AzTrials
AzTrials

Depression - Major Depressive DisorderUltraPsyBriefNCT06909669

Ultra-brief Psychological Treatments for Emotional Symptoms and Disorders

A study testing Group ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy, Group brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy and Individual ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy in people with Depression - Major Depressive Disorder and Generalized Anxiety Disorder, run by Universidad de Córdoba at 2 sites in Spain.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The main objective of this randomized clinical trial is to study if various modalities of brief (eight sessions) and ultra-brief (four sessions) transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral treatment work for decrease emotional symptoms and disorders, as well as to find out which emotional regulation processes and common… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Group ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy, Group brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy and Individual ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
184 participants
Where
2 sitesSpain
Study dates
28 Apr 2026to Sep 2028
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients presenting mild or moderate emotional symptomatology (anxiety, depression or somatizations). Specifically, they will be included in the study if they present a score ≥ 5 on the PHQ-9, the GAD-7 or the PHQ-15.

Who cannot join

  • Bipolar disorder, personality disorder, psychosis or substance abuse, indicated by SCID-5-CV
  • Recent suicide attempt.
  • Severe emotional symptoms (PHQ-15 or GAD-7 ≥ 15; or PHQ-9 ≥ 20).

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Juan Antonio Moriana Elvira Professor contact

+34 957212093

edmoelj@uco.es

Spain2 sites, 2 recruiting
  • Unidad de Salud Mental del Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía

    Córdoba, Córdoba, 14004

    Recruiting
  • Unidad de Atención Psicológica (UNAP) de la Universidad de Córdoba

    Córdoba, Córdoba, 14071

    Recruiting

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Ultra-brief Psychological Treatments for Emocional Symptoms and Disorders: An Efficacy and Efficiency Analysis

The main objective of this randomized clinical trial is to study if various modalities of brief (eight sessions) and ultra-brief (four sessions) transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral treatment work for decrease emotional symptoms and disorders, as well as to find out which emotional regulation processes and common factor of the intervention itself are involved in the therapeutic improvement.

The investigators will compare the interventions of four groups: ultra-brief group treatment (1), brief group treatment (2), ultra-brief individual treatment (3) with the ultra-brief relaxation (control) group.

Read more

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

  • Will the brief and ultra-brief treatment formats works better than the relaxation-based control group?
  • Will results obtained between the brief group therapy group and the ultra-brief group therapy group be similar?
  • Will the individual ultra brief therapy be more effective than the two group therapies because of common factors, such as the therapeutic alliance?
  • Will group therapies be more beneficial for cost and in terms of capability to reduce emocional symptoms than individual therapy? Participants will be randomly assigned to each of the groups and will receive the corresponding treatment, with different number of sessions. They will answer a series of questionnaires at the beginning and at the end of the intervention, as well as 3 months and 6 months after the end of the treatment.
Being tested
Group ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy, Group brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy, Individual ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy, Group relaxation
Keywords
ultra-brief therapy, brief therapy, transdiagnostic therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, randomized controled trial
Medical subject headings
Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Anxiety Disorders, Somatoform Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Group ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapyBehavioural

    This intervention consists of a four-session ultra-brief TD-CBT delivered in person in a group format. Sessions are held weekly or biweekly and include four therapeutic components based on both their established use: psychoeducation, emotion regulation, behavioral activation, and problem-solving. Session 1 focuses on treatment engagement, personal goals, psychoeducation on emotions, and behavioral activation. Session 2 addresses the relationship between situations, thoughts, and emotions, cognitive flexibility, and identification of overt and covert avoidance patterns. Session 3 introduces graded emotional and situational exposure as an alternative to avoidance and provides structured problem-solving skills. Session 4 reviews and consolidates the skills acquired, reinforces therapeutic gains, and focuses on maintaining progress and preventing relapse. Participants receive practical exercises and between-session activities to support the application of therapeutic skills in daily lifes.

  • Group brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapyBehavioural

    This intervention consists of an eight-session extended version of the transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral treatment, retaining the same core therapeutic components while allowing additional time for skill practice and consolidation. Sessions are delivered in person in a group format by trained psychologists, last approximately 90 minutes, and are held weekly or every two weeks. Session 1 focuses on treatment introduction and psychoeducation about emotions; Session 2 on psychoeducation and behavioral activation; Session 3 on cognitive assessment, cognitive restructuring, and emotional awareness; Session 4 on emotional avoidance and emotion-driven behaviors; Sessions 5-6 on emotional and situational exposure and problem-solving; and Sessions 7-8 on review and consolidation of therapeutic skills, reinforcement of progress, and relapse prevention. Between-session practice is encouraged throughout the intervention.

  • Individual ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapyBehavioural

    Participants assigned to the individual treatment will receive the same four-session ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral treatment as the group format, adapted for individual delivery. Sessions last approximately 60 minutes, and are held weekly or every two weeks. The intervention includes psychoeducation, emotion regulation, behavioral activation, and problem-solving. The individual format allows therapeutic content, examples, and exercises to be tailored to each participant's specific difficulties, symptoms, and personal goals. It also allows for personalised feedback and greater emphasis on the therapeutic relationship while maintaining the structured and transdiagnostic nature of the intervention. Participants receive the same printed workbook and may complete optional between-session activities to support the application of therapeutic skills in daily life.

  • Group relaxationBehavioural

    This intervention consists of a four-session group-based progressive muscle relaxation program based on Jacobson's relaxation technique. Sessions are delivered in person by trained psychologists, last approximately 90 minutes, and are held weekly. Each session combines brief psychoeducation, guided relaxation practice, discussion of participants' experiences, and instructions for home practice. Session 1 introduces relaxation techniques and trains four muscle groups of the upper extremities. Session 2 reviews previous practice and introduces six muscle groups involving the head, neck, and trunk. Session 3 reviews previous exercises and trains six muscle groups of the lower extremities. Session 4 reviews home practice and includes a complete relaxation exercise involving all 16 muscle groups. Participants are encouraged to practise the techniques between sessions and after completion of the program.

Study groups in NCT06909669
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1: Group ultra-brief TD-CBTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Group ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy
Group 2: Group brief TD-CBTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Group brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy
Group 3: Individual ultra-brief TD-CBTExperimentalNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Individual ultra-brief transdiagnostic cognitive-behavioral therapy
Group 4: relaxationActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Behavioral: Group relaxation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is the depression module of the PHQ, that scores the 9 DSM-IV depression criteria present in the last two weeks from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). A score of 10 is usually set as the cut-off point for major depression disorder (MDD): a score of 10-14 indicates minor depression, moderate MDD, or dysthymia; 15-19, moderately severe MDD; and 20-27, severe MDD. This tool has been tested in Spanish primary care centres (McDonald's ω = .89).

    Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment), and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

  2. Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)

    The GAD-7 assesses common anxiety symptoms in the last two weeks, scoring from 0 ("not at all") to 3 ("nearly every day"). Cut points of 5, 10, and 15 represent mild, moderate, and severe anxiety, respectively. The algorithm sets 8 as the cut point for GAD, however it has been found that a score of 10 is more optimal. We will use a version validated in Spanish, that was recently tested in primary care centres (Cronbach's α = .83).

    Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment), and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

  3. Patient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15)

    The PHQ-15 is the somatization module of the PHQ. It includes 13 somatic symptoms plus 2 from the PHQ-9 (sleeping problems and fatigue). Scores of 5, 10, and 15 represent low, medium, and high somatic symptom severity, respectively. To screen a somatization disorder, whereas the original algorithm needs of at least a score of 2 in three or more somatic symptoms (sensitivity of 78% and specificity of 71%), the cut point usually used is 10; nevertheless, since this can be obtained with ten symptoms of mild severity, we decided to join both criteria to screen the disorder. Furthermore, an absence of biological cause is also often required (since PHQ-15 does not distinguish between medically explained and unexplained symptoms), but the self-administered nature of the PHQ-15 makes difficult to determine this. The PHQ-15 has been validated with Spanish psychiatric outpatients (α = .78).

    Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment), and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

  4. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5, Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV)

    Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5, Clinical Version (SCID-5-CV), is an interview commonly used to diagnose mental disorders according to the DSM-5 criteria. It is administered by a clinician or trained mental heatlh professional who is familiar with the DSM-5 classification and diagnostic criteria. We will use only the diagnostic criteria to evaluate the existence or not of Major Depressive Episode, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and to exclude the existence of other disorders such as Bipolar Disorder, psychotic disorders, substance use and personality disorder.

    Measured: Baseline

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Cognitive Emotional Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-27)

    It is a 27-item instrument (3 items for each subscale) that measures the following cognitive strategies of emotional regulation: self-blame, acceptance, rumination, refocusing on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective, catastrophizing, and blaming others. Its psychometric properties are adequate, with a Cronbarch's α for each subscale between 0.73 and 0.88.

    Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment), and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

  2. Common Factor Scale (MPOQ)

    This 14-item scale measures six different domains of common factors: task agreement, goal agreement, therapist empathy, therapist experience, treatment credibility, and expectations. The items are scored from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). This scale has two underlying factors, "Confidence in the therapist" and "Confidence in the treatment", which show an excellent internal consistency (α=.924 and α=.828, respectively).

    Measured: Peritreatment: weeks 1 and 3 (for 4-session groups); weeks 1 and 7 (for the 8-session group).

  3. Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form Patient version (WAI-S-P)

    We use the Bonding subscale from Working Alliance Inventory-Short Form Patient version. It consists of four items with 7 response options that score from 1 (never) to 7 (always). This scale has an excellent internal consistency (α=.93).

    Measured: Peritreatment: weeks 1 and 3 (for 4-session groups); weeks 1 and 7 (for the 8-session group).

  4. Psychological Outcome Profiles (PSYCHLOPS)

    Psychological Outcome Profiles is a individualized patiet-reported outcome measure that measures psychological distress. It includes four items covering three domains: (1) Problems (two free-text patient-generated items regarding the two problems that trouble him/her most, questions Q1 and Q2); (2) Function (one free-text patient-generated item corresponding to what has become hardest to do because of his/her problem(s), question Q3); and (3) Well-being (pre-set standardized item about how the patient felt in him/herself in the previous week, question Q4). Items are scored for intensity on a 6-point rating scale (from "Not affected at all" to "Severely affected") and for duration (from "Under 1 month" to "Over 5 years"). PSYCHLOPS total scoring is obtained by summing the scores of the four severity scales (Q1b, Q2b, Q3b, and Q4). PSYCHLOPS has good internal consistency (α = .82).

    Measured: Baseline and post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment).

  5. Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (STQ)

    This questionnaire measures different aspects related to satisfaction with the treatment, such as perceived quality, appropriateness to previous expectations, recommendation to friends or family, usefulness of techniques learned, overall satisfaction with the intervention, likelihood of choosing this type of intervention again and disconfort generated by the intervention. It includes seven questions, six of them derived from the original Client Satisfaction Quiestionaire (CQS-8) of Larsen et al. (1979). Participants respond to each quiestion using a 4-point Likert-type response scale (1=nothing; 4= very much), and the instrument has appropiate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .76).

    Measured: Post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment).

  6. Sociodemographic data

    Sociodemographic data includes information about gender, age, marital status, level of education, employment situation and level of income (per year)

    Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment), and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

  7. Healthcare use questions

    Questions on Health Care to find out about labor and health costs, addressing different issues such as visits made to health areas for own problems, medical tests, medications or other substances for anxiety and depression and/or to sleep better, in the last 3 months, and attendance to other psychological/psychiatric therapy, public or private different from the one offered.

    Measured: Baseline and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

  8. Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-II)

    We used the Spanish adaptation. It is a 7-item instrument that measures psychological inflexibility or experiential avoidance. It is a self-report with 7 Likert-type items with 7 response options, where 1 means "never true" and 7 means "always true". A higher AAQ-II score suggests more psychological inflexibility. The scale measures the tendency to shy away from disagreeable experiences as well as a lack of contact with the present moment due to distress. The AAQ-II exhibited excellent consistency (α = 0.93).

    Measured: Baseline, post-treatment (two weeks after the end of treatment), and follow-ups (3 and 6 months)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Apr 2025
  2. Study start28 Apr 2026
  3. Primary completionJun 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Multicenter randomized controlled trial with pre-post measures and follow-ups.
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Investigator
Enrolment
184 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06909669
Sponsor's protocol ID
PID2023-152589OB-I00
Acronym
UltraPsyBrief
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
7 Mar 2025
Last updated
2 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Ruiz, F. J., Suárez-Falcón, J. C., Cárdenas-Sierra, S., Durán, Y., Guerrero, K., & Riaño-Hernández, D. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II in Colombia. The Psychological Record, 66, 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-016-0183-2

  • Bond FW, Hayes SC, Baer RA, Carpenter KM, Guenole N, Orcutt HK, Waltz T, Zettle RD. Preliminary psychometric properties of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-II: a revised measure of psychological inflexibility and experiential avoidance. Behav Ther. 2011 Dec;42(4):676-88. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2011.03.007. Epub 2011 May 25.

    PubMed 22035996
  • Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. JAMA. 1999 Nov 10;282(18):1737-44. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.18.1737.

    PubMed 10568646
  • Ros Montalban S, Comas Vives A, Garcia-Garcia M. Validation of the Spanish version of the PHQ-15 questionnaire for the evaluation of physical symptoms in patients with depression and/or anxiety disorders: DEPRE-SOMA study. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2010 Nov-Dec;38(6):345-57. Epub 2010 Nov 1.

    PubMed 21188674
  • Munoz-Navarro R, Cano-Vindel A, Moriana JA, Medrano LA, Ruiz-Rodriguez P, Aguero-Gento L, Rodriguez-Enriquez M, Piza MR, Ramirez-Manent JI. Screening for generalized anxiety disorder in Spanish primary care centers with the GAD-7. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Oct;256:312-317. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.023. Epub 2017 Jun 12.

    PubMed 28666201
  • Munoz-Navarro R, Cano-Vindel A, Medrano LA, Schmitz F, Ruiz-Rodriguez P, Abellan-Maeso C, Font-Payeras MA, Hermosilla-Pasamar AM. Utility of the PHQ-9 to identify major depressive disorder in adult patients in Spanish primary care centres. BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Aug 9;17(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1450-8.

    PubMed 28793892
  • Holgado-Tello, F., Amor, P.J., Lasa, A., & Domínguez, J. (2018). Two new brief versions of the cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire and its relationships with depression and anxiety. Anales de Psicología, 34(3), 458-464. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.34.3.306531

  • Garcia-Campayo J, Zamorano E, Ruiz MA, Pardo A, Perez-Paramo M, Lopez-Gomez V, Freire O, Rejas J. Cultural adaptation into Spanish of the generalized anxiety disorder-7 (GAD-7) scale as a screening tool. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Jan 20;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-8.

    PubMed 20089179
  • First, M.B., Williams, J.B.W., Kats, R.S., Spitzer, R.(2016). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-S Disorders-Clinician version (SCID-S-CV). Arlington, VA, American Psychiatric Association,

  • Finsrud I, Nissen-Lie HA, Vrabel K, Hostmaelingen A, Wampold BE, Ulvenes PG. It's the therapist and the treatment: The structure of common therapeutic relationship factors. Psychother Res. 2022 Feb;32(2):139-150. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2021.1916640. Epub 2021 May 2.

    PubMed 33938407
  • Diez-Quevedo C, Rangil T, Sanchez-Planell L, Kroenke K, Spitzer RL. Validation and utility of the patient health questionnaire in diagnosing mental disorders in 1003 general hospital Spanish inpatients. Psychosom Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;63(4):679-86. doi: 10.1097/00006842-200107000-00021.

    PubMed 11485122
  • Ashworth, M., Shepherd, M., Christey, J., Matthews, V., Wright, K., Parmentier, H., Robinson, S., & Godfrey, E. (2004). A client-generated psychometric instrument: the development of 'PSYCHLOPS'. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 4, 27-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733140412331383913

  • Andrade-González, N., y Fernández-Liria, A. (2016). Spanish adaptation of the Working Alliance Inventory-Short (WAI-S). Current Psychology: A Journal for Diverse Perspectives on Diverse Psychological Issues, 35(1), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-015-9365-3

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in