CraniotomyNCT06727435
an Analgesia-first Strategy Without Hypnotic Sedatives in Adult Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Neurosurgical Craniotomy
A study testing analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in people with Craniotomy and Neurosurgical Patients, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Analgesia and sedation are core components of intensive care unit (ICU) care. They are used to relieve pain and anxiety, prevent harmful physiological stress responses, improve tolerance of invasive devices and mechanical ventilation, and reduce noxious stimulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Craniotomy, Neurosurgical Patients
- What is being tested?
- analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 65 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2026to 31 Aug 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 18-85 years;
- Admission to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy;
- Anticipated ICU stay greater than 24 hours according to the treating team at ICU admission or screening;
- The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score ≥ +1, indicating restlessness or agitation requiring clinical management;
- RASS, the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), and neurological status can be assessed reliably enough for protocol monitoring.
Who cannot join
- Need for deep sedation or therapeutic coma, including (partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2): PaO2/FiO2≤100 mmHg, neuromuscular blockade requiring unconsciousness, status epilepticus, mandatory immobility for surgical or procedural safety, severe traumatic brain injury and intracranial hypertension, therapeutic hypothermia and any clinical condition requiring RASS < -2) [15, 16];
- Medullary lesion, brainstem condition, or other disorder associated with impaired respiratory drive in which opioid analgesia is judged unsafe by the treating physician [17];
- Inability to assess the RASS score or neurological status because of coma, severe aphasia, status epilepticus, severe cognitive dysfunction, schizophrenia, mania, or aother psychiatric or neurological condition that precludes reliable assessment.;
- Use of sedatives or opioid analgesics ≥ 1 week before enrollment;
- Expected ICU stay time less than or equal to 24 hours;
- Delirium, alcohol withdrawal, active severe psychiatric illness, or ongoing antipsychotic therapy before enrolment;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh grade C);
- Renal failure requiring renal replacement therapy;
- Need for major surgery during the ICU stay, except short bedside or minor procedures, such as lumbar puncture or ventricular drainage, etc.);
- Known allergy or contraindication to remifentanil, morphine, midazolam, propofol, or other protocol medications;
- Pregnancy or lactation;
- Participation in another interventional clinical trial that could interfere with the study intervention or outcomes.;
- Patient or legally authorized representative unwilling to participate;
- Investigator judgment that inclusion is inappropriate because of a specific safety concern that is documented in the screening record.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
China1 site
Beijing Tiantan Hospital, South 4th Ring West Road 119, Fengtai District, Beijing 100070, China.
Beijing
Guangzhi Shi, 86-011-5997-5098, 504251556@qq.com
About this study
Official title: Feasibility and Safety of an Analgesia-first Strategy Without Hypnotic Sedatives in Adult Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Neurosurgical Craniotomy: a Single-arm, Single-centre Exploratory Prospective Study
Analgesia and sedation are core components of intensive care unit (ICU) care. They are used to relieve pain and anxiety, prevent harmful physiological stress responses, improve tolerance of invasive devices and mechanical ventilation, and reduce noxious stimulation. Contemporary ICU practice has moved away from deep continuous sedation toward analgesia-first care, lighter sedation targets, delirium prevention, early mobilization, and patient-centred comfort strategies.
Patients admitted to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy pose a specific challenge. Postoperative agitation after intracranial surgery may lead to unplanned extubation, catheter or drain removal, injury, hypertension, coughing, increased sympathetic activation, and potentially adverse neurological consequences. The incidence of agitation after elective intracranial operations was 29%, which was higher than that previously observed in other surgical populations. Neurosurgical patients may be more vulnerable to stress caused by agitation, due to longer anesthesia duration, delayed extubation and pain and post-craniotomy frontal pneumocephalus. Brain lesions and intracranial manipulations in neurosurgical patients might affect the brain regions which involves cognition and emotion, and are assumed to influence postoperative cognition. At the same time, excessive hypnotic sedation may obscure level of consciousness, pupillary and focal neurological examinations, early seizures, intracranial hypertension, or surgical complications. Previous neurosurgical studies have reported postoperative agitation and delirium after craniotomy were not rare, and risk factors including longer anesthesia duration, delayed extubation, pain, and postoperative pneumocephalus have been reported.
Read more
However, the investigations of analgesia and sedation in neurosurgical populations have been inadequate. Most of the researches about analgesia and sedation in general ICU were excluded the neurosurgical patients. These patients are special for its cruciality of evaluating the consciousness and neurological signs examination. The analgesia and sedation management is difficult and complex. Several general ICU studies support interest in minimizing routine hypnotic sedation. In a single-centre randomized trial, a protocol of no sedation with morphine boluses increased ventilator-free days and shortened ICU and hospital stay compared with sedation and daily interruption, although agitated delirium was more frequent. In the larger multicentre NONSEDA trial, mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between nonsedation and light sedation with daily interruption, and many patients in the nonsedation group still required sedatives during ICU stay, most commonly because of delirium. Related NONSEDA substudies have also emphasized that the effects of nonsedation on physical function and cognition require dedicated evaluation.
These findings cannot be directly transferred to post-craniotomy neurocritical care. Reviews, consensus statements and observational studies in neurocritical care emphasize with brain-injured patients have unique sedation indications, including control of intracranial pressure, seizures, cerebral oxygen consumption, ventilator synchrony, and severe agitation. Observational data from brain-injury ICUs show wide variation in sedative and analgesic practice and support structured use of sedation and pain scales. Expert consensus also supports administering analgesics before sedatives when clinically appropriate, but acknowledges the limited high-quality evidence in this population. Therefore, an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives should be evaluated cautiously with explicit neurological safety monitoring and rescue criteria.
Remifentanil is a short-acting opioid with rapid onset and offset because it is metabolized by non-specific blood and tissue esterases. These pharmacological features make it suitable for titrated analgesia when repeated neurological assessment is needed. We therefore designed this single-arm exploratory study to estimate the feasibility and safety of a remifentanil-based analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives in selected adult patients admitted to ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy.
Read the detailed description
This is a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, exploratory prospective clinical study conducted in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijng Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China, a major neurosurgical centre. The ICU mainly receives patients after neurosurgical procedures. The study is reported according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) reporting guidelines.
All patients admitted to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy will be screened. Written informed consent will be obtained preoperatively whenever feasible for patients undergoing planned craniotomy. For patients who lack decision-making capacity postoperatively, consent may be obtained from a legally authorized representative according to IRB-approved procedures and local regulations. Capacity will be assessed by the treating clinician and research team before consent. Patients who regain capacity after representative consent will be informed about the study and asked to confirm continued participation. Deferred consent will not be used unless specifically permitted by the IRB. Patients or legally authorized representatives may withdraw from the study at any time without affecting clinical care.
The study intervention is an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives. The strategy does not imply absence of all sedative effect; remifentanil may influence arousal, and the RASS target includes light sedation. Routine hypnotic sedatives are avoided unless rescue sedation is clinically required.
RASS and CPOT will be assessed routinely, with target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . The intervention sequence is summarized in Table 2. Reversible causes of discomfort will first be evaluated and treated, including hypoxia, airway obstruction, ventilator dyssynchrony, pain, urinary retention, nausea, tube irritation, environmental stressors, and neurological deterioration. Non-pharmacological measures such as reassurance, communication, family support when appropriate, sleep protection, and mobilization when safe will be used before pharmacological escalation.
If RASS remains ≥ +1 and pharmacological treatment is required, remifentanil will be initiated at 0.10-0.15 µg/kg/min. The dose will be titrated every 10-15 minutes by 0.025 µg/kg/min to a maximum of 0.20 µg/kg/min to target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . Continuous SpO2, respiratory rate, heart rate, and non-invasive or invasive blood pressure monitoring will be required during continuous remifentanil infusion. For non-ventilated patients, continuous pulse oximetry and respiratory rate monitoring are mandatory; capnography will be used when available or when clinically indicated. For mechanically ventilated patients, ventilator synchrony and apnea alarms will also be monitored.
Intravenous morphine bolus doses of 2.5 mg or 5 mg may be administered for breakthrough pain when CPOT remains greater than 1 or when the treating clinician judges that pain is contributing to agitation despite remifentanil titration. Repeated morphine rescue is defined as three or more boluses within 6 hours or four or more boluses within 24 hours. Repeated morphine rescue with persistent CPOT >1, persistent RASS outside target, or need for hypnotic rescue sedation will be classified as protocol failure for the primary endpoint. Persistent CPOT >1 despite maximum remifentanil and morphine rescue will also be classified as protocol failure, even if hypnotic sedation is not used.
Rescue hypnotic sedation with midazolam or propofol is permitted for safety and clinical necessity. Criteria include persistent RASS +3 to +4 despite maximum protocolized analgesia, risk of self-injury or device removal, severe ventilator dyssynchrony, inability to maintain oxygenation or airway safety, seizure, suspected intracranial hypertension, acute neurological deterioration, requirement for urgent imaging or procedure, prone positioning, or treating clinician judgment that deeper sedation is required. Use of rescue hypnotic sedation will be recorded and will count as non-success for the primary endpoint.
Data will be collected prospectively by trained research staff using standardized case report forms. Baseline data include age, sex, body mass index, smoking and alcohol history, primary diagnosis, comorbidities, preoperative neurological status, surgery type, surgical site and approach, operation duration, indwelling tubes or drains, postoperative CT findings including pneumocephalus, ventilation status, and baseline RASS, CPOT, GCS, vital signs, and blood gas analysis (BGA) as clinically indicated.
After starting remifentanil, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), the saturation of pulse oxygen (SpO2), RASS, CPOT, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), BIS score if available, respiratory status, ventilator synchrony if applicable, BGA as clinically indicated, remifentanil dose, morphine bolus use, rescue sedative use, dose adjustments, and adverse events will be recorded at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and then every 8 hours during protocol treatment. Once stable target RASS is achieved, routine data will be recorded at least every 24 hours until ICU discharge, discontinuation of analgesia/sedation, protocol failure, withdrawal, death, or need for deep analgesia and sedation. CAM-ICU will be assessed twice daily. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first.
Adverse events potentially associated with remifentanil or the study protocol include delirium, severe hypotension, severe bradycardia, respiratory depression, constipation, shivering, vomiting, opioid-induced muscle rigidity, accidental extubation, accidental catheter or drain removal, aspiration, and neurological deterioration. Adverse events will be graded by severity, seriousness, expectedness, and relatedness to the intervention. Clavien-Dindo classification will not be used as the primary adverse-event grading system for drug-related or ICU sedation-related events, although surgical complications may be described separately when relevant.
The principal investigator and clinical team will review safety events regularly. Serious adverse events, protocol interruptions for safety, and unexpected drug-related adverse reactions will be reported to the IRB within 24 hours. Because this is a small single-arm exploratory study using approved ICU medications, an independent data monitoring committee is not planned; However, protocol-level safety review will be triggered by any of the following: two or more severe respiratory depression events judged possibly related to remifentanil; two or more severe opioid-related hypotension or bradycardia events requiring vasopressor escalation or atropine; any unexpected serious adverse drug reaction; two or more urgent rescue sedation events for uncontrolled agitation within a rolling 10-patient period; or any neurological deterioration judged possibly related to the protocol. Triggered review may lead to protocol suspension, dose-range modification, additional monitoring requirements, or IRB consultation.
- Conditions
- Craniotomy, Neurosurgical Patients
- Being tested
- analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives
- Keywords
- neurosurgical patients, analgesia-first, remifentanil, analgesia and sedation, neurosurgical craniotomy
- Medical subject headings
- Agnosia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedativesDrug
The study intervention is an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives. The strategy does not imply absence of all sedative effect; remifentanil may influence arousal, and the RASS target includes light sedation. Routine hypnotic sedatives are avoided unless rescue sedation is clinically required.
RASS and CPOT will be assessed routinely, with target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . Reversible causes of discomfort will first be evaluated and treated, including hypoxia, airway obstruction, ventilator dyssynchrony, pain, urinary retention, nausea, tube irritation, environmental stressors, and neurological deterioration. Non-pharmacological measures such as reassurance, communication, family support when appropriate, sleep protection, and mobilization when safe will be used before pharmacological escalation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives | Experimental | The strategy does not imply absence of all sedative effect; remifentanil may influence arousal, and the RASS target includes light sedation. Routine hypnotic sedatives are avoided unless rescue sedation is clinically required.
RASS and CPOT will be assessed routinely, with target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . Reversible causes of discomfort will first be evaluated and treated, including hypoxia, airway obstruction, ventilator dyssynchrony, pain, urinary retention, nausea, tube irritation, environmental stressors, and neurological deterioration. Non-pharmacological measures such as reassurance, communication, family support when appropriate, sleep protection, and mobilization when safe will be used before pharmacological escalation.
If RASS remains ≥ +1 and pharmacological treatment is required, remifentanil will be initiated at 0.10-0.15 µg/kg/min. The dose will be titrated every 10-15 minutes by 0.025 µg/k Receives: Drug: analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The rate of successful protocol management during the first 24 hours after initiation of the analgesia-first strategy
Successful protocol management requires no rescue hypnotic sedative use, no protocol discontinuation for safety, and adequate RASS control according to the following operational rule: at least 80% of scheduled RASS assessments during the first 24 hours must be within the target range of -2 to +1, with no sustained RASS > +1 lasting more than 30 minutes despite protocolized treatment and no RASS +3 or +4 at any scheduled or clinically indicated assessment.
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
The incidence rate of adverse events
Adverse events include accidental extubation, accidental catheter or drain removal, significant agitation, delirium, severe hypotension, severe bradycardia, respiratory depression, vomiting or aspiration risk, opioid-induced rigidity, seizure, neurological deterioration, suspected or confirmed intracranial hypertension, emergent neurosurgical intervention, and urgent unplanned CT or MRI for suspected neurological worsening.
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Secondary outcomes (6)
Dosage of remifentanil
total remifentanil dose (mg)
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
ICU length of stay
ICU length of stay (days)
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
ICU cost
ICU cost (yuan)
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Dosage of sedative drugs
rescue sedative dose (mg)
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
bispectral index (BIS) values
bispectral index (BIS) values (numbers)
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
hospital length of stay
hospital length of stay (days)
Measured: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Dec 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for CraniotomyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Beijing Tiantan HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- a single-arm, single-centre exploratory prospective study
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Guangzhi Shi, Beijing Tiantan Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06727435
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- analgesia-first strategy
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 5 Dec 2024
- Last updated
- 28 May 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: The datasets used in this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Publications
Wang YM, Tian Y, Wang SY, Chen GQ, Shi GZ. Feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit after neurosurgical craniotomy: a protocol for a single-arm, single-center exploratory prospective study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026 Jun 10;13:1848074. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1848074. eCollection 2026.
PubMed 42359072
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility and Safety of an Analgesia-first Strategy Without Hypnotic Sedatives in Adult Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit After Neurosurgical Craniotomy: a Single-arm, Single-centre Exploratory Prospective Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06727435
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- analgesia-first strategy
- Conditions
- Craniotomy, Neurosurgical Patients
- Keywords
- neurosurgical patients, analgesia-first, remifentanil, analgesia and sedation, neurosurgical craniotomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 65 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Beijing Tiantan HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Dec 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Analgesia and sedation are core components of intensive care unit (ICU) care. They are used to relieve pain and anxiety, prevent harmful physiological stress responses, improve tolerance of invasive devices and mechanical ventilation, and reduce noxious stimulation. Contemporary ICU practice has moved away from deep continuous sedation toward analgesia-first care, lighter sedation targets, delirium prevention, early mobilization, and patient-centred comfort strategies.
Patients admitted to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy pose a specific challenge. Postoperative agitation after intracranial surgery may lead to unplanned extubation, catheter or drain removal, injury, hypertension, coughing, increased sympathetic activation, and potentially adverse neurological consequences. The incidence of agitation after elective intracranial operations was 29%, which was higher than that previously observed in other surgical populations. Neurosurgical patients may be more vulnerable to stress caused by agitation, due to longer anesthesia duration, delayed extubation and pain and post-craniotomy frontal pneumocephalus. Brain lesions and intracranial manipulations in neurosurgical patients might affect the brain regions which involves cognition and emotion, and are assumed to influence postoperative cognition. At the same time, excessive hypnotic sedation may obscure level of consciousness, pupillary and focal neurological examinations, early seizures, intracranial hypertension, or surgical complications. Previous neurosurgical studies have reported postoperative agitation and delirium after craniotomy were not rare, and risk factors including longer anesthesia duration, delayed extubation, pain, and postoperative pneumocephalus have been reported.
However, the investigations of analgesia and sedation in neurosurgical populations have been inadequate. Most of the researches about analgesia and sedation in general ICU were excluded the neurosurgical patients. These patients are special for its cruciality of evaluating the consciousness and neurological signs examination. The analgesia and sedation management is difficult and complex. Several general ICU studies support interest in minimizing routine hypnotic sedation. In a single-centre randomized trial, a protocol of no sedation with morphine boluses increased ventilator-free days and shortened ICU and hospital stay compared with sedation and daily interruption, although agitated delirium was more frequent. In the larger multicentre NONSEDA trial, mortality at 90 days did not differ significantly between nonsedation and light sedation with daily interruption, and many patients in the nonsedation group still required sedatives during ICU stay, most commonly because of delirium. Related NONSEDA substudies have also emphasized that the effects of nonsedation on physical function and cognition require dedicated evaluation.
These findings cannot be directly transferred to post-craniotomy neurocritical care. Reviews, consensus statements and observational studies in neurocritical care emphasize with brain-injured patients have unique sedation indications, including control of intracranial pressure, seizures, cerebral oxygen consumption, ventilator synchrony, and severe agitation. Observational data from brain-injury ICUs show wide variation in sedative and analgesic practice and support structured use of sedation and pain scales. Expert consensus also supports administering analgesics before sedatives when clinically appropriate, but acknowledges the limited high-quality evidence in this population. Therefore, an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives should be evaluated cautiously with explicit neurological safety monitoring and rescue criteria.
Remifentanil is a short-acting opioid with rapid onset and offset because it is metabolized by non-specific blood and tissue esterases. These pharmacological features make it suitable for titrated analgesia when repeated neurological assessment is needed. We therefore designed this single-arm exploratory study to estimate the feasibility and safety of a remifentanil-based analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives in selected adult patients admitted to ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy.
Detailed description
This is a single-centre, single-arm, open-label, exploratory prospective clinical study conducted in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Beijng Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, China, a major neurosurgical centre. The ICU mainly receives patients after neurosurgical procedures. The study is reported according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) reporting guidelines.
All patients admitted to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy will be screened. Written informed consent will be obtained preoperatively whenever feasible for patients undergoing planned craniotomy. For patients who lack decision-making capacity postoperatively, consent may be obtained from a legally authorized representative according to IRB-approved procedures and local regulations. Capacity will be assessed by the treating clinician and research team before consent. Patients who regain capacity after representative consent will be informed about the study and asked to confirm continued participation. Deferred consent will not be used unless specifically permitted by the IRB. Patients or legally authorized representatives may withdraw from the study at any time without affecting clinical care.
The study intervention is an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives. The strategy does not imply absence of all sedative effect; remifentanil may influence arousal, and the RASS target includes light sedation. Routine hypnotic sedatives are avoided unless rescue sedation is clinically required.
RASS and CPOT will be assessed routinely, with target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . The intervention sequence is summarized in Table 2. Reversible causes of discomfort will first be evaluated and treated, including hypoxia, airway obstruction, ventilator dyssynchrony, pain, urinary retention, nausea, tube irritation, environmental stressors, and neurological deterioration. Non-pharmacological measures such as reassurance, communication, family support when appropriate, sleep protection, and mobilization when safe will be used before pharmacological escalation.
If RASS remains ≥ +1 and pharmacological treatment is required, remifentanil will be initiated at 0.10-0.15 µg/kg/min. The dose will be titrated every 10-15 minutes by 0.025 µg/kg/min to a maximum of 0.20 µg/kg/min to target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . Continuous SpO2, respiratory rate, heart rate, and non-invasive or invasive blood pressure monitoring will be required during continuous remifentanil infusion. For non-ventilated patients, continuous pulse oximetry and respiratory rate monitoring are mandatory; capnography will be used when available or when clinically indicated. For mechanically ventilated patients, ventilator synchrony and apnea alarms will also be monitored.
Intravenous morphine bolus doses of 2.5 mg or 5 mg may be administered for breakthrough pain when CPOT remains greater than 1 or when the treating clinician judges that pain is contributing to agitation despite remifentanil titration. Repeated morphine rescue is defined as three or more boluses within 6 hours or four or more boluses within 24 hours. Repeated morphine rescue with persistent CPOT >1, persistent RASS outside target, or need for hypnotic rescue sedation will be classified as protocol failure for the primary endpoint. Persistent CPOT >1 despite maximum remifentanil and morphine rescue will also be classified as protocol failure, even if hypnotic sedation is not used.
Rescue hypnotic sedation with midazolam or propofol is permitted for safety and clinical necessity. Criteria include persistent RASS +3 to +4 despite maximum protocolized analgesia, risk of self-injury or device removal, severe ventilator dyssynchrony, inability to maintain oxygenation or airway safety, seizure, suspected intracranial hypertension, acute neurological deterioration, requirement for urgent imaging or procedure, prone positioning, or treating clinician judgment that deeper sedation is required. Use of rescue hypnotic sedation will be recorded and will count as non-success for the primary endpoint.
Data will be collected prospectively by trained research staff using standardized case report forms. Baseline data include age, sex, body mass index, smoking and alcohol history, primary diagnosis, comorbidities, preoperative neurological status, surgery type, surgical site and approach, operation duration, indwelling tubes or drains, postoperative CT findings including pneumocephalus, ventilation status, and baseline RASS, CPOT, GCS, vital signs, and blood gas analysis (BGA) as clinically indicated.
After starting remifentanil, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), arterial systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), the saturation of pulse oxygen (SpO2), RASS, CPOT, the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), BIS score if available, respiratory status, ventilator synchrony if applicable, BGA as clinically indicated, remifentanil dose, morphine bolus use, rescue sedative use, dose adjustments, and adverse events will be recorded at 15 minutes, 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, and then every 8 hours during protocol treatment. Once stable target RASS is achieved, routine data will be recorded at least every 24 hours until ICU discharge, discontinuation of analgesia/sedation, protocol failure, withdrawal, death, or need for deep analgesia and sedation. CAM-ICU will be assessed twice daily. Patients will be followed until hospital discharge or death, whichever occurs first.
Adverse events potentially associated with remifentanil or the study protocol include delirium, severe hypotension, severe bradycardia, respiratory depression, constipation, shivering, vomiting, opioid-induced muscle rigidity, accidental extubation, accidental catheter or drain removal, aspiration, and neurological deterioration. Adverse events will be graded by severity, seriousness, expectedness, and relatedness to the intervention. Clavien-Dindo classification will not be used as the primary adverse-event grading system for drug-related or ICU sedation-related events, although surgical complications may be described separately when relevant.
The principal investigator and clinical team will review safety events regularly. Serious adverse events, protocol interruptions for safety, and unexpected drug-related adverse reactions will be reported to the IRB within 24 hours. Because this is a small single-arm exploratory study using approved ICU medications, an independent data monitoring committee is not planned; However, protocol-level safety review will be triggered by any of the following: two or more severe respiratory depression events judged possibly related to remifentanil; two or more severe opioid-related hypotension or bradycardia events requiring vasopressor escalation or atropine; any unexpected serious adverse drug reaction; two or more urgent rescue sedation events for uncontrolled agitation within a rolling 10-patient period; or any neurological deterioration judged possibly related to the protocol. Triggered review may lead to protocol suspension, dose-range modification, additional monitoring requirements, or IRB consultation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- a single-arm, single-centre exploratory prospective study
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives | Experimental | Drug: analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedativesThe strategy does not imply absence of all sedative effect; remifentanil may influence arousal, and the RASS target includes light sedation. Routine hypnotic sedatives are avoided unless rescue sedation is clinically required. RASS and CPOT will be assessed routinely, with target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . Reversible causes of discomfort will first be evaluated and treated, including hypoxia, airway obstruction, ventilator dyssynchrony, pain, urinary retention, nausea, tube irritation, environmental stressors, and neurological deterioration. Non-pharmacological measures such as reassurance, communication, family support when appropriate, sleep protection, and mobilization when safe will be used before pharmacological escalation. If RASS remains ≥ +1 and pharmacological treatment is required, remifentanil will be initiated at 0.10-0.15 µg/kg/min. The dose will be titrated every 10-15 minutes by 0.025 µg/k |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age 18-85 years;
- Admission to the ICU after neurosurgical craniotomy;
- Anticipated ICU stay greater than 24 hours according to the treating team at ICU admission or screening;
- The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) score ≥ +1, indicating restlessness or agitation requiring clinical management;
- RASS, the Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT), and neurological status can be assessed reliably enough for protocol monitoring.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Need for deep sedation or therapeutic coma, including (partial pressure of oxygen(PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2): PaO2/FiO2≤100 mmHg, neuromuscular blockade requiring unconsciousness, status epilepticus, mandatory immobility for surgical or procedural safety, severe traumatic brain injury and intracranial hypertension, therapeutic hypothermia and any clinical condition requiring RASS < -2) [15, 16];
- Medullary lesion, brainstem condition, or other disorder associated with impaired respiratory drive in which opioid analgesia is judged unsafe by the treating physician [17];
- Inability to assess the RASS score or neurological status because of coma, severe aphasia, status epilepticus, severe cognitive dysfunction, schizophrenia, mania, or aother psychiatric or neurological condition that precludes reliable assessment.;
- Use of sedatives or opioid analgesics ≥ 1 week before enrollment;
- Expected ICU stay time less than or equal to 24 hours;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedativesThe study intervention is an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives. The strategy does not imply absence of all sedative effect; remifentanil may influence arousal, and the RASS target includes light sedation. Routine hypnotic sedatives are avoided unless rescue sedation is clinically required. RASS and CPOT will be assessed routinely, with target RASS -2 to +1 and CPOT 0-1 . Reversible causes of discomfort will first be evaluated and treated, including hypoxia, airway obstruction, ventilator dyssynchrony, pain, urinary retention, nausea, tube irritation, environmental stressors, and neurological deterioration. Non-pharmacological measures such as reassurance, communication, family support when appropriate, sleep protection, and mobilization when safe will be used before pharmacological escalation. | Drug | an analgesia-first strategy without routine hypnotic sedatives |
Primary outcome
The rate of successful protocol management during the first 24 hours after initiation of the analgesia-first strategy
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Successful protocol management requires no rescue hypnotic sedative use, no protocol discontinuation for safety, and adequate RASS control according to the following operational rule: at least 80% of scheduled RASS assessments during the first 24 hours must be within the target range of -2 to +1, with no sustained RASS > +1 lasting more than 30 minutes despite protocolized treatment and no RASS +3 or +4 at any scheduled or clinically indicated assessment.
The incidence rate of adverse events
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Adverse events include accidental extubation, accidental catheter or drain removal, significant agitation, delirium, severe hypotension, severe bradycardia, respiratory depression, vomiting or aspiration risk, opioid-induced rigidity, seizure, neurological deterioration, suspected or confirmed intracranial hypertension, emergent neurosurgical intervention, and urgent unplanned CT or MRI for suspected neurological worsening.
6 secondary outcomes
Dosage of remifentanil
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
ICU length of stay
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
ICU cost
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Dosage of sedative drugs
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
bispectral index (BIS) values
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
hospital length of stay
Time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42359072Wang YM, Tian Y, Wang SY, Chen GQ, Shi GZ. Feasibility and safety of an analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit after neurosurgical craniotomy: a protocol for a single-arm, single-center exploratory prospective study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2026 Jun 10;13:1848074. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2026.1848074. eCollection 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. The datasets used in this study will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Related trials for Craniotomy
Recruiting
rTMS for Postoperative Brain Tumor Patients
Brain Tumors, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Not yet recruiting
Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block Combined With Either Scalp Nerve Block or Local Wound Infiltration for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Patients Undergoing Craniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Craniotomy Surgery
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Study on Prognosis of Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage, Endovascular Procedures
Recruiting
Perioperative Multimodal Analgesia for Supratentorial Craniotomy
Postoperative Pain, Analgesia
Recruiting
A Study to Measure the Effect of Brain Stimulation on Hand Strength and Function in Patients With Brain Tumors
Brain Tumor, Brain Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing analgesia-first strategy without hypnotic sedatives in people with Craniotomy and Neurosurgical Patients, run by Beijing Tiantan Hospital at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Guangzhi Shi, Professor (86-13601110669, shiguangzhi@bjtth.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The rate of successful protocol management during the first 24 hours after initiation of the analgesia-first strategy (time frame: from enrollment to the discharge of ICU, 28 days or death, whichever came first). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06727435, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2026.