Emergency Stroke Unit for Acute Cerebrovascular Events: A Prospective, Single-arm Trial With a Historical Control Group

Background:

Reperfusion therapies, i.e., intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or endovascular thrombectomy (EVT), are most effective treatments in the management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. The benefits of reperfusion therapies, however, may be reduced by treatment delays due to tests and examinations and logistic issues. Emergency Stroke Unit (ESU), a new concept of stroke unit locating at the Accident and Emergency Department (AED), equipped with a mobile, low-field MR imaging (lfMRI) scanner for fast diagnosis of ischemic stroke, differentiation of intracranial hemorrhage and identification of large vessel occlusion (LVO), is being tested in Mainland China. It may shorten the door-to-needle time (DNT) for IVT and door-to-groin puncture time (DPT) for EVT, which may hance associate with improved functional outcomes of AIS patients.

Objectives:

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the ESU workflow using lfMRI in shortening the DNT/DPT and improving functional outcomes in AIS patients, who are eligible for IVT and/or EVT and can be treated within 6 hours after onset, compared with standard practice in Hong Kong; to reveal the changes in the ischemic lesions over a few days after IVT/EVT in these patients, with serial follow-up lfMRI exams.

Methods:

This is a prospective, single-center, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm trial with a historical control group (1:2). In the trial group, the investigators will recruit 60 adult AIS patients presenting during working hours, who are eligible for IVT and/or EVT therapies and can be treated within 6 hours of symptom onset; all workflow will be the same with standard care according to contemporary guidelines, except that patient triage procedures related to diagnosis of ischemic stroke, differentiation of intracranial hemorrhage and identification of LVO will be conducted at ESU using lfMRI. A historical control group of 120 patients managed by standard workflow (using CT brain for imaging assessment), in the 3 years before start of this study, will be drawn from our prospective IVT/EVT registry.

The investigators shall collect clinical data at baseline, 24 hours, 72 hours, 5 days, 7 days, discharge (or 14 days if earlier), and 90 days. Patients will also receive follow-up lfMRI exams at 24 hours, 72 hours, 5 days, 7 days, 14 days (or discharge). The primary outcome is DNT (min) for IVT. Main secondary outcomes include DPT (min) for EVT, proportions of patients receiving IVT and/or EVT therapies, door-to-recanalization time for EVT, mRS and NIHSS at discharge (or 14 days), mRS at 90 days, and costeffectiveness analysis. Main safety outcomes include symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours, before discharge (or 14 days) and within 90 days, and mortality, adverse events, severe adverse events within 90 days. Imaging outcomes include changes of infarct volume over time, and changes/emergence of hemorrhagic transformation.

Significance:

Findings from this project and subsequent efforts could help reshape and improve the efficiency of IVT/EVT patient triage at AED, which will ultimately benefit stroke patients and the stroke care system in Hong Kong and elsewhere.