Airway Complication of AnaesthesiaPhase 4LICOSNCT06967064
The Application of Lidocaine Cream on Oral Secretions of LMA Removal During the Recovery Period in Ophthalmic Surgical Patients Under General Anesthesia
A Phase 4 study testing lidocaine cream in people with Airway Complication of Anaesthesia and Laryngeal Mask Airway Removal, run by Sun Yat-sen University.
Trial summary
The application of lidocaine cream on oral secretions of LMA removal during the recovery period in ophthalmic surgical patients under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Airway Complication of Anaesthesia, Laryngeal Mask Airway Removal, Anesthesia Emergence
- What is being tested?
- lidocaine cream
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 15 May 2025to 22 May 2025
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 to 60 years;
- With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II;
- Scheduled to undergo ophthalmic surgery following general anesthesia with LMA.
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to LMA use;
- A history of upper respiratory tract infection within one week prior to surgery;
- Persistent pharyngeal symptoms (eg. throat irritation, dryness, or chronic cough, etc.) lasting ≥ 3 months;
- Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease;
- Morbid obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2;
- A predicted difficult airway (eg. a history of difficult airway, mouth opening < 3 cm, Mallampati class 4, limited neck extension or cervical spine disease);
Show all 11Show fewer
- Presence of structural abnormalities, masses, infections, or scarring in the oral cavity or oropharynx;
- Known contraindications to lidocaine cream;
- Two or more failed attempts at LMA insertion;
- Intraoperative administration of anticholinergic agents;
- Any other condition present likely to influence the study outcomes.
About this study
Official title: The Application of Lidocaine Cream on Oral Secretions of LMA Removal During the Recovery Period in Ophthalmic Surgical Patients Under General Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
The application of lidocaine cream on oral secretions of LMA removal during the recovery period in ophthalmic surgical patients under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
Read the detailed description
During the recovery from general anesthesia, patients commonly experience heightened oral secretions, which can elevate intraocular pressure (IOP) due to coughing and potentially lead to the infiltration of secretions into the surgical site via the nasolacrimal duct, increasing the risk of endophthalmitis. This study is aimed to investigate whether applying lidocaine cream to the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) reduces oral secretions during emergence from general anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery patients.
- Conditions
- Airway Complication of Anaesthesia, Laryngeal Mask Airway Removal, Anesthesia Emergence, Secretion; Excess, Salivation, Ophthalmic Surgery, General Anesthesia
- Being tested
- lidocaine cream, Placebo
- Keywords
- airway complication, oral secretions, laryngeal mask airway, general anesthesia, ophthalmic surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Sialorrhea
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
lidocaine creamDrug
Group U receives 1 mL of lidocaine cream extracted using a syringe and evenly applied across the entire posterior surface of the LMA cuff by carefully spreading the cream to ensure uniform coverage, while Group N receives 1 mL of lidocaine cream also extracted using a syringe but applied without ensuring even distribution, resulting in a patchy or non-uniform application.
PlaceboOther
No lidocaine cream will be applied to the LMA
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The uniform application group (group U) | Experimental | 1 ml of lidocaine cream will be evenly applied to the posterior surface of the LMA cuff before insertion Receives: Drug: lidocaine cream |
| The non-uniform application group (group N) | Experimental | 1 mL of lidocaine cream will be applied to the posterior surface without ensuring uniform coverage before insertion Receives: Drug: lidocaine cream |
| The control group (group C) | Sham comparator | No lidocaine cream will be applied to the LMA Receives: Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The volume of oral secretions
Oral secretions will be collected during the phase of anesthesia emergence. In the PACU, oral and nasopharyngeal secretions are gently suctioned using a negative pressure aspirator during the phase of emergence. Subsequently, 50 ml of normal saline is used to flush the suction tubing. The volume of oral secretions (ml) is calculated as the total volume in the suction canister minus 50 ml.
Measured: Assessed during the phase of anesthesia emergence, from the discontinuation of anesthetic agents to eye opening or purposeful movement; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Secondary outcomes (9)
The time completion of LMA insertion
Measured: Assessed from holding the airway tube to successful insertion of the LMA; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)
OLP is measured by setting the expiratory valve to 30 cmH2O at a gas flow rate of 3 L/min, recording the maximum inflation pressure when a noise of gas leakage is heard in the oropharynx via a stethoscope
Measured: Assessed after the completion of LMA insertion; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Time to LMA removal
Measured: Assessed from discontinuation of anesthetic agents to LMA removal; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Time to emergence
Measured: Assessed from the discontinuation of anesthetic agents to eye opening or purposeful movement; and reported up to 4 weeks.
PACU recovery time
Measured: Assessed from arrival in the PACU until the modified Aldrete score achieved at least 9; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Postoperative airway complications
Postoperative airway complications, including coughing, laryngospasm, or blood on device, will be recorded at the time of LMA removal
Measured: Assessed at the time of LMA removal; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Pharyngeal complications
Pharyngeal complications, such as sore throat, dysphagia, or hoarseness, will be collected
Measured: Assessed at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively; and reported up to 4 weeks.
The level of sore throat
The level of sore throat will be graded as follows: none, no sore throat; mild, pain with deglutition; moderate, pain constantly present and increasing with deglutition; severe, pain interfering with eating and requiring analgesic medication
Measured: Assessed at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Ocular and other complications
Measured: Assessed within 48 h after the surgery; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 May 2025
- Study start15 May 2025
- Primary completion22 May 2025
- Study completion22 May 2025
Why it stopped: The study was proactively suspended to ensure alignment with all applicable regulatory filing procedures. This decision was made to maintain adherence to institutional and compliance standards prior to study initiation.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Airway Complication of AnaesthesiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Zhu Yanling, Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06967064
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2000035364
- Acronym
- LICOS
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 22 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 29 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Seo JH, Cho CW, Hong DM, Jeon Y, Bahk JH. The effects of thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes on postoperative sore throat, hoarseness and vocal cord injuries: a prospective double-blind randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):282-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev414.
PubMed 26787799van Esch BF, Stegeman I, Smit AL. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: a systematic review on airway complications. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
PubMed 28183554Zhu Y, Shen W, Lin Y, Huang T, Xie L, Yang Y, Chen H, Gan X. Cricoid-mental distance-based versus weight-based criteria for size selection of classic laryngeal mask airway in adults: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Oct;33(5):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00308-w. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
PubMed 30963460Park JJ, Huh H, Yoon SZ, Lim HJ, Go DY, Cho JE, Lee J, Park J, Kim HC. Two-handed jaw thrust decreases postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing double-lumen endobronchial intubation: A randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Feb;37(2):105-112. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001149.
PubMed 31860598Zhu YL, Shen WH, Chen QR, Ye HJ, Huang JX, Kang Y, Chi W, Gan XL. Desflurane anesthesia compared with total intravenous anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled operating room time in ambulatory surgery following strabotomy: a randomized controlled study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Apr 5;133(7):779-785. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000728.
PubMed 32149764
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Application of Lidocaine Cream on Oral Secretions of LMA Removal During the Recovery Period in Ophthalmic Surgical Patients Under General Anesthesia: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06967064
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LICOS / 2000035364
- Conditions
- Airway Complication of Anaesthesia, Laryngeal Mask Airway Removal, Anesthesia Emergence, Secretion; Excess, Salivation, Ophthalmic Surgery, General Anesthesia
- Keywords
- airway complication, oral secretions, laryngeal mask airway, general anesthesia, ophthalmic surgery
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: The study was proactively suspended to ensure alignment with all applicable regulatory filing procedures. This decision was made to maintain adherence to institutional and compliance standards prior to study initiation.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 15 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 22 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 22 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The application of lidocaine cream on oral secretions of LMA removal during the recovery period in ophthalmic surgical patients under general anesthesia: a randomized controlled trial
Detailed description
During the recovery from general anesthesia, patients commonly experience heightened oral secretions, which can elevate intraocular pressure (IOP) due to coughing and potentially lead to the infiltration of secretions into the surgical site via the nasolacrimal duct, increasing the risk of endophthalmitis. This study is aimed to investigate whether applying lidocaine cream to the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) reduces oral secretions during emergence from general anesthesia in ophthalmic surgery patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The uniform application group (group U) | Experimental | Drug: lidocaine cream1 ml of lidocaine cream will be evenly applied to the posterior surface of the LMA cuff before insertion |
| The non-uniform application group (group N) | Experimental | Drug: lidocaine cream1 mL of lidocaine cream will be applied to the posterior surface without ensuring uniform coverage before insertion |
| The control group (group C) | Sham comparator | Other: PlaceboNo lidocaine cream will be applied to the LMA |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Aged 18 to 60 years;
- With American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II;
- Scheduled to undergo ophthalmic surgery following general anesthesia with LMA.
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Contraindications to LMA use;
- A history of upper respiratory tract infection within one week prior to surgery;
- Persistent pharyngeal symptoms (eg. throat irritation, dryness, or chronic cough, etc.) lasting ≥ 3 months;
- Severe gastroesophageal reflux disease;
- Morbid obesity, defined as a body mass index ≥ 40 kg/m2;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| lidocaine creamGroup U receives 1 mL of lidocaine cream extracted using a syringe and evenly applied across the entire posterior surface of the LMA cuff by carefully spreading the cream to ensure uniform coverage, while Group N receives 1 mL of lidocaine cream also extracted using a syringe but applied without ensuring even distribution, resulting in a patchy or non-uniform application. | Drug | The non-uniform application group (group N), The uniform application group (group U) |
| PlaceboNo lidocaine cream will be applied to the LMA | Other | The control group (group C) |
Primary outcome
The volume of oral secretions
Time frame: Assessed during the phase of anesthesia emergence, from the discontinuation of anesthetic agents to eye opening or purposeful movement; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Oral secretions will be collected during the phase of anesthesia emergence. In the PACU, oral and nasopharyngeal secretions are gently suctioned using a negative pressure aspirator during the phase of emergence. Subsequently, 50 ml of normal saline is used to flush the suction tubing. The volume of oral secretions (ml) is calculated as the total volume in the suction canister minus 50 ml.
9 secondary outcomes
The time completion of LMA insertion
Time frame: Assessed from holding the airway tube to successful insertion of the LMA; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP)
Time frame: Assessed after the completion of LMA insertion; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Time to LMA removal
Time frame: Assessed from discontinuation of anesthetic agents to LMA removal; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Time to emergence
Time frame: Assessed from the discontinuation of anesthetic agents to eye opening or purposeful movement; and reported up to 4 weeks.
PACU recovery time
Time frame: Assessed from arrival in the PACU until the modified Aldrete score achieved at least 9; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Postoperative airway complications
Time frame: Assessed at the time of LMA removal; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Pharyngeal complications
Time frame: Assessed at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively; and reported up to 4 weeks.
The level of sore throat
Time frame: Assessed at 1 h and 24 h postoperatively; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Ocular and other complications
Time frame: Assessed within 48 h after the surgery; and reported up to 4 weeks.
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 26787799Seo JH, Cho CW, Hong DM, Jeon Y, Bahk JH. The effects of thermal softening of double-lumen endobronchial tubes on postoperative sore throat, hoarseness and vocal cord injuries: a prospective double-blind randomized trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Feb;116(2):282-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev414.
- Results publication: PubMed 28183554van Esch BF, Stegeman I, Smit AL. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway vs tracheal intubation: a systematic review on airway complications. J Clin Anesth. 2017 Feb;36:142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.10.004. Epub 2016 Dec 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 30963460Zhu Y, Shen W, Lin Y, Huang T, Xie L, Yang Y, Chen H, Gan X. Cricoid-mental distance-based versus weight-based criteria for size selection of classic laryngeal mask airway in adults: a randomized controlled study. J Clin Monit Comput. 2019 Oct;33(5):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s10877-019-00308-w. Epub 2019 Apr 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 31860598Park JJ, Huh H, Yoon SZ, Lim HJ, Go DY, Cho JE, Lee J, Park J, Kim HC. Two-handed jaw thrust decreases postoperative sore throat in patients undergoing double-lumen endobronchial intubation: A randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Feb;37(2):105-112. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001149.
- Results publication: PubMed 32149764Zhu YL, Shen WH, Chen QR, Ye HJ, Huang JX, Kang Y, Chi W, Gan XL. Desflurane anesthesia compared with total intravenous anesthesia on anesthesia-controlled operating room time in ambulatory surgery following strabotomy: a randomized controlled study. Chin Med J (Engl). 2020 Apr 5;133(7):779-785. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000728.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Airway Complication of Anaesthesia
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Not yet recruiting
Intracuff Dexmedetomidine Versus Alkalinized Lidocaine for Peri-Extubation Cough and Hemodynamic Responses in Elderly Patients
Airway Complication of Anesthesia, Hemodynamic Instability
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Ultrasound and Neuromuscular Monitoring for Predicting Early Respiratory Events After Extubation
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Diaphragm Dysfunction
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Effect of Nebulized Lignocaine on Emergence Agitation After Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Pediatric Patients Undergoing Tonsillectomy
Emergence Agitation, Emergence Delirium
Not yet recruiting
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications After Use of Supraglottic Airway Devices and Neuromuscular Blockade
Postoperative Pulmonary Complications
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing lidocaine cream in people with Airway Complication of Anaesthesia and Laryngeal Mask Airway Removal, run by Sun Yat-sen University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The volume of oral secretions (time frame: Assessed during the phase of anesthesia emergence, from the discontinuation of anesthetic agents to eye opening or purposeful movement; and reported up to 4 weeks.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06967064, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2025.