AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute PainNCT06987578

OMT vs. Standard Therapy in the Management of Acute Neck and Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department

A study testing OMT vs. Ibruprofen in people with Acute Pain, run by St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, New Jersey at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients 18 to 65 years old who present within 72 hours of onset pain will be considered for study enrollment. Patients with the acute musculoskeletal low back or neck pain based on ED history and structural physical exam will be included. Patients will be excluded based upon specific exclusion criteria. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Pain
What is being tested?
OMT vs. Ibruprofen
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
45 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
11 Jul 2019to 5 Dec 2022
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients 18 to 65 years old who present within 72 hours of onset pain will be considered for study enrollment. Patients with acute musculoskeletal low back or neck pain based on ED history and structural physical exam will be included, provided they sign the informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Failure to sign consent Focal neurological deficit (motor or sensory), or paresthesia
  • Severe osteoporosis
  • History of peptic ulcer disease
  • Presentation requiring cardiac monitoring
  • Fracture, dislocation, or joint instability at the area of symptoms
  • Presentation after traumatic injury requiring C-collar placement prior to or subsequent to arrival
Show all 20Show fewer
  • Cancer or malignancy of the head, neck, chest or back
  • Allergy to aspirin or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Cellulitis (skin infection) at the treatment site
  • Pregnancy or currently breastfeeding
  • History of renal impairment
  • Cervical or lumbar radiculopathy
  • Active illicit drug abuse or chronic alcohol use
  • Chronic pain syndrome
  • Daily opioid use
  • Use of aspirin daily
  • Use of antiplatelet or anticoagulant medications (clopidogrel, warfarin, dabigatran rivaroxaban, apixaban or other similar medications)
  • Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) less than 15 or altered mental status
  • Prisoners presenting in police custody
  • Use of any non-steroidal antiplatelet medications (NSAIDS) or administration of any non-pharmacological manipulation (Physical Therapy or OMT) within six hours prior to presentation.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • St. Joseph's University Medical Cener

    Paterson, New Jersey, 07503

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs. Standard Therapy in the Management of Acute Neck and Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department

Patients 18 to 65 years old who present within 72 hours of onset pain will be considered for study enrollment. Patients with the acute musculoskeletal low back or neck pain based on ED history and structural physical exam will be included. Patients will be excluded based upon specific exclusion criteria. After providing informed consent, patients will be randomized by block randomization to receive OMT or ibuprofen 400 mg, given orally.

Read the detailed description

Patients 18 to 65 years old who present withinj 72 hours of onset pain will be considered for study enrollment. Patients with acute musculoskeletal low back or neck pain based on ED history and structural physical exam will be included. Patients will be excluded based upon specific exclusion criteria. After providing informed consent, patients will be randomized by block randomization to receive OMT or ibuprofen 400 mg, given orally.

A unique patient code will be given to each patient to protect their privacy. A baseline pain score of an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-11) will be documented prior to the intervention. The OMT study group will receive 5 minutes of OMT treatment consisting of either or both myofascial release and muscle energy. The control group will only receive ibuprofen 400 mg in a single oral dose. At 30 and 60 minutes post intervention both groups will be asked to score their pain on the 11-point NRS scale from 0 to 10. At 60 minutes, each patient will also be asked to evaluate their perceived pain reduction on the 5-point pain reduction scale (PRS-5). A pain reduction of 50% or greater, on the NRS-11 scale, will be considered clinically significant. Additionally patients will be asked to assess whether they experienced any significant side effects, such as nausea, vomiting, epigastric pain, dizziness or worsening muscle soreness. If the patient's pain is not controlled by 60 minutes, patients will be offered rescue analgesia. The choice of analgesic will be left to the discretion of the provider, but will be recorded for analysis. Lastly, patient satisfaction and likability of treatment will be measured.

Conditions
Acute Pain
Being tested
OMT vs. Ibruprofen
Keywords
musculoskeletal pain
Medical subject headings
Acute Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OMT vs. IbruprofenOther

    OMT vs. Standard Therapy in the Management of Acute Neck and Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department

Study groups in NCT06987578
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OMT onlyOtherTHE OMT study group will receive 5 minutes of OMT treatment consisting of either or both myofascial release and muscle energy
Receives: Other: OMT vs. Ibruprofen
ibuprofen or placeboPlacebo comparatorThe control group will only receive ibuprofen 400mg in a single dose
Receives: Other: OMT vs. Ibruprofen

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. decrease opiod use

    Measured: 10/30/2022

  2. OMT vs. Standard Therapy in the Management of Acute Neck and Low Back Pain in the Emergency Department

    50% change in pain score on the NRS-11 pain scale, from time of randomization to 60 minutes post-randomization

    Measured: 60 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 May 2025
  2. Study start11 Jul 2019
  3. Primary completion5 Dec 2022
  4. Study completion5 Dec 2022

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
block randomization OMT vs Standard treatment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
45 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06987578
Sponsor's protocol ID
PR#19-025
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
17 Oct 2022
Last updated
23 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: A unique code will replace a subject identifiers

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing OMT vs. Ibruprofen in people with Acute Pain, run by St. Joseph's Regional Medical Center, New Jersey at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

decrease opiod use (time frame: 10/30/2022). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in