Primary CareIPSEDINCT06678906
Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior: Screening and Intervention in Ambulatory Primary Care
A study testing Intervention arm in people with Primary Care, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors are among the leading modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases. In France, despite the national Sport Health strategy, awareness campaigns physical inactivity and sedentary behavior worsened between 2005 and 2015. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Primary Care
- What is being tested?
- Intervention arm
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 160 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- May 2025to Jan 2027
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients
- Not benefiting from Long-Term Illness coverage
- Followed in primary outpatient care by one of the participating centers
- Patients identified as "inactive" by the ONAPS-PAQ questionnaire during an appointment with a general practitioner in the partner Multi-Professional Health Centers, whether sedentary or not
- Patient having signed informed consent to participate in the study
- Patients who understand and speak French
- Persons affiliated with a social security scheme or beneficiaries of a similar scheme
- Patients classified as "inactive" (< 600 MET.min/week) after 7-day actimetry analysis
Who cannot join
- Patient receiving follow-up for another reason with physiotherapists participating in the protocol
- Persons referred to in articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the Public Health Code
- Patient participating in another interventional research study with an exclusion period still ongoing at pre-inclusion
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
France1 site
Pr Nicolas PINSAULT
Saint-Martin-d'Hères, 38400
Nicolas PINSAULT, Professor, nicolas.pinsault@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr
Isabelle BOUDRY, PhD, +33 47 67 66 645, iboudry@chu-grenoble.fr
About this study
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors are among the leading modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases. In France, despite the national Sport Health strategy, awareness campaigns physical inactivity and sedentary behavior worsened between 2005 and 2015. Primary healthcare professionals, including general practitioners and physiotherapists already involved in tertiary prevention, can act for primary and secondary prevention.
Read the detailed description
In this study, we hypothesize that an innovative care pathway based on opportunistic screening by general practitioners to assess levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior, and an individualized intervention by a physiotherapist effectively supports behavioral changes towards increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behavior at 6 months in inactive adults without chronic conditions.
This multicenter study, employing an innovative stepped-wedge cluster methodology, will enable healthcare professionals from all included multidisciplinary health centers to enhance their skills in supporting health behavior changes.
For all patients, participation in the study should lead to an increased awareness of the risks associated with physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors.
- Conditions
- Primary Care
- Being tested
- Intervention arm
- Keywords
- Physical inactivity, Sedendary behavior, Innovative personalized support by physiotherapist, Ambulatory primary care, Healthcare pathway
- Medical subject headings
- Sedentary Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Intervention armBehavioural
All patients in the intervention group will benefit from the standard information phase on physical activity and sedentary behavior, as well as personalized support for behavior change in the form of a serious game and remote coaching.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control arm | No intervention | Control group will receive standard information about physical activity and sedentary lifestyle. |
| Intervention arm | Experimental | All patients in the intervention group will benefit from the standard information phase on physical activity and sedentary behavior, as well as personalized support for behavior change in the form of a serious game and remote coaching. Receives: Behavioral: Intervention arm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Evaluate the 6-month effectiveness of an individualized intervention by a physiotherapist, on physical activity and sedentary behavior in adult patients without chronic diseases
- Proportion of patients changing to a higher physical activity category, measured by actimetry, between inclusion and M6, defined as: from inactive to moderately active or very active
- Proportion of patients changing to a lower sedentary behavior category, measured by actimetry, between inclusion and M6, defined as: from high sedentary behavior to moderate sedentary behavior or non-sedentary and from moderate sedentary behavior to non-sedentary
Measured: 6 months
Secondary outcomes (11)
Describe the evolution of patients' physical activity and sedentary behavior levels at 6 months (for behavior change) and 12 months (for behavior maintenance).
ONAPS-PAQ questionnaire score
Measured: 12 months
Quantify the evolution of patients' physical activity and sedentary behavior levels at 6 months (for behavior change) and 12 months (for behavior maintenance).
7-day accelerometry measurement
Measured: 12 months
Explore the relationship between patient characteristics and changes (at 6 months) and maintenance (at 12 months) of physical activityand sedentary behavior levels.
Degree of correlation between the socio-demographic categories (age, sex, socio-economic category, environment and place of residence, type and work hours) and 7-day accelerometry measurement
Measured: 12 months
Describe the quality of motivation initially (Month 0), at 6 months, and at 12 months.
MAPS questionnaire score
Measured: 12 monts
Describe the satisfaction of basic psychological needs at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Basic Psychological Needs Scale score
Measured: 12 monts
Describe the self-efficacy perceived competence scale for engaging in a personalized physical activity program at 6 months and at 12 months.
Score obtained at perceived competence scale for engaging in a personalized physical activity program
Measured: 12 monts
Describe the perceived level of vitality and energy initially (M0), at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Score obtained at perceived vitality and energy scale
Measured: 12 monts
Describe the self-esteem initially (M0), at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Score obtained at the self-esteem scale
Measured: 12 monts
Describe at M6 and M12 the strategies, barriers, and facilitators to patients' behavior change.
Extraction of coaching verbatims coupled with a qualitative survey using semi-structured interviews on a sample of volunteer patients who may or may not have benefited from the intervention at 6 months and 12 months.
Measured: 12 months
Study the relationship between ONAPS-PAQ results and 7-day actimetry in this population category (inactive and/or sedentary).
Degree of correlation between categorizations obtained by energy expenditure from accelerometry and the ONAPS-PAQ questionnaire
Measured: 12 months
Identify perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation in primary care at 12 months among different stakeholders (general practitioners, physiotherapists, patients).
Score obtained on the scale of level of satisfaction and perception of the project's implementation in primary care by the various players: doctors, physiotherapists and patients.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Nov 2024
- Study startMay 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionJan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Primary CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, GrenobleThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Model description
- Cluster randomization will be conducted according to the "stepped wedge" design.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Investigation Center - University Hospital Grenoble, Department of Physiotherapy - Grenoble Alpes University - TIMC LAboratory (UMR-UGA-CNRS-5525)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nicolas PINSAULT, Professor, Principal investigator, Physiotherapy department - Grenoble Alpes University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06678906
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 38RC23.031
- Acronym
- IPSEDI
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Oct 2024
- Last updated
- 10 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Pinsault N, Rey S, Druart L, Guizon AH, Debru R, Roustit M, Pison C. Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviours: screening and intervention in primary care, a prospective, multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled, stepped-wedge study. BMC Public Health. 2025 Nov 14;25(1):3951. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-25410-4.
PubMed 41239336
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Physical Inactivity and Sedentary Behavior: Screening and Intervention in Ambulatory Primary Care
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06678906
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IPSEDI / 38RC23.031
- Conditions
- Primary Care
- Keywords
- Physical inactivity, Sedendary behavior, Innovative personalized support by physiotherapist, Ambulatory primary care, Healthcare pathway
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 160 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, GrenobleUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Clinical Investigation Center - University Hospital Grenoble, Department of Physiotherapy - Grenoble Alpes University - TIMC LAboratory (UMR-UGA-CNRS-5525)
- Study start
- May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors are among the leading modifiable risk factors for chronic diseases. In France, despite the national Sport Health strategy, awareness campaigns physical inactivity and sedentary behavior worsened between 2005 and 2015. Primary healthcare professionals, including general practitioners and physiotherapists already involved in tertiary prevention, can act for primary and secondary prevention.
Detailed description
In this study, we hypothesize that an innovative care pathway based on opportunistic screening by general practitioners to assess levels of physical activity and sedentary behavior, and an individualized intervention by a physiotherapist effectively supports behavioral changes towards increased physical activity and reduced sedentary behavior at 6 months in inactive adults without chronic conditions.
This multicenter study, employing an innovative stepped-wedge cluster methodology, will enable healthcare professionals from all included multidisciplinary health centers to enhance their skills in supporting health behavior changes.
For all patients, participation in the study should lead to an increased awareness of the risks associated with physical inactivity and sedentary behaviors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Sequential
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Cluster randomization will be conducted according to the "stepped wedge" design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control arm | No intervention | –Control group will receive standard information about physical activity and sedentary lifestyle. |
| Intervention arm | Experimental | Behavioral: Intervention armAll patients in the intervention group will benefit from the standard information phase on physical activity and sedentary behavior, as well as personalized support for behavior change in the form of a serious game and remote coaching. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Adult patients
- Not benefiting from Long-Term Illness coverage
- Followed in primary outpatient care by one of the participating centers
- Patients identified as "inactive" by the ONAPS-PAQ questionnaire during an appointment with a general practitioner in the partner Multi-Professional Health Centers, whether sedentary or not
- Patient having signed informed consent to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient receiving follow-up for another reason with physiotherapists participating in the protocol
- Persons referred to in articles L1121-5 to L1121-8 of the Public Health Code
- Patient participating in another interventional research study with an exclusion period still ongoing at pre-inclusion
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention armAll patients in the intervention group will benefit from the standard information phase on physical activity and sedentary behavior, as well as personalized support for behavior change in the form of a serious game and remote coaching. | Behavioural | Intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Evaluate the 6-month effectiveness of an individualized intervention by a physiotherapist, on physical activity and sedentary behavior in adult patients without chronic diseases
Time frame: 6 months
1. Proportion of patients changing to a higher physical activity category, measured by actimetry, between inclusion and M6, defined as: from inactive to moderately active or very active 2. Proportion of patients changing to a lower sedentary behavior category, measured by actimetry, between inclusion and M6, defined as: from high sedentary behavior to moderate sedentary behavior or non-sedentary and from moderate sedentary behavior to non-sedentary
11 secondary outcomes
Describe the evolution of patients' physical activity and sedentary behavior levels at 6 months (for behavior change) and 12 months (for behavior maintenance).
Time frame: 12 months
Quantify the evolution of patients' physical activity and sedentary behavior levels at 6 months (for behavior change) and 12 months (for behavior maintenance).
Time frame: 12 months
Explore the relationship between patient characteristics and changes (at 6 months) and maintenance (at 12 months) of physical activityand sedentary behavior levels.
Time frame: 12 months
Describe the quality of motivation initially (Month 0), at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 monts
Describe the satisfaction of basic psychological needs at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 monts
Describe the self-efficacy perceived competence scale for engaging in a personalized physical activity program at 6 months and at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 monts
Describe the perceived level of vitality and energy initially (M0), at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 monts
Describe the self-esteem initially (M0), at 6 months, and at 12 months.
Time frame: 12 monts
Describe at M6 and M12 the strategies, barriers, and facilitators to patients' behavior change.
Time frame: 12 months
Study the relationship between ONAPS-PAQ results and 7-day actimetry in this population category (inactive and/or sedentary).
Time frame: 12 months
Identify perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation in primary care at 12 months among different stakeholders (general practitioners, physiotherapists, patients).
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Feb 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41239336Pinsault N, Rey S, Druart L, Guizon AH, Debru R, Roustit M, Pison C. Physical inactivity and sedentary behaviours: screening and intervention in primary care, a prospective, multicentre, cluster-randomised, controlled, stepped-wedge study. BMC Public Health. 2025 Nov 14;25(1):3951. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-25410-4.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Primary Care
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruiting
Impact of Pharmacotherapy Optimization in Polymedicated Lebanese Older Adults in Primary Health Care Centers
Older Adults (65 Years and Older), Polypharmacy (People Under Treatment With 5 or More Drugs)
RecruitingObservational study
Pivotal Trial of an Automated AI-based System for Early Diagnosis and Prediction of Late Age-related Macular Degeneration
Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD)
Recruiting
Technology-Based Intervention Pilot Testing
Dementia, Elder Abuse
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Nicolas PINSAULT, Professor principal investigator
Physiotherapy department - Grenoble Alpes University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Intervention arm in people with Primary Care, run by University Hospital, Grenoble at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Nicolas PINSAULT, Professor (+33 45 70 413 17, nicolas.pinsault@univ-grenoble-alpes.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Evaluate the 6-month effectiveness of an individualized intervention by a physiotherapist, on physical activity and sedentary behavior in adult patients without chronic diseases (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06678906, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Feb 2025.