AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-erosive Reflux DiseaseNCT07041060

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Eolo in Patients With NERD

A study testing EOLO, PPI (proton pump inhibitor) and Group C: Eolo in people with Non-erosive Reflux Disease and Reflux Disease, Gastro-Esophageal, run by University of Bologna at 1 site in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Background: Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is a prevalent subtype of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), often inadequately managed with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
What is being tested?
EOLO, PPI (proton pump inhibitor) and Group C: Eolo
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteItaly
Study dates
30 May 2025to 30 May 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Inclusion Criteria:Participants were eligible for the study if they met the following criteria:

  • Had a diagnosis of non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) with typical reflux symptoms persisting for at least three months and occurring at least three times per week in the month preceding the study screening visit.
  • Were aged between 18 and 80 years.
  • Had been on therapy with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) at a standard dosage for at least six weeks (40 mg pantoprazole/esomeprazole, 30 mg lansoprazole, or 20 mg omeprazole/rabeprazole).
  • Had a diagnosis of NERD confirmed by the absence of macroscopic lesions of the distal esophageal mucosa on endoscopy performed within six months before the screening visit and a positive score on a validated questionnaire (Reflux Disease Questionnaire, RDQ Score ≥ 8).

Exclusion Criteria:Patients were excluded if they had any of the following conditions:

  • Erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus.
  • Gastric or duodenal ulcer.
  • History of major gastric or gastrointestinal surgery.
  • Atopy or food intolerances.
  • Thyroid disease.
  • Diabetes or metabolic syndrome.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Italy1 site
  • DIMEC

    Bologna, 40138

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of a Nutraceutical Containing Sodium Alginate, Sodium Bicarbonate, PEA, a Blend of Opuntia Ficus Indica, and Olea Europaea, Musa Paradisiaca, and Ginger in Patients With NERD

Background: Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) is a prevalent subtype of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), often inadequately managed with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alone. Eolo, a nutraceutical blend of sodium alginate, sodium bicarbonate, palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), and herbal extracts, has been proposed as an adjunctive therapy to enhance symptom relief and mucosal protection.

Objective: This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a nutraceutical [Eolo®, Cristalfarma s.r.l. - Milan (IT)] in combination with PPIs or alone compared to PPIs therapy in patients with NERD.

Methods: A single-center, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted, enrolling 60 patients with NERD. Participants were randomized into three groups: (A) Eolo + half-dose PPIs for 12 weeks, (B) half-dose PPIs alone for 12 weeks, and (C) a control group receiving only half-dose PPIs for 24 weeks. After 12 weeks, groups A and B discontinued PPIs and continued with Eolo alone for an additional 12 weeks. Symptom relief and quality of life (QoL) were assessed using GERD-HRQOL and RSI questionnaires at baseline (T0), 12 weeks (T1), and 24 weeks (T2).

Read the detailed description

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of a nutraceutical in combination with PPIs or alone compared to PPIs therapy in patients with NERD.

A single-center, randomized, parallel-group study was conducted, enrolling 60 patients with NERD. Participants were randomized into three groups: (A) Eolo + half-dose PPIs for 12 weeks, (B) half-dose PPIs alone for 12 weeks, and (C) a control group receiving only half-dose PPIs for 24 weeks. After 12 weeks, groups A and B discontinued PPIs and continued with Eolo alone for an additional 12 weeks. Symptom relief and quality of life (QoL) were assessed using GERD-HRQOL and RSI questionnaires at baseline (T0), 12 weeks (T1), and 24 weeks (T2).

Being tested
EOLO, PPI (proton pump inhibitor), Group C: Eolo
Keywords
non erosive reflux Disease, nutraceutical treatment
Medical subject headings
Non-Erosive Reflux Disease, Gastroesophageal Reflux

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EOLODietary supplement

    Eolo, a nutraceutical blend of sodium alginate, sodium bicarbonate, palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), and herbal extracts

  • PPI (proton pump inhibitor)Drug

    Received a half-dose of PPIs for 24 weeks

  • Group C: EoloDietary supplement

    Eolo, a nutraceutical blend of sodium alginate, sodium bicarbonate, palmitoylethanolamide (PEA), and herbal extracts for 24 weeks

Study groups in NCT07041060
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group CActive comparatorhalf-dose PPIs for 24 weeks
Receives: Dietary Supplement: EOLO; Dietary Supplement: Group C: Eolo
Group BExperimentalPatients receiving half-dose PPIs alone for 12 weeks, then Eolo alone for 12 additional weeks.
Receives: Drug: PPI (proton pump inhibitor); Dietary Supplement: Group C: Eolo
Group AExperimentalPatients receiving Eolo 24 we
Receives: Drug: PPI (proton pump inhibitor)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Symptom relief and quality of life (QoL)

    GERD-HRQOL

    Measured: Baseline (T0), Week 12 (T1), and Week 24 (T2). Score range 0-50; higher scores indicate worse quality of life.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. RSI (Reflux Symptom Index)

    Reflux Symptom Index

    Measured: Baseline (T0), Week 12 (T1), and Week 24 (T2). Score range 0-45; higher scores indicate worse symptoms.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Jun 2025
  2. Study start30 May 2025
  3. Primary completion30 May 2025
  4. Study completion30 May 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Group A: Patients receiving Eolo + half-dose PPIs for 12 weeks, then Eolo alone for 12 additional weeks. Group B: Patients receiving half-dose PPIs alone for 12 weeks, then Eolo alone for 12 additional weeks. Group C: Patients receiving half-dose PPIs only for 24 weeks.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07041060
Sponsor's protocol ID
DIMEC, University of Bologna
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
30 May 2025
Last updated
27 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD used in the results publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EOLO, PPI (proton pump inhibitor) and Group C: Eolo in people with Non-erosive Reflux Disease and Reflux Disease, Gastro-Esophageal, run by University of Bologna at 1 site in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Symptom relief and quality of life (QoL) (time frame: Baseline (T0), Week 12 (T1), and Week 24 (T2). Score range 0-50; higher scores indicate worse quality of life.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in