Spinal Cord Injury, AcuteDATSCINCT07280351
Duraplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
A study testing Expansile duraplasty in people with Spinal Cord Injury, Acute and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a procedure called "expansile duraplasty" can improve recovery in adults who have experienced an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Spinal Cord Injury, Acute, Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
- What is being tested?
- Expansile duraplasty
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 66 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 4 May 2026to Jun 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- In initial hospitalization for recent (less than 24 hours) acute, traumatic spinal cord injury at a participating site
- Diagnosis of acute, traumatic spinal cord injury
- AIS grade A - C
- C3 - T10 neurological level of injury on ISNCSCI exam
- Imaging showing cord compression
- Surgical decompression initiated within 24 hours after injury
- At sites where lumbar drain placement is standard of care: placement of lumbar drain
- Able to cooperate in the completion of standardized neurological examinations
Who cannot join
- Injury arising from penetrating mechanism
- Pregnancy
- In custody
- Under psychiatric hold
- Presence of traumatic durotomy severe enough to preclude study treatment or procedures, in the opinion of the treating surgeon
- Extensive polytrauma as determined by ISS score of >25
Show all 19Show fewer
- History of prior spinal cord injury
- Concomitant non-traumatic spinal cord injury (e.g. infection or tumor)
- Significant concomitant head injury as defined by a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <14 or a clinically significant abnormality on a head CT (head CT required only for patients suspected to have a brain injury at the discretion of the investigator)
- GCS Motor score < 6
- Pre-existing neurologic or mental disorder which would preclude accurate evaluation and follow-up (i.e. Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, unstable psychiatric disorder with hallucinations and/or delusions or schizophrenia)
- The treating surgeon deems that an anterior-only approach to decompression and/or stabilization (e.g. anterior cervical discectomy and fusion) is the best treatment plan based on the patient's injury pattern
- Recent history (less than 1 year) of chemical substance dependency or significant psychosocial disturbance that may impact the outcome or study participation, in the opinion of the investigator
- Active malignancy or history of invasive malignancy within the last five years, with the exception of superficial basal cell carcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin that has been definitely treated. Patients with carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix treated definitely more than 1 year prior to enrollment may enter the study.
- Thrombocytopenia, defined as less than 100,000 platelets per microliter of blood, that is not correctible by transfusion
- Coagulopathy, defined as INR > 1.4, that is not correctible by transfusion
- Allergy to the study material, which may include fetal bovine tissue and collagen.
- Contraindications for study treatment or procedures
- Unable to give informed consent prior to their standard of care surgery
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94110
About this study
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a procedure called "expansile duraplasty" can improve recovery in adults who have experienced an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does expansile duraplasty work to improve recovery in people with acute traumatic SCI?
- How safe is the use of expansile duraplasty in people with acute traumatic SCI?
Read more
Researchers will compare the strength, movement, and overall recovery of participants who receive expansile duraplasty to that of participants who do not receive expansile duraplasty to see if the use of expansile duraplasty leads to better recovery for people with acute traumatic SCI.
Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups: an Experimental group and a Control group. Participants in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. Participants in the Control group will not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. All participants will:
- Provide samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid
- Undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans
- Undergo an assessment of the ability to move arms/legs and feel touch or pin prick
- Answer questionnaires about medical history, pain, health, and independence with activities of daily living
Read the detailed description
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial aimed at evaluating safety and effectiveness of expansile duraplasty in people hospitalized for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
Traumatic SCI remains a challenging clinical problem for which treatment options remain limited, despite significant ongoing efforts by industry, non-profit organizations and academia to unveil the mechanisms behind it. There is currently no clearly beneficial pharmaceutical therapy for SCI, so in the absence of suitable pharmacotherapy, early surgical decompression and optimization of spinal cord perfusion have been emerged as targets for intervention. Common surgical techniques do not address intrathecal compression due to spinal cord swelling. The lack of dural decompression after SCI is in contrast to traumatic brain injury, where dural opening is a routine part of decompressive craniectomy. There remains a paucity of data on whether durotomy or expansile duraplasty may provide additional benefit in decompressing the injured spinal cord, though preclinical animal data has for decades been in favor of early decompression, and there is evidence from non-randomized human studies that suggest duraplasty may lead to improved outcomes for SCI patients. These data, along with other published SCI research, served as motivation to explore expansile duraplasty in humans.
Specific objectives of this randomized clinical trial are to evaluate (i) effectiveness of the expansile duraplasty in improving neurologic motor outcomes in patients with acute traumatic SCI; (ii) safety of expansile duraplasty in acute traumatic SCI patients; (iii) exploratory effectiveness of reducing intrathecal pressure (ITP) by expansile duraplasty in patients with acute traumatic SCI.
Eligible patients admitted at participating sites will be approached for study participation prior to their standard of care (SOC) index surgery for acute traumatic SCI. Consenting participants will be randomized into either the Experimental or Control group, and those in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their SOC surgery. A blood sample, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, motorsensory assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be obtained pre-operatively. Additional CSF samples, motorsensory assessments, and MRI scan will be obtained post-operatively during participants' subsequent stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and acute care units. During this stay, participants will receive standard of care medical treatment for SCI that is standardized across all sites (except where specified), including: close monitoring, including hemodynamic and pressure monitoring; intrathecal pressure measurement, at least once hourly for five days; maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) at 65 and above, via vasopressor administration as needed, for at least five days; post-treatment rehabilitation and occupational therapy procedures, per standard of care at the investigational site. During this time also, the participants will be monitored for Adverse Events (AEs). Questionnaires will be administered and clinical information such as injury characteristics, vitals measurements, and lab results will be collected during the participants' hospital stay.
Study follow-up visits occur at 6 and 12 months post-injury, with the primary endpoint at the 6-month follow-up. At the follow-up visits, vitals will be measured, a motorsensory assessment completed, and questionnaires on pain and quality of life will be administered. The Investigator will assess participants at each study visit for the occurrence of AEs.
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Acute, Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
- Being tested
- Expansile duraplasty
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, SCI, expansile duraplasty, duraplasty, acute SCI, traumatic SCI, acute traumatic spinal cord injury
- Medical subject headings
- Spinal Cord Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Expansile duraplastyProcedure or surgery
During their standard of care surgery, in participants undergoing expansile duraplasty, the dura of the spinal cord will be opened linearly at midline to a target length of 3.5cm during surgery and a 1.5 wide x 3.5cm long suturable dural patch will be sutured in place with 6-0 polypropylene running suture to expand the intrathecal space and create room for post-injury spinal cord swelling. Duraplasty is performed during the index surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury, not as a separate, nor delayed surgery. The pia and the spinal cord will not be opened.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Participants in this arm receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. Receives: Procedure: Expansile duraplasty |
| Control | No intervention | Participants in this arm do not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in AIS grade from baseline
The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) established the ASIA Injury Scale (AIS). The AIS grade is derived from the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) exam, ASIA's standard assessment for documentation of the level and severity of a spinal cord injury. The ISNCSCI yields a grade from A to E, wherein A indicates greater severity.
Measured: From admission to 6 months post-injury
Secondary outcomes (5)
SCIM III scores
The Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) version III is a questionnaire that captures independence in activities of daily living following spinal cord injury. The SCIM yields a score from 0 to 100, with a higher number indicating a greater degree of independence.
Measured: At 6 months post-injury
SF-36 scores
The 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures health-related quality-of-life. It covers eight health domains. Scores for each domain range from 0 to 100, with a higher score defining a more favorable health state.
Measured: At 6 months post-injury
Pain assessment (modified from Neuropathic Pain 4; International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0)
The study will use a pain questionnaire modified slightly from the Neuropathic Pain 4 (DN4) assessment (which captures symptoms of neuropathic pain) and the International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) version 2.0 (which characterizes pain problems). These questions will yield quantitative and qualitative data regarding pain intensity and neuropathic symptoms, including a score of pain intensity with values ranging from 0 to 10, with 0 being "No pain" and 10 being "Pain as bad as you can imagine."
Measured: At 6 months post-injury
Proportion of time during first 5 days after injury that SCPP was greater than 65 mmHg
Spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) is a measure of the pressure gradient that drives blood flow through the spinal cord. It is measured in millimeters of mercury (mmHg), and it is calculated in this study as the difference between the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and the intrathecal pressure (ITP).
Measured: From admission to 5 days post-injury
Maximum Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) metric
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are used to derive a quantitative metric of the intrathecal space calculated as: ([2 x (post-op cord diameter at injury site - pre-op diameter at injury site)/(cord diameter at segment above injury + cord diameter at segment below injury)] x 100). A value is obtained from the post-operative MRI scan performed at 3 days post-injury, and the values between the Experimental and Control groups are compared.
Measured: At 3 days post-injury
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Dec 2025
- Study start4 May 2026
- Primary completionJun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Spinal Cord Injury, AcuteStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rajiv Saigal, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University of California, San Francisco
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07280351
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 24-42716
- Other IDs
- CDMRP-SC240090
- Acronym
- DATSCI
- Status last verified
- Jul 2026
- First submitted
- 1 Dec 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Duraplasty for Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07280351
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DATSCI / 24-42716
- Conditions
- Spinal Cord Injury, Acute, Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, Spinal Cord Injury Cervical
- Keywords
- spinal cord injury, SCI, expansile duraplasty, duraplasty, acute SCI, traumatic SCI, acute traumatic spinal cord injury
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 66 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- United States Department of Defense, Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs
- Study start
- 4 May 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Jun 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a procedure called "expansile duraplasty" can improve recovery in adults who have experienced an acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Does expansile duraplasty work to improve recovery in people with acute traumatic SCI?
- How safe is the use of expansile duraplasty in people with acute traumatic SCI?
Researchers will compare the strength, movement, and overall recovery of participants who receive expansile duraplasty to that of participants who do not receive expansile duraplasty to see if the use of expansile duraplasty leads to better recovery for people with acute traumatic SCI.
Participants will be randomly placed in one of two groups: an Experimental group and a Control group. Participants in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. Participants in the Control group will not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard SCI surgery. All participants will:
- Provide samples of blood and cerebrospinal fluid
- Undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans
- Undergo an assessment of the ability to move arms/legs and feel touch or pin prick
- Answer questionnaires about medical history, pain, health, and independence with activities of daily living
Detailed description
This is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, single-blinded controlled trial aimed at evaluating safety and effectiveness of expansile duraplasty in people hospitalized for acute traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI).
Traumatic SCI remains a challenging clinical problem for which treatment options remain limited, despite significant ongoing efforts by industry, non-profit organizations and academia to unveil the mechanisms behind it. There is currently no clearly beneficial pharmaceutical therapy for SCI, so in the absence of suitable pharmacotherapy, early surgical decompression and optimization of spinal cord perfusion have been emerged as targets for intervention. Common surgical techniques do not address intrathecal compression due to spinal cord swelling. The lack of dural decompression after SCI is in contrast to traumatic brain injury, where dural opening is a routine part of decompressive craniectomy. There remains a paucity of data on whether durotomy or expansile duraplasty may provide additional benefit in decompressing the injured spinal cord, though preclinical animal data has for decades been in favor of early decompression, and there is evidence from non-randomized human studies that suggest duraplasty may lead to improved outcomes for SCI patients. These data, along with other published SCI research, served as motivation to explore expansile duraplasty in humans.
Specific objectives of this randomized clinical trial are to evaluate (i) effectiveness of the expansile duraplasty in improving neurologic motor outcomes in patients with acute traumatic SCI; (ii) safety of expansile duraplasty in acute traumatic SCI patients; (iii) exploratory effectiveness of reducing intrathecal pressure (ITP) by expansile duraplasty in patients with acute traumatic SCI.
Eligible patients admitted at participating sites will be approached for study participation prior to their standard of care (SOC) index surgery for acute traumatic SCI. Consenting participants will be randomized into either the Experimental or Control group, and those in the Experimental group will receive expansile duraplasty during their SOC surgery. A blood sample, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) sample, motorsensory assessment, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan will be obtained pre-operatively. Additional CSF samples, motorsensory assessments, and MRI scan will be obtained post-operatively during participants' subsequent stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) and acute care units. During this stay, participants will receive standard of care medical treatment for SCI that is standardized across all sites (except where specified), including: close monitoring, including hemodynamic and pressure monitoring; intrathecal pressure measurement, at least once hourly for five days; maintenance of spinal cord perfusion pressure (SCPP) at 65 and above, via vasopressor administration as needed, for at least five days; post-treatment rehabilitation and occupational therapy procedures, per standard of care at the investigational site. During this time also, the participants will be monitored for Adverse Events (AEs). Questionnaires will be administered and clinical information such as injury characteristics, vitals measurements, and lab results will be collected during the participants' hospital stay.
Study follow-up visits occur at 6 and 12 months post-injury, with the primary endpoint at the 6-month follow-up. At the follow-up visits, vitals will be measured, a motorsensory assessment completed, and questionnaires on pain and quality of life will be administered. The Investigator will assess participants at each study visit for the occurrence of AEs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Experimental | Procedure: Expansile duraplastyParticipants in this arm receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. |
| Control | No intervention | –Participants in this arm do not receive expansile duraplasty during their standard surgery for spinal cord injury. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- In initial hospitalization for recent (less than 24 hours) acute, traumatic spinal cord injury at a participating site
- Diagnosis of acute, traumatic spinal cord injury
- AIS grade A - C
- C3 - T10 neurological level of injury on ISNCSCI exam
- Imaging showing cord compression
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Injury arising from penetrating mechanism
- Pregnancy
- In custody
- Under psychiatric hold
- Presence of traumatic durotomy severe enough to preclude study treatment or procedures, in the opinion of the treating surgeon
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Expansile duraplastyDuring their standard of care surgery, in participants undergoing expansile duraplasty, the dura of the spinal cord will be opened linearly at midline to a target length of 3.5cm during surgery and a 1.5 wide x 3.5cm long suturable dural patch will be sutured in place with 6-0 polypropylene running suture to expand the intrathecal space and create room for post-injury spinal cord swelling. Duraplasty is performed during the index surgery for traumatic spinal cord injury, not as a separate, nor delayed surgery. The pia and the spinal cord will not be opened. | Procedure or surgery | Experimental |
Primary outcome
Change in AIS grade from baseline
Time frame: From admission to 6 months post-injury
The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) established the ASIA Injury Scale (AIS). The AIS grade is derived from the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) exam, ASIA's standard assessment for documentation of the level and severity of a spinal cord injury. The ISNCSCI yields a grade from A to E, wherein A indicates greater severity.
5 secondary outcomes
SCIM III scores
Time frame: At 6 months post-injury
SF-36 scores
Time frame: At 6 months post-injury
Pain assessment (modified from Neuropathic Pain 4; International Spinal Cord Injury Pain Basic Data Set version 2.0)
Time frame: At 6 months post-injury
Proportion of time during first 5 days after injury that SCPP was greater than 65 mmHg
Time frame: From admission to 5 days post-injury
Maximum Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) metric
Time frame: At 3 days post-injury
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jul 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
Spinal Cord Injury, Acute
Recruiting
Acute Genital Nerve Stimulation for Neurogenic Bowel Dysfunction in Individuals Living With Spinal Cord Injury
Fecal Incontinence
Recruiting
Functional Electrical Stimulation vs Transcutaneous Stimulation in Patients With Subacute Spinal Cord Injury
Non Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury, Sub-Acute Rehabilitation
RecruitingPhase 1
NG004 in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury Patients
Acute Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Spinal Cord Diseases
Recruiting
Protocol for Rapid Onset of Mobilization in Patients With Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury II (PROMPT-SCI II) Trial
Spinal Cord Injuries, Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rajiv Saigal, MD, PhD principal investigator
University of California, San Francisco
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Expansile duraplasty in people with Spinal Cord Injury, Acute and Spinal Cord Injury (SCI), Initial Encounter, run by University of California, San Francisco at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in AIS grade from baseline (time frame: From admission to 6 months post-injury). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jul 2026.