This Study is Assessing the Safety and Efficacy of Immune Inhibition as a Treatment to Prevent Primary Graft Dysfunction

This trial seeks to pilot processes to optimize for a multi-center clinical trial of CCR5 inhibition before transplant. Investigators will measure success in enriching a lung transplant population for PGD and will investigate the feasibility of recruitment for a pilot trial of CCR5 inhibition. Investigators will also assess the safety and tolerability of CCR5 inhibition in lung transplant recipients. Investigators will measure key adverse events and assess for drug-drug interactions. In addition, investigators will measure Maraviroc drug levels in plasma and bronchoalveolar lavage to determine dosing efficacy. Increasingly, there is awareness that subphenotypes of diseases exist and can be leveraged for targeted therapies. Therefore, the investigators also seek to develop standard assays for future subphenotyping efforts in a larger multicenter clinical trial. To do this, the investigators will measure donor and recipient biologic endpoints. These include bronchoalveolar lavage NK cells after transplant as a surrogate marker for biologic efficacy.

A complete physical examination will be performed by either the investigator or a sub investigator who is a physician at Baseline/Screening Visit 1. Qualified staff (MD, NP, RN, and PA) may complete the abbreviated physical exams at all other visits. New abnormal physical exam findings must be documented and will be followed by a physician or other qualified staff at the next scheduled visit. The experimental product, Maraviroc, will be administered in 300mg and 150mg formulations. Product will be administered for 300 mg in the PACU and then will receive doses every 12 hours with 2 additional 300 mg doses and the remaining will be 150 mg doses for a total of 7 doses over 3 days. Maraviroc will be given oral (PO) or by feeding tube (PFT) in crushed format depending on the route availability. Placebo will be administered in a reflective capacity and in similar dosage. Patients will be in the study for up to 28 days, all of which will be during their hospital stay, leading up to and following their lung transplant operation. A final subject follow up will occur 12 months later. When approximately 50% of patients have completed the study through Visit 6, an interim analysis for safety will be conducted by an independent data monitoring committee.

The association between the maraviroc treatment group and placebo control group and severe PGD (primary endpoint) or continuous secondary endpoints (such as immune populations) will be tested using logistic or linear regression, respectively. For study's secondary analysis of maximum PGD grade, investigators will use cumulative linked models assessing PGD as an ordinal variable. All models will be adjusted for variables that may introduce clinical heterogeneity (age, sex, ethnicity, transplant type, transplant indication) and are not established PGD risk factors or used in the randomization tool. Each endpoint/experimental aim will work from a fixed cohort of 30 participants randomized to CCR5 inhibition (maraviroc group, n = 15) or placebo control (placebo group, n = 15). Investigators will use an enrichment tool to target an incidence of PGD of 50% in our study population. Conservatively, it is expected that approximately 75% of the consented cohort will not meet randomization criteria. Thus, there will be 90 consented participants with <50% risk for PGD to be used as clinical comparators (Low risk PGD group). For the investigator's primary outcome, it is expected that 80% power will detect an estimated effect size of 0.39 with a two-tailed alpha of 0.051. This equates to a power to resolve a difference in 9.5% in severe PGD between treatment and control groups. These effect sizes provide ample power for the primary outcomes of interest based on previously reported data within the field.

Complete blood counts (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, white blood cell count, white blood cell differential, and platelet count) are measured per routine clinical care. Investigators will record the baseline CBC obtained near the time of lung transplant waitlisting as well as CBCs performed on post-operative days (POD) 0-3, POD 7, POD14, and POD30. Serum sodium, potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, random glucose, BUN, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase (AST/SGOT), alanine aminotransferase (ALT/SGPT), alkaline phosphatase, total bilirubin, direct bilirubin, tacrolimus trough, and posaconazole levels are also collected as part of routine clinical care. These data points from the time nearest to lung transplant waitlisting as a baseline as well as chemistries performed on POD 0-3, POD 7, POD14, and POD30 will be recorded. Blood for determination of serum concentrations of maraviroc will be collected pre-dose as well as at 12 hours, 24 hours, 36 hours, 48 hours, 60 hours, 72, 84, and 96 hours after the start of dosing. Investigators will collect vials of blood for plasma banking pre-dose and on POD 1 and POD 3 and store/ process it in a lung transplant biorepository according to established protocols.

Investigators will perform a lavage of the donor lung during back table OR preparation with 20 mL of saline. Bronchoscopy for routine graft assessment occurs at the bedside on POD 0 through 3. During the POD 1 and POD 3 bronchoscopies, we will perform lavage in the right middle lobe or lingula with 20 mL of saline. Specimens will be collected in a sterile 50 mL falcon tube. The tube will be labeled, packed in ice and transferred to our laboratory for processing. Investigators plan to perform BAL cell immunophenotyping with spectral flow cytometry, BAL supernatant cytokine measurements, and will bank cell pellets in qiazol for future RNA sequencing. The data will be entered into a validated UCSF RedCap database. The PI will be responsible for data processing, in accordance with procedural documentation. Database lock will occur once quality assurance procedures have been completed. All procedures for the handling and analysis of data will be conducted using good computing practices meeting FDA guidelines for the handling and analysis of data for clinical trials. After data have been entered into the study database, a system of computerized data validation checks will be implemented and applied to the database on a regular basis. The study database will be updated in accordance with the resolved queries. All changes to the study database will be documented.

This is a single center pilot study. As such, there is no appointed "Medical Monitor." Rather, the study PI (Dr. Calabrese) and co-Investigator (Dr. Hays) should be contacted directly at these numbers to report medical concerns or questions regarding safety. Subjects may be discontinued from study treatment at any time if the subject, the investigator, or the Sponsor feels that it is not in the subject's best interest to continue. This may be due to a subject withdrawal of consent, the emergence of adverse events that in the opinion of the investigator would be in the best interest of the subject to discontinue study treatment, or if a protocol violation requires discontinuation of study treatment. If a subject is withdrawn from treatment due to an adverse event, the subject will be followed and treated by the Investigator until the abnormal parameter or symptom has resolved or stabilized. All subjects who discontinue study treatment will be evaluated in the hospital for an early discontinuation visit as soon as possible and then should be encouraged to complete all remaining scheduled visits and procedures. All subjects are free to withdraw from participation at any time, for any reason, specified or unspecified, and without prejudice. Reasonable attempts will be made by the investigator to provide a reason for subject withdrawals.

The study will have an independent Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) that will advise and periodically monitor participant safety and evaluate the progress of the study. The DSMB will review all changes to the study plan and will review procedures for maintaining data confidentiality, data integrity, and data analyses. The DSMB has not been selected yet for this study, but participants will be recruited from inside UCSF and outside of the institution. The board will have a range of specialties and backgrounds to account for the complexity of the patient population. The DSMB will meet quarterly to review study progress, data quality and participant safety. Safety reports will be sent 2 weeks before each meeting to afford statistical overview and review beforehand. De-identified but unmasked data will be provided to the DSMB statistician for data processing and analysis. Raw data identifying individual participants will not be available to the DSMB. After the conclusion of the study, the DSMB will confer with the study team to provide individual participants' health providers with pertinent information from the trial. The study team will discuss results with each randomized trial participant after all data has been analyzed but before publication of results. The data and safety monitoring reports will contain both masked and unmasked data. Reports will be generated with the help of the DSMB statistician. A report template has been created and will be available for the DSMB to review. Unmasking will be provided at written request from the DSMB statistician to the Investigational Pharmacy Service. Patient data will remain deidentified throughout the data analysis process. The reports will include information on the study status, participant enrollment status, participant descriptive information, and data on adverse events and serious adverse events by organ system. While some summary tables will show unmasked treatments, data will be presented in a blinded manner during open DSMB meetings. All data and discussion inside DSMB will be confidential. The responsibilities of the DSMB and individual voting members are outlined in the IRB. The DSMB will meet quarterly through the end of the patient phase of the study and then twice annually. The DSMB will propose additional analyses and discuss the rationale for continuation of the study or stopping early for safety. At the end of each DSMB, the group will vote on whether to continue the study and make recommendations on proposed protocol changes. The DSMB will also review data integrity at each meeting and review manuscripts of trial results as requested by the trial team.