AzTrials
AzTrials

Cervical Cancer Stage IB2MOTTONCT06836869

Modified Tumor-free Techniques Operation to Cervical Cancer

A study testing Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques and Abdominal radical hysterectomy in people with Cervical Cancer Stage IB2, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 17 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques (LRH-MTF) works to treat FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer as good as abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). It will also learn about the safety of LRH-MTF. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Cervical Cancer Stage IB2
What is being tested?
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques and Abdominal radical hysterectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
524 participants
Where
17 sitesChina
Study dates
20 Feb 2025to Jul 2032
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult
  1. Inclusion Criteria: 1.1 Females aged 18 to 65 years old. 1.2 Histologically confirmed primary cervical squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma. 1.3 FIGO 2018 stage IB2. 1.4 The maximum diameter of the cervical lesion measured by MRI is >2 cm and ≤4 cm. For those with MRI contraindications, PET/CT, CT, or ultrasound can be used as alternatives. 1.5 Scheduled to receive type C (Q - M classification) radical hysterectomy. 1.6 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 or 1. 1.7 Willing to participate in this trial and sign the informed consent form. 1.8 Able to cooperate and complete follow - up and relevant examinations. 1.9 For pre - menopausal women, a negative pregnancy test within 30 days before surgery. 1.10 Laboratory test indicators of vital organs meet the standards
  2. Exclusion Criteria:

2.1 Special pathological types (gastric - type adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, clear cell carcinoma, carcinosarcoma, etc.).

2.2 Imaging examinations suggest pelvic or para - aortic lymph node metastasis (MRI or CT shows a short - axis diameter of ≥1.5 cm, or SUV ≥2.5), or histopathology indicates lymph node metastasis.

2.3 History of pelvic and abdominal radiotherapy. 2.4 History of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. 2.5 Uterus larger than that at 10 weeks of pregnancy. 2.6 Contraindications for surgery and anesthesia (such as severe medical comorbidities).

2.7 Patients who cannot tolerate the Trendelenburg position. 2.8 Patients who cannot cooperate with treatment and follow - up. 2.9 Pregnant patients. 2.10 History of other malignancies, except for those who have been cancer - free for more than 3 years with no current evidence of tumor recurrence.

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Yuan Li, professor contact

+8617810376318

liyuan10833@pumch.cn

17 sites in 1 country

China17 sites, 17 recruiting
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital

    Beijing, 100079

    Yuan Li, professor, +8617810376318, liyuan10833@pumch.cn

    Jiayuan Zhao, MD, zhaojy1221@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Cangzhou Central Hospital

    Cangzhou, Hebei, 061000

    Shikai Liu, professor, commasll@163.com

    Recruiting
  • The Second Hospital of Jilin University

    Changchun, Jilin, 130041

    Tianmin Xu, professor, xutianmin@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Hunan Provincial Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital

    Changsha, Hunan, 410000

    Chuqiang Shu, professor, siqing9999@163.com

    Recruiting
  • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute

    Chengdu

    Dengfeng Wang, 8615982222707, zhanggn@hotmail.com

    Recruiting
  • Southwest Hospital

    Chongqing

    Jinjin Li, 8618883938300, wangyanzhou1981@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510120

    Huaiwu Lu, professor, luhuaiwu@mai.sysu.edu.cn

    Recruiting
  • Zhejiang cancer hospital

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310022

    Tao Zhu, professor, +8613858065156, zhutao@zjcc.org.cn

    Recruiting
  • The First Hospital of Lanzhou University

    Lanzhou, Gansu, 730000

    Chang Liu, professor, lch@lzu.edu.cn

    Not yet recruiting
  • Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College

    Nanchong, Sichuan, 637000

    Aiping Wen, professor, +8613890893965, 369563889@qq.com

    Chengchao Du, professor, +8615082471020, 854803952@qq.com

    Recruiting
  • Renji Hospital Affiliated to The Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical School

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200001

    Kaijiang Liu, professor, liukaijiang@263.net

    Recruiting
  • Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University

    Shanghai

    Lin Qiu, 8615221848983, wuxin_fc@fudan.edu.cn

    Recruiting
  • The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011

    Shan Kang, professor, kangshan@hebmu.edu.cn

    Recruiting
  • Tianjin Central Hospital of Gynecology Obstetrics

    Tianjin

    Yuanjing Hu, 18920196053, julianna_hu@163.com

    Hu

    Recruiting
  • Tongji Medical College

    Wuhan

    Peng Wu, 8613995573729, pengwu8626@tjh.tjmu.edu.cn

    Recruiting
  • The Fourth Military Medical University, Xijing Hospital

    Xi’an, Shanxi, 710032

    Wei Zhang, professor, +8618049504994, doctor_zw@sina.com

    Recruiting
  • Affiliated Hospital of Shanxi University of Traditional Chinese Medicine

    Xianyang, Shanxi, 712000

    Fei Li, professor, 13595024@qq.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Non-inferiority Trial to Compare the Effectiveness and Safety of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Incorporating Modified Tumor-free Techniques Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients With Stage IB2 Cervical Cancer

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques (LRH-MTF) works to treat FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer as good as abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH). It will also learn about the safety of LRH-MTF. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does LRH-MTF achieve a non-inferior disease-free survival rate at 4.5 years post - operation compared to ARH? What complications do patients have during and after the operation when receiving LRH-MTF? Researchers will compare LRH-MTF to ARH to see if LRH-MTF works no worse than ARH in treating FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Read more

Participants will:

  1. Undergo either LRH-MTF or ARH as assigned by randomization.
  2. Visit the hospital for follow-up according to the study schedule for various examinations including blood tests, imaging studies, and assessment of complications.
  3. Complete quality-of-life questionnaires such as EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CX24, FSFI, and FSDS-R at baseline (pre-operation) and specific time points during the follow - up period (post-operation 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years, 4.5 years).
Read the detailed description

A progress report will be conducted within 4 weeks after all participants have completed their 6-month postoperative visit (the 5th visit). The report will be performed by an independent third-party statistical team, which will provide a comprehensive analysis of the safety data, baseline characteristic, and perioperative indicators.

The study will perform one final analysis.

Being tested
Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques, Abdominal radical hysterectomy
Keywords
radical hysterectomy, Modified Tumor-Free Techniques, cervical cancer, FIGO stage 1B2, laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniquesProcedure or surgery

    Thoroughly examine the pelvic and abdominal cavities. Coagulation of the fallopian tubes are recommanded at the beginning of the surgery. The use of uterine manipulator is prohibited. An "8"-suture at the uterine fundus is recommended. Insert a trocar 3 cm above the pubic symphysis and suspend the uterus by pulling with a needle holder. Alternative methods are also acceptable. Perform pelvic lymphadenectomy. Conduct radical hysterectomy according to the Q-M classification type C. Before incising the vagina, the upper part of the vagina must be closed (using a cable tie or suture), or the vagina can be incised transvaginally after deflating the pneumoperitoneum. Sterilized distilled water or saline solution (≥1000 mL) is used to irrigate the pelvic cavity. The vaginal stump can be sutured either laparoscopically or transvaginally.

  • Abdominal radical hysterectomyProcedure or surgery

    At the onset of surgery, comprehensively explore the pelvic and abdominal cavities. If intraperitoneal metastases are identified, radical hysterectomy should be aborted. Perform pelvic lymphadenectomy. After lymph node resection, remove the lymph nodes from the surgical field promptly. Sentinel lymph node mapping and biopsy are not performed in this study. Perform radical hysterectomy according to type C of the Q-M classification. It can be accompanied by or without bilateral salpingo - oophorectomy. For patients who retain their ovaries, bilateral ovarian transposition can be carried out. Before incising the vagina, close the upper segment of the vagina and/or the vaginal stump. This can be achieved using instruments such as a large right - angle clamp or an auricular clamp. Sterilized distilled water or saline solution (≥1000 mL) is used to irrigate the pelvic cavity.

Study groups in NCT06836869
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
LRH-MTFExperimentalLaparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques
Receives: Procedure: Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques
ARHActive comparatorAbdominal radical hysterectomy
Receives: Procedure: Abdominal radical hysterectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. 4.5-year Disease-free Survival

    The time from the surgery until the first recurrence or death from any cause within 4.5 years after surgery. Recurrence needs to be confirmed by histopathology and/or imaging. If pathological evidence cannot be obtained, recurrence should be determined by two or more detection methods, and adjudicated by an independent Endpoint Event Evaluation Committee.

    Measured: From the surgery to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. 4.5-year Overall Survival

    The time interval from the surgery to death from any cause within 4.5 years after surgery.

    Measured: From the surgery to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

  2. Pattern of Reccurence

    According to the location of the first recurrence, it is divided into intra-pelvic recurrence and distant recurrence. Analyze the differences in the location of tumor recurrence after different surgical methods to provide a reference for subsequent treatment and prognosis judgment.

    Measured: From surgery to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

  3. Estimated surgical blood loss

    Calculate it as the difference in the weight of gauze/gauze pads before and after the surgery (g) divided by 1.05, plus the difference between the total volume of aspirated fluid and the volume of irrigation fluid at the end of the surgery (mL). Also, record whether blood transfusion is performed during the surgery and within 1 week after the surgery. In addition, record the changes in hemoglobin before and after the surgery to assess blood loss. Perform a complete blood count (hemoglobin) test within 1 week before the surgery and on the 1st day after the surgery.

    Measured: From the start to the end of the surgery up to 24 hours

  4. Operating time

    The time from making the first incision to completing the suturing.

    Measured: From the start to the end of the surgery up to 24 hours

  5. Postoperative pain

    It is evaluated using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Additionally, the types, quantities, and administration methods of postoperative analgesics are recorded.

    Measured: From surgery to the third day after surgery

  6. Gastrointestinal function recovery

    Record the time (in hours) of the first postoperative flatus.

    Measured: From the end of surgery to the first postoperative flatus at 7 days.

  7. Length of hospital stay

    The number of days from hospitalization to discharge.

    Measured: From hospitalization to discharge up to 90 days.

  8. Treatment cost

    The total cost of hospitalization and outpatient services related to this disease. Conduct cost - effectiveness analysis through incremental cost, improvement of functional outcomes, and quality - adjusted life - years.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

  9. EORTC QLQ - C30 scale

    EORTC QLQ - C30 is short for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core 30. Each of the 15 subscales of the EORTC QLQ - C30 is scored from 0 to 100.

    For the functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), higher scores indicate better functioning and thus a better outcome. For the symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, etc.) and the global health status/QOL scale, a higher score on the symptom scales means more severe symptoms (a worse outcome), while a higher score on the global health status/QOL scale means a better quality of life. It is used to evaluate the quality of life at baseline (pre - operation) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4.5 years after surgery.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

  10. EORTC QLQ - CX24 Scale

    EORTC QLQ - CX24 Scale is short for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire - Cervical Cancer Module. Similar to the QLQ - C30, most of its subscales are scored from 0 to 100. Interpretation of Scores: The interpretation is generally in line with the QLQ - C30. Higher scores in functional aspects indicate better conditions, while higher scores in symptom-related aspects indicate more severe symptoms or worse outcomes. It is used to evaluate the quality of life at baseline (pre - operation) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4.5 years after surgery.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

  11. FSFI Scale

    FSFI is short for Female Sexual Function Index. Minimum and Maximum Values: The total score of the FSFI ranges from 2 to 36. Interpretation of Scores: A higher score indicates better female sexual function and a better outcome in terms of sexual health. Scores below a certain threshold may indicate sexual dysfunction.

    It is used to evaluate the sexual function at baseline (pre - operation) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4.5 years after surgery.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

  12. FSDS - R Scale

    FSDS - R Scale is short for Female Sexual Distress Scale - Revised. Minimum and Maximum Values: The FSDS - R typically has a score range from 0 to 52.

    Interpretation of Scores: In this scale, a higher score indicates a higher level of sexual distress, meaning a worse outcome. It reflects the degree of distress a woman experiences related to her sexual function or situation.

    It is used to evaluate the sexual function at baseline (pre - operation) and at 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 3 years and 4.5 years after surgery.

    Measured: From enrollment to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Feb 2025
  2. Study start20 Feb 2025
  3. Primary completionJul 2032 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This is a prospective, multi-center, open-label, blind endpoint evaluation (PROBE), non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial with a parallel-group design. The main hypothesis of this study is that laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques (LRH-MTF) is non-inferior to abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in terms of disease-free survival at 4.5 years post-operation. A non-inferiority margin of 7% is set based on previous studies. This means that as long as the difference in the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate between LRH-MTF and ARH is within this non-inferiority margin, LRH-MTF will be considered non-inferior to ARH. If LRH-MTF meets this criterion, it can potentially offer the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, such as reduced surgical trauma, shorter hospital stay, and faster recovery, while maintaining comparable oncological outcomes.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
524 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06836869
Sponsor's protocol ID
MOTTO
Acronym
MOTTO
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
11 Feb 2025
Last updated
27 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: IPD used in the results publication will be shared.

Publications

  • Kanao H, Aoki Y, Fusegi A, Omi M, Nomura H, Tanigawa T, Okamoto S, Kurita T, Netsu S, Omatsu K, Yunokawa M. Feasibility and Outcomes of "No-Look No-Touch" Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. J Clin Med. 2021 Sep 15;10(18):4154. doi: 10.3390/jcm10184154.

    PubMed 34575265
  • Chiva L, Zanagnolo V, Querleu D, Martin-Calvo N, Arevalo-Serrano J, Capilna ME, Fagotti A, Kucukmetin A, Mom C, Chakalova G, Aliyev S, Malzoni M, Narducci F, Arencibia O, Raspagliesi F, Toptas T, Cibula D, Kaidarova D, Meydanli MM, Tavares M, Golub D, Perrone AM, Poka R, Tsolakidis D, Vujic G, Jedryka MA, Zusterzeel PLM, Beltman JJ, Goffin F, Haidopoulos D, Haller H, Jach R, Yezhova I, Berlev I, Bernardino M, Bharathan R, Lanner M, Maenpaa MM, Sukhin V, Feron JG, Fruscio R, Kukk K, Ponce J, Minguez JA, Vazquez-Vicente D, Castellanos T, Chacon E, Alcazar JL; SUCCOR study Group. SUCCOR study: an international European cohort observational study comparing minimally invasive surgery versus open abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1269-1277. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001506. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

    PubMed 32788262
  • Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, Buda A, Yan X, Shuzhong Y, Chetty N, Isla D, Tamura M, Zhu T, Robledo KP, Gebski V, Asher R, Behan V, Nicklin JL, Coleman RL, Obermair A. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.

    PubMed 30380365
  • Li Y, Zhao J, Ding X, Liang C, Wang W, Ren T, Jiang F, Yang J, Xiang Y. Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy Incorporating Modified Tumor-Free Techniques. Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Feb 1;145(2):134-143. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005805. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

    PubMed 39700500

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy incorporating modified tumor-free techniques and Abdominal radical hysterectomy in people with Cervical Cancer Stage IB2, run by Peking Union Medical College Hospital at 17 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Yuan Li, professor (+8617810376318, liyuan10833@pumch.cn), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

4.5-year Disease-free Survival (time frame: From the surgery to the 4.5 years after the end of treatment). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06836869, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in