Dental Implant Overdenturebar implantNCT06909435
Nylon Clip Wear Assessment in Implant
A study testing PEEK dental bar and Metal bar attachment in people with Dental Implant Overdenture and Complete Edentulous Patient, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
This study is aimed to compare the wear of nylon caps and patient satisfaction in two-implant overdentures with metal bar and Peek bar overlays in the premolar area: This prospective clinical trial will involve 14 edentulous patients who will receive two implants in the premolar area. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Dental Implant Overdenture, Complete Edentulous Patient
- What is being tested?
- PEEK dental bar and Metal bar attachment
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 8 Apr 2023to 20 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- good bone quantity and quality especially in the anterior interforaminal region as detected by CBCT and sufficient inter-arch space, minimally 12-14 mm from the ridge to the occlusal plane
Who cannot join
- diabetic patient or patient received radiation therapy, or with parafunctional habits, and smokers should be excluded from the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Egypt1 site
Cairo University Faculty of dentistry
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, 1211
About this study
Official title: Nylon Clip Wear and Patient Perception in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture Using PEEK Versus Metal Bar :One Year Randomized Clinical Study
This study is aimed to compare the wear of nylon caps and patient satisfaction in two-implant overdentures with metal bar and Peek bar overlays in the premolar area:
This prospective clinical trial will involve 14 edentulous patients who will receive two implants in the premolar area. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: Group A will receive metal bar overlays, and Group B will receive Peek bar overlays. The patients will be evaluated at baseline,one month ,6 month and 12 month The following parameters will be evaluated:
- Wear of nylon cap: The wear of the nylon cap will be evaluated using a digital microscope at each follow-up visit.
- Patient satisfaction: Patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the overdentureResults: Metal group showed significantly higher roughness and volumetric changes than PEEK regarding baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months, and after 9 months. and there was insignificant difference between them after 12 months as P=0.11.Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the PEEK group, particularly in retention, stability, comfort, and speech domains at both six months and one year (p = 0.04). on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at each follow-up visit.
Read the detailed description
Forty-six individuals were diagnosed at the outpatient clinic of Removable prosthodontic department at Cairo university and MTI university. From this group, 20 completely edentulous participants of both males and females aged 50 to 60 years were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each participant provided written consent before this study used their treatment-related radiography data. Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Faculty of Dental Medicine Cairo University, with the reference number REC (No 94/23). The implemented radiation protection methods were in accordance with established guidelines.
Patient selection All the patient involved in the study, they should have inclusion criteria as good bone quantity and quality especially in the anterior interforaminal region as detected by CBCT and sufficient inter-arch space, minimally 12-14 mm from the ridge to the occlusal plane. The diabetic patient or patient received radiation therapy, or with parafunctional habits, and smokers should be excluded from the study.
Diagnostic and pre-operative prosthetic preparation Following the prosthetic driven implant placement protocol, all the Eligible patients already had complete dentures, their dentures were checked for adaptation, fit, stability, and occlusion. And the other patients were not wearing upper and lower complete dentures , a new denture were fabricated .
Preliminary alginate impressions (Zhermack SpA ) using a perforated stock tray were recorded, Impressions were then poured into dental stone to obtain the diagnostic model. Occlusion blocks were constructed over the diagnostic models, followed by bite registration, try-in, then the inter arch space availability for the bar was evaluated on the casts using the putty-silicon-index (Kettenbach GmbH and Co. KG ) around the artificial teeth , a minimum 13-14 mm of vertical space is required for bar-retained overdentures and finally upper and lower denture (Acrostone Dental and Medical Supplie) was delivered . Radiographic stents were fabricated as a duplicate from the fabricated patient mandibular denture with radiopaque markers (gutta percha ,Meta Dental Corp Glendale, NY ) in the centre of the teeth to guide implant positioning.
The patient was scanned CBCT while wearing the radiographic stent in the proper seating position
Surgical phase. The radiographic stent was converted to a surgical stent by drilling holes at canine areas to determine the intended surgical sites . For both groups, all patient received two implants' DENTIS Co., LTD. 3.2 x 11.5 mm (bilaterally in the canine premolar region according to bone availability in the case. All implants were placed using a surgical guide and following two-stage surgical protocol. Covering screws were screwed into the implants 3 month of healing time. In the Prosthetic stage, after 3 months of ossointegration period, the implants were exposed to receive healing collars. After two weeks, the healing collars were removed, and the soft tissue was assessed for healing. Multiunit abutments were screwed at 30 Newtons using a torque wrench. To reduce settling effect, the multiunit abutment were retightened at least two or three times at 30N torque for 10 min interval.
For both groups, primary impressions (Zhermack SpA ) were made to fabricate a special tray with window at the implant area for open tray impression technique. For impression accuracy, the long transfers coping were splinted through self-cure acrylic resin. A single-stage impression technique (putty and light body) (Kettenbach GmbH and Co. KG ) was made using silicon impression material with the open custom tray (Acrostone cold cure acrylic material; Acrostone Co).The healing caps were replaced intraorally after the impression making. Analogs were screwed over the picked-up impression coping. The final impression was poured with extra hard dental stone. (Zhermack SpA ) To assure accuracy of the master cast, acrylic verification jig (Duralay, Prestige Dentl Products, UK Ltd ) was fabricated over the impression coping using a self-cure acrylic resin. Intraoral one screw test was applied to check passivity.
Computer-generated randomization was used to divide the patients into two equal groups (1:1). An implant-retained overdenture with a cobalt-chromium bar attachment was given to Group II (the metal bar group), and Group II (the PEEK bar group) was given an overdenture with a PEEK bar attachment.
Regarding Co-Cr metal bar group, in the master cast , the multiunit abutment were attached to the implant analogues and plastic abutments were adjusted , prepared and then wax pattern coping was customized on each abutment and was connected to a preformed castable bar 2.4mm Height, (Rhein 83) The bar was placed to be away from the anterior ridge by about 2-3 mm for proper hygiene measures. The wax pattern was then sprued and casted into cobalt- chromium alloy.
Regarding PEEK bar group, the master stone cast is scanned with external desktop scanner to produce an STL (Standard Tesellation Language) file for a virtual model using the CAD/CAM software (Medit 500i.). The design of the multiunit abutment and bar (Rhein Bar )was selected from the library of the CAD software. The bar dimensions were selected according to the study bar design .
After the data acquisition, the STL file was imported to the CAM part of the CAD/CAM system to mill PEEK bar from biological high-performance polymer (Bio-HPP) (BreCAM. BioHPP, Bredent GmbH \& Co.KG, Senden, Germany) block PEEK type. Multi-unit abutments were screwed to the implants and the PEEK bar was screwed to the abutments .
For all groups, Passive fit was checked visually by using a probe and by taking peri-apical radiographs to check for misfits. It was then confirmed by the one screw test which involved screwing the abutment on one side and checking the fit on the other terminal abutment.
For bar clip pickup ,all the overdentures seated and was examined intraorally, a space was made in its fitting surface that corresponded to the bar area. Condensation silicon impression material was used to block the space beneath the bar. The nylon clip (Rhein83 Italy) is firmly seated over the bar, autopolymerized acrylic resin(Acrostone cold cure acrylic material; Acrostone Co) was inserted in the relieved areas of the denture to pick up the retentive nylon clips intraorally ,the acrylic resin was set, the excess material was removed and the overdenture was delivered.
Measured outcomes Plastic clip wear and roughness were analyzed on overdenture insertion and after 3,6,9 month and 1 year of clinical usage in a 3D-surface analyzer system.27Fitting surface of denture with the nylon clip were photographed using USB Digital microscope with a built-in camera (Scope Capture Digital Microscope, Guangdong, China) connected with an IBM compatible personal computer using a fixed magnification of 120X.The images were recorded with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels per image. Digital microscope images were cropped to 350 x 400 pixels using Microsoft office picture manager to standardize area of roughness measurement. WSxM software used for measure the average of heights of volumetric changes and surface roughness which expressed in μm, 28 a 3D image of the surface plastic clip was created ready for a 3-dimensional geometric analysis by the using a digital image analysis system (Image J 1.43U, National Institute of Health, USA). The intact unworn surface used as a reference.
Patients' satisfaction was evaluated After 6 month and 1 year on a scale from 1 to 10 according to the following criteria: (A) physical (stability and retention of denture), (B) Functional (chewing ability, speech ability, Pain, Comfort, Occlusion, Easiness of denture cleaning\& taste of food) and(C) Aesthetic factors (Appearance of dentures \& Self-image).
statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16 ® (Statistical Package for Scientific Studies), Graph pad prism \& windows excel
- Being tested
- PEEK dental bar, Metal bar attachment
- Keywords
- implant, bar attachment, nylon clip, wear, overdenture
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PEEK dental barOther
the master stone cast is scanned with external desktop scanner to produce an STL (Standard Tesellation Language) file for a virtual model using the CAD/CAM software (Medit 500i.). The design of the multiunit abutment and bar (Rhein Bar )was selected from the library of the CAD software. The bar dimensions were selected according to the study bar design .
After the data acquisition, the STL file was imported to the CAM part of the CAD/CAM system to mill PEEK bar from biological high-performance polymer (Bio-HPP) (BreCAM. BioHPP, Bredent GmbH \& Co.KG, Senden, Germany) block PEEK type. Multi-unit abutments were screwed to the implants and the PEEK bar was screwed to the abutments .
Metal bar attachmentOther
Co-Cr metal bar group, in the master cast , the multiunit abutment were attached to the implant analogues and plastic abutments were adjusted , prepared and then wax pattern coping was customized on each abutment and was connected to a preformed castable bar 2.4mm Height, (Rhein 83) The bar was placed to be away from the anterior ridge by about 2-3 mm for proper hygiene measures. The wax pattern was then sprued and casted into cobalt- chromium alloy.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK bar | Sham comparator | Peek bar attachment with Nylon clip for retaining overdenture Receives: Other: PEEK dental bar |
| Metal bar | Sham comparator | metal bar attachment to retain implant overdenture Receives: Other: Metal bar attachment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
attachment clip wear
Plastic clip wear and roughness were analyzed on overdenture insertion and after 3,6,9 month and 1 year of clinical usage in a 3D-surface analyzer system.27Fitting surface of denture with the nylon clip were photographed using USB Digital microscope with a built-in camera (Scope Capture Digital Microscope, Guangdong, China) connected with an IBM compatible personal computer using a fixed magnification of 120X.The images were recorded with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels per image. Digital microscope images were cropped to 350 x 400 pixels using Microsoft office picture manager to standardize area of roughness measurement. WSxM software used for measure the average of heights of volumetric changes and surface roughness which expressed in μm, 28 a 3D image of the surface plastic clip was created ready for a 3-dimensional geometric analysis by the using a digital image analysis system (Image J 1.43U, National Institute of Health, USA). The intact unworn surface used as a reference.
Measured: base line ,3,6 and12 month
Secondary outcomes (1)
patient satisfaction
Patients' satisfaction was evaluated After 6 month and 1 year on a scale from 1 to 10 according to the following criteria: (A) physical (stability and retention of denture), (B) Functional (chewing ability, speech ability, Pain, Comfort, Occlusion, Easiness of denture cleaning\& taste of food) and(C) Aesthetic factors (Appearance of dentures \& Self-image).
statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16 ® (Statistical Package for Scientific Studies), Graph pad prism \& windows excel
Measured: base line ,3,6 and12 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Apr 2025
- Study start8 Apr 2023
- Primary completion2 Jan 2024
- Study completion20 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Dental Implant OverdentureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Cairo UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Doaa Amr Heshmat, Cairo University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06909435
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- esthetic committee 49-7-32
- Acronym
- bar implant
- Status last verified
- Jan 2023
- First submitted
- 27 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: the data is available with the corresponding author on reasonable request
Publications
Mohamed SM, Rostom DAH. Nylon clip wear and patient satisfaction in implant-retained mandibular overdenture using PEEK bar versus metal bar: a one-year randomized clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Mar 26;26(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-08020-3.
PubMed 41882638
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nylon Clip Wear and Patient Perception in Implant Retained Mandibular Overdenture Using PEEK Versus Metal Bar :One Year Randomized Clinical Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06909435
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- bar implant / esthetic committee 49-7-32
- Keywords
- implant, bar attachment, nylon clip, wear, overdenture
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cairo UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 8 Apr 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Apr 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is aimed to compare the wear of nylon caps and patient satisfaction in two-implant overdentures with metal bar and Peek bar overlays in the premolar area:
This prospective clinical trial will involve 14 edentulous patients who will receive two implants in the premolar area. Patients will be randomly assigned to two groups: Group A will receive metal bar overlays, and Group B will receive Peek bar overlays. The patients will be evaluated at baseline,one month ,6 month and 12 month The following parameters will be evaluated:
- Wear of nylon cap: The wear of the nylon cap will be evaluated using a digital microscope at each follow-up visit.
- Patient satisfaction: Patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction with the overdentureResults: Metal group showed significantly higher roughness and volumetric changes than PEEK regarding baseline, after 3 months, after 6 months, and after 9 months. and there was insignificant difference between them after 12 months as P=0.11.Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the PEEK group, particularly in retention, stability, comfort, and speech domains at both six months and one year (p = 0.04). on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at each follow-up visit.
Detailed description
Forty-six individuals were diagnosed at the outpatient clinic of Removable prosthodontic department at Cairo university and MTI university. From this group, 20 completely edentulous participants of both males and females aged 50 to 60 years were selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Each participant provided written consent before this study used their treatment-related radiography data. Ethics committee approval for the study was obtained from the Research Ethics Committee (REC) of the Faculty of Dental Medicine Cairo University, with the reference number REC (No 94/23). The implemented radiation protection methods were in accordance with established guidelines.
Patient selection All the patient involved in the study, they should have inclusion criteria as good bone quantity and quality especially in the anterior interforaminal region as detected by CBCT and sufficient inter-arch space, minimally 12-14 mm from the ridge to the occlusal plane. The diabetic patient or patient received radiation therapy, or with parafunctional habits, and smokers should be excluded from the study.
Diagnostic and pre-operative prosthetic preparation Following the prosthetic driven implant placement protocol, all the Eligible patients already had complete dentures, their dentures were checked for adaptation, fit, stability, and occlusion. And the other patients were not wearing upper and lower complete dentures , a new denture were fabricated .
Preliminary alginate impressions (Zhermack SpA ) using a perforated stock tray were recorded, Impressions were then poured into dental stone to obtain the diagnostic model. Occlusion blocks were constructed over the diagnostic models, followed by bite registration, try-in, then the inter arch space availability for the bar was evaluated on the casts using the putty-silicon-index (Kettenbach GmbH and Co. KG ) around the artificial teeth , a minimum 13-14 mm of vertical space is required for bar-retained overdentures and finally upper and lower denture (Acrostone Dental and Medical Supplie) was delivered . Radiographic stents were fabricated as a duplicate from the fabricated patient mandibular denture with radiopaque markers (gutta percha ,Meta Dental Corp Glendale, NY ) in the centre of the teeth to guide implant positioning.
The patient was scanned CBCT while wearing the radiographic stent in the proper seating position
Surgical phase. The radiographic stent was converted to a surgical stent by drilling holes at canine areas to determine the intended surgical sites . For both groups, all patient received two implants' DENTIS Co., LTD. 3.2 x 11.5 mm (bilaterally in the canine premolar region according to bone availability in the case. All implants were placed using a surgical guide and following two-stage surgical protocol. Covering screws were screwed into the implants 3 month of healing time. In the Prosthetic stage, after 3 months of ossointegration period, the implants were exposed to receive healing collars. After two weeks, the healing collars were removed, and the soft tissue was assessed for healing. Multiunit abutments were screwed at 30 Newtons using a torque wrench. To reduce settling effect, the multiunit abutment were retightened at least two or three times at 30N torque for 10 min interval.
For both groups, primary impressions (Zhermack SpA ) were made to fabricate a special tray with window at the implant area for open tray impression technique. For impression accuracy, the long transfers coping were splinted through self-cure acrylic resin. A single-stage impression technique (putty and light body) (Kettenbach GmbH and Co. KG ) was made using silicon impression material with the open custom tray (Acrostone cold cure acrylic material; Acrostone Co).The healing caps were replaced intraorally after the impression making. Analogs were screwed over the picked-up impression coping. The final impression was poured with extra hard dental stone. (Zhermack SpA ) To assure accuracy of the master cast, acrylic verification jig (Duralay, Prestige Dentl Products, UK Ltd ) was fabricated over the impression coping using a self-cure acrylic resin. Intraoral one screw test was applied to check passivity.
Computer-generated randomization was used to divide the patients into two equal groups (1:1). An implant-retained overdenture with a cobalt-chromium bar attachment was given to Group II (the metal bar group), and Group II (the PEEK bar group) was given an overdenture with a PEEK bar attachment.
Regarding Co-Cr metal bar group, in the master cast , the multiunit abutment were attached to the implant analogues and plastic abutments were adjusted , prepared and then wax pattern coping was customized on each abutment and was connected to a preformed castable bar 2.4mm Height, (Rhein 83) The bar was placed to be away from the anterior ridge by about 2-3 mm for proper hygiene measures. The wax pattern was then sprued and casted into cobalt- chromium alloy.
Regarding PEEK bar group, the master stone cast is scanned with external desktop scanner to produce an STL (Standard Tesellation Language) file for a virtual model using the CAD/CAM software (Medit 500i.). The design of the multiunit abutment and bar (Rhein Bar )was selected from the library of the CAD software. The bar dimensions were selected according to the study bar design .
After the data acquisition, the STL file was imported to the CAM part of the CAD/CAM system to mill PEEK bar from biological high-performance polymer (Bio-HPP) (BreCAM. BioHPP, Bredent GmbH \& Co.KG, Senden, Germany) block PEEK type. Multi-unit abutments were screwed to the implants and the PEEK bar was screwed to the abutments .
For all groups, Passive fit was checked visually by using a probe and by taking peri-apical radiographs to check for misfits. It was then confirmed by the one screw test which involved screwing the abutment on one side and checking the fit on the other terminal abutment.
For bar clip pickup ,all the overdentures seated and was examined intraorally, a space was made in its fitting surface that corresponded to the bar area. Condensation silicon impression material was used to block the space beneath the bar. The nylon clip (Rhein83 Italy) is firmly seated over the bar, autopolymerized acrylic resin(Acrostone cold cure acrylic material; Acrostone Co) was inserted in the relieved areas of the denture to pick up the retentive nylon clips intraorally ,the acrylic resin was set, the excess material was removed and the overdenture was delivered.
Measured outcomes Plastic clip wear and roughness were analyzed on overdenture insertion and after 3,6,9 month and 1 year of clinical usage in a 3D-surface analyzer system.27Fitting surface of denture with the nylon clip were photographed using USB Digital microscope with a built-in camera (Scope Capture Digital Microscope, Guangdong, China) connected with an IBM compatible personal computer using a fixed magnification of 120X.The images were recorded with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels per image. Digital microscope images were cropped to 350 x 400 pixels using Microsoft office picture manager to standardize area of roughness measurement. WSxM software used for measure the average of heights of volumetric changes and surface roughness which expressed in μm, 28 a 3D image of the surface plastic clip was created ready for a 3-dimensional geometric analysis by the using a digital image analysis system (Image J 1.43U, National Institute of Health, USA). The intact unworn surface used as a reference.
Patients' satisfaction was evaluated After 6 month and 1 year on a scale from 1 to 10 according to the following criteria: (A) physical (stability and retention of denture), (B) Functional (chewing ability, speech ability, Pain, Comfort, Occlusion, Easiness of denture cleaning\& taste of food) and(C) Aesthetic factors (Appearance of dentures \& Self-image).
statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 16 ® (Statistical Package for Scientific Studies), Graph pad prism \& windows excel
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK bar | Sham comparator | Other: PEEK dental barPeek bar attachment with Nylon clip for retaining overdenture |
| Metal bar | Sham comparator | Other: Metal bar attachmentmetal bar attachment to retain implant overdenture |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- good bone quantity and quality especially in the anterior interforaminal region as detected by CBCT and sufficient inter-arch space, minimally 12-14 mm from the ridge to the occlusal plane
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- diabetic patient or patient received radiation therapy, or with parafunctional habits, and smokers should be excluded from the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PEEK dental barthe master stone cast is scanned with external desktop scanner to produce an STL (Standard Tesellation Language) file for a virtual model using the CAD/CAM software (Medit 500i.). The design of the multiunit abutment and bar (Rhein Bar )was selected from the library of the CAD software. The bar dimensions were selected according to the study bar design . After the data acquisition, the STL file was imported to the CAM part of the CAD/CAM system to mill PEEK bar from biological high-performance polymer (Bio-HPP) (BreCAM. BioHPP, Bredent GmbH \& Co.KG, Senden, Germany) block PEEK type. Multi-unit abutments were screwed to the implants and the PEEK bar was screwed to the abutments . | Other | PEEK bar |
| Metal bar attachmentCo-Cr metal bar group, in the master cast , the multiunit abutment were attached to the implant analogues and plastic abutments were adjusted , prepared and then wax pattern coping was customized on each abutment and was connected to a preformed castable bar 2.4mm Height, (Rhein 83) The bar was placed to be away from the anterior ridge by about 2-3 mm for proper hygiene measures. The wax pattern was then sprued and casted into cobalt- chromium alloy. | Other | Metal bar |
Primary outcome
attachment clip wear
Time frame: base line ,3,6 and12 month
Plastic clip wear and roughness were analyzed on overdenture insertion and after 3,6,9 month and 1 year of clinical usage in a 3D-surface analyzer system.27Fitting surface of denture with the nylon clip were photographed using USB Digital microscope with a built-in camera (Scope Capture Digital Microscope, Guangdong, China) connected with an IBM compatible personal computer using a fixed magnification of 120X.The images were recorded with a resolution of 1280 × 1024 pixels per image. Digital microscope images were cropped to 350 x 400 pixels using Microsoft office picture manager to standardize area of roughness measurement. WSxM software used for measure the average of heights of volumetric changes and surface roughness which expressed in μm, 28 a 3D image of the surface plastic clip was created ready for a 3-dimensional geometric analysis by the using a digital image analysis system (Image J 1.43U, National Institute of Health, USA). The intact unworn surface used as a reference.
1 secondary outcome
patient satisfaction
Time frame: base line ,3,6 and12 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41882638Mohamed SM, Rostom DAH. Nylon clip wear and patient satisfaction in implant-retained mandibular overdenture using PEEK bar versus metal bar: a one-year randomized clinical study. BMC Oral Health. 2026 Mar 26;26(1):628. doi: 10.1186/s12903-026-08020-3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. the data is available with the corresponding author on reasonable request
Related trials for Dental Implant Overdenture
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
RecruitingPhase 2
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Using Regular Versus Narrow Diameter Dental Implantto Support Mandibular Complete Over Denture
DENT IMPLANTS
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Masticatory Efficiency, Bite Force, and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients Rehabilitated With Complete and Partial Dentures Supported by Teeth, Mini-Implants, or Conventional Implants
Edentulism, Edentulism Complete
Not yet recruiting
Mandibular Implant Overdenture With OT Cap Bar vs Bar Attachment
Edentulous Mandible, Implant-Supported Overdentures
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Implant-supported Maxillary Overdentures; a 15-years Evaluation
Edentulous Maxilla, Atrophic, Implants, Dental
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PEEK dental bar and Metal bar attachment in people with Dental Implant Overdenture and Complete Edentulous Patient, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
attachment clip wear (time frame: base line ,3,6 and12 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06909435, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2025.