AzTrials
AzTrials

Atrial Fibrillation (AF)NON-FLUORO-LABNCT06719921

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Non-Fluoroscopic Lab

A study testing AF ablation, AF ablation in a non-fluoroscopic EP lab and AF ablation in a fluoroscopic lab in people with Atrial Fibrillation (AF), run by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital at 1 site in China.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation performed in non-fluoroscopic electrophysiology (EP) labs compared to conventional fluoroscopic digital subtraction angiography labs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
What is being tested?
AF ablation, AF ablation in a non-fluoroscopic EP lab and AF ablation in a fluoroscopic lab
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
724 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
22 Apr 2025to 31 May 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age: ≥18 years
  • Patients diagnosed with paroxysmal AF or persistent AF with a duration of 1 years or less, who are referred for catheter ablation.
  • Patients referred for catheter ablation as a first-time intervention (no prior catheter ablation or surgical procedures for AF).
  • The patient is able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with contraindication to anticoagulation
  • Patients with contraindication to right or left sided cardiac catheterization
  • X-ray fluoroscopy is required in the procedure, such as ablation combined with VOM ethanol ablation, epicardial ablation, LAAO, CAG, etc.
  • Serious known concomitant disease with a life expectancy of < 1 year
  • MI, CABG, or PCI within the preceding 3 months
  • Left atrial diameter >55 mm
Show all 14Show fewer
  • LVEF<30%
  • NYHA class III or IV
  • Awaiting cardiac transplantation or other cardiac surgery within 12 months.
  • History of a documented thromboembolic event within the past 6 weeks.
  • Heart or vascular malformation that impedes catheter access or vascular puncture.
  • Current enrollment in an investigational study evaluating another device or drug.
  • Acute illness, active systemic infection, or sepsis.
  • Significant congenital anomaly or a medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this trial.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site
  • Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Efficacy and Safety of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Non-Fluoroscopic Cardiac Electrophysiology Lab: A Non-Inferior, Multi-Center, Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled trial investigates the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation performed in non-fluoroscopic electrophysiology (EP) labs compared to conventional fluoroscopic digital subtraction angiography labs. The trial hypothesizes non-inferiority in outcomes, with the added benefits of simplified lab environment. Up to 724 participants aged 18-80 with paroxysmal or persistent AF will be enrolled across 10 centers. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to undergo catheter ablation in non-fluoroscopic or fluoroscopic labs, using pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) as the primary ablation strategy. The primary endpoints are freedom from AF recurrence at 12 months and composite safety outcomes related to procedure. Secondary endpoints mainly include procedure duration, recurrence during the initial 90 days, incidence of peri-procedural complications and changes in quality-of-life forms.

Read the detailed description

This study evaluates the clinical efficacy and safety of AF catheter ablation procedures in non-fluoroscopic EP labs, compared to fluoroscopy labs. Non-fluoroscopic labs rely on advanced technologies such as three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system, intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), contact force sensing catheter and/or pulsed field ablation(PFA), etc...

Participants are randomized into two groups:

  1. Non-Fluoroscopic Lab Group: Ablation procedures will utilize 3D mapping systems. ICE is mandatory for real-time anatomical visualization, and fluoroscopy is employed only in unforeseen procedural challenges to ensure patient safety.
  2. Fluoroscopy-equipped Lab Group: Procedures are conducted in a fluoroscopic lab using the same tools and mapping system as non-fluoroscopic lab group, with radiation exposure monitored and minimized according to ALARA principles.

The primary efficacy endpoint assesses treatment success at 12 months, defined as freedom from AF, atrial flutter (AFL), or atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence for more than 30 seconds, as detected by ECG or 7-day Holter. Safety endpoints include a composite of major adverse events such as stroke, tamponade, myocardial infarction, or phrenic nerve injury within 3 months post-procedure. Secondary endpoints focus on procedural metrics, recurrence during the blanking period, adverse event profiles, and changes in quality-of-life forms using the AF Effect on Quality of Life (AFQT) and the EuroQol Health-Related Quality-of-Life 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) instruments.

Data collection involves electronic data capture (EDC) systems, with detailed peri-procedural and follow-up evaluations at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Each participant undergoes quality-of-life assessments, physical exams, and arrhythmia recurrence monitoring via ECG and 7-day Holter recordings.

Being tested
AF ablation, AF ablation in a non-fluoroscopic EP lab, AF ablation in a fluoroscopic lab
Keywords
non-fluoroscopic lab, catheter ablation, atrial fibrillation
Medical subject headings
Atrial Fibrillation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • AF ablationProcedure or surgery

    The primary ablation strategy for both groups will be pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

    Other additional ablation, including but not limited to linear ablation, complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation, or superior vena cava (SVC) isolation is not recommended unless necessitated by one of the following:

    • Documented atrial flutter (AFL) or atrial tachycardia (AT) observed during the procedure, or
    • Arrhythmias originating from the specific region requiring intervention.
  • AF ablation in a non-fluoroscopic EP labOther

    This procedure will take place in a non-fluoroscopic lab ( a lab without a fluoroscopy system).

  • AF ablation in a fluoroscopic labOther

    This procedure will take place in a fluoroscopy-equipped lab.

Study groups in NCT06719921
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-Fluoroscopic Lab GroupExperimentalAblation procedures will utilize ICE and 3D mapping systems for non-fluoroscopic guidance. ICE is mandatory for real-time anatomical visualization.
Receives: Procedure: AF ablation; Other: AF ablation in a non-fluoroscopic EP lab
Fluoroscopy-equipped Lab GroupActive comparatorAblation procedures will be conducted in a fluoroscopic lab. The use of ICE, 3D EP mapping systems, and other tools will follow the same recommendations as in the non-fluoroscopic lab group. Radiation exposure will be closely monitored and minimized in accordance with the ALARA (As Low As Reasonably Achievable) principles when necessary.
Receives: Procedure: AF ablation; Other: AF ablation in a fluoroscopic lab

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Freedom from Documented AF Without Antiarrhythmic Drugs at 12 Months Post-Ablation

    The primary endpoint of the study is treatment success from the end of the 90-day blanking period through 12 months after the index procedure. Treatment failure is defined as documented AF, atrial flutter, or atrial tachycardia lasting >30 seconds; continuation or reinitiation of a class I or III AAD after the blanking period; or electrical cardioversion after the blanking period; or repeat catheter ablation for any atrial arrhythmia at any time of follow-up, including during the blanking period. Ablation performed solely for typical right atrial flutter or other supraventricular tachycardia will not constitute treatment failure.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months

  2. Incidence of Composite Procedure-Related Serious Adverse Events at 3 Months Post-Ablation

    The primary safety endpoint is a composite of the following prespecified procedure-related serious adverse events:

    • Major vascular complication or major bleeding within the first 7 days post procedure.
    • Development of a clinically significant pericardial effusion.
    • Transient ischemic attack.
    • Stroke.
    • Myocardial infarction.
    • Sinus node dysfunction or high-grade atrioventricular block within 30 days.
    • Severe pulmonary vein stenosis.
    • Atrial-esophageal fistula, or phrenic nerve injury within 3 months.
    • Death.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 3 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Acute Success of the Procedure

    The acute success of the procedure is defined as the percentage of procedures achieving the intended acute procedural endpoints, including: 1) Complete PVI, as confirmed by mapping or pacing maneuvers. 2) Immediate restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm at the end of the procedure, either spontaneously or through cardioversion.

    Measured: From the start to the completion of the procedure.

  2. Proportion of Intra-Procedural Conversion to Using X-ray

    The percentage of procedures in each group (non-fluoroscopic and conventional DSA lab) that required conversion to X-ray guidance during the ablation procedure. Conversion is defined as the use of fluoroscopy to complete any part of the procedure that could not be accomplished using the assigned guidance modality.

    Measured: From the start to the completion of the procedure.

  3. Proportion of Patients with Recurrence of AF During the First 90 Days Post-Ablation

    he percentage of patients experiencing recurrence of AF or AFL/AT during the blanking period (90 days post-ablation).

    Measured: from the time of ablation to 90 days post-ablation.

  4. Incidence of Peri-Procedural Complications

    The percentage of patients experiencing complications such as cardiac tamponade, stroke, or vascular complications during the peri-procedural period.

    Measured: From the start of the procedure to 7 days post-ablation.

  5. Total Procedure Duration

    The total time elapsed from the moment of skin puncture to the removal of all catheters and completion of the procedure (skin-to-skin time).

    Measured: During the procedure.

  6. Ablation Time

    The total time during the procedure when energy was delivered for ablation.

    Measured: During the procedure.

  7. Change in Quality of Life Using the AF Effect on Quality of Life (AFQT) Instrument

    The change in patients' self-reported quality of life related to atrial fibrillation, as measured by the AF Effect on Quality of Life (AFQT) questionnaire. And the change in patients' overall health-related quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months

  8. Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Using the EuroQol Health-Related Quality-of-Life 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Instrument

    The change in patients' overall health-related quality of life, as measured by the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire.

    Measured: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Dec 2024
  2. Study start22 Apr 2025
  3. Primary completion30 Apr 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
724 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06719921
Sponsor's protocol ID
SRRSH-2025-Research-0052
Acronym
NON-FLUORO-LAB
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
26 Nov 2024
Last updated
20 Aug 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: The IPD collected during this study will not be made publicly available. The decision not to share IPD is based on lack of resources to support secure and compliant data sharing. The study's findings are fully presented in the manuscript, and any additional summary data can be provided upon reasonable request to the corresponding author, subject to ethical considerations and institutional policies.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing AF ablation, AF ablation in a non-fluoroscopic EP lab and AF ablation in a fluoroscopic lab in people with Atrial Fibrillation (AF), run by Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Freedom from Documented AF Without Antiarrhythmic Drugs at 12 Months Post-Ablation (time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 12 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Aug 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in