AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Apical PeriodontitisNCT07069881

Sonic vs Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation for Chronic Apical Periodontitis

A study testing Sonic-Activated Irrigation and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation in people with Chronic Apical Periodontitis, run by Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial aims to directly compare the efficacy of Sonically Activated Irrigation (SAI) versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) in the root canal treatment of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, analyze potential influencing factors, and thereby identify a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 59 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Apical Periodontitis
What is being tested?
Sonic-Activated Irrigation and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
30 Dec 2024to 31 Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 59 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Agree to participate in this study and provide informed consent;
  • Age 18-59 years at the time of enrolment;
  • At least one permanent tooth diagnosed with chronic periapical periodontitis at root development stage of Nolla10th;
  • Able to follow up on schedule.

Who cannot join

  • Allergies to any medications or materials necessary to complete the procedures;
  • Non-restorable teeth, teeth with severe defects, or teeth that need to be extracted due to orthodontic treatment;
  • Teeth with root canal treatment or vital pulp therapy;
  • Teeth with canal calcification or root canal instrument separation;
  • Teeth with root fracture or vertical root fracture;
  • Tooth with internal or external root resorption;
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Patients with periodontitis;
  • Patients with orthodontic treatment;
  • Presence of dental phobia;
  • Women who are pregnant;
  • Patients who have taken medications that affect central nervous system, such as tricyclic antidepressant;
  • Patients who have taken medications that affect immune response, such as glucocorticoid or cyclosporin;
  • Patients after radiotherapy of tumor head and neck;
  • Patients who have taken medications that affect curative effect, such as bisphosphonates;
  • Patients with serious systemic diseases that can affect curative effect;
  • Participation in other clinical studies within the past several weeks;
  • Patients who are deemed unsuitable to participate in the study by investigators.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Southern Hospital, Southern Medical University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510515

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Endodontic Treatment Using Sonic-activated Irrigation and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation to Evaluate Healing in Chronic Apical Periodontitis

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial aims to directly compare the efficacy of Sonically Activated Irrigation (SAI) versus Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) in the root canal treatment of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis, analyze potential influencing factors, and thereby identify a highly effective and safe root canal irrigation protocol. The ultimate goal is to provide an evidence-based rationale for optimizing irrigation technique selection and overall treatment strategies for chronic apical periodontitis.

Read the detailed description

Root canal therapy (RCT) is the common treatment for chronic apical periodontitis. Successful outcomes critically depend on the complete eradication of infection within the root canal system. The efficacy of infection control is significantly influenced by the irrigation technique employed. While passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI) is a widely utilized form of activated irrigation in clinical practice, it carries inherent risks such as instrument separation and unnecessary dentin removal, limiting its use.

Sonically activated irrigation (SAI) represents a novel irrigation approach. Its polymeric tips circumvent the drawbacks associated with ultrasonic metal tips while delivering comparable irrigation efficiency. However, high-quality randomized controlled clinical evidence supporting its use is currently lacking.

This randomized, controlled, double-blinded clinical trial aims to directly compare the efficacy of SAI versus PUI in root canal treatment of teeth with chronic apical periodontitis and analyze potential influencing factors. The goal is to identify a highly effective and safe root canal irrigation protocol, ultimately providing an evidence-based rationale for optimizing irrigation technique selection and overall treatment strategies for chronic apical periodontitis.

Being tested
Sonic-Activated Irrigation, Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Sonic-Activated IrrigationDevice

    Sonic-activated irrigation was performed using the polymer tip (Eddy™, VDW, Germany) activated by an airscaler handpiece.

  • Passive Ultrasonic IrrigationDevice

    Passive ultrasonic irrigation was performed using the ultrasonic tip (ACTEON, France) attached to an ultrasonic device (P5 Newton™, ACTEON, France)

Study groups in NCT07069881
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Sonic-Activated IrrigationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Sonic-Activated Irrigation
Passive Ultrasonic IrrigationActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Therapeutic Effect Evaluation

    1. Success: A tooth is considered successfully treated when it is asymptomatic, showing no signs of apical infection such as percussion pain, mobility (loosening), tenderness, mucosal swelling, sinus tract, or fistula. Radiographically, the periapical radiolucency must demonstrate either absence or significant reduction.
    2. Failure: Treatment is deemed unsuccessful if the tooth remains symptomatic or develops new symptoms of apical infection (e.g., pain, fistula). Radiographically, the size of the periapical radiolucency remains unchanged or shows enlargement.

    Measured: 12 months after treatment

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. postoperative pain

    Postoperative pain was assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) during clinical follow-up on day 1 after treatment.

    Measured: day 1 after treatment

  2. Cone Beam Computed Tomography Periapical Index Scores (CBCTPAI)

    The CBCT Periapical Index (CBCTPAI) assigns scores to lesions of chronic apical periodontitis based on the largest dimension measured in three planes (buccopalatal, mesiodistal, diagonal) on CBCT scans.

    0: Intact periapical bone structures;

    1. Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 0.5-1 mm;
    2. Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 1-2 mm;
    3. Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 2-4 mm;
    4. Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 4-8 mm;
    5. Diameter of periapical radiolucency > 8 mm; Score (n) + E: Expansion of periapical cortical bone; Score (n) + D : Destruction of periapical cortical bone.

    Measured: 12 months after treatment

  3. The size of the periapical lesion

    The size in periapical lesions were quantified using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) at 1-year postoperative compared to preoperative baseline across three anatomical planes: buccopalatal, mesiodistal, and diagonal.

    Measured: 12 months after treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2025
  2. Study start30 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07069881
Sponsor's protocol ID
NFEC-2024-435
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
22 Jun 2025
Last updated
17 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in