AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisCHAT-OANCT06778486

Conversations in Health Literacy Using AI Technology for Osteoarthritis Patients

A study testing Artificial Intelligence Chatbot in people with Osteoarthritis and Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the use of a generative artificial intelligence large language model chatbot in improving decision making factors in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 years
What is being tested?
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
6 Jan 2025to Dec 2026
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult
  • Ability to read and write in English
  • All races and ethnicities
  • Clinical symptoms of hip and/or knee osteoarthritis

Who cannot join

  • Inability to read and write in English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California Davis Health

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: CHAT-OA: Conversations in Health Literacy Using AI Technology for Osteoarthritis Patients

The goal of this clinical trial is to assess the use of a generative artificial intelligence large language model chatbot in improving decision making factors in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does the use of an artificial intelligence chatbot have an effect on decisional conflict and anxiety related to decision making? Are changes in decisional conflict correlated with changes in patient reported outcomes? Are changes in decisional conflict correlated with health literacy? Participants will interact with an artificial intelligence chatbot prior to their clinic visit with an orthopaedic surgeon, using a structured prompt.

Being tested
Artificial Intelligence Chatbot
Keywords
artificial intelligence, health literacy, decisional conflict
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Osteoarthritis, Hip

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Artificial Intelligence ChatbotOther

    The intervention is a generative artificial intelligence large language model chatbot that has a structured prompt with fill-in-the-blank style questions that the participant will complete.

Study groups in NCT06778486
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of careNo interventionThis arm will undergo standard clinical care without the intervention.
Artificial Intelligence ChatbotExperimentalThis arm will interact with an artificial intelligence chatbot prior to their clinic visit.
Receives: Other: Artificial Intelligence Chatbot

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Decisional Conflict Scale

    16 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (no decisional conflict) to 100 (extremely high decisional conflict).

    Measured: At three time points: Within one week after the clinic visit, 1 month after the clinic visit, 6 months after the clinic visit.

  2. Beck Anxiety Inventory

    21 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of the answers, which is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (low anxiety) to 63 (high anxiety).

    Measured: At three time points: Within one week after the clinic visit, 1 month after the clinic visit, 6 months after the clinic visit.

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement

    7 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of the answers, which is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (total knee disability) to 100 (perfect knee health).

    Measured: At enrollment

  2. Hip dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement

    6 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 0 to 4. The raw score is the sum of the answers, which is converted to a score out of 100. The score ranges from 0 (total hip disability) to 100 (perfect hip health).

    Measured: At enrollment

  3. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Global Health Version 1.2

    10 questions with Likert scale style answers ranging from 1 to 5 and 1 question about pain with answers from 0 to 10. The questions are grouped into 4 sub-groups corresponding to physical and mental health main groups, in addition to the pain score. The raw scores are a sum of the answers for both physical and mental health range from 4 (poor physical or mental health) to 20 (best possible physical or mental health). The raw score is then converted to a t-score using the associated tables with the range 16.2 (worst possible physical or mental health) to 67.7 (best possible physical or mental health). The t-score is interpreted in comparison to the general population that has a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Measured: At enrollment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jan 2025
  2. Study start6 Jan 2025
  3. Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06778486
Sponsor's protocol ID
2169004
Acronym
CHAT-OA
Status last verified
Sep 2026
First submitted
22 Nov 2024
Last updated
14 Sep 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in