Endometrial CancerENDORISK-INCT07200466
Individualised Endometrial Cancer Risk Stratification by Bayesian Prediction Model (ENDORISK), Optimizing Clinical Implementation
A study testing ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 14 sites in Netherlands.
Trial summary
Rationale: Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, a Bayesian network model called ENDORISK was developed and validated in three external cohorts to improve preoperative risk stratification. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Endometrial Cancer
- What is being tested?
- ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 735 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesNetherlands
- Study dates
- 23 Oct 2025to 16 Oct 2032
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with early stage (FIGO stage I-II) endometrial carcinoma (every grade permitted)
- Eligible for primary surgical treatment (neo-adjuvant therapy is permitted)
Who cannot join
- Unable to give informed consent
- No understanding of Dutch or English language
- Rare types of endometrial cancer, such as endometrial stroma cell sarcoma
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Hanny M.A. Pijnenborg, MD, PhD contact
14 sites in 1 country
Netherlands14 sites, 14 recruiting
- Recruiting
Jeroen Bosch Hospital
's-Hertogenbosch, North Brabant
Louis van der Putten, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Rijnstate
Arnhem, Gelderland
Tijmen Bonestroo, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Amphia
Breda, North Brabant
Dennis van Hamont, MD PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Slingeland Hospital
Doetinchem, Gelderland
Kirsten Smeets, MD
Myrtille Vallen, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Gelderse Vallei
Ede, Gelderland
Rahul Samlal, MD
Lidewij Bartelink, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Catharina Hospital
Eindhoven, North Brabant
Dorry Boll, MD PhD
- Recruiting
St. Anna Hospital
Geldrop, North Brabant
Channa E Schmeink, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Elkerliek Hospital
Helmond, North Brabant
Joris van Esch, MD
- Recruiting
Radboudumc
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525GA
Hanny M.A. Pijnenborg, MD PhD, +31 024 361 1111, hanny.ma.pijnenborg@radboudumc.nl
Ruben Koek, MD
- Not yet recruiting
Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis (CWZ)
Nijmegen, Gelderland
Willem Jan van Weelden, MD PhD
- Recruiting
Elisabeth-Tweesteden Hospital
Tilburg, North Brabant
Marieke Smink, MD
- Recruiting
Bernhoven Hospital
Uden, North Brabant
Angèle Oei, MD
Jos Vollenbergh, MD
- Recruiting
Maxima Medical Center
Veldhoven, North Brabant
Viola Verhoef, MD PhD
- Not yet recruiting
Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix
Winterswijk, Gelderland
Charlotte Lybol, MD PhD
Lotte van Dijk, MD
About this study
Official title: ENDORISK Clinical Implementation Study
Rationale: Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, a Bayesian network model called ENDORISK was developed and validated in three external cohorts to improve preoperative risk stratification. The next step is to implement and evaluate whether use of the model improves daily clinical practice. Objective: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate whether implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice improves preoperative risk stratification. Study design: A stepped wedge non inferiority study in which two oncology regions will consecutively start implementation of ENDORISK with one year interval. The ENDORISK model will be filled in and used in preoperative treatment counselling. Results will be compared to current standard clinical care which is prospectively evaluated in both regions since March 2022 in the 'evaluation of care in endometrial cancer' study (2021-7400). Study population: all consecutive patients recently diagnosed with early stage EC who are eligible for surgical treatment, who understand Dutch and are able to fill in a digital or paper questionnaire can be included. Main study parameters/endpoints: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice by investigating:
- The proportion of identified LNM in patients with lymph node staging (positive predictive value (PPV)) compared to standard care
- Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care
- Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care
- Patients' disease- specific-, overall survival, and health-related quality of life compared to standard care
- Patients' and doctors' use of and experiences with the ENDORISK-model
- Impact of ENDORISK on regional care costs
- Conditions
- Endometrial Cancer
- Being tested
- ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.
- Keywords
- ENDORISK, Endometrial Cancer, surgical staging, risk stratification, lymph node metastases, lymphadenectomy, sentinel node
- Medical subject headings
- Endometrial Neoplasms, Lymphatic Metastasis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.Diagnostic test
The intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | The control arm is a group of patients from our previous 'evaluation of care' study which underwent standard care for endometrial cancer between march of 2022 and the start of the ENDORISK-I study. This group serves as a control group for the intervention arm. |
| Intervention | Experimental | The intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk. Receives: Diagnostic Test: ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care.
Measured: from enrolment to surgery
Proportion of patients with lymph node metastases within patients undergoing lymph node staging (the positive predictive value) in ENDORISK care
The lymph node metastases in patients undergoing lymph node staging will be determined by pathology report on the surgical specimen. The positive predicting value will be compared to the positive predictive value of standard care.
Measured: From enrolment to time of surgery
Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care, measured by questionnaires.
Information provision score: Questionnaire EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-INFO25 with additional questions specific to ENDORISK use.
Shared-decision making score: Shared Decision Making Questionnaire SDM-Q-9 with additional questions specific to ENDORISK use
Measured: From enrolment to 12 weeks post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (10)
Patients' 5-year disease- specific-, overall survival (DSS, OS), compared to standard care;
Measured: from enrolment to 5-year post surgery
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care
as measured by questionnaire: EORTC Quality of life questionnaire (QLQ) -C30
Measured: 12 weeks after primary surgery
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care
as measured by questionnaire: EORTC QLQ-C30
Measured: 12 months after primary surgery
Treatment-related morbidity compared to standard care
As measured by questionnaire: EORTC QLQ- Endometrial cancer (EN) 24
Measured: 12 weeks after primary surgery
Treatment related morbidity compared to standard care
As measured by questionnaire: EORTC QLQ-EN24 and questionnaires about lymphoedema: EORTC IL76 \& Lymphoedema quality of Life (LYMQOL)
Measured: 12 months after primary surgery
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Questionnaire at baseline
Measured: at baseline
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Questionnaire at 9 months
Measured: 9 months after start of inclusions
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Questionnaire at 18 months
Measured: 18 months after start of inclusions
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
In depth interviews with a sample of participating clinicians to evaluate user experiences.
Measured: Within 1 year of start of the inclusion period in their hospital.
Impact of ENDORISK on regional care costs
Measured: from enrolment to the end of inclusions
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Oct 2025
- Study start23 Oct 2025
- Primary completion16 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Oct 2032 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Endometrial CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Radboud University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Patients will receive a personalized treatment plan based on the risk of lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model. Patients with low grade endometrial cancer (EC) (grade I-II) at high risk of lymph node metastases might therefore undergo additional surgical staging, through either sentinel lymph node procedure or lymphadenectomy. Patients with low grade EC (grade I-II) at low-risk of lymph node metastases are counselled to undergo standard treatment, which involves hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with high grade EC (grade III), receive their personalized risk but will undergo standard care to further validate the ENDORISK model in this group.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 735 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Amphia Hospital, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Elkerliek Hospital, St. Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, Netherlands, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, s'-Hertogenbosch, Rijnstate Hospital, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Maxima Medical Center, Bernhoven Hospital, Maas Hospital Pantein, Slingeland Hospital, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands, Stichting PAMM
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07200466
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NL86300.000.24
- Other IDs
- 14032
- Acronym
- ENDORISK-I
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Only anonymized datasets (without patient numbers, date of birth or name) will be shared with other people relevant to the study or relevant to additional studies as reported in the patient information folder. Patients are requested whether or not they give permission to use anonymized data from this study for further research into cervical cancer.
Publications
Vinklerova P, Ovesna P, Hausnerova J, Pijnenborg JMA, Lucas PJF, Reijnen C, Vrede S, Weinberger V. External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK). Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:939226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.939226. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35992828Reijnen C, Gogou E, Visser NCM, Engerud H, Ramjith J, van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, van der Wurff AAM, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F; ENITEC Consortium; Massuger LFAG, Snijders MPLM, Kusters-Vandevelde HVN, Lucas PJF, Pijnenborg JMA. Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study. PLoS Med. 2020 May 15;17(5):e1003111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003111. eCollection 2020 May.
PubMed 32413043Grube M, Reijnen C, Lucas PJF, Kommoss F, Kommoss FKF, Brucker SY, Walter CB, Oberlechner E, Kramer B, Andress J, Neis F, Staebler A, Pijnenborg JMA, Kommoss S. Improved preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients: external validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian network model in a large population-based case series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04218-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
PubMed 35939115
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ENDORISK Clinical Implementation Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07200466
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ENDORISK-I / NL86300.000.24
- Conditions
- Endometrial Cancer
- Keywords
- ENDORISK, Endometrial Cancer, surgical staging, risk stratification, lymph node metastases, lymphadenectomy, sentinel node
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 735 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis, Amphia Hospital, Catharina Ziekenhuis Eindhoven, Elkerliek Hospital, St. Anna Ziekenhuis, Geldrop, Netherlands, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, s'-Hertogenbosch, Rijnstate Hospital, Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital, Maxima Medical Center, Bernhoven Hospital, Maas Hospital Pantein, Slingeland Hospital, Streekziekenhuis Koningin Beatrix, Gelderse Vallei Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Centre The Netherlands, Stichting PAMM
- Study start
- 23 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Oct 2032 (estimated)
- First posted
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Rationale: Preoperative identification of patients at risk for lymph node metastasis (LNM) is challenging in endometrial cancer (EC). Therefore, a Bayesian network model called ENDORISK was developed and validated in three external cohorts to improve preoperative risk stratification. The next step is to implement and evaluate whether use of the model improves daily clinical practice. Objective: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate whether implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice improves preoperative risk stratification. Study design: A stepped wedge non inferiority study in which two oncology regions will consecutively start implementation of ENDORISK with one year interval. The ENDORISK model will be filled in and used in preoperative treatment counselling. Results will be compared to current standard clinical care which is prospectively evaluated in both regions since March 2022 in the 'evaluation of care in endometrial cancer' study (2021-7400). Study population: all consecutive patients recently diagnosed with early stage EC who are eligible for surgical treatment, who understand Dutch and are able to fill in a digital or paper questionnaire can be included. Main study parameters/endpoints: The ENDORISK implementation (ENDORISK-I) study aims to prospectively evaluate implementation of ENDORISK in daily clinical practice by investigating:
- The proportion of identified LNM in patients with lymph node staging (positive predictive value (PPV)) compared to standard care
- Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care
- Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care
- Patients' disease- specific-, overall survival, and health-related quality of life compared to standard care
- Patients' and doctors' use of and experiences with the ENDORISK-model
- Impact of ENDORISK on regional care costs
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients will receive a personalized treatment plan based on the risk of lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model. Patients with low grade endometrial cancer (EC) (grade I-II) at high risk of lymph node metastases might therefore undergo additional surgical staging, through either sentinel lymph node procedure or lymphadenectomy. Patients with low grade EC (grade I-II) at low-risk of lymph node metastases are counselled to undergo standard treatment, which involves hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients with high grade EC (grade III), receive their personalized risk but will undergo standard care to further validate the ENDORISK model in this group.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –The control arm is a group of patients from our previous 'evaluation of care' study which underwent standard care for endometrial cancer between march of 2022 and the start of the ENDORISK-I study. This group serves as a control group for the intervention arm. |
| Intervention | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.The intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosed with early stage (FIGO stage I-II) endometrial carcinoma (every grade permitted)
- Eligible for primary surgical treatment (neo-adjuvant therapy is permitted)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Unable to give informed consent
- No understanding of Dutch or English language
- Rare types of endometrial cancer, such as endometrial stroma cell sarcoma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer.The intervention group are patients receiving a personalized risk on lymph node metastases as predicted by the ENDORISK model, they also receive a treatment plan (hysterectomy + bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without lymph node surgery) based on this personalized risk. | Diagnostic test | Intervention |
Primary outcome
Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care.
Time frame: from enrolment to surgery
Proportion of patients with lymph node metastases within patients undergoing lymph node staging (the positive predictive value) in ENDORISK care
Time frame: From enrolment to time of surgery
The lymph node metastases in patients undergoing lymph node staging will be determined by pathology report on the surgical specimen. The positive predicting value will be compared to the positive predictive value of standard care.
Preoperative information provision for patients and shared-decision making with the use of ENDORISK compared to standard care, measured by questionnaires.
Time frame: From enrolment to 12 weeks post-operatively
Information provision score: Questionnaire EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-INFO25 with additional questions specific to ENDORISK use. Shared-decision making score: Shared Decision Making Questionnaire SDM-Q-9 with additional questions specific to ENDORISK use
10 secondary outcomes
Patients' 5-year disease- specific-, overall survival (DSS, OS), compared to standard care;
Time frame: from enrolment to 5-year post surgery
Health related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care
Time frame: 12 weeks after primary surgery
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) compared to standard care
Time frame: 12 months after primary surgery
Treatment-related morbidity compared to standard care
Time frame: 12 weeks after primary surgery
Treatment related morbidity compared to standard care
Time frame: 12 months after primary surgery
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Time frame: at baseline
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Time frame: 9 months after start of inclusions
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Time frame: 18 months after start of inclusions
Clinicians' experiences with ENDORISK care
Time frame: Within 1 year of start of the inclusion period in their hospital.
Impact of ENDORISK on regional care costs
Time frame: from enrolment to the end of inclusions
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Jul 2026.
- Background: PubMed 35992828Vinklerova P, Ovesna P, Hausnerova J, Pijnenborg JMA, Lucas PJF, Reijnen C, Vrede S, Weinberger V. External validation study of endometrial cancer preoperative risk stratification model (ENDORISK). Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 3;12:939226. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.939226. eCollection 2022.
- Background: PubMed 32413043Reijnen C, Gogou E, Visser NCM, Engerud H, Ramjith J, van der Putten LJM, van de Vijver K, Santacana M, Bronsert P, Bulten J, Hirschfeld M, Colas E, Gil-Moreno A, Reques A, Mancebo G, Krakstad C, Trovik J, Haldorsen IS, Huvila J, Koskas M, Weinberger V, Bednarikova M, Hausnerova J, van der Wurff AAM, Matias-Guiu X, Amant F; ENITEC Consortium; Massuger LFAG, Snijders MPLM, Kusters-Vandevelde HVN, Lucas PJF, Pijnenborg JMA. Preoperative risk stratification in endometrial cancer (ENDORISK) by a Bayesian network model: A development and validation study. PLoS Med. 2020 May 15;17(5):e1003111. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003111. eCollection 2020 May.
- Background: PubMed 35939115Grube M, Reijnen C, Lucas PJF, Kommoss F, Kommoss FKF, Brucker SY, Walter CB, Oberlechner E, Kramer B, Andress J, Neis F, Staebler A, Pijnenborg JMA, Kommoss S. Improved preoperative risk stratification in endometrial carcinoma patients: external validation of the ENDORISK Bayesian network model in a large population-based case series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul;149(7):3361-3369. doi: 10.1007/s00432-022-04218-4. Epub 2022 Aug 8.
- ENDORISK website with information relating to the ENDORISK model and the research teamLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Only anonymized datasets (without patient numbers, date of birth or name) will be shared with other people relevant to the study or relevant to additional studies as reported in the patient information folder. Patients are requested whether or not they give permission to use anonymized data from this study for further research into cervical cancer.
Related trials for Endometrial Cancer
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Endometrial Cancer Patientes MMR Deficient Comparing Chemotherapy vs Dostarlimab in First Line
Endometrial Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Testing the Addition of an Antiangiogenic Drug (Bevacizumab) to Chemotherapy (Carboplatin and Paclitaxel) Combined With Immunotherapy (Pembrolizumab) for pMMR, TP53 Mutated Endometrial Cancer
Advanced Endometrial Carcinoma, Recurrent Endometrial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer
Stage I Uterine Corpus Carcinoma or Carcinosarcoma AJCC v8
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Hanny M.A. Pijnenborg, MD, PhD contact
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing ENDORISK personalized risk assesment for lymph node metastases in endometrial cancer. in people with Endometrial Cancer, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 14 sites in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ruben C.G. Koek, MD / Drs (+31631015109, ruben.koek@radboudumc.nl), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of patients who decide to have lymph node status assessed in ENDORISK care compared to standard care. (time frame: from enrolment to surgery). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07200466, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2026.