AzTrials
AzTrials

Behavior ChangeiRiseNCT06984692

Evaluation of iRise mHealth App on Healthcare Workers' (HCWs') Self-Efficacy and Willingness to Respond During Public Health Emergencies in Pakistan

A study testing iRise curriculum in people with Behavior Change and Self Efficacy, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 3 sites in Pakistan.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a novel mHealth intervention that is being designed to promote self-efficacy and response willingness among Pakistan-based emergency department health care workers (HCWs) in public health emergencies and disasters. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Behavior Change, Self Efficacy
What is being tested?
iRise curriculum
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
3 sitesPakistan
Study dates
1 Oct 2025to 30 Apr 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Participants are eligible to be included in the study if
  • aged 18 years or older,
  • have worked in the current job position for at least three months,
  • current Emergency Department clinical staff/employee involved in direct patient care (doctors, nurses, and technicians) at a participating institution (Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH), Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC)
  • understand and write English,
  • own a smart phone and have access to the internet to download the app.

Who cannot join

  • Participants will not be eligible to participate if
  • younger than 18 years of age,
  • have worked in the current job position for less than three months,
  • are not a current employee or staff member as described above,
  • are auxiliary personnel such as registration staff, housekeeping, porters, and security personnel,
  • don't understand and write English, or
  • don't own a smart phone or have access to the internet to download the app.

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

Pakistan3 sites
  • Aga Khan University Hospital

    Karachi, Sindh, 74800

  • Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre

    Karachi, Sindh, 75510

  • Aga khan university

    Karachi, Sindh

Other trials in Pakistan

About this study

The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of a novel mHealth intervention that is being designed to promote self-efficacy and response willingness among Pakistan-based emergency department health care workers (HCWs) in public health emergencies and disasters. This application seeks approval for the trial of the intervention. The purpose of this trial is to gauge short-term (1-month), medium-term (6-months), and longer-term (12-months) impacts of iRise mHealth app on low and middle income based countries HCWs' self-efficacy and willingness to respond (WTR) during public health emergencies and disasters. The investigators will test the hypothesis that the iRise app would yield an increased 12-months WTR in Aga Khan University Hospital (AKUH) and Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center (JMPC) emergency departments.

Being tested
iRise curriculum, Control Curriculum

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • iRise curriculumOther

    Intervention group: The intervention group would download the iRise mHealth app ("iRise app") via Canvas on the participant's respective smart phones, and based on the participant's own schedules and preferences, would complete different modules of iRise. The iRise app would include emergency management elements as received by the control group, but presented via smart phone-based content delivery (i.e., rather than rather than via the in-person modality utilized for the control group).

  • Control CurriculumOther

    The control group will receive standard training in crisis response and management, which is offered as a course on Emergency Management and Response at AKU, for which study participants from JPMC will also readily access. The course involves introduction to disaster terminology, emergency management cycle and hospital-based patient treatment guidelines. The control curriculum will offer a comprehensive focus on disaster preparedness, addressing important subjects such as emergency management techniques, disasters, and triage. The eight-hour training will be split into two parts, aiming to improve academic and practical understanding. The first part will be a didactic session, where participants will learn fundamental information through lectures and discussions. The second part will consist of hands-on training, allowing attendees to practice and apply learned concepts in simulated emergency scenarios.

Study groups in NCT06984692
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control CurriculumActive comparatorControl group: The control group will receive standard training in crisis response and management, which is offered as a course on Emergency Management and Response at AKU, for which study participants from JPMC will also readily access. Participants will be able to both view and download the course content via internet and can request a printed version of the course. The course involves introduction to disaster terminology, emergency management cycle and hospital-based patient treatment guidelines. The control curriculum will offer a comprehensive focus on disaster preparedness, addressing important subjects such as emergency management techniques, disasters, and triage. The eight-hour training will be split into two parts, aiming to improve academic and practical understanding. The first part will be a didactic session, where participants will learn fundamental information through lectures and discussions. The second part will consist of hands-on training.
Receives: Other: Control Curriculum
iRise curriculumExperimentalThe intervention group would download the iRise mHealth app ("iRise app") via Canvas on the participant's respective smart phones, and based on the participant's own schedules and preferences, would complete different modules of iRise. The iRise app would include emergency management elements as received by the control group, but presented via smart phone-based content delivery (i.e., rather than rather than via the in-person modality utilized for the control group).
Receives: Other: iRise curriculum

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Willingness to respond (WTR) to disasters as measured by Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST)

    HIRST uses a 9-point Likert scale [1= Strongly Agree; 9 = Strongly Disagree] or "Don't Know) to indicate attitudes and beliefs about a series of 20 construct statements relevant to emergency response risk perception. Score range 20-180. Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to respond or preparedness.

    Measured: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months

  2. Willingness to respond (WTR) to disasters as measured by Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST)

    HIRST uses a 9-point Likert scale [1= Strongly Agree; 9 = Strongly Disagree] or "Don't Know) to indicate attitudes and beliefs about a series of 20 construct statements relevant to emergency response risk perception. Score range 20-180. Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to respond or preparedness.

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Willingness to respond (WTR) to disasters as measured by Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST)

    HIRST uses a 9-point Likert scale [1= Strongly Agree; 9 = Strongly Disagree] or "Don't Know) to indicate attitudes and beliefs about a series of 20 construct statements relevant to emergency response risk perception. Score range 20-180. Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to respond or preparedness.

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Willingness to respond (WTR) to disasters as measured by Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST)

    HIRST uses a 9-point Likert scale [1= Strongly Agree; 9 = Strongly Disagree] or "Don't Know) to indicate attitudes and beliefs about a series of 20 construct statements relevant to emergency response risk perception. Score range 20-180. Higher scores indicate a greater willingness to respond or preparedness.

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Self efficacy as assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale

    Self efficacy is assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale embedded within the Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST).Total score ranging between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating a higher level of self efficacy

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Self efficacy as assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale

    Self efficacy is assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale embedded within the Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST).Total score ranging between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating a higher level of self efficacy

    Measured: 1 month

  3. Self efficacy as assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale

    Self efficacy is assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale embedded within the Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST).Total score ranging between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating a higher level of self efficacy

    Measured: 6 months

  4. Self efficacy as assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale

    Self efficacy is assessed by the General Self-efficacy Scale embedded within the Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST).Total score ranging between 10 and 40, with a higher score indicating a higher level of self efficacy

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2025
  2. Study start1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion15 Apr 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2026 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Due to collaboration model change

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This will be a 12-month, two-arm, parallel randomized controlled trial to evaluate a mHealth intervention, iRise, for emergency health care workers (HCWs).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06984692
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00029867
Other IDs
5R33TW012210-04
Acronym
iRise
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
8 May 2025
Last updated
5 Nov 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing iRise curriculum in people with Behavior Change and Self Efficacy, run by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health at 3 sites in Pakistan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Willingness to respond (WTR) to disasters as measured by Hospital Infrastructure Response Survey Tool (HIRST) (time frame: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months, 12 months). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in