Comparison of the Efficiency of Femur Nerve Block and Intravenous Analgesia Treatment in Hip Fracture Patients

Hip fractures constitute a significant medical and socioeconomic challenge, particularly among elderly populations. Epidemiological projections estimate a marked rise in the global incidence of hip fractures, with approximately 6.26 million cases anticipated by 2050. These injuries are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality, with one-year post-fracture mortality rates ranging from 20% to 30%. Furthermore, only 30% to 40% of survivors recover their pre-injury functional capacity, and many require long-term care, underscoring the profound impact of these injuries.

Effective pain management is pivotal in optimizing early outcomes for patients with hip fractures. Adequate analgesia not only enhances patient comfort but also facilitates the initiation of physical therapy, shortens hospital stays, and supports improved long-term functional recovery. Various pain control strategies, including systemic analgesia, traction, neurostimulation, and alternative therapies, have been employed. However, perioperative nerve blockade has demonstrated superior efficacy and broader patient benefits. Peripheral nerve blocks, such as the femoral nerve block (FNB), offer notable advantages, including reduced pain scores, decreased opioid consumption, lower incidence of pneumonia, enhanced mobilization, diminished risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction, and reduced costs associated with analgesic regimens.

This randomized controlled trial seeks to evaluate the comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided, single-injection femoral nerve block versus intravenous fentanyl for pain management in patients presenting with proximal femoral fractures in the emergency department. The study cohort comprises adult patients diagnosed with hip fractures-specifically femoral neck and intertrochanteric fractures-confirmed through radiological imaging. Participants will be randomly allocated to receive either an ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block with 20 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine or intravenous fentanyl at a dose of 1 mcg/kg.

Pain levels will be assessed using the standardized Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) at baseline (pre-intervention) and 20 minutes post-intervention. For patients with cognitive impairment, the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAINAD) scale will serve as an alternative evaluation tool. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, patient satisfaction, length of stay in the emergency department, and adverse effects associated with each analgesic modality.

The study employs a double-blind methodology, ensuring that both participants and assessing clinicians remain unaware of treatment allocation. To maintain blinding, all participants will undergo two procedures: one active intervention and one placebo. In the intravenous fentanyl group, a placebo femoral block will be administered using 20 mL of normal saline, while in the FNB group, a placebo intravenous infusion (100 mL of normal saline) will be provided. This design minimizes bias in the assessment of efficacy and adverse effects.

The findings of this study are expected to inform the optimization of acute pain management strategies in emergency settings, potentially reducing opioid reliance, enhancing patient mobility, and improving overall clinical outcomes. By comparing these two analgesic approaches, this trial aims to identify the most effective and practical pain relief strategy for hip fracture patients prior to surgical intervention.