AzTrials
AzTrials

Biliary and Pancreatic DiseasesNCT07017283

Effect of Deep Analgosedation vs. Endotracheal Intubation General Anesthesia on on Perioperative Sedation Related Adverse Events in Elderly ERCP Patients

A study testing Tracheal intubation general anesthesia and Nasopharyngeal airway ventilation in people with Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), run by Gang Chen at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to investigate the impact of deep analgosedation versus endotracheal intubation general anesthesia on perioperative sedation related adverse events in elderly ERCP patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
What is being tested?
Tracheal intubation general anesthesia and Nasopharyngeal airway ventilation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
170 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
10 Nov 2025to 28 Feb 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Aged 60 and above;
  • ASA physical status≤III;
  • Patients who scheduled for elective therapeutic ERCP (ERCP complexity grading system;
  • Willing to provide informed consent (or by legal guardian/witness if applicable).

Who cannot join

  • 1: Altered gastrointestinal anatomy, delayed gastric emptying, or gastric outlet obstruction; 2.Coagulopathy or epistaxis tendency; 3.Cardiac diseases (e.g., coronary artery disease, heart failure, arrhythmias); 4.Pulmonary diseases (e.g., asthma, COPD); 5.Prior hypersensitivity to anesthetic agents; 6.Active upper respiratory infection; 7.Severe liver and kidney diseases; 8.Difficult airway: Preoperative anesthesiologist assessment of difficult airway; 9.Psychiatric disorders, cognitive impairment, critical illness, or pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine

    Hangzhou, Zhijiang, 310016

    Xiaocui Lv, 13567109477, 3412008@zju.edu.cn

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Effect of Deep Analgosedation vs. Endotracheal Intubation General Anesthesia on Perioperative Respiratory Adverse Events in Elderly ERCP Patients: An Open-Label Randomized Controlled Trial

This study aims to investigate the impact of deep analgosedation versus endotracheal intubation general anesthesia on perioperative sedation related adverse events in elderly ERCP patients.

Read the detailed description

This study aims to investigate the impact of deep analgosedation versus endotracheal intubation general anesthesia on perioperative sedation related adverse events in elderly ERCP patients.

Being tested
Tracheal intubation general anesthesia, Nasopharyngeal airway ventilation
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tracheal intubation general anesthesiaDevice

    Endotracheal intubation with general anesthesia was administered to the patient during the ERCP procedure.

  • Nasopharyngeal airway ventilationDevice

    Nasopharyngeal airway-assisted deep sedation was employed for the patient during the ERCP procedure.

Study groups in NCT07017283
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
General anesthesiaActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Device: Tracheal intubation general anesthesia
Deep sedationExperimentalNot described
Receives: Device: Nasopharyngeal airway ventilation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Perioperative sedation related adverse events

    Measured: Perioperative period

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. recovery room time

    Measured: Perioperative period

  2. Nasopharyngeal airway requires face mask ventilation or switching to tracheal intubation

    Measured: Perioperative

  3. Second intubation after the tracheal intubation is removed

    Measured: Perioperative

  4. Tachycardia (>100 beats/minute) or bradycardia (<50 beats/minute)

    Measured: Perioperative

  5. Rating of reflux degree

    Measured: perioperative

  6. QoR-15 score on POD1

    Measured: Postoperative day 1

  7. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Measured: postoperative day 1

  8. respiratory failure/ARDS incidence

    Measured: Perioperative

  9. Postoperative cognitive function assessment (MoCA)

    The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has a total score of 30 points, with a score of ≥26 considered normal

    Measured: Perioperative

  10. patient/endoscopist satisfaction

    Patient/endoscopist satisfaction with sedation type was assessed using a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS), where 1 represented the worst possible experience and 10 indicated the optimal experience

    Measured: Perioperative

  11. hospital stay duration

    Measured: Perioperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Jun 2025
  2. Study start10 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
170 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07017283
Sponsor's protocol ID
ERCP
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
21 May 2025
Last updated
18 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Lv X, Xu Y, Sun J, Liu H, Yu Y, Chen G. Effect of deep analgosedation vs. intubated general anesthesia on perioperative sedation-related adverse events in older adults undergoing ERCP: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026 Feb 26;13:1764649. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1764649. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 41836944

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tracheal intubation general anesthesia and Nasopharyngeal airway ventilation in people with Biliary and Pancreatic Diseases and Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), run by Gang Chen at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Xiaocui Lv (+8613567109477, 3412008@zju.edu.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Perioperative sedation related adverse events (time frame: Perioperative period). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07017283, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in