AzTrials
AzTrials

Critical IllnessPhase 4MAGNOLIANCT07173855

Effect of Protocolized Magnesium Replacement on Mortality and Atrial Fibrillation in Critically Ill Patients

A Phase 4 study testing Magnesium sulfate administration, Magnesium oxide and Magnesium glucoheptonate in people with Critical Illness, run by Scarborough General Hospital at 6 sites in Canada.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

In patients with critical illness, such as severe infections, heart attacks, or respiratory failure, most intensive care units (ICUs) measure magnesium levels and give supplemental doses of magnesium when levels are below certain targets. However, the best targets are unknown. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Critical Illness
What is being tested?
Magnesium sulfate administration, Magnesium oxide and Magnesium glucoheptonate
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
3,853 participants
Where
6 sitesCanada
Study dates
25 Nov 2025to 1 Jun 2027
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 16 years or older
  • Admission orders written to a medical-surgical intensive care unit at a participating site
  • Magnesium replacement protocol ordered

Who cannot join

  • Prior enrollment in or withdrawal from MAGNOLIA trial
  • Sustained ventricular tachycardia
  • Pre-eclampsia
  • Myasthenia gravis

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

6 sites in 1 country

Canada6 sites, 6 recruiting
  • Lakeridge Health Ajax-Pickering

    Ajax, Ontario, L1S 2J4

    Sarah Dulmage, 9055768711 ext. 32748, sdulmage@lh.ca

    Recruiting
  • Lakeridge Health Bowmanville

    Bowmanville, Ontario, L1C 2N3

    Sarah Dulmage, 905-576-8711 ext. 32748, sdulmage@lh.ca

    Recruiting
  • Lakeridge Health Oshawa

    Oshawa, Ontario, L1G 8A2

    Sarah Dulmage, 905-576-8711 ext. 32748, sdulmage@lh.ca

    Recruiting
  • Scarborough Centenary Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M1E 4B9

    Joshua Craig, 4164382911 ext. 86006, jcraig@shn.ca

    Recruiting
  • Scarborough General Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M1P2V5

    Joshua Craig, 4164382911 ext. 86006, jcraig@shn.ca

    Recruiting
  • Scarborough Birchmount Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M1W 3W3

    Joshua Craig, 4164382911 ext. 86006, jcraig@shn.ca

    Recruiting

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Effect of Protocolized Magnesium Replacement in Critically Ill Patients on Mortality and Atrial Fibrillation: the MAGNOLIA Randomized Controlled Trial

In patients with critical illness, such as severe infections, heart attacks, or respiratory failure, most intensive care units (ICUs) measure magnesium levels and give supplemental doses of magnesium when levels are below certain targets. However, the best targets are unknown. The goal of this clinical trial is to study protocols for magnesium supplementation in people with critical illness, comparing a protocol with higher target level to a protocol with a lower target level.

The main question this study aims to answer is whether magnesium supplementation protocols targeting a higher or lower level lead to better 30-day survival and less atrial fibrillation.

Participants will not have to do any specific tasks, undergo any additional tests, or complete any surveys.

Read the detailed description

Background: Measurement of serum magnesium levels, and administration of supplemental magnesium when levels are below target, is a common element of routine care for critically ill patients. However, targets for replacement vary, and the targets that lead to the best outcomes are unknown.

Methods: Multi-center open-label parallel group randomized controlled superiority trial of adult critically ill patients receiving protocolized magnesium replacement, comparing a higher target (>0.95mmol/L) to a lower target (>0.7mmol/L). The trial will be embedded into the electronic medical record (EMR) at 5 hospitals across 2 health networks in Ontario, Canada, with a shared EMR. Patients aged 16 years or older who have ICU admission orders and an order for the magnesium replacement protocol will be included. Patients with pre-eclampsia, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or neuromuscular junction disease will be excluded. The primary outcome will be an ordinal composite, evaluated at 30 days, composed of death and the number of days free of atrial fibrillation or flutter in ICU. Secondary outcomes will include ventricular arrhythmia and antiarrhythmics administered; receipt of vasopressors, ventilation, and new renal replacement therapy in ICU; lengths of ICU and hospital stay; hospital mortality at 60 and 90 days, magnesium levels, and magnesium supplementation. Analyses will use Bayesian regression with weakly skeptical priors and an intention-to-treat approach. Because both targets lie within the standard of care, the trial will use opt-out consent. Screening will be integrated with the EMR, such that when a patient meets inclusion criteria, a pop-up will appear for the ordering clinician. After the clinician confirms eligibility, the patient will be randomized and assigned to their target. Outcome ascertainment will occur within the EMR.

Discussion: This randomized controlled trial addresses an important uncertainty regarding routine care in the ICU with an EMR-embedded design. The innovative EMR-embedded design facilitates the large sample sizes and comprehensive, equitable recruitment needed for a trial evaluating a routine care intervention, and will lead to seamless integration with routine care upon trial completion.

Being tested
Magnesium sulfate administration, Magnesium oxide, Magnesium glucoheptonate
Keywords
Critical illness, Magnesium, Atrial fibrillation, Protocols
Medical subject headings
Critical Illness, Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Magnesium sulfate administrationDrug

    Magnesium sulfate is used in both arms for magnesium replacement.

  • Magnesium oxideDrug

    In the higher-target arm, magnesium oxide 420mg po q12h x 2 is one of the options available for magnesium replacement when magnesium levels lie between 0.75 and 0.95mmol/L.

  • Magnesium glucoheptonateDrug

    Magnesium glucoheptonate 30mL po q12h x 2 is an oral option for magnesium replacement in the higher-target arm.

Study groups in NCT07173855
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Lower target (>0.7mmol)OtherProtocolized magnesium replacement according to magnesium level as follows: for 0.45 - 0.70mmol/L, magnesium sulfate 4g IV x 1 and repeat magnesium level the next day; for < 0.45mmol/L, magnesium sulfate 6g IV x 1, alert most responsible physician, and repeat level in 4 hours.
Receives: Drug: Magnesium sulfate administration
Higher target (>0.95mmol/L)OtherProtocolized magnesium replacement according to magnesium level as follows: for 0.75-0.95mmol/L, magnesium sulfate 2g IV x 1, magnesium oxide 420 mg po q12h x 2, or magnesium glucoheptonate 30mL po q12h x 2; for 0.45 - 0.74mmol/L, magnesium sulfate 4g IV x 1 and repeat magnesium level the next day; for < 0.45mmol/L, magnesium sulfate 6g IV x 1, alert most responsible physician, and repeat level in 4 hours.
Receives: Drug: Magnesium sulfate administration; Drug: Magnesium oxide; Drug: Magnesium glucoheptonate

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 30-day ordinal composite of hospital mortality and days free of atrial fibrillation in ICU

    This is an ordinal outcome with 32 levels ranging from -1 (worst) to 30 (best). It is evaluated at 30 days. The worst outcome (-1) corresponds to mortality in hospital within 30 days from trial enrollment. Among patients who do not die in hospital by day 30, we count the number of days when they did not have atrial fibrillation in the ICU. For example, a survivor who never had atrial fibrillation in ICU would be scored as "30." A survivor who had 5 days of atrial fibrillation in ICU would be scored as "25." A patient who is discharged from hospital, either to home or transferred to another site, but is readmitted to a study hospital and dies within 30 days of enrollment, would be counted as having had hospital mortality. This stipulation is relevant because of the frequency of transfers between sites within a health network, due to regionalization of services such as vascular surgery, thoracic surgery, dialysis, and angiography.

    Measured: 30 days after enrollment.

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Organ-support free days

    Number of days alive and free of invasive ventilation, vasopressors, and renal replacement therapy

    Measured: 30 days

  2. ICU-free days

    Number of days alive and not in ICU

    Measured: 30 days

  3. Invasive ventilation-free days

    Number of days alive and free of invasive ventilation

    Measured: 30 days

  4. Vasopressor-free days

    Days alive and not receiving vasopressors

    Measured: 30 days

  5. Renal replacement therapy-free days

    Days alive and not receiving renal replacement therapy in the ICU

    Measured: 30 days

  6. Ventricular arrhythmia

    Binary outcome noting the occurence of either sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation in ICU (1), or not (0).

    Measured: 30 days

  7. Intravenous antiarrhythmics

    Binary variable noting administration of intravenous antiarrhythmics in ICU (1) or not (0). Intravenous antiarrhythmics include amiodarone, metoprolol, esmolol, diltiazem, procainamide, lidocaine, flecainide, adenosine, digoxin.

    Measured: 30 days

  8. Magnesium and potassium levels in ICU

    Daily levels of magnesium and potassium in ICU

    Measured: 30 days

  9. Magnesium administrations

    Magnesium administrations while in ICU (number per day)

    Measured: 30 days

  10. Fluid balance

    Daily fluid balance (sum of all liquid intakes minus the sum of all liquid outputs).

    Measured: 30 days

  11. DOOR 1: Death and arrhythmia

    This is a desirability of outcome ordinal ranking (DOOR) outcome. The possible binary levels are, from worst to best: death, ventricular arrhythmia, atrial fibrillation or flutter, none of the above.

    Measured: 30 days

  12. DOOR 2: Survival, organ dysfunction, hospitalization, discharge

    This is a desirability of outcome ordinal ranking (DOOR) outcome. The binary levels are, ordered from best to worst: discharge home, discharge to location other than home, ongoing hospital admission, persistent organ dysfunction in ICU, death.

    Measured: 30 days

  13. Hospital mortality

    Hospital mortality

    Measured: 60 days

  14. Hospital mortality

    Hospital mortality

    Measured: 90 days

  15. Hospital length of stay

    Length of hospitalization, including transfers within the health network.

    Measured: 90 days

  16. Discharge destination

    Categorical variable noting discharge destination on index hospitalization (eg home, retirement home, long-term care, acute care hospital, etc).

    Measured: 90 days

  17. Magnesium administrations - by mass

    Elemental magnesium administered (g per day)

    Measured: 30 days

  18. Magnesium administrations - route

    Route of magnesium administrations each day (PO vs IV)

    Measured: 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2025
  2. Study start25 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Mar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Pragmatic comparative effectiveness trial
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
3,853 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07173855
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICU-25-018
Acronym
MAGNOLIA
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
8 Sep 2025
Last updated
24 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified data will be posted in the Health Data Nexus (https://healthdatanexus.ai/) deidentified data repository overseen by the University of Toronto Temerty Centre for Artificial Intelligence Research and Education in Medicine. This will allow credentialed access to deidentified individual patient data.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in