Colorectal CancerNCT07219745
Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Early Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS)
A study testing Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit and LARS mobile application in people with Colorectal Cancer and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, run by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Transanal irrigation (TAI) has shown to improve fecal incontinence and increase quality of life in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This trial is a small study being conducted to determine whether a larger trial is feasible. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Colorectal Cancer, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit and LARS mobile application
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2026to Nov 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults (≥18 years-old) patients who underwent a LAR for any indication via open, laparoscopic, robotic, or transanal total mesorectal excision, with creation of a diverting loop ileostomy,
- have confirmed anastomotic healing demonstrated by flexible sigmoidoscopy and CT scan with rectally-administered water soluble contrast or gastrograffin enema,
- are planned for an ileostomy closure operation, and
- are in the first 12 months post-LAR operation
Who cannot join
- Inability to comprehend English or Spanish or provide informed consent (Note: after the English documents are approved, the study team plans to obtain a Spanish consent and study documents),
- ongoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and
- ongoing anastomotic complication.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Digestive Disease Institute Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331
Marylise Boutros, MD
About this study
Official title: Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Early Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Transanal irrigation (TAI) has shown to improve fecal incontinence and increase quality of life in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This trial is a small study being conducted to determine whether a larger trial is feasible. Investigators are also doing this research to see if TAI impacts quality of life and improves bowel function within the early post-operative period (1-12 months).
This treatment is designed for participants to have more control over their bowel movements and reduce the dependency on immediate access to the toilet.
Read the detailed description
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S. with 152,810 new cases estimated for 2024. Rectal cancer comprises one-third of all incident cases, with rising incidence among young individuals (1-2% rise/year). With advances in multidisciplinary management, the overall, 5-year survival has improved (68%), and for localized rectal cancers it is excellent (90%), creating a growing rectal cancer survivorship population (currently >450,000). Traditionally, surgery for rectal cancer required removal of the rectum and the anus, with the creation of a permanent ostomy. However, with recent advances in subspecialty training and technique, in combination with neoadjuvant radiation, surgeons can offer a cure while preserving the anal sphincter and restoring bowel continuity, via a newer technique called Low Anterior Resection (LAR). This technique, favored by surgeons and patients, aims to allow patients to have an option of remaining "close to normal", as opposed to having a permanent ostomy. While this technique has been successful in sparing the rectum, these advancements have not come without consequence. Bowel dysfunction post-LAR, known as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is perhaps the most prevalent and significant sequela, affecting up to 70-90% of rectal cancer survivors. LARS symptoms include fecal incontinence, urgency, increased frequency, stool fragmentation, and incomplete evacuation. These uncontrolled LARS symptoms have a devastating impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), and often persist indefinitely. Treatment for LARS focuses on symptom management, using diet, medications and pelvic floor physiotherapy, but these measures often fail leaving patients with significant symptoms. Consequently, many patients are unable to return to work in their prior roles and require long-term disability or early retirement. Patients also resort to lifestyle restrictions including skipping meals, restricting social and recreational activities, and avoiding travel and exercise, thereby further diminishing their QoL .
Transanal irrigation (TAI) is an established treatment used for fecal incontinence and constipation. TAI is designed to irrigate a large amount of water throughout the entire colon, allowing for scheduled and complete emptying of stool. As such, TAI has the potential to reduce the symptoms of LARS including difficulty emptying, incontinence, and frequent, unpredictable bowel movements. This single daily irrigation is designed to allow patients to be free of bowel movements during the day and reduce their dependency on immediate access to the toilet, thus decreasing the impact of LARS on their daily lives. Currently, TAI is not in wide clinical use for LARS in North America despite reports from small prospective European studies (15-37 patients) demonstrating benefits for LARS . The most recent and robust published study to date, included patients with late LARS (>1-year post-treatment) randomized to TAI (n=16) vs. control (n=22), and reported significant improvements in LARS and QoL at 1 year when using TAI.
Prior work: Investigators have conducted a multi-center, cross-over, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess TAI for late LARS (median 2 years post-treatment) at 7 Canadian institutions (NCT04469426). The trial has completed accrual (n=71). Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to start in either the TAI or control group, and then crossed over to the opposite group. Participants spent 3 months in each arm. Participants in the TAI arm received nursing instruction and online education for learning TAI using the "LARS-TAI" app. I created this web-based HIPAA-compliant, mobile app (iOS™ and Android™ compatible) to support patients with LARS using TAI. The LARS-TAI App is accessible on any device with internet access or cellular data, including smart phones, tablets, and computers. The app contains educational modules on LARS and TAI, a discussion forum, patient videos, and bowel diaries. Investigators are currently completing follow-up and data analysis for this study. This cross-over trial has provided invaluable practical knowledge on educating patients about TAI and has demonstrated a high level of acceptance for TAI as a treatment for LARS within the first North American sample. Furthermore, it has underscored the challenges associated with a cross-over study design, as many participants were hesitant to transition from TAI to the control group due to the marked improvements in LARS and QoL that they experienced with the intervention.
At CCF-FL, I have established a LARS Clinic, with a trained LARS nurse, and investigators have treated over 50 rectal cancer patients with LARS in 2024. Investigators have established a LARS registry and are routinely screening for LARS in our rectal cancer patients. Investigators have partnered with CCF-Ohio who have also started screening rectal cancer patients for LARS. Investigators have identified a high burden (75% major LARS) of LARS post-treatment in our rectal cancer patients.
The knowledge gap: While TAI shows promise for LARS management, the optimal timing for its use remains unclear. The first 6 months post-treatment pose significant challenges for LARS patients, with at least 58% experiencing major LARS and significantly decreased quality of life (QoL). Investigators observed that 54% of these patients with major LARS also experience financial distress, with most unable to return to work. Unfortunately, conservative measures often fail in this early phase, rendering patients in despair as they try to adapt to their altered bowel function. The potential for TAI to improve LARS in this early phase was proposed in a small German RCT (n=37) that demonstrated reduced bowel movements and improved LARS with no significant complications .
Overall, TAI has only been reported in 9 published studies (total n=204) all from outside of the US, including only 3 small RCTs (total n=102). Although these trials are somewhat limited in size and design, taken together they represent important evidence for the benefit of TAI in LARS and are the basis for pursuing a larger North American RCT. TAI is promising for decreasing LARS and improving QoL. Despite this available evidence on the potential benefits of TAI for LARS, TAI is currently not in standard clinical use for LARS in North America due to limited North American data. As such, TAI for the indication of LARS is not available to patients and current insurance plans (medicare/medicaid or private) do not cover its cost. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of a larger trial that will build on the foundation of evidence that supports the use of TAI in rectal cancer patients with LARS. In this pilot and subsequent larger trial, investigators will gather North American data to support the use of TAI in a North American population, especially in the early post-treatment period.
Expected Results: Investigators hypothesize that TAI will decrease early LARS and positively impact quality of life for rectal cancer patients. Investigators aim to transition into a phase III study, with pilot study cases contributing to the larger sample. This strategy optimizes pilot study data use, maintains research momentum, and builds on initial findings. Successful pilot completion will yield data affirming TAI's feasibility and potential efficacy in managing LARS, bolstering our applications for extramural funding (NIH R01 Research Project Grant).
Impact: More than 450,000 rectal cancer patients in the US will enter survivorship for rectal cancer this year, with a rising number of younger patients of working age affected by rectal cancer. TAI may help patients significantly control their symptoms from the early post-operative period, allowing them to return to work and normal activities sooner and improve their QoL. The success of this pilot and consequently our larger trial will provide the necessary evidence to incorporate TAI into standard practice for LARS treatment.
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
- Being tested
- Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit, LARS mobile application
- Keywords
- Transanal irrigation, Peristeen Transanal Irrigation System, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, LARS
- Medical subject headings
- Colorectal Neoplasms, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Peristeen Plus Irrigation kitDevice
Transanal irrigation TAI is performed by inserting an applicator into the anal canal, inflating a balloon to occlude passage of stool and then installing 500-1000 mL of tap water via an irrigation system to fill the rectum and distal colon, followed by evacuation of bowel contents.
Participants in the TAI-intervention arm will receive in-person training to learn how to use TAI and will also be given weekly virtual or in-person follow-up appointments for the first 4 weeks to troubleshoot any issues with TAI.
Participants will do TAI once per day for 3 months. Each session of TAI takes about 20-60 minutes, depending on the individual's experience and bowel response.
LARS mobile applicationOther
Both arms will receive access to the LARS mobile application, which is a digital self-management tool. The app provides interactive educational content, personalized bowel function diaries, guided video tutorials, and peer testimonials, all designed to enhance engagement, promote self-efficacy, and support long-term self-management.
The TAI-intervention arm will also receive access to a TAI Module on the LARS app that will offer comprehensive educational resources, including step-by-step guidance, animations, photographs, and participant videos to reinforce safe and confident use of the TAI system.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Transanal Irrigation (TAI) - intervention arm | Other | Participants in the TAI-intervention arm will receive TAI (using Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit), training of TAI administration, and access to the LARS app (including TAI module). Receives: Device: Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit; Other: LARS mobile application |
| Continued conservative management - control arm. | Other | Participants in the control arm will receive conservative management and access to the LARS app (excluding the TAI module). Conservative management includes individualized combinations of dietary modifications, pharmacologic therapies, pelvic floor rehabilitation, and structured follow-up Receives: Other: LARS mobile application |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at baseline
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Measured: Baseline
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 1 month
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Measured: 1 month post randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 2 months
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Measured: 2 months post randomization
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 3 months
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at baseline
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 1 month
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 2 months
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 3 months
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
Measured: 3 months post randomization
Average monthly randomization rate
Participants who report a LARS Score of ≥20-the threshold for moderate-to-severe LARS-will meet criteria for randomization. Score range: 0-42 (higher scores = more severe LARS; 0-20 = no LARS, 21-29 = minor, 30-42 = major)
Measured: 3 months post ileostomy
Secondary outcomes (31)
PROMIS Physical Function at baseline
PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance.T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Physical Function at 1 month
PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance.T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Physical Function at 2 months
PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Physical Function at 3 months
PROMIS_Physical Function with domains covering Physical capability, daily activity performance.T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better physical function
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at baseline
PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 1 month
PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 2 months
PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 3 months
PROMIS_Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities with domains covering Social, role functioning, engagement in daily life. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = better social participation
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Anxiety at baseline
PROMIS_anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Anxiety at 1 month
PROMIS_anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Anxiety at 2 months
PROMIS_anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Anxiety at 3 months
PROMIS anxiety with domains covering Anxiety symptoms. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more anxiety
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Depression at baseline
PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Depression at 1 month
PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Depression at 2 months
PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Depression at 3 months
PROMIS depression with domains covering Depressive symptoms .T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more depression
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 1 month
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 2 months
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 3 months
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance with domains covering Sleep quality, falling/ staying asleep, restfulness. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = more sleep disturbance
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at baseline
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 1 month
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 2 months
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 3 months
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles, with domains covering Satisfaction with role \& social engagement. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater satisfaction
Measured: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at baseline
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy
Measured: Baseline
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 1 month
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy
Measured: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 2 months
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy
Measured: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 3 months
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions, with domains covering Satisfaction with Confidence in managing symptoms and health tasks. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = greater self-efficacy
Measured: 3 months post randomization
Completeness
Proportion of participants completing the 3-month outcome assessment.
Measured: 3 months post randomization
Treatment adherence rate
Proportion of participants completing at least 80% of TAI sessions over 3-months
Measured: 3 months post randomization
Consent rates
Proportion of participants undergoing ileostomy closure who provide informed consent.
Measured: Post consenting, Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2025
- Study startOct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionNov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Colorectal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07219745
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CASE3225
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 20 Oct 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transanal Irrigation for the Management of Early Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07219745
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CASE3225
- Conditions
- Colorectal Cancer, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome
- Keywords
- Transanal irrigation, Peristeen Transanal Irrigation System, Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, LARS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Case Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Nov 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Transanal irrigation (TAI) has shown to improve fecal incontinence and increase quality of life in patients with low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). This trial is a small study being conducted to determine whether a larger trial is feasible. Investigators are also doing this research to see if TAI impacts quality of life and improves bowel function within the early post-operative period (1-12 months).
This treatment is designed for participants to have more control over their bowel movements and reduce the dependency on immediate access to the toilet.
Detailed description
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the U.S. with 152,810 new cases estimated for 2024. Rectal cancer comprises one-third of all incident cases, with rising incidence among young individuals (1-2% rise/year). With advances in multidisciplinary management, the overall, 5-year survival has improved (68%), and for localized rectal cancers it is excellent (90%), creating a growing rectal cancer survivorship population (currently >450,000). Traditionally, surgery for rectal cancer required removal of the rectum and the anus, with the creation of a permanent ostomy. However, with recent advances in subspecialty training and technique, in combination with neoadjuvant radiation, surgeons can offer a cure while preserving the anal sphincter and restoring bowel continuity, via a newer technique called Low Anterior Resection (LAR). This technique, favored by surgeons and patients, aims to allow patients to have an option of remaining "close to normal", as opposed to having a permanent ostomy. While this technique has been successful in sparing the rectum, these advancements have not come without consequence. Bowel dysfunction post-LAR, known as Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS), is perhaps the most prevalent and significant sequela, affecting up to 70-90% of rectal cancer survivors. LARS symptoms include fecal incontinence, urgency, increased frequency, stool fragmentation, and incomplete evacuation. These uncontrolled LARS symptoms have a devastating impact on patients' quality of life (QoL), and often persist indefinitely. Treatment for LARS focuses on symptom management, using diet, medications and pelvic floor physiotherapy, but these measures often fail leaving patients with significant symptoms. Consequently, many patients are unable to return to work in their prior roles and require long-term disability or early retirement. Patients also resort to lifestyle restrictions including skipping meals, restricting social and recreational activities, and avoiding travel and exercise, thereby further diminishing their QoL .
Transanal irrigation (TAI) is an established treatment used for fecal incontinence and constipation. TAI is designed to irrigate a large amount of water throughout the entire colon, allowing for scheduled and complete emptying of stool. As such, TAI has the potential to reduce the symptoms of LARS including difficulty emptying, incontinence, and frequent, unpredictable bowel movements. This single daily irrigation is designed to allow patients to be free of bowel movements during the day and reduce their dependency on immediate access to the toilet, thus decreasing the impact of LARS on their daily lives. Currently, TAI is not in wide clinical use for LARS in North America despite reports from small prospective European studies (15-37 patients) demonstrating benefits for LARS . The most recent and robust published study to date, included patients with late LARS (>1-year post-treatment) randomized to TAI (n=16) vs. control (n=22), and reported significant improvements in LARS and QoL at 1 year when using TAI.
Prior work: Investigators have conducted a multi-center, cross-over, pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess TAI for late LARS (median 2 years post-treatment) at 7 Canadian institutions (NCT04469426). The trial has completed accrual (n=71). Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to start in either the TAI or control group, and then crossed over to the opposite group. Participants spent 3 months in each arm. Participants in the TAI arm received nursing instruction and online education for learning TAI using the "LARS-TAI" app. I created this web-based HIPAA-compliant, mobile app (iOS™ and Android™ compatible) to support patients with LARS using TAI. The LARS-TAI App is accessible on any device with internet access or cellular data, including smart phones, tablets, and computers. The app contains educational modules on LARS and TAI, a discussion forum, patient videos, and bowel diaries. Investigators are currently completing follow-up and data analysis for this study. This cross-over trial has provided invaluable practical knowledge on educating patients about TAI and has demonstrated a high level of acceptance for TAI as a treatment for LARS within the first North American sample. Furthermore, it has underscored the challenges associated with a cross-over study design, as many participants were hesitant to transition from TAI to the control group due to the marked improvements in LARS and QoL that they experienced with the intervention.
At CCF-FL, I have established a LARS Clinic, with a trained LARS nurse, and investigators have treated over 50 rectal cancer patients with LARS in 2024. Investigators have established a LARS registry and are routinely screening for LARS in our rectal cancer patients. Investigators have partnered with CCF-Ohio who have also started screening rectal cancer patients for LARS. Investigators have identified a high burden (75% major LARS) of LARS post-treatment in our rectal cancer patients.
The knowledge gap: While TAI shows promise for LARS management, the optimal timing for its use remains unclear. The first 6 months post-treatment pose significant challenges for LARS patients, with at least 58% experiencing major LARS and significantly decreased quality of life (QoL). Investigators observed that 54% of these patients with major LARS also experience financial distress, with most unable to return to work. Unfortunately, conservative measures often fail in this early phase, rendering patients in despair as they try to adapt to their altered bowel function. The potential for TAI to improve LARS in this early phase was proposed in a small German RCT (n=37) that demonstrated reduced bowel movements and improved LARS with no significant complications .
Overall, TAI has only been reported in 9 published studies (total n=204) all from outside of the US, including only 3 small RCTs (total n=102). Although these trials are somewhat limited in size and design, taken together they represent important evidence for the benefit of TAI in LARS and are the basis for pursuing a larger North American RCT. TAI is promising for decreasing LARS and improving QoL. Despite this available evidence on the potential benefits of TAI for LARS, TAI is currently not in standard clinical use for LARS in North America due to limited North American data. As such, TAI for the indication of LARS is not available to patients and current insurance plans (medicare/medicaid or private) do not cover its cost. This pilot trial aims to assess the feasibility of a larger trial that will build on the foundation of evidence that supports the use of TAI in rectal cancer patients with LARS. In this pilot and subsequent larger trial, investigators will gather North American data to support the use of TAI in a North American population, especially in the early post-treatment period.
Expected Results: Investigators hypothesize that TAI will decrease early LARS and positively impact quality of life for rectal cancer patients. Investigators aim to transition into a phase III study, with pilot study cases contributing to the larger sample. This strategy optimizes pilot study data use, maintains research momentum, and builds on initial findings. Successful pilot completion will yield data affirming TAI's feasibility and potential efficacy in managing LARS, bolstering our applications for extramural funding (NIH R01 Research Project Grant).
Impact: More than 450,000 rectal cancer patients in the US will enter survivorship for rectal cancer this year, with a rising number of younger patients of working age affected by rectal cancer. TAI may help patients significantly control their symptoms from the early post-operative period, allowing them to return to work and normal activities sooner and improve their QoL. The success of this pilot and consequently our larger trial will provide the necessary evidence to incorporate TAI into standard practice for LARS treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Transanal Irrigation (TAI) - intervention arm | Other | Device: Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit, Other: LARS mobile applicationParticipants in the TAI-intervention arm will receive TAI (using Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit), training of TAI administration, and access to the LARS app (including TAI module). |
| Continued conservative management - control arm. | Other | Other: LARS mobile applicationParticipants in the control arm will receive conservative management and access to the LARS app (excluding the TAI module). Conservative management includes individualized combinations of dietary modifications, pharmacologic therapies, pelvic floor rehabilitation, and structured follow-up |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults (≥18 years-old) patients who underwent a LAR for any indication via open, laparoscopic, robotic, or transanal total mesorectal excision, with creation of a diverting loop ileostomy,
- have confirmed anastomotic healing demonstrated by flexible sigmoidoscopy and CT scan with rectally-administered water soluble contrast or gastrograffin enema,
- are planned for an ileostomy closure operation, and
- are in the first 12 months post-LAR operation
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Inability to comprehend English or Spanish or provide informed consent (Note: after the English documents are approved, the study team plans to obtain a Spanish consent and study documents),
- ongoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, and
- ongoing anastomotic complication.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Peristeen Plus Irrigation kitTransanal irrigation TAI is performed by inserting an applicator into the anal canal, inflating a balloon to occlude passage of stool and then installing 500-1000 mL of tap water via an irrigation system to fill the rectum and distal colon, followed by evacuation of bowel contents. Participants in the TAI-intervention arm will receive in-person training to learn how to use TAI and will also be given weekly virtual or in-person follow-up appointments for the first 4 weeks to troubleshoot any issues with TAI. Participants will do TAI once per day for 3 months. Each session of TAI takes about 20-60 minutes, depending on the individual's experience and bowel response. | Device | Transanal Irrigation (TAI) - intervention arm |
| LARS mobile applicationBoth arms will receive access to the LARS mobile application, which is a digital self-management tool. The app provides interactive educational content, personalized bowel function diaries, guided video tutorials, and peer testimonials, all designed to enhance engagement, promote self-efficacy, and support long-term self-management. The TAI-intervention arm will also receive access to a TAI Module on the LARS app that will offer comprehensive educational resources, including step-by-step guidance, animations, photographs, and participant videos to reinforce safe and confident use of the TAI system. | Other | Continued conservative management - control arm., Transanal Irrigation (TAI) - intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS_GI Diarrhea with domains covering Frequency, urgency, burden. T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse diarrhea
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
PROMIS-GI Fecal Incontinence at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS_GI Fecal Incontinence with domains covering Leakage, control, impact . T-score (mean = 50, SD = 10); higher scores = worse incontinence
Average monthly randomization rate
Time frame: 3 months post ileostomy
Participants who report a LARS Score of ≥20-the threshold for moderate-to-severe LARS-will meet criteria for randomization. Score range: 0-42 (higher scores = more severe LARS; 0-20 = no LARS, 21-29 = minor, 30-42 = major)
31 secondary outcomes
PROMIS Physical Function at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Physical Function at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Physical Function at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Physical Function at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Anxiety at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Anxiety at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Anxiety at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Anxiety at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Depression at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Depression at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Depression at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Depression at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at baseline
Time frame: Baseline
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 1 month
Time frame: 1 month post randomization
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 2 months
Time frame: 2 months post randomization
PROMIS Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Conditions at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
Completeness
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
Treatment adherence rate
Time frame: 3 months post randomization
Consent rates
Time frame: Post consenting, Baseline
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Aug 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes
Related trials for Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Study of the Anti-Programmed Death Ligand-1 Durvalumab Antibody (MEDI4736) in Combination With Olaparib and/or Cediranib for Advanced Solid Tumors and Advanced or Recurrent Ovarian, Triple Negative Breast, Lung, Prostate and Colorectal Can...
Colorectal Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Targeted Therapies in Subpopulations of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (INTRINSIC)
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Streamlined Geriatric and Oncological Evaluation Based On IC Technology
Breast Cancer, Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
SAMe in Prevention of Oxaliplatin-associated Liver Injury
Colorectal Cancer, Liver Metastases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Peristeen Plus Irrigation kit and LARS mobile application in people with Colorectal Cancer and Low Anterior Resection Syndrome, run by Case Comprehensive Cancer Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Marylise Boutros, MD (954-659-5278, CORSFLresearch@ccf.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-GI Diarrhea at baseline (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.