HIPECPhase 2ICI-HIPETNCT07068178
Evaluating the Efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Treatment to Enhance the Sensitivity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Single-arm Study
A Phase 2 study testing ICI-HIPET in people with HIPEC and Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma, run by Jing Li at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Background: Advanced ovarian cancer is a highly dangerous disease, and many patients lose their lives due to limited treatment effectiveness. Previous studies have shown that current immunotherapy (e.g., PD-1 inhibitors) has poor results in ovarian cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- HIPEC, Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma
- What is being tested?
- ICI-HIPET
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Aug 2025to Jan 2030
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosed with FIGO stage IIIC-IVA high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma (histologically confirmed).
- Aged 18-70 years.
- Life expectancy ≥12 months.
- CT Suidan score ≥7 and Fagotti score ≥8 (assessed by two independent gynecologic oncologists via laparoscopic evaluation).
- Adequate organ function:AST/ALT ≤2× upper limit of normal (ULN);Total bilirubin ≤1.5× ULN;Serum creatinine ≤1.5× ULN.
- No myelosuppression:Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥80 g/L,White blood cell count (WBC) ≥2.0×10⁹/L,Neutrophil count ≥1.0×10⁹/L,Platelet count ≥100×10⁹/L.
- Performance Status (PS) score 0-1.
Who cannot join
- Partial or complete bowel obstruction.
- Intestinal fistula of any grade.
- Hydronephrosis unrelieved by ureteral stenting.
- History of organ transplantation.
- Inflammatory bowel disease.
- Active or history of autoimmune diseases (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus).
Show all 15Show fewer
- Prior immunotherapy (including cellular therapy) or use of immunomodulators.
- Brain metastases.
- Grade ≥3 venous thromboembolism.
- Active infections (e.g., tuberculosis).
- Prior pelvic/abdominal radiotherapy.
- Prior hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) or thermotherapy.
- Grade ≥2 dysfunction of major organs (e.g., heart, liver, kidneys).
- Other malignancies within 5 years (except skin or thyroid cancer).
- Psychiatric disorders affecting compliance.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120
Erwei Song, Jing Li ext. +8615915893493, lijing228@mail.sysu.edu.cn
About this study
Background:
Advanced ovarian cancer is a highly dangerous disease, and many patients lose their lives due to limited treatment effectiveness. Previous studies have shown that current immunotherapy (e.g., PD-1 inhibitors) has poor results in ovarian cancer. The research team discovered that adding "heated abdominal chemotherapy" (called HIPEC, which uses a heated drug solution to wash the abdomen) to standard chemotherapy helps patients better control tumors. Recent lab studies also found that HIPEC not only reduces "harmful cells" around tumors that block drug effectiveness but also makes immunotherapy drugs work better. Animal experiments further confirmed that combining HIPEC with immunotherapy improves outcomes. Therefore, the investigators aim to test a key question: Can HIPEC help immunotherapy drugs work more effectively in humans?
Read more
Study Details:
The study will conduct a small two-phase trial, planning to enroll 30 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (Stage IIIc-IVA). All participants will receive standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel + platinum drugs) combined with HIPEC and an immunotherapy drug (tislelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor). The main goal is to check whether tumors are completely removed after surgery. Investigators will also track how long tumors stay under control, overall survival time, treatment safety, and use blood and tumor tissue tests to find biomarkers that predict treatment response.
Why This Matters:
The study hopes to identify a safe method to enhance immunotherapy effectiveness and offer improved outcomes for advanced ovarian cancer patients.
Read the detailed description
Advanced ovarian cancer carries a high mortality rate, and improving prognosis remains a clinical challenge, particularly given the limited efficacy of immunotherapy observed in prior studies. Prior randomized controlled trial demonstrated that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) enhances the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Further preclinical studies revealed that HIPEC reduces cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment, alleviates immunosuppressive phenotypes, and synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in animal models. Building on this evidence, it is hypothesized that HIPEC sensitizes ovarian cancer to ICIs. This prospective single-arm trial employs a Simon's two-stage design to evaluate HIPEC combined with tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 agent) and standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel/platinum) in 30 patients with FIGO stage IIIc-IVA high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The primary endpoint is R0 resection rate, with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pathological response, and multi-omics biomarker exploration. The study aims to validate HIPEC's role in enhancing ICI efficacy and provide evidence for improving immunotherapy outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer.
- Conditions
- HIPEC, Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma
- Being tested
- ICI-HIPET
- Keywords
- ICI-HIPET
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ICI-HIPETDrug
Patients received the following interventions: On Day 0, intravenous administration of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor) was initiated within 3 hours post-HIPEC. Tumor tissue samples were collected before HIPEC, at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes (end of HIPEC). Serum samples were collected pre- and post-HIPEC. On Day 1, additional serum samples were collected 24 hours after HIPEC-ICI completion. From Days 2-3, patients underwent paclitaxel + carboplatin chemotherapy, with serum sampling repeated at 48 hours post-HIPEC-ICI. On Days 21 and 42, the second and third cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tislelizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin) were administered intravenously.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ICI-HIPET | Experimental | Patients received the following interventions: On Day 0, intravenous administration of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor) was initiated within 3 hours post-HIPEC. Tumor tissue samples were collected before HIPEC, at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes (end of HIPEC). Serum samples were collected pre- and post-HIPEC. On Day 1, additional serum samples were collected 24 hours after HIPEC-ICI completion. From Days 2-3, patients underwent paclitaxel + carboplatin chemotherapy, with serum sampling repeated at 48 hours post-HIPEC-ICI. On Days 21 and 42, the second and third cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tislelizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin) were administered intravenously. Receives: Drug: ICI-HIPET |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
R0 Resection Rate
R0 resection rate refers to the proportion of patients achieving complete macroscopic tumor removal (no visible residual disease) during interval debulking surgery after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This is determined by the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the pelvic and abdominal cavities for any gross residual lesions.
Measured: At interval debulking surgery (approximately 9-12 weeks after treatment initiation)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Rate of progression-free survival
The 1-year, 2-year, and median progression-free survival (PFS) rates of patients were calculated.
Measured: From day 1 of treatment until progression/death, through study completion (up to 24months)
Rate of overall survival
The 1-year, 2-year overall survival (OS) rates and median OS of patients were calculated.
Measured: From completion of first neoadjuvant therapy until death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Pathological response rate
Independently assessed by pathologists, defined as the absence of microscopic residual tumor in all specimens obtained during interval debulking surgery.
Incidence of chemotherapy response score 3 (CRS3): Following three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, patients underwent surgical debulking via laparotomy. The omental tissue was evaluated using the chemotherapy response score (CRS) system to determine the rate of CRS3 (indicating complete or near-complete pathological response).
Measured: During pathological examination of omental tissue (within 2 weeks post-surgery)
Radiological Response Rate
Independently assessed by radiologists using baseline CT or MRI (prior to neoadjuvant therapy) as reference. Tumor changes were evaluated after three cycles of neoadjuvant therapy, categorized as follows:
Complete Response (CR): Disappearance of all target lesions, except for nodal disease. All target nodes must shrink to normal size (short axis <10 mm). All lesions must be assessed.
Partial Response (PR): ≥30% reduction in the sum of diameters of all measurable target lesions compared to baseline. Nodal lesions are measured by short axis, while non-nodal lesions use the longest diameter. All lesions must be assessed.
Progressive Disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters relative to the smallest value recorded during the study (or baseline if no decrease was observed), plus an absolute increase of ≥5 mm. Appearance of new lesions also qualifies as PD.
Stable Disease (SD): Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify as PR nor sufficient increase to qualify as PD
Measured: After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (approximately 9 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2025
- Study startAug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionMay 2029 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2030 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIPECStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Jing Li
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Jing Li, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07068178
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ICI-HIPET
- Acronym
- ICI-HIPET
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Don't share IPD
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluating the Efficacy of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Treatment to Enhance the Sensitivity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Single-arm Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07068178
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICI-HIPET / ICI-HIPET
- Conditions
- HIPEC, Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma
- Keywords
- ICI-HIPET
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Jing LiUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- May 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2030 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
Advanced ovarian cancer is a highly dangerous disease, and many patients lose their lives due to limited treatment effectiveness. Previous studies have shown that current immunotherapy (e.g., PD-1 inhibitors) has poor results in ovarian cancer. The research team discovered that adding "heated abdominal chemotherapy" (called HIPEC, which uses a heated drug solution to wash the abdomen) to standard chemotherapy helps patients better control tumors. Recent lab studies also found that HIPEC not only reduces "harmful cells" around tumors that block drug effectiveness but also makes immunotherapy drugs work better. Animal experiments further confirmed that combining HIPEC with immunotherapy improves outcomes. Therefore, the investigators aim to test a key question: Can HIPEC help immunotherapy drugs work more effectively in humans?
Study Details:
The study will conduct a small two-phase trial, planning to enroll 30 patients with advanced ovarian cancer (Stage IIIc-IVA). All participants will receive standard chemotherapy (paclitaxel + platinum drugs) combined with HIPEC and an immunotherapy drug (tislelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor). The main goal is to check whether tumors are completely removed after surgery. Investigators will also track how long tumors stay under control, overall survival time, treatment safety, and use blood and tumor tissue tests to find biomarkers that predict treatment response.
Why This Matters:
The study hopes to identify a safe method to enhance immunotherapy effectiveness and offer improved outcomes for advanced ovarian cancer patients.
Detailed description
Advanced ovarian cancer carries a high mortality rate, and improving prognosis remains a clinical challenge, particularly given the limited efficacy of immunotherapy observed in prior studies. Prior randomized controlled trial demonstrated that hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) enhances the effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer. Further preclinical studies revealed that HIPEC reduces cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment, alleviates immunosuppressive phenotypes, and synergizes with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in animal models. Building on this evidence, it is hypothesized that HIPEC sensitizes ovarian cancer to ICIs. This prospective single-arm trial employs a Simon's two-stage design to evaluate HIPEC combined with tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 agent) and standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel/platinum) in 30 patients with FIGO stage IIIc-IVA high-grade serous ovarian cancer. The primary endpoint is R0 resection rate, with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival, overall survival, safety, pathological response, and multi-omics biomarker exploration. The study aims to validate HIPEC's role in enhancing ICI efficacy and provide evidence for improving immunotherapy outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ICI-HIPET | Experimental | Drug: ICI-HIPETPatients received the following interventions: On Day 0, intravenous administration of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor) was initiated within 3 hours post-HIPEC. Tumor tissue samples were collected before HIPEC, at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes (end of HIPEC). Serum samples were collected pre- and post-HIPEC. On Day 1, additional serum samples were collected 24 hours after HIPEC-ICI completion. From Days 2-3, patients underwent paclitaxel + carboplatin chemotherapy, with serum sampling repeated at 48 hours post-HIPEC-ICI. On Days 21 and 42, the second and third cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tislelizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin) were administered intravenously. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Diagnosed with FIGO stage IIIC-IVA high-grade serous ovarian adenocarcinoma (histologically confirmed).
- Aged 18-70 years.
- Life expectancy ≥12 months.
- CT Suidan score ≥7 and Fagotti score ≥8 (assessed by two independent gynecologic oncologists via laparoscopic evaluation).
- Adequate organ function:AST/ALT ≤2× upper limit of normal (ULN);Total bilirubin ≤1.5× ULN;Serum creatinine ≤1.5× ULN.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Partial or complete bowel obstruction.
- Intestinal fistula of any grade.
- Hydronephrosis unrelieved by ureteral stenting.
- History of organ transplantation.
- Inflammatory bowel disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ICI-HIPETPatients received the following interventions: On Day 0, intravenous administration of tislelizumab (an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor) was initiated within 3 hours post-HIPEC. Tumor tissue samples were collected before HIPEC, at 30 minutes, 60 minutes, and 90 minutes (end of HIPEC). Serum samples were collected pre- and post-HIPEC. On Day 1, additional serum samples were collected 24 hours after HIPEC-ICI completion. From Days 2-3, patients underwent paclitaxel + carboplatin chemotherapy, with serum sampling repeated at 48 hours post-HIPEC-ICI. On Days 21 and 42, the second and third cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (tislelizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin) were administered intravenously. | Drug | ICI-HIPET |
Primary outcome
R0 Resection Rate
Time frame: At interval debulking surgery (approximately 9-12 weeks after treatment initiation)
R0 resection rate refers to the proportion of patients achieving complete macroscopic tumor removal (no visible residual disease) during interval debulking surgery after three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This is determined by the surgeon's intraoperative assessment of the pelvic and abdominal cavities for any gross residual lesions.
4 secondary outcomes
Rate of progression-free survival
Time frame: From day 1 of treatment until progression/death, through study completion (up to 24months)
Rate of overall survival
Time frame: From completion of first neoadjuvant therapy until death from any cause, assessed up to 24 months
Pathological response rate
Time frame: During pathological examination of omental tissue (within 2 weeks post-surgery)
Radiological Response Rate
Time frame: After 3 cycles of neoadjuvant therapy (approximately 9 weeks)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Don't share IPD
Related trials for HIPEC
RecruitingPhase 1
Individual Response to Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) Treatment of Peritoneal Carcinomatosis From Peritoneal Mesothelioma or Atypical Mesothelial Proliferation or From Ovarian, Colorectal, or Appendiceal Histologies
Peritoneal Mesothelioma, Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Application of Intraperitoneal Hyperthermic Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer With Peritoneal Metastasis
Gastric Cancer (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cost-utility Evaluation of Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Mitomycin-C Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) for Resectable Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherap, Colorectal Cancer Metastatic
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Surgery and Chemotherapy With or Without Chemotherapy After Surgery in Treating Patients With Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, Uterine, or Peritoneal Cancer
FIGO Stage IVA Ovarian Cancer, FIGO Stage IVB Ovarian Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
HIPEC Priming Followed by Serplulimab Plus SOX/XELOX in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer
Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer, Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing ICI-HIPET in people with HIPEC and Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma, run by Jing Li at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jing Li, Doctor (+86 17701927439, lijing228@mail.sysu.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
R0 Resection Rate (time frame: At interval debulking surgery (approximately 9-12 weeks after treatment initiation)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Jul 2025.