Induced AbortionNCT06894732
To Study the Safety and Efficacy of Disposable Cyclone Ring in Artificial Abortion
A study testing Rotary induced abortion in people with Induced Abortion, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the two surgical methods of surgical rotation abortion and surgical negative pressure uterine aspiration with the termination of pregnancy. which one can better protect female fertility; To understand the impact of both surgical approaches on the long-term prognosis of patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 to 40 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Induced Abortion
- What is being tested?
- Rotary induced abortion
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 332 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 20 Mar 2025to 31 Dec 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 to 40 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- 1) Age: 20-40 years old, planning to terminate pregnancy; 2) Menopause time≤ 56 days (8 weeks); 3) Ultrasound examination showed early pregnancy in utero, and the average diameter of the fetal sac was 1-3cm; 4) According to the requirements of clinical operation standards, the preoperative examination, laboratory results and surgical indicators are normal 5) The subject was conscious, had good compliance, agreed to participate in the trial, and voluntarily signed the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- 1) According to the requirements of clinical practice, there are contraindications to induced abortion; 2) The number of previous induced abortions ≥2 times; 3) Diseases affecting uterine cavity morphology such as uterine malformations and uterine fibroids; 4) History of uterine surgery: such as submucosal myomectomy history, mediastinal resection history, uterine adhesion-separation history; 5) Unable to sign the informed consent; 6) Other conditions that the investigator considers inappropriate to participate in this clinical study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Peking Union Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000
xinyan Liu Liuxinyan, +86 186 0000 8013, liuxymeng@163.com
About this study
The purpose of this study is to compare the two surgical methods of surgical rotation abortion and surgical negative pressure uterine aspiration with the termination of pregnancy. which one can better protect female fertility; To understand the impact of both surgical approaches on the long-term prognosis of patients.
- Conditions
- Induced Abortion
- Being tested
- Rotary induced abortion
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Rotary induced abortionProcedure or surgery
Rotary induced abortion under ultrasonic monitoring was performed with intravenous anesthesia.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rotary induced abortion | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Rotary induced abortion |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Cervical dilation rate (e.g. %)
Measured: 30
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 Mar 2025
- Study start20 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Induced AbortionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Peking Union Medical College HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 332 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Peking Union Medical College Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06894732
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ChiCTR2400089857
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 25 Jan 2025
- Last updated
- 25 Mar 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Mar 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- To Study the Safety and Efficacy of Disposable Cyclone Ring in Artificial Abortion
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06894732
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ChiCTR2400089857
- Conditions
- Induced Abortion
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 332 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Peking Union Medical College HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Mar 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the two surgical methods of surgical rotation abortion and surgical negative pressure uterine aspiration with the termination of pregnancy. which one can better protect female fertility; To understand the impact of both surgical approaches on the long-term prognosis of patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rotary induced abortion | Experimental | Procedure: Rotary induced abortion |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 to 40 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) Age: 20-40 years old, planning to terminate pregnancy; 2) Menopause time≤ 56 days (8 weeks); 3) Ultrasound examination showed early pregnancy in utero, and the average diameter of the fetal sac was 1-3cm; 4) According to the requirements of clinical operation standards, the preoperative examination, laboratory results and surgical indicators are normal 5) The subject was conscious, had good compliance, agreed to participate in the trial, and voluntarily signed the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) According to the requirements of clinical practice, there are contraindications to induced abortion; 2) The number of previous induced abortions ≥2 times; 3) Diseases affecting uterine cavity morphology such as uterine malformations and uterine fibroids; 4) History of uterine surgery: such as submucosal myomectomy history, mediastinal resection history, uterine adhesion-separation history; 5) Unable to sign the informed consent; 6) Other conditions that the investigator considers inappropriate to participate in this clinical study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Rotary induced abortionRotary induced abortion under ultrasonic monitoring was performed with intravenous anesthesia. | Procedure or surgery | Rotary induced abortion |
Primary outcome
Cervical dilation rate (e.g. %)
Time frame: 30
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Mar 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Induced Abortion
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Cervical Length Reference Range at 28-34 Weeks in Singleton Pregnancies
Preterm Birth, Cervical Length
Not yet recruiting
Virtual Reality for Pain and Anxiety During Surgical Uterine Evacuation After Early Pregnancy Loss
Early Pregnancy Loss, Procedural Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Factors Influencing Fertility or Pregnancy Health
Menstrual Cycles, Conception
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Progesterone and Low Molecular Weight Heparin in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss
Pregnancy Loss, Pregnancy Loss, Early
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Azithromycin for Cerclage Prophylaxis
Cervical Insufficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Rotary induced abortion in people with Induced Abortion, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Mar 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact xinyan Liu Liuxinyan (+86 186 0000 8013, liuxymeng@163.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Cervical dilation rate (e.g. %) (time frame: 30). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Mar 2025.