CommunicationNCT06969196
Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients
A study testing Written Communicatoin in people with Communication and ICU, run by Rush University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Our research group has developed an approach for providing families of ICU patients with daily written summaries of care as a supplement to traditional verbal communication. Written summaries describe the patient's main ICU problems and management plan and are delivered to families each day. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Communication, ICU
- What is being tested?
- Written Communicatoin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 27 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 7 Jul 2025to 20 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Surrogate Inclusion
- One self-identified adult decision maker for an adult medical ICU patient cared for on the 10W ICU
- Member of the primary ICU team believes the respective patient will require at least three additional days of ICU care
- Member of the primary ICU team has identified at least one communication challenge with the patient's surrogate(s) including but not limited to:
- Complex medical issues requiring frequent updates to families
- Complex family dynamics (i.e., multiple involved family members)
- Increased anxiety/stress of surrogate(s)
- Difficult to provide updates to family members because they do not visit ICU regularly or are hard to reach by phone
Surrogate Exclusion
- Surrogate cannot read or understand English
- Surrogate is unwilling or unable to participate in study procedures
- Patient is decisional and refuses to allow surrogate participation
Clinician Inclusion • Advanced practice provider (APP) on the medical ICU team on the 10W ICU
Clinician Exclusion
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
About this study
Official title: Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients - A Pilot Study
Our research group has developed an approach for providing families of ICU patients with daily written summaries of care as a supplement to traditional verbal communication. Written summaries describe the patient's main ICU problems and management plan and are delivered to families each day. Despite the benefits of written communication to both the family and clinician experience, the main barrier to implementing this communication approach is the time required for clinicians to create a written summary. For the proposed pilot study, the investgators will ask ICU clinicians to identify patients and respective families for whom there has been a challenge with communication. The investigators will ask ICU clinicians to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families. The investigators hypothesize that this process will acceptable and feasible for ICU clinicians and families.
- Conditions
- Communication, ICU
- Being tested
- Written Communicatoin
- Medical subject headings
- Communication
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Written CommunicatoinOther
ICU clinicians will be asked to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Written Communication | Experimental | AI-edited, ICU clinician edited written communication Receives: Other: Written Communicatoin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Communication Quality (Clinicians)
Clinician participants will ratings of quality of AI-generated written summaries and whether written summaries address family-specific communication challenges (5-point Likert scale, 1-5 points with higher scores indicating better quality)
Measured: Through study completion, an average of one week
Communication Quality (Families/Surrogates)
The Family Inpatient Communication Survey (FICS) is a 30-item survey measuring of the quality of communication with the treatment team from the perspective of families of hospitalized patients. Items on this survey measure the informational and emotional aspects of communication, and each item of this survey is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree (30-150 points with higher scores indicating better quality communication)
Measured: Average one week after enrollment
Acceptability of intervention
Acceptability of the intervention will reflected in adequate enrollment and an average score of at least 3.5 on surveys with 5-point Likert scale measures including the Acceptability of Intervention (AIM), Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Survey (FIM) (1-5 point with higher scores being better)
Measured: Average one week after enrollment
Feasibility of intervention
Feasibility will be determined by written communication being created for at least 80% of all ICU days and less than 5 minutes on average being spent editing each AI-generated summary.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of one week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2025
- Study start7 Jul 2025
- Primary completion20 Sep 2025
- Study completion20 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CommunicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Rush University Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Rush University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06969196
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 25040406
- Status last verified
- Dec 2025
- First submitted
- 18 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Lee JJ, Mathur S, Gerhart J, Glover CM, Ritz E, Basapur S, Greenberg JA. Written communication and the ICU team experience (WRITE): A pre-post intervention study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Oct;84:103753. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103753. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
PubMed 38924848Greenberg JA, Basapur S, Quinn TV, Bulger JL, Schwartz NH, Oh SK, Ritz EM, Glover CM, Shah RC. Daily Written Care Summaries for Families of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;50(9):1296-1305. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005583. Epub 2022 May 23.
PubMed 35607975Bulger JL, Quinn TV, Glover CM, Basapur S, Shah RC, Greenberg JA. Written Care Summaries Facilitate Communication Between Families and Providers of ICU Patients: A Pilot Study. Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jul 13;3(7):e0473. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000473. eCollection 2021 Jul.
PubMed 34278309
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Artificial Intelligence-Generated Written Communication for Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients - A Pilot Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06969196
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 25040406
- Conditions
- Communication, ICU
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 27 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Rush University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 7 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Our research group has developed an approach for providing families of ICU patients with daily written summaries of care as a supplement to traditional verbal communication. Written summaries describe the patient's main ICU problems and management plan and are delivered to families each day. Despite the benefits of written communication to both the family and clinician experience, the main barrier to implementing this communication approach is the time required for clinicians to create a written summary. For the proposed pilot study, the investgators will ask ICU clinicians to identify patients and respective families for whom there has been a challenge with communication. The investigators will ask ICU clinicians to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families. The investigators hypothesize that this process will acceptable and feasible for ICU clinicians and families.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Written Communication | Experimental | Other: Written CommunicatoinAI-edited, ICU clinician edited written communication |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Written CommunicatoinICU clinicians will be asked to edit AI-generated written summaries for content and clarity before they are delivered to families | Other | Written Communication |
Primary outcome
Communication Quality (Clinicians)
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one week
Clinician participants will ratings of quality of AI-generated written summaries and whether written summaries address family-specific communication challenges (5-point Likert scale, 1-5 points with higher scores indicating better quality)
Communication Quality (Families/Surrogates)
Time frame: Average one week after enrollment
The Family Inpatient Communication Survey (FICS) is a 30-item survey measuring of the quality of communication with the treatment team from the perspective of families of hospitalized patients. Items on this survey measure the informational and emotional aspects of communication, and each item of this survey is rated on a 5-point Likert scale from strongly agree to strongly disagree (30-150 points with higher scores indicating better quality communication)
Acceptability of intervention
Time frame: Average one week after enrollment
Acceptability of the intervention will reflected in adequate enrollment and an average score of at least 3.5 on surveys with 5-point Likert scale measures including the Acceptability of Intervention (AIM), Appropriateness of Intervention (IAM), and Feasibility of Intervention Survey (FIM) (1-5 point with higher scores being better)
Feasibility of intervention
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of one week
Feasibility will be determined by written communication being created for at least 80% of all ICU days and less than 5 minutes on average being spent editing each AI-generated summary.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 38924848Lee JJ, Mathur S, Gerhart J, Glover CM, Ritz E, Basapur S, Greenberg JA. Written communication and the ICU team experience (WRITE): A pre-post intervention study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2024 Oct;84:103753. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103753. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
- Background: PubMed 35607975Greenberg JA, Basapur S, Quinn TV, Bulger JL, Schwartz NH, Oh SK, Ritz EM, Glover CM, Shah RC. Daily Written Care Summaries for Families of Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 1;50(9):1296-1305. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005583. Epub 2022 May 23.
- Background: PubMed 34278309Bulger JL, Quinn TV, Glover CM, Basapur S, Shah RC, Greenberg JA. Written Care Summaries Facilitate Communication Between Families and Providers of ICU Patients: A Pilot Study. Crit Care Explor. 2021 Jul 13;3(7):e0473. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000473. eCollection 2021 Jul.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Communication
Not yet recruitingObservational study
IN-TALK: Co-producing a Hospice Intimacy Support Toolkit in England
Communication About Intimacy Needs in Hospice and Palliative Care
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Validation of the Healthcare Relationship Assessment Scale (ERA) in Health Sciences Students.
Health Adult Subjects, Communication
Recruiting
Trial of Center-Based vs. In-Home Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) in Autism
Autism, Autism Spectrum Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Trial of Center-Based Early Start Denver Model vs. Pivotal Response Treatment in Children With Autism
Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Autism
RecruitingObservational study
Pediatric Research in the Outpatient Setting CoHort
Parental Stress, Communication Disorder, Childhood
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Written Communicatoin in people with Communication and ICU, run by Rush University Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Communication Quality (Clinicians) (time frame: Through study completion, an average of one week). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06969196, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.