompressive craniectomy. There remains a paucity of data on whether durotomy or expansile duraplasty may provide additional benefit in decompressing the injured spinal cord, though preclinical animal data has for decades been in favor of early decompression, and there is evidence from non-randomized human studies that suggest duraplasty may lead to improved outcomes for SCI patients. These data, along with other published SCI research, served as motivation to explore expansile duraplasty in humans.

Specific objectives of this randomized clinical trial are to evaluate (i) effectiveness of the expansile duraplasty in improving neurologic motor outcomes in patients with acute traumatic SCI; (ii) safety of expansile duraplasty in acute traumatic SCI patients; (iii) exploratory effectiveness of reducing intrathecal pressure (ITP) by expansile duraplasty in patients with acute traumatic SCI.

Eligible patients admitted at participating sites will be approached for study participation prior to their standard of care (SOC) index surgery for acute traumatic SCI. Consenting participants will be randomized into either the Experimental or Control group, and those in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their SOC surgery. A blood sample, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, motorsensory assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be obtained pre-operatively. Additional CSF samples, motorsensory assessments, and MRI scan will be obtained post-operatively during participants' subsequent stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and acute care units. During this stay, participants will receive standard of care medical treatment for SCI that is standardized across all sites (except where specified), including: close monitoring, including hemodynamic and pressure monitoring; intrathecal pressure measurement, at least once hourly for five days; maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) at 65 and above, via vasopressor administration as needed, for at least five days; post-treatment rehabilitation and occupational therapy procedures, per standard of care at the investigational site. During this time also, the participants will be monitored for Adverse Events (AEs). Questionnaires will be administered and clinical information such as injury characteristics, vitals measurements, and lab results will be collected during the participants' hospital stay.

Study follow-up visits occur at 6 and 12 months post-injury, with the primary endpoint at the 6-month follow-up. At the follow-up visits, vitals will be measured, a motorsensory assessment completed, and questionnaires on pain and quality of life will be administered. The Investigator will assess participants at each study visit for the occurrence of AEs.

Being tested
Expansile duraplasty
Keywords
spinal cord injury, SCI, expansile duraplasty, duraplasty, acute SCI, traumatic SCI, acute traumatic spinal cord injury
Medical subject headings
Spinal Cord Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Expansile duraplastyProcedure or surgery

    During their standard of care surgery, in participants undergoing expansile duraplasty, the dura of the spinal cord will be opened linearly at midline to a target length of 3.5cm during surgery and a 1.5 wide x 3.5cm long suturable dural patch will be sutured in place with 6-0 polypropylene running suture to expand the intrathecal space and create room for post-injury spinal cord swelling. Duraplasty is performed during the index surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury, not as a separate, nor delayed surgery. The pia and the spinal cord will not be opened.

Study groups in NCT07280351
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExperimentalExperimentalParticipants in this arm receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury.
Receives: Procedure: Expansile duraplasty
ControlNo interventionParticipants in this arm do not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in AIS grade from baseline

    The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) established the ASIA Injury Scale (AIS). The AIS grade is derived from the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) exam, ASIA's standard assessment for documentation of the level and severity of a spinal cord injury. The ISNCSCI yields a grade from A to E, wherein A indicates greater severity.

    Measured: From admission to 6 months post-injury

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. SCIM III scores

    The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III is a questionnaire that captures independence in activities of daily living following spinal cord injury. The SCIM yields a score from 0 to 100, with a higher number indicating a greater degree of independence.

    Measured: At 6 months post-injury

  2. SF-36 scores

    The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures health-related quality-of-life. It covers eight health domains. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.

    Measured: At 6 months post-injury

  3. Pain assessment (modified from Neuropathic Pain 4; International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0)

    The study will use a pain questionnaire modified slightly from the Neuropathic Pain 4 (DN4) assessment (which captures symptoms of neuropathic pain) and the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) version 2.0 (which characterizes pain problems). These questions will yield quantitative and qualitative data regarding pain intensity and neuropathic symptoms, including a score of pain intensity with values ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "No pain" and 10 being "Pain as bad as you can imagine."

    Measured: At 6 months post-injury

  4. Proportion of time during first 5 days after injury that SCPP was greater than 65 mmHg

    Spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) is a measure of the pressure gradient that drives blood flow through the spinal cord. It is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg), and it is calculated in this study as the difference between the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the intrathecal pressure (ITP).

    Measured: From admission to 5 days post-injury

  5. Maximum Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) metric

    Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used to derive a quantitative metric of the intrathecal space calculated as: ([2 x (post-op cord diameter at injury site - pre-op diameter at injury site)/(cord diameter at segment above injury + cord diameter at segment below injury)] x 100). A value is obtained from the post-operative MRI scan performed at 3 days post-injury, and the values between the Experimental and Control groups are compared.

    Measured: At 3 days post-injury

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Dec 2025
  2. Study start4 May 2026
  3. Primary completionJun 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJun 2029 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
66 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07280351
Sponsor's protocol ID
24-42716
Other IDs
CDMRP-SC240090
Acronym
DATSCI
Status last verified
Jul 2026
First submitted
1 Dec 2025
Last updated
21 Jul 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Expansile duraplasty in people with Spinal Cord Injury, Acute and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in AIS grade from baseline (time frame: From admission to 6 months post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in