Auditory HallucinationsVOICESNCT07134816
Cost-utility Study of Cognitive-behavioral Management of Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenic Disorder
A study testing Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations and Usual treatment in people with Auditory Hallucinations and Schizophrenia Spectrum, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and costs of a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for auditory hallucinations (psychotherapy) as an adjunct to usual care, comparing it to the effectiveness and costs of usual care alone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 15 to 45 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Auditory Hallucinations, Schizophrenia Spectrum
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations and Usual treatment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- Aug 2025to Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 15 to 45 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenic disorder according to DSM 5 as assessed by the investigating psychiatrist during the screening medical examination
- Age between 15 and 45 years inclusive
- Patients hearing AVHs for at least 3 months
- Patient with a score of at least 2 on the distress intensity item of the hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS-AH).
Who cannot join
- Patients hospitalized full-time for acute decompensation of their schizophrenic disorder
- Patients with a history of severe head trauma and/or neurological pathology with cognitive impact
- Patients with a characterized depressive state (Calgary scale score>9)
- Patients unable to understand, speak and read French
- Patients with moderate to severe intellectual disability (pre-morbid IQ estimated by fNART<70)
- Hallucinations of organic or toxic origin
Show all 13Show fewer
- Suicidal ideation type 4 or 5
- Pregnant and breastfeeding women
- Main diagnosis of substance abuse or dependence, having received full CBT care (minimum 16 hours) for psychotic symptoms in the past year
- Participation in another interventional study in which the patient benefits from psychological intervention
- Patient unable to give written informed consent, for minors, absence of signatures of the legal representative(s), for adults patients benefiting from guardianship, absence of written consent from the guardian, for patients under curatorship, failure to inform the curator, for patients in psychiatric care at the request of a third party, absence of consent from the trusted person
- Not able to carry out all visits and follow the study procedures
- Not affiliated or beneficiary of a social security scheme
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site
University Hospital, Montpellier
Montpellier, Occitanie, 34000
Renan TARGHETTA, renan.targhetta@chu-montpellier.fr
About this study
The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and costs of a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for auditory hallucinations (psychotherapy) as an adjunct to usual care, comparing it to the effectiveness and costs of usual care alone. Usual care is defined as the use of medication, regular consultations with your psychiatrist, and, if necessary, day hospital care.
The study plans to include 240 participants across several hospitals in France (multicenter study). Each participant will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (cognitive-behavioral therapy) or the control group (usual treatment). Participants assigned to the control group will have the opportunity to receive therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) after the study.
Read more
After an initial inclusion assessment (V0), the participant will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups after the V1 assessment. Additional evaluations will be conducted after inclusion at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months.The evaluations consist of questionnaires to assess intensity and severity of AVHs / beliefs related to AVHs, clinical status, well-being, depression, suicidal thoughts, quality of life, functioning (mobility/autonomy/pain, etc.), sleep and costs related to care.
At Visit 1, after obtaining consent for participation in the study on behalf of your ward, the investigator will also collect their social security number, full date of birth, and gender, which will allow us to gather information on actual healthcare consumption from the healthcare system.
The VOICES intervention will consist of 16 one-hour individual sessions (one session per week over a 16-week period), divided into several types of intervention (modules) that have been independently proven to treat AVHs. The VOICES intervention is modular, personalized, and incorporates patient preference. Following an initial clinical assessment, patients will be offered first the GIVE intervention (8 sessions) and subsequently a choice of treatment modules, delivered by a clinical psychologist.
After this first module (GiVE Intervention), three other intervention modules will be proposed. These three additional modules comprise seven sessions each. One additional relapse prevention sessions will be scheduled at the end of these modules.
- The GiVE intervention is divided into five modules: (1) Coping - exploring ways to manage voices; (2) Me - targeting negative beliefs about the self; (3) My Voices - targeting unhelpful beliefs about voices; (4) My Relationships - improving assertiveness in difficult relationships; and (5) Looking to the Future - making plans to continue the use of new skills. Modules 2, 3 and 4 were each offered over two sessions (six sessions in total), and modules 1 and 5 were each one session long.
After the GivE intervention three modules will be offered will be :
- "Relating CBT" is based on a large body of research which has shown that voice hearers personify their voices and establish relationships with them, which largely correspond to the relationships they generally establish with the people around them. The aim of relational therapy will be to modify this relationship and enable the voice hearer to develop assertive and balanced behaviours towards them.
- The individual "Mindfulness Program for Voices" will be delivered individually and will include guided mindfulness exercises, complemented by discussions aimed at cultivating mindful responses as alternatives to automatic or habitual reactions.
- Imagery rescripting for distressing voices will consist of a series of targeted imagery-based interventions guided by a micro-formulation approach. This method will focus on the identification and transformation of discrete, emotionally salient mental images linked to specif distressing experiences
All participants will receive medical monitoring, and the treatment will be the same in both groups. No treatment will be prohibited if deemed necessary for your health. At any time, participants have the right to withdraw their consent and stop participating in the research, without any change to their care, as long as the patient's condition does not require otherwise.
The expected benefits for participants are a significant improvement in the symptoms as well as psychosocial functioning, leading to greater autonomy in daily life and an improved quality of life. In the control group, the follow-up will likely be more attentive than usual, with regular evaluations. In any case, there is no loss of opportunity for the participant regardless of the group assignment. Additionally, random assignment to the control group allows participants to benefit from AVH therapy after the study.
When the research is completed, participants will be informed of the overall results by the investigator as soon as they are available, if wished.
Participation in this research will not incur any additional costs compared to the usual follow-up for this condition.
- Conditions
- Auditory Hallucinations, Schizophrenia Spectrum
- Being tested
- Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations, Usual treatment
- Keywords
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Non Pharmacological Intervention (NPI), cost utility study
- Medical subject headings
- Hallucinations
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinationsOther
Consists of 16 one-hour individual sessions (one session per week over a 16-week period) of cognitive behavioral therapy, divided into three types of interventions (modules) that have been independently proven to be effective in the management of auditory hallucinations.
Usual treatmentOther
Consists of an antipsychotic medication treatment (including dosage changes and molecule changes.), regular consultation with a psychiatrist (once a month on average), and if necessary, one-off psychological support or family interventions not including specific CBT for positive symptoms
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations |
| Usual treatment | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Other: Usual treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incremental cost-utility ratio
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) at 12 months, of the management of auditory hallucinations by CBT compared to usual treatment. The preferred outcome criterion is the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Years) unit of measurement of the duration of life weighted by the quality of life related to health (HAS 2020), calculated from the utilities derived from the EuroQuality of life 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D-5L).
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Secondary outcomes (16)
Distress associated with AVHs and frequency
Using the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scales - Auditory Hallucinations (PSYRATS-AH; Haddock et al., 1999; Favrod et al., 2012 for French validation), a hetero-questionnaire consisting of 11 items designed to measure the severity of various dimensions of the auditory hallucination experience. The items are grouped into four factors: distress (negative content, distress, and control), frequency (frequency, duration, and disruption), attribution (location and origin of the auditory hallucinations), and intensity of sound. Each item is rated on a scale from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("always"). The total score ranges from 0 to 44.
Measured: Baseline, for intervention group 6 weeks to 11 weeks, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Beliefs about voices
Using The Beliefs About Voices Questionnaire (BAVQ-R, Chadwick and al, 2000) a self-report questionnaire that assesses beliefs, emotional, and behavioral consequences related to auditory hallucinations (AHs). It initially contains 35 items, each rated from 0 ("strongly disagree") to 3 ("strongly agree"), and is divided into 5 subscales: Power, Malevolence, Benevolence, Resistance, and Engagement. We will consider the total score for the four subscales: Power, Malevolence, Resistance, and Engagement (total score ranging from 0 to 12).
Measured: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Maastricht Semi-structured Interview
The Maastricht Semi-structured Interview, developed by Romme and Escher (2000), is a precursor to the early work on the experience of AVHs in the Netherlands. It allows for the assessment of this phenomenological experience through a variety of individual variables such as intensity, volume, and number of AVHs, while also addressing the individual's environmental spheres and potential journey through different psychiatric care services.
Measured: Baseline only for The Maastricht interview
Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale
Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale (AHRS), French validation by Dondé et al., 2020. This scale includes 7 questions regarding the frequency, intensity, or intentional valence of AVHs.
Measured: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Hallucination Relationship Scale
Hallucination Relationship Scale (Approve Questionnaire, Hayward et al., 2020). This scale consists of 30 items measuring both assertiveness in relation to AVHs and assertiveness in everyday life in human relationships.
Measured: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Assessment of psychotic symptomatology
For the psychotic symptoms, the "Positive And Negative Syndrome Scale" (PANSS): The PANSS is a 30-item hetero-assessment scale, rated from 1 to 7, which measures the symptomatology specific to psychotic disorders, particularly schizophrenic disorders. It calculates scores for 3 syndromic dimensions: positive (7 items), negative (7 items), and general psychopathology (16 items), from both a categorical and dimensional perspective.
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8, 12 months
Psychiatric comorbidities
For the comorbidities,the "Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview" (M.I.N.I) is a structured diagnostic interview, with a short duration (approximately 20 minutes) exploring in a standardized way, the main psychiatric disorders according to the DSM IV. The M.I.N.I version 5.0 is divided into identified modules, each corresponding to a diagnostic category. We will use modules A, D, E, F, G, H, I, M, N, O.
Measured: Baseline
Depression assessment
Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS, Addington \& Addington, 1990). This scale is designed to assess depression in individuals with schizophrenia. The questionnaire consists of 9 items (depressed mood, despair, self-deprecation, reference ideas with a theme of guilt, pathological guilt, morning depression, early awakening, suicidal thoughts, and observed depression) covering the past two weeks. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from: "Absent" (0) to "Severe" (3). The total score is obtained by adding the items and provides a score out of 27.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Suicidal risk
Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS, Posner et al., 2011). The C-SSRS measures four dimensions. The first is the severity of suicidal ideation, which is assessed on a 5-point ordinal scale. The second is the subscale of intensity of suicidal thoughts, which includes 5 items, each rated on a 5-point ordinal scale: frequency, duration, controllability, deterrents, and reason for ideation. The third is the behavioral subscale, assessed on a nominal scale, which includes actual, aborted, and interrupted attempts, preparatory behavior, and non-suicidal self-injury. The fourth is the lethality subscale, which evaluates actual attempts; actual lethality is rated on a 6-point ordinal scale. Suicidal risk is ultimately determined by the clinician's judgment when administering the scale.
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months
Psychological well-being
PERMA Psychological Well-Being Scale (Seligman, 2011). This scale consists of 10 items encompassing four factors: positive emotion, relationships, having a sense of purpose in life, and personal accomplishment. Each question is rated on an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from "0 = never" to "10 = always," "0 = not at all" to "10 = completely," or "0 = very poor" to "10 = excellent," depending on the content of the question.
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months
EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol)
The EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol) is a multi-attribute health status classification system consisting of 5 attributes: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The EQ-5D-5L will be used to measure the effectiveness of the innovation in terms of QALYs (Quality-Adjusted Life Years), which is an which is an indicator where health states are weighted by quality of life.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
The Global Assessment of Functioning
The Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) is a numerical scale (ranging from 0 to 100) used in psychiatry to assess an individual's psychological, social, and occupational functioning.
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia
The Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia (FROGS) scale will be used to assess patients' functioning (Llorca et al., 2009).
Measured: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Estimation of premorbid IQ
Premorbid IQ by the fNART (French version of the National Adult Reading Test, Mackinnon \& Mulligan (2005)). The ƒNART is based on the ability to pronounce 40 words with irregular spelling. It offers clinicians and researchers an easy method of estimating premorbid intelligence using a robust test in the face of cognitive decline.
Measured: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Sleep assessment
Using the Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), developed to assess the severity of insomnia complaints and their daytime repercussions on daily activities. The first item evaluates the intensity of insomnia complaints such as difficulty falling asleep, maintaining sleep, and early awakening, each separately. One item assesses the overall satisfaction of the subject with their sleep, and another item evaluates concerns about insomnia. Finally, two items assess the impact on daily activities. Each item is rated by the patient on a scale from 0 to 4. The total score is obtained by adding the scores for each item. The total score ranges from 0 to 28.
Measured: Months 8 and 12
Medication Adherence Rating Scale
The "Medication Adherence Rating Scale" (MARS) will assess adherence to medication treatment. This is a self-administered questionnaire of 10 items, yes/no answer
Measured: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2025
- Study startAug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionMar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Auditory HallucinationsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, MontpellierThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Montpellier
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes, Centre Hospitalier de Béziers, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134816
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RECHMPL22_0337
- Acronym
- VOICES
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cost-utility Study of Cognitive-behavioral Management of Auditory Hallucinations in Schizophrenic Disorder
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134816
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VOICES / RECHMPL22_0337
- Conditions
- Auditory Hallucinations, Schizophrenia Spectrum
- Keywords
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Non Pharmacological Intervention (NPI), cost utility study
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, MontpellierUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes, Centre Hospitalier de Béziers, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
- Study start
- Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and costs of a cognitive-behavioral treatment (CBT) for auditory hallucinations (psychotherapy) as an adjunct to usual care, comparing it to the effectiveness and costs of usual care alone. Usual care is defined as the use of medication, regular consultations with your psychiatrist, and, if necessary, day hospital care.
The study plans to include 240 participants across several hospitals in France (multicenter study). Each participant will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group (cognitive-behavioral therapy) or the control group (usual treatment). Participants assigned to the control group will have the opportunity to receive therapy for auditory verbal hallucinations (AVHs) after the study.
After an initial inclusion assessment (V0), the participant will be randomly assigned to one of the two groups after the V1 assessment. Additional evaluations will be conducted after inclusion at 4 months, 8 months, and 12 months.The evaluations consist of questionnaires to assess intensity and severity of AVHs / beliefs related to AVHs, clinical status, well-being, depression, suicidal thoughts, quality of life, functioning (mobility/autonomy/pain, etc.), sleep and costs related to care.
At Visit 1, after obtaining consent for participation in the study on behalf of your ward, the investigator will also collect their social security number, full date of birth, and gender, which will allow us to gather information on actual healthcare consumption from the healthcare system.
The VOICES intervention will consist of 16 one-hour individual sessions (one session per week over a 16-week period), divided into several types of intervention (modules) that have been independently proven to treat AVHs. The VOICES intervention is modular, personalized, and incorporates patient preference. Following an initial clinical assessment, patients will be offered first the GIVE intervention (8 sessions) and subsequently a choice of treatment modules, delivered by a clinical psychologist.
After this first module (GiVE Intervention), three other intervention modules will be proposed. These three additional modules comprise seven sessions each. One additional relapse prevention sessions will be scheduled at the end of these modules.
- The GiVE intervention is divided into five modules: (1) Coping - exploring ways to manage voices; (2) Me - targeting negative beliefs about the self; (3) My Voices - targeting unhelpful beliefs about voices; (4) My Relationships - improving assertiveness in difficult relationships; and (5) Looking to the Future - making plans to continue the use of new skills. Modules 2, 3 and 4 were each offered over two sessions (six sessions in total), and modules 1 and 5 were each one session long.
After the GivE intervention three modules will be offered will be :
- "Relating CBT" is based on a large body of research which has shown that voice hearers personify their voices and establish relationships with them, which largely correspond to the relationships they generally establish with the people around them. The aim of relational therapy will be to modify this relationship and enable the voice hearer to develop assertive and balanced behaviours towards them.
- The individual "Mindfulness Program for Voices" will be delivered individually and will include guided mindfulness exercises, complemented by discussions aimed at cultivating mindful responses as alternatives to automatic or habitual reactions.
- Imagery rescripting for distressing voices will consist of a series of targeted imagery-based interventions guided by a micro-formulation approach. This method will focus on the identification and transformation of discrete, emotionally salient mental images linked to specif distressing experiences
All participants will receive medical monitoring, and the treatment will be the same in both groups. No treatment will be prohibited if deemed necessary for your health. At any time, participants have the right to withdraw their consent and stop participating in the research, without any change to their care, as long as the patient's condition does not require otherwise.
The expected benefits for participants are a significant improvement in the symptoms as well as psychosocial functioning, leading to greater autonomy in daily life and an improved quality of life. In the control group, the follow-up will likely be more attentive than usual, with regular evaluations. In any case, there is no loss of opportunity for the participant regardless of the group assignment. Additionally, random assignment to the control group allows participants to benefit from AVH therapy after the study.
When the research is completed, participants will be informed of the overall results by the investigator as soon as they are available, if wished.
Participation in this research will not incur any additional costs compared to the usual follow-up for this condition.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations | Experimental | Other: Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations |
| Usual treatment | Active comparator | Other: Usual treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 15 to 45 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with a diagnosis of schizophrenic disorder according to DSM 5 as assessed by the investigating psychiatrist during the screening medical examination
- Age between 15 and 45 years inclusive
- Patients hearing AVHs for at least 3 months
- Patient with a score of at least 2 on the distress intensity item of the hallucinations subscale of the Psychotic Symptom Rating Scale (PSYRATS-AH).
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients hospitalized full-time for acute decompensation of their schizophrenic disorder
- Patients with a history of severe head trauma and/or neurological pathology with cognitive impact
- Patients with a characterized depressive state (Calgary scale score>9)
- Patients unable to understand, speak and read French
- Patients with moderate to severe intellectual disability (pre-morbid IQ estimated by fNART<70)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinationsConsists of 16 one-hour individual sessions (one session per week over a 16-week period) of cognitive behavioral therapy, divided into three types of interventions (modules) that have been independently proven to be effective in the management of auditory hallucinations. | Other | Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations |
| Usual treatmentConsists of an antipsychotic medication treatment (including dosage changes and molecule changes.), regular consultation with a psychiatrist (once a month on average), and if necessary, one-off psychological support or family interventions not including specific CBT for positive symptoms | Other | Usual treatment |
Primary outcome
Incremental cost-utility ratio
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) at 12 months, of the management of auditory hallucinations by CBT compared to usual treatment. The preferred outcome criterion is the QALY (Quality Adjusted Life Years) unit of measurement of the duration of life weighted by the quality of life related to health (HAS 2020), calculated from the utilities derived from the EuroQuality of life 5 dimensions questionnaire (EQ5D-5L).
16 secondary outcomes
Distress associated with AVHs and frequency
Time frame: Baseline, for intervention group 6 weeks to 11 weeks, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Beliefs about voices
Time frame: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Maastricht Semi-structured Interview
Time frame: Baseline only for The Maastricht interview
Auditory Hallucination Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Hallucination Relationship Scale
Time frame: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Assessment of psychotic symptomatology
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8, 12 months
Psychiatric comorbidities
Time frame: Baseline
Depression assessment
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Suicidal risk
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months
Psychological well-being
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months
EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol)
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
The Global Assessment of Functioning
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Functional Remission of General Schizophrenia
Time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months
Estimation of premorbid IQ
Time frame: Baseline, months 4, 8 and 12
Sleep assessment
Time frame: Months 8 and 12
Medication Adherence Rating Scale
Time frame: Baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Auditory Hallucinations
Recruiting
Theta-Burst Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Auditory Verbal Hallucinations, Schizophrenia
Not yet recruiting
DecNef for Auditory Verbal Hallucinations (AVH) in Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Disorder, Schizoaffecitve Disorder
Recruiting
Neuronavigated rTMS for Treatment-Resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Schizophrenia, Auditory Verbal Hallucinations
Recruiting
fMRI-based Neurofeedback to Relieve Drug-resistant Auditory Hallucinations
Schizophrenia, Hallucinations, Auditory
Recruiting
Reduction of Auditory-Verbal Hallucinations in Schizophrenia Through Cortical Neuromodulation
Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive and behavioral therapy for auditory hallucinations and Usual treatment in people with Auditory Hallucinations and Schizophrenia Spectrum, run by University Hospital, Montpellier at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Delphine CAPDEVIELLE, MD, PhD (+33467339702, d-capdevielle@chu-montpellier.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incremental cost-utility ratio (time frame: Baseline, 4 months, 8 months, 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2025.