Ovarian EndometriomaCUSA-ENDONCT07215130
Selective Removal of Endometriotic Lesions Using CUSA Clarity in Ovarian Endometriomas
An observational study of Ovarian Endometrioma and Endometriosis, run by Kanazawa University at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and tissue selectivity of a novel surgical technology, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity, in the management of ovarian endometriomas. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometriosis
- What is being tested?
- Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- 30 Jan 2025to 31 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Women aged 20 years or older diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma and treated surgically at Kanazawa University Hospital. Surgically resected ovarian endometrioma specimens are used for ex vivo histopathological evaluation of selective lesion removal using the CUSA® Clarity device.
Who may be able to join
- Female patients diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma who undergo surgical treatment (cystectomy or adnexectomy) at Kanazawa University Hospital between January 1, 2025, and March 31, 2027.
- Written informed consent obtained prior to study participation.
- Age ≥ 20 years at the time of consent.
- For patients with previously stored endometrioma specimens under a broad consent, additional written consent for participation in this study will be obtained.
Who cannot join
- Patients with suspected malignancy based on preoperative imaging.
- Patients judged by the attending physician to be unsuitable for participation in this study for any reason.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Japan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Kanazawa University Hospital
Kanazawa, Ishikawa-ken, 9208641
Tatsuhito Kanda, MD, PhD, +81-76-265-2000, tkanda@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
About this study
Official title: Selective Removal of Endometriotic Lesions Using CUSA Clarity in Ovarian Endometriomas: A Case-Based Histopathological Study
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and tissue selectivity of a novel surgical technology, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity, in the management of ovarian endometriomas. Ovarian endometriomas are cysts caused by endometriosis that can damage ovarian reserve when treated by conventional surgery. In this study, ovarian cyst wall specimens are examined ex vivo using different Tissue Select settings of the CUSA device. Histopathological analyses are performed to determine whether endometriotic epithelium can be selectively removed while preserving normal ovarian tissue. The findings may contribute to developing fertility-preserving surgical approaches for women with endometriomas.
Read the detailed description
Endometriomas are one of the most common manifestations of endometriosis and are frequently associated with infertility. Conventional cystectomy often results in inadvertent removal of normal ovarian tissue, which may reduce ovarian reserve. To address this issue, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity system, particularly with the Tissue Select mode, has been proposed as a tissue-selective surgical device.
In this observational histopathological study, ovarian endometrioma wall specimens obtained during surgery are divided into multiple parts. Each part is subjected to ex vivo treatment with the CUSA Clarity device at different Tissue Select settings (0-4). The treated samples are fixed, paraffin-embedded, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical markers (e.g., cytokeratin 7, CD10). Pathologists evaluate the extent of removal of endometriotic lesions and preservation of normal ovarian stroma.
The primary objective is to assess whether endometriotic epithelium can be selectively removed while sparing ovarian stromal tissue. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the depth of tissue removal and the presence of residual lesions at unscraped margins. The results are expected to provide histopathological evidence supporting the potential clinical application of CUSA in fertility-preserving surgery for ovarian endometriomas.
- Conditions
- Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometriosis
- Being tested
- Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity
- Keywords
- Endometriosis, Ovarian Cyst, CUSA Clarity, Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Fertility Preservation, Histopathology
- Medical subject headings
- Endometriosis, Ovarian Cysts
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) ClarityDevice
Also called CUSA Clarity
Ex vivo application of the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity device to ovarian endometrioma cyst wall specimens. Tissue Select settings from 0 to 4 are used to evaluate tissue selectivity, specifically removal of endometriotic epithelium while preserving normal ovarian stroma. Samples are subsequently analyzed histopathologically.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ovarian Endometrioma Cases | Patients with ovarian endometriomas undergoing surgical excision at Kanazawa University Hospital. Cyst wall specimens are collected and analyzed ex vivo using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity device at different Tissue Select settings. Histopathological evaluation is performed to assess selective removal of endometriotic epithelium and preservation of ovarian stroma. Receives: Device: Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Histopathological confirmation of selective removal of endometriotic epithelium with preservation of ovarian stroma
Evaluation of hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical stained sections to determine whether endometriotic epithelial lining is removed while normal ovarian stroma is preserved.
Measured: Immediately after ex vivo CUSA treatment of specimens (within 1 day of surgery)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Depth of tissue removal at different Tissue Select settings
Histological measurement of tissue removal depth under Tissue Select settings 0-4 using H\&E and Sirius Red staining.
Measured: Immediately after ex vivo treatment
Presence of residual endometriotic lesions at unscraped margins
Histological evaluation of cyst wall margins not subjected to CUSA scraping to confirm lesion selectivity.
Measured: Immediately after ex vivo treatment
Immunohistochemical assessment of epithelial and stromal markers
Immunostaining with cytokeratin 7 (epithelial) and CD10 (stromal) to assess selective tissue removal.
Measured: Within 1 week after sample fixation and processing
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Oct 2025
- Study start30 Jan 2025
- Primary completion31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ovarian EndometriomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kanazawa University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Takashi IIZUKA, Kanazawa University
- Investigators
- Kaoru Abiko, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Kanazawa University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07215130
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- KU-OBGYN-CUSA-2025-01
- Acronym
- CUSA-ENDO
- Status last verified
- Oct 2025
- First submitted
- 1 Oct 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Muzii L, Bianchi A, Bellati F, Cristi E, Pernice M, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Panici PB. Histologic analysis of endometriomas: what the surgeon needs to know. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.055. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
PubMed 17094980D'Alterio MN, Nappi L, Vitale SG, Agus M, Fanni D, Malzoni M, Falcone F, Sorrentino F, D'Agate MG, Scibilia G, Mereu L, Scollo P, Angioni S. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve and Recurrence Rate After DWLS Diode Laser Ovarian Endometrioma Vaporization (OMAlaser): A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Clinical Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025 Mar;32(3):279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
PubMed 39477011Ferrari SM, Dolci C, Taccagni G, Congia C, Ottolina J, Schimberni M, Bartiromo L, Candiani M. Histologic findings from ablation of ovarian endometriomas using argon plasma coagulation (APC-ENDO): a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Aug;312:114532. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114532. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
PubMed 40540997Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, Ferrari S, Castellano LM, Tandoi I, Pagliardini L, Nocun A, Jach R. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2205-2211. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey305.
PubMed 30299482Younis JS, Shapso N, Ben-Sira Y, Nelson SM, Izhaki I. Endometrioma surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):33-51.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.102. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
PubMed 34265271Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, Marchetti C, Perniola G, Panici PB. The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2190-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu199. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
PubMed 25085800Vasquez JM, Eisenberg E, Osteen KG, Hickerson D, Diamond MP. Laparoscopic ablation of endometriosis using the cavitational ultrasonic surgical aspirator. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1993 Nov;1(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80756-x.
PubMed 9050458Adamyan L, Kasyan V, Pivazyan L, Isaeva S, Avetisyan J. Laser vaporization compared with other surgical techniques in women with ovarian endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):413-425. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06799-4. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
PubMed 36175684Matsuzaki S, Houlle C, Darcha C, Pouly JL, Mage G, Canis M. Analysis of risk factors for the removal of normal ovarian tissue during laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep043. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
PubMed 19246468Bafort C, Beebeejaun Y, Tomassetti C, Bosteels J, Duffy JM. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):CD011031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub3.
PubMed 33095458
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Selective Removal of Endometriotic Lesions Using CUSA Clarity in Ovarian Endometriomas: A Case-Based Histopathological Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07215130
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CUSA-ENDO / KU-OBGYN-CUSA-2025-01
- Conditions
- Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometriosis
- Keywords
- Endometriosis, Ovarian Cyst, CUSA Clarity, Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator, Fertility Preservation, Histopathology
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kanazawa UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Mar 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and tissue selectivity of a novel surgical technology, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity, in the management of ovarian endometriomas. Ovarian endometriomas are cysts caused by endometriosis that can damage ovarian reserve when treated by conventional surgery. In this study, ovarian cyst wall specimens are examined ex vivo using different Tissue Select settings of the CUSA device. Histopathological analyses are performed to determine whether endometriotic epithelium can be selectively removed while preserving normal ovarian tissue. The findings may contribute to developing fertility-preserving surgical approaches for women with endometriomas.
Detailed description
Endometriomas are one of the most common manifestations of endometriosis and are frequently associated with infertility. Conventional cystectomy often results in inadvertent removal of normal ovarian tissue, which may reduce ovarian reserve. To address this issue, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity system, particularly with the Tissue Select mode, has been proposed as a tissue-selective surgical device.
In this observational histopathological study, ovarian endometrioma wall specimens obtained during surgery are divided into multiple parts. Each part is subjected to ex vivo treatment with the CUSA Clarity device at different Tissue Select settings (0-4). The treated samples are fixed, paraffin-embedded, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical markers (e.g., cytokeratin 7, CD10). Pathologists evaluate the extent of removal of endometriotic lesions and preservation of normal ovarian stroma.
The primary objective is to assess whether endometriotic epithelium can be selectively removed while sparing ovarian stromal tissue. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the depth of tissue removal and the presence of residual lesions at unscraped margins. The results are expected to provide histopathological evidence supporting the potential clinical application of CUSA in fertility-preserving surgery for ovarian endometriomas.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ovarian Endometrioma Cases | – | Device: Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) ClarityPatients with ovarian endometriomas undergoing surgical excision at Kanazawa University Hospital. Cyst wall specimens are collected and analyzed ex vivo using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity device at different Tissue Select settings. Histopathological evaluation is performed to assess selective removal of endometriotic epithelium and preservation of ovarian stroma. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Women aged 20 years or older diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma and treated surgically at Kanazawa University Hospital. Surgically resected ovarian endometrioma specimens are used for ex vivo histopathological evaluation of selective lesion removal using the CUSA® Clarity device.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female patients diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma who undergo surgical treatment (cystectomy or adnexectomy) at Kanazawa University Hospital between January 1, 2025, and March 31, 2027.
- Written informed consent obtained prior to study participation.
- Age ≥ 20 years at the time of consent.
- For patients with previously stored endometrioma specimens under a broad consent, additional written consent for participation in this study will be obtained.
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients with suspected malignancy based on preoperative imaging.
- Patients judged by the attending physician to be unsuitable for participation in this study for any reason.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) ClarityAlso: CUSA ClarityEx vivo application of the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity device to ovarian endometrioma cyst wall specimens. Tissue Select settings from 0 to 4 are used to evaluate tissue selectivity, specifically removal of endometriotic epithelium while preserving normal ovarian stroma. Samples are subsequently analyzed histopathologically. | Device | Ovarian Endometrioma Cases |
Primary outcome
Histopathological confirmation of selective removal of endometriotic epithelium with preservation of ovarian stroma
Time frame: Immediately after ex vivo CUSA treatment of specimens (within 1 day of surgery)
Evaluation of hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical stained sections to determine whether endometriotic epithelial lining is removed while normal ovarian stroma is preserved.
3 secondary outcomes
Depth of tissue removal at different Tissue Select settings
Time frame: Immediately after ex vivo treatment
Presence of residual endometriotic lesions at unscraped margins
Time frame: Immediately after ex vivo treatment
Immunohistochemical assessment of epithelial and stromal markers
Time frame: Within 1 week after sample fixation and processing
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Oct 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 17094980Muzii L, Bianchi A, Bellati F, Cristi E, Pernice M, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Panici PB. Histologic analysis of endometriomas: what the surgeon needs to know. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.055. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 39477011D'Alterio MN, Nappi L, Vitale SG, Agus M, Fanni D, Malzoni M, Falcone F, Sorrentino F, D'Agate MG, Scibilia G, Mereu L, Scollo P, Angioni S. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve and Recurrence Rate After DWLS Diode Laser Ovarian Endometrioma Vaporization (OMAlaser): A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Clinical Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025 Mar;32(3):279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
- Results publication: PubMed 40540997Ferrari SM, Dolci C, Taccagni G, Congia C, Ottolina J, Schimberni M, Bartiromo L, Candiani M. Histologic findings from ablation of ovarian endometriomas using argon plasma coagulation (APC-ENDO): a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Aug;312:114532. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114532. Epub 2025 Jun 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 30299482Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, Ferrari S, Castellano LM, Tandoi I, Pagliardini L, Nocun A, Jach R. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2205-2211. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey305.
- Results publication: PubMed 34265271Younis JS, Shapso N, Ben-Sira Y, Nelson SM, Izhaki I. Endometrioma surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):33-51.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.102. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
- Results publication: PubMed 25085800Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, Marchetti C, Perniola G, Panici PB. The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2190-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu199. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 9050458Vasquez JM, Eisenberg E, Osteen KG, Hickerson D, Diamond MP. Laparoscopic ablation of endometriosis using the cavitational ultrasonic surgical aspirator. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1993 Nov;1(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80756-x.
- Results publication: PubMed 36175684Adamyan L, Kasyan V, Pivazyan L, Isaeva S, Avetisyan J. Laser vaporization compared with other surgical techniques in women with ovarian endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):413-425. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06799-4. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
- Results publication: PubMed 19246468Matsuzaki S, Houlle C, Darcha C, Pouly JL, Mage G, Canis M. Analysis of risk factors for the removal of normal ovarian tissue during laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep043. Epub 2009 Feb 26.
- Results publication: PubMed 33095458Bafort C, Beebeejaun Y, Tomassetti C, Bosteels J, Duffy JM. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):CD011031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub3.
- Official website of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kanazawa UniversityLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Ovarian Endometrioma
RecruitingPhase 4
Estetrol/Drospirenone to Reduce the Average Size of Endometriomas
Ovarian Endometrioma, Endometrioma
Recruiting
Effect of Alcohol Sclerotherapy on Pelvic Pain and Quality of Life in Women With Ovarian Endometriosis
Endometrioma, Ultrasound Therapy; Complications
Recruiting
Argon Plasma Treatment for Ovarian Endometrioma Compared to Standard Cystectomy
Endometriosis
RecruitingObservational study
Study on the Ultrasound and Biological Characteristics of Atypical Endometriosis.
Endometriosis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Laparoscopic Sclerotherapy for the Management of Ovarian Endometriomas
Endometriosis, Endometrioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Kaoru Abiko, MD, PhD principal investigator
Kanazawa University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Ovarian Endometrioma and Endometriosis, run by Kanazawa University at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tatsuhito Kanda, MD, PhD (+81-76-265-2425, tkanda@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Histopathological confirmation of selective removal of endometriotic epithelium with preservation of ovarian stroma (time frame: Immediately after ex vivo CUSA treatment of specimens (within 1 day of surgery)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07215130, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2025.