Brain Tumor AdultPPV-CVP-FLUIDNCT06776666
Pulse Pressure Variation vs. Central Venous Pressure for Fluid Management in Intracranial Tumor Surgery
An observational study of Brain Tumor Adult and Pulse Pressure Variation, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This study investigates the efficacy of pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to central venous pressure (CVP) in guiding fluid management during intracranial tumor surgeries. Perioperative fluid therapy is critical to prevent complications arising from both hypovolemia (e.g., hypotension, tissue hypoperfusion… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Brain Tumor Adult, Pulse Pressure Variation, Central Venous Pressure
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 3 Apr 2024to 15 Dec 2024
- How long will I take part?
- 2 Days
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: * ages of 18-65 * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification score I-III * who will undergo elective intracranial mass surgery under general anesthesia
Who may be able to join
- ages of 18-65
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification score I-III
- who will undergo elective intracranial mass surgery under general anesthesia
Who cannot join
- Patients with renal failure
- mental retardation
- arrhythmia
- severe cardiopulmonary disease
- hemodynamic instability
- body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m2
Show all 11Show fewer
- respiratory system compliance (Crs) <30 mL/cmH2O
- use of lactate-producing drugs such as metformin
- lactate elevation at the beginning of the operation
- tumor causing diabetes insipitus
- patients who do not accept the procedure
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Pamukkale University
Denizli, Pamukkale, 20020
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Pulse Pressure Variation and Central Venous Pressure for Fluid Management Guidance in Intracranial Tumor Surgery
This study investigates the efficacy of pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to central venous pressure (CVP) in guiding fluid management during intracranial tumor surgeries. Perioperative fluid therapy is critical to prevent complications arising from both hypovolemia (e.g., hypotension, tissue hypoperfusion, ischemia) and hypervolemia (e.g., pulmonary edema, delayed wound healing, infection). Traditional fluid therapy relies on static parameters such as CVP, which have limited sensitivity and specificity. Emerging technologies and dynamic parameters, including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV), offer higher accuracy in evaluating fluid responsiveness.
This randomized study includes 42 patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective intracranial tumor surgery under general anesthesia. Patients are classified as ASA I-III and are randomized into two groups:
Read more
- Group N: Fluid therapy guided by PPV.
- Group S: Fluid therapy guided by CVP. The study follows standard perioperative protocols, with PPV (>13%) and CVP (0-6 mmHg) used as primary parameters for fluid administration. Key outcomes include intraoperative fluid requirements (primary) and secondary parameters such as serum lactate levels, incidence of hypotension, brain relaxation scores, and ICU length of stay.
PPV has been shown to be more reliable than CVP in predicting fluid responsiveness, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients with tidal volumes ≥8 mL/kg. However, its efficacy in neurosurgical patients remains underexplored. This study aims to determine if PPV can replace CVP as a superior guide for fluid therapy, enhancing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.
Read the detailed description
To prevent fluid losses secondary to surgery, fluid therapy should be administered to patients during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. The goal of perioperative fluid therapy is to maintain adequate circulating volume and pressure, avoid dehydration and the adverse effects of excessive fluid administration, and optimize oxygen delivery to tissues to ensure sufficient perfusion. Inadequate fluid administration can result in hypovolemia, leading to complications such as hypotension, tissue hypoperfusion, ischemia, arrhythmias, and renal damage. Conversely, excessive fluid administration can cause hypervolemia-related issues, including fluid accumulation in tissues (especially in the lungs), impaired tissue perfusion, prolonged mechanical ventilation, anastomotic leaks, delayed wound healing, and infections. Postoperative complications can also increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, achieving normovolemia in patients during the perioperative period is of paramount importance.
In traditional fluid therapy, hourly fluid requirements for maintenance and fasting-related deficits are calculated using the '4-2-1' rule (4 mL/kg/hour for the first 10 kg, 2 mL/kg/hour for the next 10 kg, and 1 mL/kg/hour for each kilogram thereafter). Estimated fluid losses from surgical bleeding and evaporation are added to these calculations for replacement. In traditional fluid therapy, intravascular volume is estimated using parameters such as arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and urine output. However, these parameters are influenced by many factors and do not always accurately reflect intravascular volume. Managing patients using these parameters, especially in high-risk surgeries, can result in complications related to hypovolemia and hypervolemia. The lack of an optimal perioperative fluid therapy approach in high-risk surgeries has led to new explorations, including personalized, goal-directed fluid therapy facilitated by advanced technological devices. Studies have shown that personalized, goal-directed fluid therapy improves postoperative outcomes.
Various static parameters have been used to guide fluid therapy to date, one of which is CVP (central venous pressure), commonly employed in clinical practice. The normal range of CVP in the supine position is 0-6 mmHg. A CVP below this range indicates hypovolemia, while a CVP above it suggests hypervolemia. Recent studies have shown that CVP's sensitivity and specificity in detecting fluid deficits are insufficient.
In recent years, dynamic parameters with high sensitivity and specificity, such as PPV (pulse pressure variation) and SVV (stroke volume variation), have been increasingly utilized to assess fluid deficits. Changes in arterial pressure waveforms during respiration are used to evaluate the response to fluid administration. These changes occur during controlled mechanical ventilation. Positive pressure ventilation increases intrathoracic pressure during inspiration, reducing venous return, right ventricular filling volume, and left ventricular stroke volume. During expiration, the effects are reversed. If arterial vasomotor tone and cardiac function remain constant, these changes in stroke volume during positive pressure ventilation are reflected in pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure. In fluid-nonresponsive patients, variations in these dynamic parameters are less than 10%.
In mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable, and intubated patients with a tidal volume ≥8 mL/kg, a stroke volume variation (SVV) >10% and a pulse pressure variation (PPV) >13% indicate a fluid deficit.
PPV has been demonstrated to be more reliable than CVP in predicting fluid responsiveness in various studies. However, there are limited studies evaluating the efficacy of PPV in neurosurgical patient populations. Due to the scarcity of studies in the literature, this study aims to compare the efficacy of fluid management guided by PPV and CVP in patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery. This study aims to evaluate whether PPV can effectively guide fluid therapy and replace CVP in neurosurgical patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery.
A total of 42 patients aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective intracranial mass surgery under general anesthesia, with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification score of I-III, will be included in the study. Patients with renal failure, mental retardation, arrhythmia, severe cardiopulmonary disease, hemodynamic instability, body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m², respiratory system compliance (Crs) <30 mL/cmH₂O, use of lactate-producing medications such as metformin, preoperative elevated lactate levels, tumors causing diabetes insipidus, or those refusing the procedure will be excluded from the study. Patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, failing central venous catheter (CVC) placement, or requiring postoperative ventilator support will also be excluded. All procedures to be performed on the study participants will be explained in detail, and informed consent forms will be signed. The invasive procedures, drug applications, and monitoring methods in this study are within the scope of routine practice.
The 42 patients included in the study will be randomized using a computer-generated sampling method into two groups: Group N (n=21), receiving intraoperative fluid management based on PPV (pulse pressure variation) parameters, and Group S (n=21), receiving intraoperative fluid management based on CVP (central venous pressure) parameters.
All patients in both groups will be encouraged to consume oral carbohydrate fluids (12.5% glucose solution) until two hours before surgery. Upon being brought to the operating table, routine electrocardiogram (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂), and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring will be performed, and an 18G peripheral intravenous line will be placed. During surgery, all patients will receive a crystalloid infusion at 3 mL/kg/hour.
All patients will be intubated after intravenous induction with propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). After induction, a 20G cannula will be placed in the radial artery of the upper extremity for monitoring. A 7 French triple-lumen central venous catheter will be placed in the right subclavian vein to manage potential complications. General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at approximately 1.0 (±20%) minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) with 40% FiO₂ (Fraction of Inspired Oxygen) at 1 L/min fresh gas flow. Both groups will be ventilated in volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg. To calculate Crs in the supine position, a 10% inspiratory pause will be added to the ventilator settings to obtain plateau pressure. The surgery will be performed in the supine position, and the transducer will be positioned at the mid-axillary line in both groups. A urinary catheter will be inserted to monitor urine output. Additional doses of muscle relaxants and fentanyl will be administered as needed. NSAIDs, magnesium, and lidocaine will not be used to avoid affecting intraoperative hypotension or postoperative renal function. Intraoperative systolic arterial pressure will not be allowed to drop by more than 30% from baseline, and the mean arterial pressure will be maintained above 65 mmHg in normotensive patients and 80 mmHg in hypertensive patients. Hypotension will be defined as a drop of more than 20% from baseline mean arterial pressure.
According to institutional practice, 1 g/kg mannitol will be administered before the dura mater is opened. During dura mater opening, the surgical team will assess brain relaxation using a five-point scale (1=optimal conditions, 2=retraction not possible and dilated blood vessels, 3=tissue tension hindering intervention with obliterated sulci and dilated vessels, 4=worsening factors causing brain tissue extrusion, 5=worst conditions for surgery).
Patients with intraoperative hematocrit (Hct) <24% will receive erythrocyte suspension (ES). For patients with Hct >24%, transfusion will only occur with severe active bleeding. If Hct >24% and estimated blood loss is less than 10% of total blood volume, 1.5 times the amount of blood lost will be replaced with crystalloids. If Hct >24% and blood loss is estimated at 10-20% of total blood volume, 500 mL colloid will be administered. Blood loss will be estimated using the amount in the suction canister and the number of surgical sponges and gauzes used during surgery (a '4x4' gauze will be assumed to hold 10 mL, and a fully soaked laparotomy pad will be assumed to hold 150 mL of blood). In cases of severe volume deficit, colloids will be used to manage hypotensive periods until blood transfusion is administered. Diuresis will be targeted at 0.5 mL/kg/hour or higher in both groups.
In Group N, PPV values will be monitored continuously during the intraoperative period. If PPV >13%, patients will receive an additional 250 mL of crystalloid fluid over 10 minutes, followed by reevaluation. If PPV ≤13%, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR <100 bpm, ephedrine will be administered. If more than 30 mg of ephedrine is required, dopamine infusion will be initiated. If PPV ≤13%, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR >100 bpm, norepinephrine infusion will be used.
In Group S, CVP values will be monitored continuously. Patients will be disconnected from the ventilator for CVP measurement. If CVP <6 mmHg, patients will receive an additional 250 mL of crystalloid bolus over 10 minutes, followed by reevaluation. If CVP ≥6 mmHg, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR <100 bpm, ephedrine will be administered. If more than 30 mg of ephedrine is required, dopamine infusion will be initiated. If CVP ≥6 mmHg, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR >100 bpm, norepinephrine infusion will be used.
The demographic data of both groups (gender, age, BMI, ASA physical status classification score, comorbidities, baseline oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂), HR, MAP, CVP, PPV, creatinine, and serum lactate levels) and intraoperative data (surgery duration, fluid management protocol, postoperative creatinine and lactate levels, intraoperative hypotensive episodes, vasopressor requirements, volumes of crystalloids/colloids administered, number of bolus fluids given, volume of blood transfused, brain relaxation score, total intraoperative urine output) will be recorded.
Intraoperative SpO₂, EtCO₂, MAP, HR values, and hourly urine output of all patients will be recorded.
Fifteen minutes before the end of surgery, all patients will receive 100 mg tramadol and 1000 mg paracetamol in 150 mL normal saline as an IV infusion. At the end of surgery, 2-4 mg/kg sugammadex will be administered to reverse neuromuscular blockade. After extubation, patients will be transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Postoperative creatinine and lactate levels will be measured and recorded at the 12th hour. The ICU length of stay will also be documented.
- Conditions
- Brain Tumor Adult, Pulse Pressure Variation, Central Venous Pressure, Fluid Management, Brain Surgery
- Keywords
- Central venous pressure, Fluid management, Brain tumors, Pulse pressure variation, Surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Brain Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PPV | Patients with intraoperative fluid management according to PPV parameters | |
| CVP | patients with intraoperative fluid management according to CVP parameters |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Fluid requirement (number of times needing bolus infusion-during surgery)
Fluid requirement (number of times needing bolus infusion) One bolus infusion 250 mL amount
Bolus fluid requirement will be assessed every 15 minutes throughout the operation.
Assesment will make two method: CVP and PPV. Will be to compare the intraoperative fluid requirement between the two groups.
- CVP (Central Venous Pressure) group: In cases where CVP<6 mmHg during the intraoperative period, patients will be given an additional 250 ml bolus crystalloid infusion over a 10 minute period and LVB will be re-evaluated.
- PPV (Pulse Pressure Variation) group:
In cases where the pulse pressure variations value is >13%, patients will be given an additional 250 ml of crystalloid fluid over a 10 minute period and pulse pressure variations will be reassessed.
Measured: At 10-minutes intervals throughout the surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Duration of postoperative stay in the intensive care unit
Evaluation of postoperative intensive care unit length of stay in days
Measured: in 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jan 2025
- Study start3 Apr 2024
- Primary completion5 Dec 2024
- Study completion15 Dec 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Brain Tumor AdultStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Pamukkale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Target duration
- 2 Days
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pamukkale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Gizem Demirci, Pamukkale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06776666
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E-60116787-020-512899
- Other IDs
- ET-GD-CVP-PPV-FLD-001
- Acronym
- PPV-CVP-FLUID
- Status last verified
- Jan 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: I need to consider several factors when deciding whether or not to share Individual Participant Data (IPD). Privacy concerns are a primary issue, as ensuring the confidentiality of participants is critical. Additionally, the ethical constraints tied to the original consent process may limit sharing if explicit permissions were not obtained.
Publications
Bristow A, Shalev D, Rice B, Lipton JM, Giesecke AH Jr. Low-dose synthetic narcotic infusions for cerebral relaxation during craniotomies. Anesth Analg. 1987 May;66(5):413-6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198705000-00007.
PubMed 2953270Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
PubMed 17695343Rail B, Hicks WH, Oduguwa E, Barrie U, Pernik MN, Montgomery E, Tao J, Kenfack YJ, Mofor P, Adeyemo E, Edukugho D, Caruso J, Bagley CA, El Ahmadieh TY, Aoun SG. Transfusion Guidelines in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review and Critical Summary of Currently Available Evidence. World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;165:172-179.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.077. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
PubMed 35752421Gopal J, Srivastava S, Singh N, Haldar R, Verma R, Gupta D, Mishra P. Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV)-Guided Fluid Management in Adult Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Tumor Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Asian J Neurosurg. 2023 Sep 22;18(3):508-515. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771364. eCollection 2023 Sep.
PubMed 38152505Vos JJ, Poterman M, Salm PP, Van Amsterdam K, Struys MM, Scheeren TW, Kalmar AF. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1153-60. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0464-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
PubMed 26335905Sundaram SC, Salins SR, Kumar AN, Korula G. Intra-Operative Fluid Management in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: Randomised Control Trial Comparing Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP). J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):UC01-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18377.7850. Epub 2016 May 1.
PubMed 27437329Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R18. doi: 10.1186/cc8875. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
PubMed 20156348Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):848-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.848.
PubMed 16100177Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P. Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):245-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem361. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
PubMed 18083787Montenij LJ, de Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;24(6):651-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834cd2d9.
PubMed 22036950Teboul JL, Monnet X, Chemla D, Michard F. Arterial Pulse Pressure Variation with Mechanical Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan 1;199(1):22-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0088CI.
PubMed 30138573Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y, Perel A. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001 Apr;92(4):984-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00034.
PubMed 11273937Cannesson M, Le Manach Y, Hofer CK, Goarin JP, Lehot JJ, Vallet B, Tavernier B. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach. Anesthesiology. 2011 Aug;115(2):231-41. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318225b80a.
PubMed 21705869Yang X, Du B. Does pulse pressure variation predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2014 Nov 27;18(6):650. doi: 10.1186/s13054-014-0650-6.
PubMed 25427970Voldby AW, Brandstrup B. Fluid therapy in the perioperative setting-a clinical review. J Intensive Care. 2016 Apr 16;4:27. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0154-3. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27087980
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Pulse Pressure Variation and Central Venous Pressure for Fluid Management Guidance in Intracranial Tumor Surgery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06776666
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PPV-CVP-FLUID / E-60116787-020-512899
- Conditions
- Brain Tumor Adult, Pulse Pressure Variation, Central Venous Pressure, Fluid Management, Brain Surgery
- Keywords
- Central venous pressure, Fluid management, Brain tumors, Pulse pressure variation, Surgery
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Pamukkale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 3 Apr 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 15 Dec 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study investigates the efficacy of pulse pressure variation (PPV) compared to central venous pressure (CVP) in guiding fluid management during intracranial tumor surgeries. Perioperative fluid therapy is critical to prevent complications arising from both hypovolemia (e.g., hypotension, tissue hypoperfusion, ischemia) and hypervolemia (e.g., pulmonary edema, delayed wound healing, infection). Traditional fluid therapy relies on static parameters such as CVP, which have limited sensitivity and specificity. Emerging technologies and dynamic parameters, including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV), offer higher accuracy in evaluating fluid responsiveness.
This randomized study includes 42 patients, aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective intracranial tumor surgery under general anesthesia. Patients are classified as ASA I-III and are randomized into two groups:
- Group N: Fluid therapy guided by PPV.
- Group S: Fluid therapy guided by CVP. The study follows standard perioperative protocols, with PPV (>13%) and CVP (0-6 mmHg) used as primary parameters for fluid administration. Key outcomes include intraoperative fluid requirements (primary) and secondary parameters such as serum lactate levels, incidence of hypotension, brain relaxation scores, and ICU length of stay.
PPV has been shown to be more reliable than CVP in predicting fluid responsiveness, particularly in mechanically ventilated patients with tidal volumes ≥8 mL/kg. However, its efficacy in neurosurgical patients remains underexplored. This study aims to determine if PPV can replace CVP as a superior guide for fluid therapy, enhancing patient outcomes and minimizing complications.
Detailed description
To prevent fluid losses secondary to surgery, fluid therapy should be administered to patients during the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. The goal of perioperative fluid therapy is to maintain adequate circulating volume and pressure, avoid dehydration and the adverse effects of excessive fluid administration, and optimize oxygen delivery to tissues to ensure sufficient perfusion. Inadequate fluid administration can result in hypovolemia, leading to complications such as hypotension, tissue hypoperfusion, ischemia, arrhythmias, and renal damage. Conversely, excessive fluid administration can cause hypervolemia-related issues, including fluid accumulation in tissues (especially in the lungs), impaired tissue perfusion, prolonged mechanical ventilation, anastomotic leaks, delayed wound healing, and infections. Postoperative complications can also increase morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Therefore, achieving normovolemia in patients during the perioperative period is of paramount importance.
In traditional fluid therapy, hourly fluid requirements for maintenance and fasting-related deficits are calculated using the '4-2-1' rule (4 mL/kg/hour for the first 10 kg, 2 mL/kg/hour for the next 10 kg, and 1 mL/kg/hour for each kilogram thereafter). Estimated fluid losses from surgical bleeding and evaporation are added to these calculations for replacement. In traditional fluid therapy, intravascular volume is estimated using parameters such as arterial blood pressure, heart rate (HR), and urine output. However, these parameters are influenced by many factors and do not always accurately reflect intravascular volume. Managing patients using these parameters, especially in high-risk surgeries, can result in complications related to hypovolemia and hypervolemia. The lack of an optimal perioperative fluid therapy approach in high-risk surgeries has led to new explorations, including personalized, goal-directed fluid therapy facilitated by advanced technological devices. Studies have shown that personalized, goal-directed fluid therapy improves postoperative outcomes.
Various static parameters have been used to guide fluid therapy to date, one of which is CVP (central venous pressure), commonly employed in clinical practice. The normal range of CVP in the supine position is 0-6 mmHg. A CVP below this range indicates hypovolemia, while a CVP above it suggests hypervolemia. Recent studies have shown that CVP's sensitivity and specificity in detecting fluid deficits are insufficient.
In recent years, dynamic parameters with high sensitivity and specificity, such as PPV (pulse pressure variation) and SVV (stroke volume variation), have been increasingly utilized to assess fluid deficits. Changes in arterial pressure waveforms during respiration are used to evaluate the response to fluid administration. These changes occur during controlled mechanical ventilation. Positive pressure ventilation increases intrathoracic pressure during inspiration, reducing venous return, right ventricular filling volume, and left ventricular stroke volume. During expiration, the effects are reversed. If arterial vasomotor tone and cardiac function remain constant, these changes in stroke volume during positive pressure ventilation are reflected in pulse pressure and systolic blood pressure. In fluid-nonresponsive patients, variations in these dynamic parameters are less than 10%.
In mechanically ventilated, hemodynamically stable, and intubated patients with a tidal volume ≥8 mL/kg, a stroke volume variation (SVV) >10% and a pulse pressure variation (PPV) >13% indicate a fluid deficit.
PPV has been demonstrated to be more reliable than CVP in predicting fluid responsiveness in various studies. However, there are limited studies evaluating the efficacy of PPV in neurosurgical patient populations. Due to the scarcity of studies in the literature, this study aims to compare the efficacy of fluid management guided by PPV and CVP in patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery. This study aims to evaluate whether PPV can effectively guide fluid therapy and replace CVP in neurosurgical patients undergoing intracranial tumor surgery.
A total of 42 patients aged 18-65 years, undergoing elective intracranial mass surgery under general anesthesia, with an ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) physical status classification score of I-III, will be included in the study. Patients with renal failure, mental retardation, arrhythmia, severe cardiopulmonary disease, hemodynamic instability, body mass index (BMI) >40 kg/m², respiratory system compliance (Crs) <30 mL/cmH₂O, use of lactate-producing medications such as metformin, preoperative elevated lactate levels, tumors causing diabetes insipidus, or those refusing the procedure will be excluded from the study. Patients experiencing massive intraoperative bleeding, failing central venous catheter (CVC) placement, or requiring postoperative ventilator support will also be excluded. All procedures to be performed on the study participants will be explained in detail, and informed consent forms will be signed. The invasive procedures, drug applications, and monitoring methods in this study are within the scope of routine practice.
The 42 patients included in the study will be randomized using a computer-generated sampling method into two groups: Group N (n=21), receiving intraoperative fluid management based on PPV (pulse pressure variation) parameters, and Group S (n=21), receiving intraoperative fluid management based on CVP (central venous pressure) parameters.
All patients in both groups will be encouraged to consume oral carbohydrate fluids (12.5% glucose solution) until two hours before surgery. Upon being brought to the operating table, routine electrocardiogram (ECG), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂), and non-invasive blood pressure monitoring will be performed, and an 18G peripheral intravenous line will be placed. During surgery, all patients will receive a crystalloid infusion at 3 mL/kg/hour.
All patients will be intubated after intravenous induction with propofol (1.5-2 mg/kg), fentanyl (1-2 mcg/kg), and rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). After induction, a 20G cannula will be placed in the radial artery of the upper extremity for monitoring. A 7 French triple-lumen central venous catheter will be placed in the right subclavian vein to manage potential complications. General anesthesia will be maintained with sevoflurane at approximately 1.0 (±20%) minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) with 40% FiO₂ (Fraction of Inspired Oxygen) at 1 L/min fresh gas flow. Both groups will be ventilated in volume-controlled mode with a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg. To calculate Crs in the supine position, a 10% inspiratory pause will be added to the ventilator settings to obtain plateau pressure. The surgery will be performed in the supine position, and the transducer will be positioned at the mid-axillary line in both groups. A urinary catheter will be inserted to monitor urine output. Additional doses of muscle relaxants and fentanyl will be administered as needed. NSAIDs, magnesium, and lidocaine will not be used to avoid affecting intraoperative hypotension or postoperative renal function. Intraoperative systolic arterial pressure will not be allowed to drop by more than 30% from baseline, and the mean arterial pressure will be maintained above 65 mmHg in normotensive patients and 80 mmHg in hypertensive patients. Hypotension will be defined as a drop of more than 20% from baseline mean arterial pressure.
According to institutional practice, 1 g/kg mannitol will be administered before the dura mater is opened. During dura mater opening, the surgical team will assess brain relaxation using a five-point scale (1=optimal conditions, 2=retraction not possible and dilated blood vessels, 3=tissue tension hindering intervention with obliterated sulci and dilated vessels, 4=worsening factors causing brain tissue extrusion, 5=worst conditions for surgery).
Patients with intraoperative hematocrit (Hct) <24% will receive erythrocyte suspension (ES). For patients with Hct >24%, transfusion will only occur with severe active bleeding. If Hct >24% and estimated blood loss is less than 10% of total blood volume, 1.5 times the amount of blood lost will be replaced with crystalloids. If Hct >24% and blood loss is estimated at 10-20% of total blood volume, 500 mL colloid will be administered. Blood loss will be estimated using the amount in the suction canister and the number of surgical sponges and gauzes used during surgery (a '4x4' gauze will be assumed to hold 10 mL, and a fully soaked laparotomy pad will be assumed to hold 150 mL of blood). In cases of severe volume deficit, colloids will be used to manage hypotensive periods until blood transfusion is administered. Diuresis will be targeted at 0.5 mL/kg/hour or higher in both groups.
In Group N, PPV values will be monitored continuously during the intraoperative period. If PPV >13%, patients will receive an additional 250 mL of crystalloid fluid over 10 minutes, followed by reevaluation. If PPV ≤13%, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR <100 bpm, ephedrine will be administered. If more than 30 mg of ephedrine is required, dopamine infusion will be initiated. If PPV ≤13%, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR >100 bpm, norepinephrine infusion will be used.
In Group S, CVP values will be monitored continuously. Patients will be disconnected from the ventilator for CVP measurement. If CVP <6 mmHg, patients will receive an additional 250 mL of crystalloid bolus over 10 minutes, followed by reevaluation. If CVP ≥6 mmHg, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR <100 bpm, ephedrine will be administered. If more than 30 mg of ephedrine is required, dopamine infusion will be initiated. If CVP ≥6 mmHg, SBP <90 mmHg, MAP <65 mmHg, and HR >100 bpm, norepinephrine infusion will be used.
The demographic data of both groups (gender, age, BMI, ASA physical status classification score, comorbidities, baseline oxygen saturation (SpO₂), end-tidal carbon dioxide (EtCO₂), HR, MAP, CVP, PPV, creatinine, and serum lactate levels) and intraoperative data (surgery duration, fluid management protocol, postoperative creatinine and lactate levels, intraoperative hypotensive episodes, vasopressor requirements, volumes of crystalloids/colloids administered, number of bolus fluids given, volume of blood transfused, brain relaxation score, total intraoperative urine output) will be recorded.
Intraoperative SpO₂, EtCO₂, MAP, HR values, and hourly urine output of all patients will be recorded.
Fifteen minutes before the end of surgery, all patients will receive 100 mg tramadol and 1000 mg paracetamol in 150 mL normal saline as an IV infusion. At the end of surgery, 2-4 mg/kg sugammadex will be administered to reverse neuromuscular blockade. After extubation, patients will be transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU).
Postoperative creatinine and lactate levels will be measured and recorded at the 12th hour. The ICU length of stay will also be documented.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Target follow-up
- 2 Days
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PPV | – | –Patients with intraoperative fluid management according to PPV parameters |
| CVP | – | –patients with intraoperative fluid management according to CVP parameters |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- * ages of 18-65 * ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification score I-III * who will undergo elective intracranial mass surgery under general anesthesia
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ages of 18-65
- ASA (American Society of Anesthesiology) physical status classification score I-III
- who will undergo elective intracranial mass surgery under general anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Patients with renal failure
- mental retardation
- arrhythmia
- severe cardiopulmonary disease
- hemodynamic instability
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Fluid requirement (number of times needing bolus infusion-during surgery)
Time frame: At 10-minutes intervals throughout the surgery
Fluid requirement (number of times needing bolus infusion) One bolus infusion 250 mL amount Bolus fluid requirement will be assessed every 15 minutes throughout the operation. Assesment will make two method: CVP and PPV. Will be to compare the intraoperative fluid requirement between the two groups. 1. CVP (Central Venous Pressure) group: In cases where CVP<6 mmHg during the intraoperative period, patients will be given an additional 250 ml bolus crystalloid infusion over a 10 minute period and LVB will be re-evaluated. 2. PPV (Pulse Pressure Variation) group: In cases where the pulse pressure variations value is >13%, patients will be given an additional 250 ml of crystalloid fluid over a 10 minute period and pulse pressure variations will be reassessed.
1 secondary outcome
Duration of postoperative stay in the intensive care unit
Time frame: in 2 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 2953270Bristow A, Shalev D, Rice B, Lipton JM, Giesecke AH Jr. Low-dose synthetic narcotic infusions for cerebral relaxation during craniotomies. Anesth Analg. 1987 May;66(5):413-6. doi: 10.1213/00000539-198705000-00007.
- Results publication: PubMed 17695343Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007 May;39(2):175-91. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146.
- Results publication: PubMed 35752421Rail B, Hicks WH, Oduguwa E, Barrie U, Pernik MN, Montgomery E, Tao J, Kenfack YJ, Mofor P, Adeyemo E, Edukugho D, Caruso J, Bagley CA, El Ahmadieh TY, Aoun SG. Transfusion Guidelines in Brain Tumor Surgery: A Systematic Review and Critical Summary of Currently Available Evidence. World Neurosurg. 2022 Sep;165:172-179.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.06.077. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 38152505Gopal J, Srivastava S, Singh N, Haldar R, Verma R, Gupta D, Mishra P. Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV)-Guided Fluid Management in Adult Patients Undergoing Supratentorial Tumor Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Asian J Neurosurg. 2023 Sep 22;18(3):508-515. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1771364. eCollection 2023 Sep.
- Results publication: PubMed 26335905Vos JJ, Poterman M, Salm PP, Van Amsterdam K, Struys MM, Scheeren TW, Kalmar AF. Noninvasive pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation to predict fluid responsiveness at multiple thresholds: a prospective observational study. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;62(11):1153-60. doi: 10.1007/s12630-015-0464-2. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
- Results publication: PubMed 27437329Sundaram SC, Salins SR, Kumar AN, Korula G. Intra-Operative Fluid Management in Adult Neurosurgical Patients Undergoing Intracranial Tumour Surgery: Randomised Control Trial Comparing Pulse Pressure Variance (PPV) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP). J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):UC01-5. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/18377.7850. Epub 2016 May 1.
- Results publication: PubMed 20156348Mayer J, Boldt J, Mengistu AM, Rohm KD, Suttner S. Goal-directed intraoperative therapy based on autocalibrated arterial pressure waveform analysis reduces hospital stay in high-risk surgical patients: a randomized, controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(1):R18. doi: 10.1186/cc8875. Epub 2010 Feb 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 16100177Hofer CK, Muller SM, Furrer L, Klaghofer R, Genoni M, Zollinger A. Stroke volume and pulse pressure variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest. 2005 Aug;128(2):848-54. doi: 10.1378/chest.128.2.848.
- Results publication: PubMed 18083787Deflandre E, Bonhomme V, Hans P. Delta down compared with delta pulse pressure as an indicator of volaemia during intracranial surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):245-50. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem361. Epub 2007 Dec 14.
- Results publication: PubMed 22036950Montenij LJ, de Waal EE, Buhre WF. Arterial waveform analysis in anesthesia and critical care. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011 Dec;24(6):651-6. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834cd2d9.
- Results publication: PubMed 30138573Teboul JL, Monnet X, Chemla D, Michard F. Arterial Pulse Pressure Variation with Mechanical Ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan 1;199(1):22-31. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0088CI.
- Results publication: PubMed 11273937Berkenstadt H, Margalit N, Hadani M, Friedman Z, Segal E, Villa Y, Perel A. Stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing brain surgery. Anesth Analg. 2001 Apr;92(4):984-9. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200104000-00034.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. I need to consider several factors when deciding whether or not to share Individual Participant Data (IPD). Privacy concerns are a primary issue, as ensuring the confidentiality of participants is critical. Additionally, the ethical constraints tied to the original consent process may limit sharing if explicit permissions were not obtained.
Related trials for Brain Tumor Adult
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
High-Intensity Interval Exercise in Young Adult Survivors of Pediatric Brain Tumors: A Pilot Feasibility Study
Pediatric Brain Tumor
Recruiting
Virtual Home-based Exercise Intervention (RISE) to Improve Cancer-Related Cognitive Impairment and Gut Microbiome in Adolescent and Young Adult Brain Tumor Survivors
Cancer-related Cognitive Dysfunction, Primary Brain Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Safety and Dose Finding Study of GLIX1 in Adults With Recurrent or Progressive High-grade Glioma
Glioblastoma Multiforme of Brain, Glioma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
ADAGiO: Adoptive Cellular Therapy for the TreAtment of Recurrent OliGodendrogliOma (OG) Adult Patients
Recurrent Oligodendroglioma, Progressive Oligodendroglioma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Brain Tumor Adult and Pulse Pressure Variation, run by Pamukkale University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Fluid requirement (number of times needing bolus infusion-during surgery) (time frame: At 10-minutes intervals throughout the surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06776666, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.