Heart Valve DiseasesNCT06541483
Multicentre Clinical Study of Ultra-Fast-Track Anaesthesia for Minimally Invasive Heart Valve Surgery
A study testing Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) and conventional general anesthesia (CGA) in people with Heart Valve Diseases and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, run by Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital.
Trial summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical effects of ultra-fast-track anesthesia (UFTA) for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in adults. It will also learn about the safety and feasibility of Ultra-Fast-Track cardiac surgery(UFTCA).The main questions it aims to answer are:Does UFTCA promote… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Heart Valve Diseases, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) and conventional general anesthesia (CGA)
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2024to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥18 and ≤80 years
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac class III or below
- Preoperative inspired air pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≥95%
- Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 40%
- No contraindications to nerve blocks
Who cannot join
- Patient's refusal to participate
- Severe communication disorders
- Severe disorders of coagulation with spontaneous bleeding tendency
- Long-term application of opioid analgesics
- Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥55 mmHg)
- People who need artificial ventilation
- Allergy to dexmedetomidine and ropivacaine
- Complex aortic root surgery such as root widening
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: A Multicenter Clinical Study of Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical effects of ultra-fast-track anesthesia (UFTA) for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in adults. It will also learn about the safety and feasibility of Ultra-Fast-Track cardiac surgery(UFTCA).The main questions it aims to answer are:Does UFTCA promote rapid postoperative recovery, reduce postoperative complications and perioperative mortality, and improve the quality of mid- and long-term survival.And does it improve patient satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs.
Participants will receive homogenized perioperative management in the cardiac ward, extracorporeal circulation, and postoperative ICU, except for anesthesia extubation time.Furthermore,Participants need complete quality of life scales at 30 days, 90 days, six months, and one year after surgery, separately.
Participants in this study are adults who required elective minimally invasive heart valve surgery under extracorporeal circulation.This study will be able to promote rapid recovery while reducing the associated costs and the financial burden on participants.Retrospective big data analysis of perioperative clinical characteristics of patients undergoing minimally invasive heart valve surgery to establish a risk warning model and develop a perioperative management program. The investigators then conducts a randomized group trial comparing the similarities and differences between conventional general anesthesia(CGA) and ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia(URTCA) to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of UFTA in MICS.Finally, building expert consensus.
Read the detailed description
This study was divided into two parts:The first part is retrospective data collection and organization, screening risk factors to establish an early warning model to improve the perioperative management program, and the other part is conducted using a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and benefit of the perioperative management program of ultra-fast-track anesthesia(UFTA) for minimally invasive heart valve surgery. The specific program is as follows:
Part I
- Establishment of an information collection platform Log in to the platform for electronic data entry and retain the paper version of the CaseReportForm(CRF)
- Retrospective data collection Relying on the National Head Medical Center for Cardiac Surgery, 5000 perioperative case data of minimally invasive heart valve surgery patients were counted to obtain the perioperative clinical characteristics of Chinese adult minimally invasive heart valve surgery patients.
- Screening for risk factors Statistical analysis of risk factors affecting perioperative ultra-fast-track anesthesia delivery and postoperative complications
- Establishment of early warning model Combining age stratification, surgical mode stratification and general characteristics, establish an early warning model to improve the perioperative management protocol of ultra-fast channel anesthesia for minimally invasive heart valve surgery.
Part II Recruitment of participants for a prospective randomized controlled trial
- Participants Patients undergoing elective minimally invasive adult heart valve surgery will be selected after completion of history taking, physical examination, preoperative laboratory and ancillary investigations, preoperative health and quality of life questionnaires, and frailty assessment of their physical condition, and will be confirmed to be free of any one of the "Exclusion Criteria" and to meet any one or more of the "Inclusion Criteria". Those who fulfill any one of the "Exclusion Criteria" and more than one of the "Inclusion Criteria" will be given a screening number. After completing the basic information and preoperative medications, the participant signed the informed consent form. If either the participant or the family member does not agree to participate in the study, the participant will only be given a screening number and the study will end here.
- Randomized grouping Participants who were included to meet the criteria were randomly divided into the ultra-fast-track anesthesia group (UFTCA) and the conventional general anesthesia group (CGA), and the homogenized perioperative management of the extracardiac ward, extracorporeal circulation, and postoperative ICU was implemented, except for anesthesia resuscitation methods.
- Anesthesia management 3.1 Preoperative Preoperative education, nutritional support, fasting and abstinence from food and drink, prophylactic multimodal analgesia (preoperative oral pregabalin 150 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg) 3.2 Intraoperative Anesthesia mode: tracheal intubation general anesthesia plus nerve block anesthesia Induction of anesthesia: intravenous slow push etomidate fat milk injection 0.15 mg/kg, propofol injection 0.5~1.0 mg/kg, sufentanil citrate injection 0.4~0.5 mg/kg, rocuronium bromide 0.6~0.8 mg/kg, to be the patient's consciousness disappeared, to be the mask pressurized denitrification of oxygen for 3~5 minutes, muscle relaxation after the complete effect of the laryngoscopy under the direct visualization The patient was intubated, fixed, and mechanically ventilated, and the respiratory parameters were set as follows: Fraction of inspiratory oxygen concentration (FiO2): 50~80%, tidal volume (VT): 6~8 ml/kg, respiratory rate (RR): 10~12 times/min, Inhalation-exhalation ratio (I:E): 1:2, Maintain End-tidal CarbonDioxidePartialPressure (PetCO2) at 35~45 mmHg. Anesthesia maintenance: Propofol injection 150~250 μg/(kg·min) and remifentanil 0.2~0.4 μg/(kg·min) were continuously pumped through the central venous catheter, and intraoperative EEG Bispectral Index (BIS) values were maintained between 40~60. According to the hemodynamic indexes, respiratory parameters and the needs of surgical operation, intravenous sufentanil was injected in divided doses of 0.1~0.2 μg/kg, and the total amount of intraoperative sufentanil was controlled to be 1.0~1.5 μg/kg. Additional rocuronium bromide 0.1~0.2 mg/kg was added at the time of aortic blockade and opening, respectively. Intraoperative multimodal analgesia: (Pectoral nerves I(Pecs I), Pectoral nerves II(Pecs II), anterior serratus plane block(SPB)) anesthetic resuscitation: Evaluate to confirm whether the patient can be included in ultra-fast-track anesthesia. After the aorta was opened, the anesthesiologist, by observing the surgical procedure and communicating with the surgeon as well as the sonographer in a timely manner, confirmed that the surgery was successful, the heart was restarting normally, the extracorporeal circulation was withdrawn smoothly, there was no active hemorrhage in the surgical field, hemostasis was complete, oxygenation was functioning well, and the patient's finger pulse oximetry saturation was ≥98% under conditions of inhaled pure oxygen. UFTCA:The amount of propofol maintenance was dynamically adjusted according to the degree of stimulation at the beginning of chest closure, and all intravenous anesthesia maintenance drugs were discontinued at the beginning of chest closure. When the patient is under deep anesthesia, clear the patient's airway secretions and other foreign objects in advance; without interfering with the surgeon's operation, give bilateral lung bulging, and according to the trend of the BIS value and the patient's somatic reaction or not, give a single intravenous injection of propofol of 20~30mg as appropriate to maintain the patient's sedation until the end of the operation, and then remove the airway catheter when the patient is fully awake on the operating table. If necessary, an appropriate amount of neostigmine methylsulfate 1mg and atropine sulfate injection 0.5mg can be used intravenously to antagonize the muscle relaxant. CGA:Propofol injection 150~250 μg/(kg·min) and remifentanil 0.2~0.4 ug/(kg·min) were continuously pumped, and the patients were transferred to the ICU with tubes, and the ICU doctors decided the timing of stopping sedation and extubation. 3.3 Postoperative multimodal analgesia Immediately after surgery, an intravenous analgesic pump was connected (sufentanil 200 μg and palonosetron 0.25 mg saline configured to a total of 200 mL)
- Surgery Valve surgery encompasses aortic valve / mitral valve / tricuspid valve disease, performing single / double / triple valves, using minimally invasive procedures.This can be done through a small upper sternal incision, a small right anterior chest incision or a small transaxillary incision.
- Extracorporeal circulation management The pre-filled fluid for extracorporeal circulation was 500~750 ml of crystalloid, 150 ml of 20% mannitol, 100 ml of 20% albumin, and 150 ml of sodium bicarbonate. Heparinization was performed at 3~4 mg/kg, and extracorporeal circulation was started after activated clotting time(ACT)>480s. The pacing fluid and dosage was 30 ml/kg, and the total amount did not exceed 2000 ml. During extracorporeal circulation, the mean arterial pressure was maintained at 50~80 mmHg, and the perfusion flow rate was 2.2~2.4 L/m^2.
- Postoperative monitoring The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used for pain assessment after tracheal tube removal. VAS pain score by the nurse every 4 hours, if VAS ≥ 3, then press the analgesic pump once additional sufentanil 3 ~ 5 μg, 3 minutes later to assess again, if the patient VAS ≥ 3, then press the analgesic pump again additional sufentanil 3 ~ 5 μg; if sufentanil reached the analgesic pump set the limit of the amount of VAS ≥ 3 or produce serious nausea and vomiting and other side effects, then the intravenous oxycodone 10mg / time for Remedial analgesia.
- Being tested
- Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA), conventional general anesthesia (CGA)
- Keywords
- Ultra-fast-track Anesthesia, minimally invasive cardiac surgery
- Medical subject headings
- Heart Valve Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA)Procedure or surgery
(UFTCA)The researcher removed the endotracheal tube either immediately or within 1 hour of the end of the procedure.
conventional general anesthesia (CGA)Procedure or surgery
(CGA)The researcher not extubated at the end of the operation and were admitted to the ICU under anesthesia with an endotracheal tube.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) | Experimental | The researchers implemented an ultra-fast-track anesthesia protocol, and the tracheal tube was removed immediately or within 1 hour of awakening at the end of the operation. Receives: Procedure: Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) |
| conventional general anesthesia (CGA) | Other | The researcher implemented a conventional anesthesia protocol, and participants were not extubated at the end of the procedure and were admitted to the ICU under anesthesia with an endotracheal tube. Receives: Procedure: conventional general anesthesia (CGA) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
tracheal tube extubation time
Time interval for tracheal extubation
Measured: From the end of the operation to the removal of the tracheal tube,up to 3 days
ICU length of stay
Length of time participants stayed in the ICU
Measured: From entry to exit from ICU,approximately 3 days
Post-operative hospitalization
Length of postoperative hospitalization
Measured: From the end of surgery to discharge, approximately 1 week
Length of hospitalization
Length of time participants stayed in the hospital
Measured: From admission to discharge, approximately 2 weeks
complication
Acute kidney injury, coma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), postoperative atrial fibrillation, pericardial tamponade, gastrointestinal complications, death, cardiac arrest, heart block, and permanent stroke
Measured: From the end of surgery to 1 year after surgery
Unscheduled events
reintubation, reoperation,ICU readmission, 30-day readmission
Measured: From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36)
minimum values:0 maximum values:100 higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: up to 1 year postoperative
expenditure
Total cost of treatment
Measured: From admission to discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Secondary outcomes (17)
Time from end of surgery to removal from operating room
Time from end of surgery to removal from operating room
Measured: From end of surgery to removal from operating room, up to 1 hour
Intraoperative opioid dosages
Intraoperative dosage of sufentanil and remifentanil for induction and maintenance of anesthesia
Measured: intraoperative
VAS score
minimum values:1 maximum values:10 higher scores mean a worse outcome
Measured: 72 hours post-surgery
Postoperative opioid dosage
Level of postoperative analgesia
Measured: From the end of surgery to discharge,approximately 1 week
Application of vasoactive drugs
Vasoactive drugs given as per participant and intraoperative needs
Measured: intraoperative
oxygenation index
Pulmonary Function Assessment
Measured: From admission to discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Thoracic drainage within 24 hours
Thoracic drainage within 24 hours after surgery
Measured: 24 hours post-surgery
Total Thoracic Drainage
Total postoperative chest drainage
Measured: From the end of surgery to chest drain removal, approximately 3 days
Thoracic drain removal time
Thoracic drain removal time
Measured: From the end of surgery to chest drain removal, approximately 3 days
Bowel evacuation time
Assessment of postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function
Measured: Time from end of surgery to first bowel evacuation, approximately 2 days
time out of bed
First time out of bed
Measured: Time from end of surgery to first time out of bed, approximately 2 days
Inflammatory levels
interleukin(IL)-1β,IL-4,IL-6,IL-8,IL-10,Procalcitonin(PCT),Hypersensitive C-reactive protein(hs-CRP) and tumor necrosis factor(TNF)-α
Measured: From the start of anesthesia induction to 48 hours after extubation
coagulation
Prothrombin Time (PT), Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT), International Normalized Ratio (INR), Fibrinogen (FIB), D-dimer (DD2), Fibrin (Pro) Degradation Product (FDP), Antithrombin III (ATIII ), Thromboelastography (TEG)
Measured: One day before to the next day after surgery,72 hours
myocardial injury
N-terminal Pro-brain B-type Natriuretic Peptides(NT-proBNP), Cardiac troponin I(cTnI )
Measured: One day before to the next day after surgery,72 hours
neurological injury
Neuron-specific enolase(NSE)
Measured: One day before to the next day after surgery,72 hours
Anesthesia costs
Costs incurred for perioperative anesthesia medications and anesthesia management requirements
Measured: Until 1 hours post-surgery
Patient satisfaction
Participants are rated on a 10-point satisfaction scale minimum values:1 maximum values:10 higher scores mean a better outcome
Measured: up to 1 year after discharge from hospital
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted7 Aug 2024
- Study startDec 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Heart Valve DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Fudan University, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mei J Yan, QC, Study chair, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06541483
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 099
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 23 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 7 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Krzych L, Kucewicz-Czech E. It is time for enhanced recovery after surgery in cardiac surgery. Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(5):415-420. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0014. Epub 2017 Feb 2. No abstract available.
PubMed 28150277Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
PubMed 9175983Coleman SR, Chen M, Patel S, Yan H, Kaye AD, Zebrower M, Gayle JA, Liu H, Urman RD. Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Cardiac Surgery. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 14;23(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0764-2.
PubMed 30868281Zaouter C, Imbault J, Labrousse L, Abdelmoumen Y, Coiffic A, Colonna G, Jansens JL, Ouattara A. Association of Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Associated With a Preliminary Cardiac Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: A Retrospective Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):1489-97. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
PubMed 26119408Fleming IO, Garratt C, Guha R, Desai J, Chaubey S, Wang Y, Leonard S, Kunst G. Aggregation of Marginal Gains in Cardiac Surgery: Feasibility of a Perioperative Care Bundle for Enhanced Recovery in Cardiac Surgical Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):665-70. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
PubMed 27321791Williams JB, McConnell G, Allender JE, Woltz P, Kane K, Smith PK, Engelman DT, Bradford WT. One-year results from the first US-based enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1881-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.164. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
PubMed 30665758Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, Roselli EE, Khoynezhad A, Gerdisch M, Levy JH, Lobdell K, Fletcher N, Kirsch M, Nelson G, Engelman RM, Gregory AJ, Boyle EM. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):755-766. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153.
PubMed 31054241Pokhrel S, Gregory A, Mellor A. Perioperative care in cardiac surgery. BJA Educ. 2021 Oct;21(10):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jul 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 34567795Cohen B, Turan A. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery - Is evidence still necessary? J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:171-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.049. Epub 2018 Dec 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 30599274Noss C, Prusinkiewicz C, Nelson G, Patel PA, Augoustides JG, Gregory AJ. Enhanced Recovery for Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Dec;32(6):2760-2770. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.045. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
PubMed 29503121Bianchi P, Constantine A, Costola G, Mele S, Shore D, Dimopoulos K, Aw TC. Ultra-Fast-Track Extubation in Adult Congenital Heart Surgery. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e020201. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020201. Epub 2021 May 17.
PubMed 33998289Zayat R, Menon AK, Goetzenich A, Schaelte G, Autschbach R, Stoppe C, Simon TP, Tewarie L, Moza A. Benefits of ultra-fast-track anesthesia in left ventricular assist device implantation: a retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study of a four-year single center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Feb 8;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0573-9.
PubMed 28179009Xu J, Zhou G, Li Y, Li N. Benefits of ultra-fast-track anesthesia for children with congenital heart disease undergoing cardiac surgery. BMC Pediatr. 2019 Dec 11;19(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12887-019-1832-9.
PubMed 31829170Akhtar MI, Momeni M, Szekely A, Hamid M, El Tahan MR, Rex S. Multicenter International Survey on the Clinical Practice of Ultra-Fast-Track Anesthesia with On-Table Extubation in Pediatric Congenital Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019 Feb;33(2):406-415. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
PubMed 30115517Jiang S, Wang L, Teng H, Lou X, Wei H, Yan M. The Clinical Application of Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia in Right-Thoracoscopic Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2023 May;37(5):700-706. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2023.01.010. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
PubMed 36804223
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Multicenter Clinical Study of Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia in Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery for Valvular Heart Disease
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06541483
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 099
- Keywords
- Ultra-fast-track Anesthesia, minimally invasive cardiac surgery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Zhejiang Provincial People's HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Fudan University, Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Chinese PLA General Hospital, First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
- Study start
- Dec 2024 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 7 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the clinical effects of ultra-fast-track anesthesia (UFTA) for minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) in adults. It will also learn about the safety and feasibility of Ultra-Fast-Track cardiac surgery(UFTCA).The main questions it aims to answer are:Does UFTCA promote rapid postoperative recovery, reduce postoperative complications and perioperative mortality, and improve the quality of mid- and long-term survival.And does it improve patient satisfaction and reduce healthcare costs.
Participants will receive homogenized perioperative management in the cardiac ward, extracorporeal circulation, and postoperative ICU, except for anesthesia extubation time.Furthermore,Participants need complete quality of life scales at 30 days, 90 days, six months, and one year after surgery, separately.
Participants in this study are adults who required elective minimally invasive heart valve surgery under extracorporeal circulation.This study will be able to promote rapid recovery while reducing the associated costs and the financial burden on participants.Retrospective big data analysis of perioperative clinical characteristics of patients undergoing minimally invasive heart valve surgery to establish a risk warning model and develop a perioperative management program. The investigators then conducts a randomized group trial comparing the similarities and differences between conventional general anesthesia(CGA) and ultra-fast-track cardiac anesthesia(URTCA) to demonstrate the effectiveness and safety of UFTA in MICS.Finally, building expert consensus.
Detailed description
This study was divided into two parts:The first part is retrospective data collection and organization, screening risk factors to establish an early warning model to improve the perioperative management program, and the other part is conducted using a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and benefit of the perioperative management program of ultra-fast-track anesthesia(UFTA) for minimally invasive heart valve surgery. The specific program is as follows:
Part I
- Establishment of an information collection platform Log in to the platform for electronic data entry and retain the paper version of the CaseReportForm(CRF)
- Retrospective data collection Relying on the National Head Medical Center for Cardiac Surgery, 5000 perioperative case data of minimally invasive heart valve surgery patients were counted to obtain the perioperative clinical characteristics of Chinese adult minimally invasive heart valve surgery patients.
- Screening for risk factors Statistical analysis of risk factors affecting perioperative ultra-fast-track anesthesia delivery and postoperative complications
- Establishment of early warning model Combining age stratification, surgical mode stratification and general characteristics, establish an early warning model to improve the perioperative management protocol of ultra-fast channel anesthesia for minimally invasive heart valve surgery.
Part II Recruitment of participants for a prospective randomized controlled trial
- Participants Patients undergoing elective minimally invasive adult heart valve surgery will be selected after completion of history taking, physical examination, preoperative laboratory and ancillary investigations, preoperative health and quality of life questionnaires, and frailty assessment of their physical condition, and will be confirmed to be free of any one of the "Exclusion Criteria" and to meet any one or more of the "Inclusion Criteria". Those who fulfill any one of the "Exclusion Criteria" and more than one of the "Inclusion Criteria" will be given a screening number. After completing the basic information and preoperative medications, the participant signed the informed consent form. If either the participant or the family member does not agree to participate in the study, the participant will only be given a screening number and the study will end here.
- Randomized grouping Participants who were included to meet the criteria were randomly divided into the ultra-fast-track anesthesia group (UFTCA) and the conventional general anesthesia group (CGA), and the homogenized perioperative management of the extracardiac ward, extracorporeal circulation, and postoperative ICU was implemented, except for anesthesia resuscitation methods.
- Anesthesia management 3.1 Preoperative Preoperative education, nutritional support, fasting and abstinence from food and drink, prophylactic multimodal analgesia (preoperative oral pregabalin 150 mg and acetaminophen 1000 mg) 3.2 Intraoperative Anesthesia mode: tracheal intubation general anesthesia plus nerve block anesthesia Induction of anesthesia: intravenous slow push etomidate fat milk injection 0.15 mg/kg, propofol injection 0.5~1.0 mg/kg, sufentanil citrate injection 0.4~0.5 mg/kg, rocuronium bromide 0.6~0.8 mg/kg, to be the patient's consciousness disappeared, to be the mask pressurized denitrification of oxygen for 3~5 minutes, muscle relaxation after the complete effect of the laryngoscopy under the direct visualization The patient was intubated, fixed, and mechanically ventilated, and the respiratory parameters were set as follows: Fraction of inspiratory oxygen concentration (FiO2): 50~80%, tidal volume (VT): 6~8 ml/kg, respiratory rate (RR): 10~12 times/min, Inhalation-exhalation ratio (I:E): 1:2, Maintain End-tidal CarbonDioxidePartialPressure (PetCO2) at 35~45 mmHg. Anesthesia maintenance: Propofol injection 150~250 μg/(kg·min) and remifentanil 0.2~0.4 μg/(kg·min) were continuously pumped through the central venous catheter, and intraoperative EEG Bispectral Index (BIS) values were maintained between 40~60. According to the hemodynamic indexes, respiratory parameters and the needs of surgical operation, intravenous sufentanil was injected in divided doses of 0.1~0.2 μg/kg, and the total amount of intraoperative sufentanil was controlled to be 1.0~1.5 μg/kg. Additional rocuronium bromide 0.1~0.2 mg/kg was added at the time of aortic blockade and opening, respectively. Intraoperative multimodal analgesia: (Pectoral nerves I(Pecs I), Pectoral nerves II(Pecs II), anterior serratus plane block(SPB)) anesthetic resuscitation: Evaluate to confirm whether the patient can be included in ultra-fast-track anesthesia. After the aorta was opened, the anesthesiologist, by observing the surgical procedure and communicating with the surgeon as well as the sonographer in a timely manner, confirmed that the surgery was successful, the heart was restarting normally, the extracorporeal circulation was withdrawn smoothly, there was no active hemorrhage in the surgical field, hemostasis was complete, oxygenation was functioning well, and the patient's finger pulse oximetry saturation was ≥98% under conditions of inhaled pure oxygen. UFTCA:The amount of propofol maintenance was dynamically adjusted according to the degree of stimulation at the beginning of chest closure, and all intravenous anesthesia maintenance drugs were discontinued at the beginning of chest closure. When the patient is under deep anesthesia, clear the patient's airway secretions and other foreign objects in advance; without interfering with the surgeon's operation, give bilateral lung bulging, and according to the trend of the BIS value and the patient's somatic reaction or not, give a single intravenous injection of propofol of 20~30mg as appropriate to maintain the patient's sedation until the end of the operation, and then remove the airway catheter when the patient is fully awake on the operating table. If necessary, an appropriate amount of neostigmine methylsulfate 1mg and atropine sulfate injection 0.5mg can be used intravenously to antagonize the muscle relaxant. CGA:Propofol injection 150~250 μg/(kg·min) and remifentanil 0.2~0.4 ug/(kg·min) were continuously pumped, and the patients were transferred to the ICU with tubes, and the ICU doctors decided the timing of stopping sedation and extubation. 3.3 Postoperative multimodal analgesia Immediately after surgery, an intravenous analgesic pump was connected (sufentanil 200 μg and palonosetron 0.25 mg saline configured to a total of 200 mL)
- Surgery Valve surgery encompasses aortic valve / mitral valve / tricuspid valve disease, performing single / double / triple valves, using minimally invasive procedures.This can be done through a small upper sternal incision, a small right anterior chest incision or a small transaxillary incision.
- Extracorporeal circulation management The pre-filled fluid for extracorporeal circulation was 500~750 ml of crystalloid, 150 ml of 20% mannitol, 100 ml of 20% albumin, and 150 ml of sodium bicarbonate. Heparinization was performed at 3~4 mg/kg, and extracorporeal circulation was started after activated clotting time(ACT)>480s. The pacing fluid and dosage was 30 ml/kg, and the total amount did not exceed 2000 ml. During extracorporeal circulation, the mean arterial pressure was maintained at 50~80 mmHg, and the perfusion flow rate was 2.2~2.4 L/m^2.
- Postoperative monitoring The Visual Analogue Score (VAS) was used for pain assessment after tracheal tube removal. VAS pain score by the nurse every 4 hours, if VAS ≥ 3, then press the analgesic pump once additional sufentanil 3 ~ 5 μg, 3 minutes later to assess again, if the patient VAS ≥ 3, then press the analgesic pump again additional sufentanil 3 ~ 5 μg; if sufentanil reached the analgesic pump set the limit of the amount of VAS ≥ 3 or produce serious nausea and vomiting and other side effects, then the intravenous oxycodone 10mg / time for Remedial analgesia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) | Experimental | Procedure: Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA)The researchers implemented an ultra-fast-track anesthesia protocol, and the tracheal tube was removed immediately or within 1 hour of awakening at the end of the operation. |
| conventional general anesthesia (CGA) | Other | Procedure: conventional general anesthesia (CGA)The researcher implemented a conventional anesthesia protocol, and participants were not extubated at the end of the procedure and were admitted to the ICU under anesthesia with an endotracheal tube. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Age ≥18 and ≤80 years
- American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) class I-III
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) cardiac class III or below
- Preoperative inspired air pulse oximetry (SpO2) ≥95%
- Ejection fraction (EF) ≥ 40%
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient's refusal to participate
- Severe communication disorders
- Severe disorders of coagulation with spontaneous bleeding tendency
- Long-term application of opioid analgesics
- Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure ≥55 mmHg)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA)(UFTCA)The researcher removed the endotracheal tube either immediately or within 1 hour of the end of the procedure. | Procedure or surgery | Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) |
| conventional general anesthesia (CGA)(CGA)The researcher not extubated at the end of the operation and were admitted to the ICU under anesthesia with an endotracheal tube. | Procedure or surgery | conventional general anesthesia (CGA) |
Primary outcome
tracheal tube extubation time
Time frame: From the end of the operation to the removal of the tracheal tube,up to 3 days
Time interval for tracheal extubation
ICU length of stay
Time frame: From entry to exit from ICU,approximately 3 days
Length of time participants stayed in the ICU
Post-operative hospitalization
Time frame: From the end of surgery to discharge, approximately 1 week
Length of postoperative hospitalization
Length of hospitalization
Time frame: From admission to discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Length of time participants stayed in the hospital
complication
Time frame: From the end of surgery to 1 year after surgery
Acute kidney injury, coma, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), postoperative atrial fibrillation, pericardial tamponade, gastrointestinal complications, death, cardiac arrest, heart block, and permanent stroke
Unscheduled events
Time frame: From the end of surgery to 30 days after surgery
reintubation, reoperation,ICU readmission, 30-day readmission
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36)
Time frame: up to 1 year postoperative
minimum values:0 maximum values:100 higher scores mean a better outcome
expenditure
Time frame: From admission to discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Total cost of treatment
17 secondary outcomes
Time from end of surgery to removal from operating room
Time frame: From end of surgery to removal from operating room, up to 1 hour
Intraoperative opioid dosages
Time frame: intraoperative
VAS score
Time frame: 72 hours post-surgery
Postoperative opioid dosage
Time frame: From the end of surgery to discharge,approximately 1 week
Application of vasoactive drugs
Time frame: intraoperative
oxygenation index
Time frame: From admission to discharge, approximately 2 weeks
Thoracic drainage within 24 hours
Time frame: 24 hours post-surgery
Total Thoracic Drainage
Time frame: From the end of surgery to chest drain removal, approximately 3 days
Thoracic drain removal time
Time frame: From the end of surgery to chest drain removal, approximately 3 days
Bowel evacuation time
Time frame: Time from end of surgery to first bowel evacuation, approximately 2 days
time out of bed
Time frame: Time from end of surgery to first time out of bed, approximately 2 days
Inflammatory levels
Time frame: From the start of anesthesia induction to 48 hours after extubation
coagulation
Time frame: One day before to the next day after surgery,72 hours
myocardial injury
Time frame: One day before to the next day after surgery,72 hours
neurological injury
Time frame: One day before to the next day after surgery,72 hours
Anesthesia costs
Time frame: Until 1 hours post-surgery
Patient satisfaction
Time frame: up to 1 year after discharge from hospital
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 28150277Krzych L, Kucewicz-Czech E. It is time for enhanced recovery after surgery in cardiac surgery. Kardiol Pol. 2017;75(5):415-420. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0014. Epub 2017 Feb 2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 9175983Kehlet H. Multimodal approach to control postoperative pathophysiology and rehabilitation. Br J Anaesth. 1997 May;78(5):606-17. doi: 10.1093/bja/78.5.606.
- Background: PubMed 30868281Coleman SR, Chen M, Patel S, Yan H, Kaye AD, Zebrower M, Gayle JA, Liu H, Urman RD. Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Cardiac Surgery. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019 Mar 14;23(4):28. doi: 10.1007/s11916-019-0764-2.
- Background: PubMed 26119408Zaouter C, Imbault J, Labrousse L, Abdelmoumen Y, Coiffic A, Colonna G, Jansens JL, Ouattara A. Association of Robotic Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Associated With a Preliminary Cardiac Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program: A Retrospective Analysis. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015 Dec;29(6):1489-97. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 27321791Fleming IO, Garratt C, Guha R, Desai J, Chaubey S, Wang Y, Leonard S, Kunst G. Aggregation of Marginal Gains in Cardiac Surgery: Feasibility of a Perioperative Care Bundle for Enhanced Recovery in Cardiac Surgical Patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Jun;30(3):665-70. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.01.017. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
- Background: PubMed 30665758Williams JB, McConnell G, Allender JE, Woltz P, Kane K, Smith PK, Engelman DT, Bradford WT. One-year results from the first US-based enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERAS Cardiac) program. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 May;157(5):1881-1888. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.164. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
- Background: PubMed 31054241Engelman DT, Ben Ali W, Williams JB, Perrault LP, Reddy VS, Arora RC, Roselli EE, Khoynezhad A, Gerdisch M, Levy JH, Lobdell K, Fletcher N, Kirsch M, Nelson G, Engelman RM, Gregory AJ, Boyle EM. Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Society Recommendations. JAMA Surg. 2019 Aug 1;154(8):755-766. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.1153.
- Background: PubMed 34567795Pokhrel S, Gregory A, Mellor A. Perioperative care in cardiac surgery. BJA Educ. 2021 Oct;21(10):396-402. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.05.008. Epub 2021 Jul 13. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30599274Cohen B, Turan A. Enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery - Is evidence still necessary? J Clin Anesth. 2019 May;54:171-172. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.049. Epub 2018 Dec 29. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 29503121Noss C, Prusinkiewicz C, Nelson G, Patel PA, Augoustides JG, Gregory AJ. Enhanced Recovery for Cardiac Surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018 Dec;32(6):2760-2770. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.045. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
- Background: PubMed 33998289Bianchi P, Constantine A, Costola G, Mele S, Shore D, Dimopoulos K, Aw TC. Ultra-Fast-Track Extubation in Adult Congenital Heart Surgery. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Jun;10(11):e020201. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020201. Epub 2021 May 17.
- Background: PubMed 28179009Zayat R, Menon AK, Goetzenich A, Schaelte G, Autschbach R, Stoppe C, Simon TP, Tewarie L, Moza A. Benefits of ultra-fast-track anesthesia in left ventricular assist device implantation: a retrospective, propensity score matched cohort study of a four-year single center experience. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Feb 8;12(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13019-017-0573-9.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Heart Valve Diseases
Recruiting
Trial of the F2 Filter and Delivery System for Embolic Protection During TAVR
Aortic Stenosis Treated With TAVI, Aortic Diseases
Not yet recruiting
Human Experimental Models of Pain (HEMP)
Acute Pain
RecruitingObservational study
A Post-Market Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the TriClip™ System
Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Intravascular Lithotripsy in High Risk Calcified Iliac Anatomy for Transfemoral TAVR
Iliac Disease, Aortic Valve Stenosis
Not yet recruiting
NHLBI SESAME (SEptal Scoring Along Midline Endocardium) Multi-Center Prospective Study Using Improvised Off-Label Devices
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy, Left Ventricular Outflow Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mei J Yan, QC study chair
Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ultra-Fast-Track Cardiac Anesthesia(UFTCA) and conventional general anesthesia (CGA) in people with Heart Valve Diseases and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery, run by Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mei J Yan, QC (+863313957116714, 1514018695@qq.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
tracheal tube extubation time (time frame: From the end of the operation to the removal of the tracheal tube,up to 3 days). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06541483, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Aug 2024.