AzTrials
AzTrials

Depression and Suicide IdeationNCT06980441

Culturally Adapted Psychological Support for Conflict-Affected Afghans: Study Protocol on Mental Health & Violence

A study testing Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing module in people with Depression and Suicide Ideation and Anxiety, run by Peace of Mind Association (PoMA) at 1 site in Afghanistan.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

This pilot study examines the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted psychological intervention-Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing (PM+ EP)-for young Afghans aged 16-30 experiencing high psychological distress. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 30 years
Conditions the study is for
Depression and Suicide Ideation, Anxiety, PTSD
What is being tested?
Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing module
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteAfghanistan
Study dates
Jun 2025to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 30 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Psychological Distress, measured at >15 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10)
  • Afghan nationality
  • Age between 16 and 30
  • Ability to read and write in Dari

Who cannot join

  • Imminent suicide risk
  • Experiencing psychosis
  • Neurological or cognitive disabilities

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Lyla L Schwartz, Masters contact

4132973569

lyla@pomaglobal.org

Afghanistan1 site
  • Peace of Mind Association (PoMA)

    Kabul

Other trials in Afghanistan

About this study

Official title: Feasibility and Acceptability of Culturally Adapted, Evidence-Informed Psychological Support on Mental Health Symptoms and Violence for Conflict-Affected Populations in Afghanistan: A Study Protocol

This pilot study examines the feasibility and acceptability of a culturally adapted psychological intervention-Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing (PM+ EP)-for young Afghans aged 16-30 experiencing high psychological distress. Through a pilot randomized control trial and qualitative interviews, the study explores whether PM+ EP can reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, PTSD, and aggression, and improve daily functioning. Findings will inform the potential for a larger trial and address critical mental health and violence prevention needs in conflict-affected Afghan communities.

Read the detailed description

Background: A large portion of Afghanistan's population, particularly children, has endured prolonged conflict, poverty, and displacement, leading to significant psychological distress. As children grow into adolescence and adulthood, this distress often manifests in mental health symptoms and an increased likelihood of violent behaviours. With limited mental health professionals and strong stigma around mental health in Afghanistan, culturally adapted, evidence-based interventions are needed.

Objective: The study aims to explore the feasibility and acceptability of culturally adapted mental health intervention Problem Management Plus with an additional Emotional Processing module (PM+ EP), in reducing psychological distress in young Afghans. The primary objective is to assess the feasibility of delivering this intervention in Afghanistan and its acceptability by the target communities, and the secondary objective is to assess symptom reduction and behavioural change.

Methods: This is a pilot Randomized Control Trial (RCT) with participants aged 16 to 30 in Afghanistan. Eligible participants, young Afghans with high levels of distress and impaired functioning - measured by the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) -, will be randomized to PM+ EP (n=30) or the waiting group (n=30). The participants will be evaluated through self-report questionnaires at three time points; baseline (T1), four weeks later immediately post-intervention (T2), and 3 months post-intervention (T3), and through a qualitative interview (Process Evaluation) at the end of the study. Outcomes will include measures of anxiety and depression (HSCL-25), aggressive behaviours (AGQ), PTSD symptoms (PCL-5), and daily functioning (WHODAS 2.0).

Analysis: This study will assess the feasibility and acceptability of culturally adapted PM+ EP in Afghanistan and explore the relationship between mental health symptoms and violence among young Afghans. It will be the first to evaluate the feasibility of PM+ EP with this population and could pave the way for a large define RCT examining the effectiveness this approach, should the results show promise.

Being tested
Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing module
Keywords
Youth mental health, Afghanistan, Implementation science, Culturally adapted psychological support, Evidence informed interventions, Mental health symptoms, Psychological experiences
Medical subject headings
Depression, Anxiety Disorders, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing moduleBehavioural

    PM+ EP comprises of Problem Management Plus, an evidence-based low intensity psychological intervention developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), with an additional Emotional Processing module specifically to address psychological distress related to trauma exposure. The core of the intervention is designed for adults impaired by distress in communities exposed to conflict and adversity; it consists of CBT techniques that have been adapted for communities that do not have good availability of specialist care. The additional module was developed by researchers treating refugee youth (Alozkan Sever et al, 2021). For this study, PM+ EP will be a six-session individual and guided support program. The original sections of PM+ are available in many languages including Farsi, and the additional EP module will be translated by PoMA's Afghan translator. The sessions cover the topics of managing stress, strengthening social support, staying well and persevering.

Study groups in NCT06980441
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Intervention Arm: PM+ EPExperimentalParticipants in this group will receive a culturally adapted version of the World Health Organization's Problem Management Plus (PM+) program, with an added Emotional Processing (EP) module. The intervention will be delivered through six individual sessions over one month by trained Afghan facilitators of the same gender as the participant. Sessions will focus on managing distress, solving problems, building social support, and processing difficult emotions.
Receives: Behavioral: Problem Management Plus with Emotional Processing module
No Intervention ArmNo interventionParticipants in this group will not receive the intervention during the study period but will complete the same assessments as the intervention group. After the study concludes, they will be offered the opportunity to receive the PM+ EP sessions.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reduction in psychological distress symptoms among participants, as measured by scientific scale HSCL-25.

    In this pilot RCT, the primary outcome is to explore the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the PM+ EP intervention in Afghanistan. The study serves to demonstrate whether such interventions could be safety scaled and produce positive outcomes for the target population. All participants will complete four surveys for assessment at study points T0, T1, T2 and T3. The Hopkins Symptom Checklist 25 (HSCL-25) is one outcome measure designed to measure for anxiety and depression. Hopkins Symptom Checklist-25 (HSCL-25) is a 25 item self-report questionnaire assessing symptoms of psychological distress; 10 items for anxiety symptoms and 15 items for depression symptoms (2 of which identify somatic symptoms) (Mollica et al, 1987). The items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (never) to 4 (always) with the anxiety scale ranging from 10-40 and the depression scale from 15-60. The total scale (range 25-100) represents psychological distress.

    Measured: Pre-intervention until 3 months post-intervention

  2. Reduction in psychological distress symptoms among participants, as measured by scientific scale DSM-5 (PCL-5).

    The primary outcome of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the PM+ EP intervention in Afghanistan and its potential for safe scale-up and positive impact. All participants will complete four assessments at T0, T1, T2, and T3. PTSD symptoms will be measured using the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), a 20-item self-report tool that assesses symptoms over the past month. Each item is scored from 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Extremely), covering four symptom clusters: Re-experiencing, Avoidance, Negative Cognition/Mood, and Hyperarousal. A provisional PTSD diagnosis can be made if participants endorse the minimum number of symptoms in each cluster at a rating of 2 or higher. A total score between 31-33 suggests probable PTSD. This outcome will help determine whether PM+ EP is a feasible and acceptable approach to reducing trauma symptoms among conflict-affected youth in Afghanistan.

    Measured: Pre-intervention until 3 months post-intervention

  3. Reduction in psychological distress symptoms among participants, as measured by scientific scale WHODAS 2.0.

    The primary outcome of this pilot RCT is to assess the feasibility and acceptability of delivering the PM+ EP intervention in Afghanistan, evaluating its potential for safe scale-up and positive outcomes. All participants will complete four assessments at T0, T1, T2, and T3. Functional ability will be measured using the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), a validated tool developed by WHO to assess health and disability across six domains: cognition, mobility, self-care, getting along, life activities, and participation. Participants report difficulties experienced in the past 30 days on a five-point Likert scale (1 = none to 5 = extreme), with total scores ranging from 12 to 60. Higher scores indicate greater functional impairment. This outcome will inform whether PM+ EP is feasible, acceptable, and functionally beneficial for young Afghans experiencing psychological distress.

    Measured: Pre-intervention until 3 months post-intervention

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Participant-Reported Changes in Attitudes Toward Violence and Perceived Impact of PM+ EP on Mental Health and Behavior.

    This outcome explores the relationship between mental health symptoms and violent behavior through qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of participants and facilitators conducted after the intervention (T3). Interviews will investigate perceived changes in psychological distress, aggressive behavior, and attitudes toward violence, as well as the cultural relevance and acceptability of the PM+ EP intervention. Data will be analyzed thematically using ATLAS.ti. Results will be used to illustrate context-specific linkages between mental health and violence and to inform future adaptation and scale-up of culturally tailored psychological interventions in conflict-affected settings.

    Measured: 3 months post-intervention

  2. Analysis of relationship between mental health and violence, as measured by scientific scale AGQ.

    The study's secondary outcome is to examine the relationship between mental health and violence, and assess the potential impact of culturally adapted mental health programming on symptom and behavioral change, particularly in reducing violence. Aggression will be measured using the Aggression Questionnaire (AGQ), a 29-item self-report tool assessing physical aggression, verbal aggression, anger, and hostility. Participants rate each item on a 7-point Likert scale (1 = extremely uncharacteristic of me; 7 = extremely characteristic of me), with total scores ranging from 29 to 203. Higher scores indicate greater levels of aggression. The AGQ captures both aggressive acts and temperamental traits, allowing for analysis of change in aggressive behaviors and attitudes over time. This outcome will contribute to understanding context-specific linkages between mental health symptoms and violence in conflict-affected populations.

    Measured: Pre-intervention until 3 months post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2025
  2. Study startJun 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
60 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06980441
Sponsor's protocol ID
1378139
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
1 May 2025
Last updated
20 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Anonymised study data will be available upon request after publication.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in