AzTrials
AzTrials

AnxietyNCT06924814

Technology-Based Distractions for Minor Procedures

A study testing Immersive technology in people with Anxiety and Procedural Anxiety, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive distracting devices (Virtual Reality headset, Augmented Reality Headset) are more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology-based distraction) for decreasing anxiety and pain scores in pediatric patients undergoing various minor procedures (i.e… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Anxiety, Procedural Anxiety
What is being tested?
Immersive technology
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 May 2026to 30 Apr 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Pediatric patient age between 4-17
  • English speaking
  • Parental consent/patient assent
  • Undergoing minor procedure(s) at LPCH or Stanford Hospital

Who cannot join

  • Patient does not consent
  • Legal guardian not present to obtain consent
  • Patient with a significant neurological condition or major developmental disability
  • Patient experiencing nausea
  • Patient with active infection of the face or hand
  • A history of severe motion sickness
Show all 11Show fewer
  • A history of visual problems
  • A history of seizures caused by flashing light
  • Major surgery within the last 48 hours
  • Patients who are clinically unstable or require urgent/emergent intervention
  • Patient or parental preference for general anesthesia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Lucile Packard Children's Hospital Stanford

    Palo Alto, California, 94304

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine if non-invasive distracting devices (Virtual Reality headset, Augmented Reality Headset) are more effective than the standard of care (i.e., no technology-based distraction) for decreasing anxiety and pain scores in pediatric patients undergoing various minor procedures (i.e lumbar punctures and cardiac catheterization). The anticipated primary outcome will be a reduction of overall cumulative medication and secondary outcomes include but are not limited to: physician satisfaction, discharge time, pain scores, anxiety scores, and procedure time.

Being tested
Standard of Care, Immersive technology
Keywords
Pain
Medical subject headings
Anxiety Disorders, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Standard of CareBehavioural

    Participant is allowed to use what they will use as a distraction tool while they are receiving treatment.

  • Immersive technologyBehavioural

    Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following four groups; VR headsets, a bluetooth haptic device (Buddy Guard), a screen and projector (BERT), and a tablets with a game. Participant's anxiety will be assessed and pre- and post-intervention assessments will be completed.

Study groups in NCT06924814
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of Care groupActive comparatorNo immersive technology will be assigned to the participant. Participant will use their own distraction method.
Receives: Behavioral: Standard of Care
Immersive Technology grorupExperimentalImmersive technologies including VR headsets, a bluetooth haptic device (Buddy Guard), a screen and projector (BERT), and a tablets with a game will be randomly assigned to the participants. Each participant will receive one technological intervention.
Receives: Behavioral: Immersive technology

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of technological interventions on anxiety levels in patients who undergo minor procedures

    Participants will complete the Visual Analogue Scale for Anxiety (VAS-A), a self-report scale to measure anxiety levels before and after the technological intervention. The scale is a horizontal line from 0 to 10 with an anchor at 0 indicating "no anxiety" and an anchor at 10 indicating "worst possible anxiety".

    Measured: baseline, immediately after the intervention

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of technological interventions on pain levels in patients whose age is 4-11 years old and undergo minor procedures

    The FSP-R is a self-report measure of pain intensity displaying six faces representing equal intervals between the scale values from least pain = 0 to most pain = 10

    Measured: baseline, immediately after the intervention

  2. To evaluate pain levels pre- and post-intervention, participants will complete the Numerical Rating Pain Scale (NRPS) for patients 12-17 years old.

    The NRPS quantifies pain intensity on a scale from 0, being no pain, to 10, being the worst imaginable pain.

    Measured: baseline, immediately after the intervention

  3. To evaluate patient's, clinician's, and caregiver's satisfaction levels

    To analyze the patient's, clinician's, and caregiver's satisfaction levels, the feedback in the satisfaction survey at the end will be evaluated. The purpose of this analysis is to provide qualitative data on which aspects of the technological intervention the patient received mattered the most to the patient, clinician, and caregiver.

    Measured: immediately after the intervention

  4. To evaluate the patient's affect during the intervention using HRAD

    HRAD contains 5-item scale assessing participant's affective state; happy, relaxed, anxious, distressed, with a yes/no answer to cooperation.

    Measured: during minor procedure

  5. To evaluate the patient's cooperation during the intervention using the modified Induction Compliance Checklist (mICC)

    The mICC score will be recorded by the trained research observers during the minor procedure.11 behaviors that are commonly observed preoperatively will be recorded. Perfect compliance (score of 0) was compared to those that lacked cooperation. mICC will be rated at the time of intervention and only requires one RA.

    Measured: during minor procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Apr 2025
  2. Study start1 May 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Apr 2027 (estimated)

Why it stopped: The collaborator has no intention to initiate the study at this moment.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06924814
Sponsor's protocol ID
80120
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
4 Apr 2025
Last updated
18 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Immersive technology in people with Anxiety and Procedural Anxiety, run by Stanford University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluate the effectiveness of technological interventions on anxiety levels in patients who undergo minor procedures (time frame: baseline, immediately after the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Aug 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in