Prediabetic StateNCT06533618
Characterization of the "Transfusion-dependent Prediabetes" Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring
A study testing Continuous glucose monitoring system in people with Prediabetic State, run by University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Dysglycemia is a frequent finding in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the only validated screening test, but the procedure is complex and time-consuming. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Prediabetic State
- What is being tested?
- Continuous glucose monitoring system
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 29 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2023to 30 Oct 2023
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- They were affected by transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT)
- They had a history of at least 10 years of therapy with red blood cell transfusions (transfusion frequency less than one months) and iron chelation therapy
- They tested negative for diabetes mellitus screening tests (fasting glycemia, OGTT).
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Characterization of the "Transfusion-dependent Prediabetes" Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: the Hemoglycare Study
Dysglycemia is a frequent finding in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the only validated screening test, but the procedure is complex and time-consuming. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are simple to use, and could have a role in the diabetes mellitus diagnosis. This study involved 39 participants (19 cases and 20 healthy controls) using CGM for the analysis of the glucose metrics. Participants resulted negative for diabetes mellitus screening tests. Patients' clinical data were compared with glucose metrics.
Read the detailed description
The selection of patients took place randomly among adult patients suffering from transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) belonging to the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit of the AOU University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli". Patients had a history of at least 10 years of therapy with red blood cell transfusions (transfusion frequency less than one months) and iron chelation therapy. Cases tested negative for diabetes mellitus screening tests (fasting glycemia, OGTT).
Some healthy volunteers were also recruited among medical resident and doctors. Major eligibility criteria for the volunteers were: caucasian; age ≥18 years; body mass index <25.0 kg/m2; no chronic illness or medications that might affect glucose metabolism; fasting glycemia<100 mg/dl; HbA1c <5.7% (39 mmol/mol); no positive islet autoantibodies; HOMA-IR <2.5. Female participants pregnant at the time of study enrollment were not eligible.
All procedures performed in this study were approved by the Institutional Research Committee of the University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli". All participants have provided written consent.
Demographic and Clinical characteristics A brief schedule was specifically designed and completed by clinicians (diabetologists or hematologists) to record demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, height, weight, duration of illness, and other medical conditions (family history of diabetes, endocrine disorders, cigarette smoking habit). Finally, the HOMA-IR was calculated as a parameter for evaluating insulin resistance. Possible missing data was obtained by reviewing medical charts
Study design
All participants (subjects and controls) applied a Medtronic Guardian4 sensor for seven days. At the end of the monitoring, the glucose sensor data was analyzed using the Carelink System software.
Glucose metrics considered for the analysis were glucose management indicator (GMI), mean glucose (mg/dl), glycemic variability as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV), time spent with glycemia greater than or equal to 200 mg /dl (TAR200%,median), time spent with blood glucose greater than or equal to 140 mg/dl (TAR140%, median), time spent with blood glucose less than 70 mg/dl (TBR<70%, median).
As it is described in the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines ,2h-glucose value ≥ 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) and <199 mg/dl (11 mmol/l) during OGTT is diagnostic for prediabetes. Moreover, 2h glucose value ≥200 mg/dl(11.1 mmol/L) during OGTT or a random glucose value (in any time of the day without regard to time since previous meal) ≥200 mg/dl(11.1 mmol/L) are both diagnostic for diabetes mellitus.
During a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) it is not easy to understand correlation between glucose values and meals. Furthermore, in this study, the evaluation of glucose values (during CGM) two hours after a controlled meal (75-g of oral glucose in OGTT) was not performed. Instead, the participants' glucose values were observed in real life. Therefore, although the number of participants who exceeded or equaled the value 140 mg/dl or the value 200mg/dl was recorded, in addition how long these patients remained with glucose values above these cut-offs (TAR140%; TAR200%)was registered, to make the observation of abnormal glycemic profiles more precise.
Finally, the value ≤6% of TAR 140%was used as an index of normality (as indicated in other studies on healthy volunteers).
- Conditions
- Prediabetic State
- Being tested
- Continuous glucose monitoring system
- Medical subject headings
- Prediabetic State
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Continuous glucose monitoring systemDiagnostic test
All participants (subjects and controls) applied a Medtronic Guardian4 sensor for seven days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Thalassemic patients | Experimental | Patient affected by TDD Receives: Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring system |
| Healthy controls | Experimental | caucasian; age ≥18 years; body mass index <25.0 kg/m2; no chronic illness or medications that might affect glucose metabolism; fasting glycemia<100 mg/dl; HbA1c <5.7% (39 mmol/mol); no positive islet autoantibodies; HOMA-IR <2.5 Receives: Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring system |
| Euglycemic thalassemic patients | Experimental | Glucose metrics characteristic: (Time above range≥140 mg/dl: ≤ 6%) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring system |
| Hyperglicemic thalassemic patients | Experimental | Glucose metrics characteristic: (Time above range≥140 mg/dl: >6%) Receives: Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring system |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of participants with pre diabetes in Transfusion dependent patients
Transfusion dependent patients were studied using a continuous glucose monitoring system with the aim to show condition of dysglicemia (prediabetes)
Measured: Seven days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2024
- Study start1 Jul 2023
- Primary completion1 Oct 2023
- Study completion30 Oct 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prediabetic StateStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Angela Zanfardino, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
- Investigators
- Angela Zanfardino, Principal investigator, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06533618
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Hemoglycare
- Status last verified
- Aug 2024
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2024
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2024
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: We could share our data via a shared folder in the cloud
Publications
Naberezhnykh GA, Khomenko VA, Krasikova IN, Kim NIu, Solov'eva TF. [Cooperative interaction between protein-porin and lipopolysaccharide]. Bioorg Khim. 1996 Sep;22(9):671-7. Russian.
PubMed 8999784De Sanctis V, Soliman A, Yassin M. Iron overload and glucose metabolism in subjects with beta-thalassaemia major: an overview. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013 Jul;9(4):332-41. doi: 10.2174/1573399811309040005.
PubMed 23687960Karlen A, Johansson AM, Kenne L, Arvidsson LE, Hacksell U. Conformational analysis of the dopamine-receptor agonist 5-hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin and its C(2)-methyl-substituted derivative. J Med Chem. 1986 Jun;29(6):917-24. doi: 10.1021/jm00156a008.
PubMed 3712382Miller E, Polonsky WH, Miller K. What Role Might There Be for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Assessment of Diabetes Risk? Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jun;25(S3):S14-S20. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0136.
PubMed 37306445
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Characterization of the "Transfusion-dependent Prediabetes" Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring: the Hemoglycare Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06533618
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Hemoglycare
- Conditions
- Prediabetic State
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 29 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Campania Luigi VanvitelliUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Oct 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Dysglycemia is a frequent finding in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT). The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) remains the only validated screening test, but the procedure is complex and time-consuming. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems are simple to use, and could have a role in the diabetes mellitus diagnosis. This study involved 39 participants (19 cases and 20 healthy controls) using CGM for the analysis of the glucose metrics. Participants resulted negative for diabetes mellitus screening tests. Patients' clinical data were compared with glucose metrics.
Detailed description
The selection of patients took place randomly among adult patients suffering from transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) belonging to the Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Unit of the AOU University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli". Patients had a history of at least 10 years of therapy with red blood cell transfusions (transfusion frequency less than one months) and iron chelation therapy. Cases tested negative for diabetes mellitus screening tests (fasting glycemia, OGTT).
Some healthy volunteers were also recruited among medical resident and doctors. Major eligibility criteria for the volunteers were: caucasian; age ≥18 years; body mass index <25.0 kg/m2; no chronic illness or medications that might affect glucose metabolism; fasting glycemia<100 mg/dl; HbA1c <5.7% (39 mmol/mol); no positive islet autoantibodies; HOMA-IR <2.5. Female participants pregnant at the time of study enrollment were not eligible.
All procedures performed in this study were approved by the Institutional Research Committee of the University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli". All participants have provided written consent.
Demographic and Clinical characteristics A brief schedule was specifically designed and completed by clinicians (diabetologists or hematologists) to record demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, height, weight, duration of illness, and other medical conditions (family history of diabetes, endocrine disorders, cigarette smoking habit). Finally, the HOMA-IR was calculated as a parameter for evaluating insulin resistance. Possible missing data was obtained by reviewing medical charts
Study design
All participants (subjects and controls) applied a Medtronic Guardian4 sensor for seven days. At the end of the monitoring, the glucose sensor data was analyzed using the Carelink System software.
Glucose metrics considered for the analysis were glucose management indicator (GMI), mean glucose (mg/dl), glycemic variability as standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV), time spent with glycemia greater than or equal to 200 mg /dl (TAR200%,median), time spent with blood glucose greater than or equal to 140 mg/dl (TAR140%, median), time spent with blood glucose less than 70 mg/dl (TBR<70%, median).
As it is described in the American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines ,2h-glucose value ≥ 140 mg/dl (7.8 mmol/L) and <199 mg/dl (11 mmol/l) during OGTT is diagnostic for prediabetes. Moreover, 2h glucose value ≥200 mg/dl(11.1 mmol/L) during OGTT or a random glucose value (in any time of the day without regard to time since previous meal) ≥200 mg/dl(11.1 mmol/L) are both diagnostic for diabetes mellitus.
During a continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) it is not easy to understand correlation between glucose values and meals. Furthermore, in this study, the evaluation of glucose values (during CGM) two hours after a controlled meal (75-g of oral glucose in OGTT) was not performed. Instead, the participants' glucose values were observed in real life. Therefore, although the number of participants who exceeded or equaled the value 140 mg/dl or the value 200mg/dl was recorded, in addition how long these patients remained with glucose values above these cut-offs (TAR140%; TAR200%)was registered, to make the observation of abnormal glycemic profiles more precise.
Finally, the value ≤6% of TAR 140%was used as an index of normality (as indicated in other studies on healthy volunteers).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Thalassemic patients | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring systemPatient affected by TDD |
| Healthy controls | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring systemcaucasian; age ≥18 years; body mass index <25.0 kg/m2; no chronic illness or medications that might affect glucose metabolism; fasting glycemia<100 mg/dl; HbA1c <5.7% (39 mmol/mol); no positive islet autoantibodies; HOMA-IR <2.5 |
| Euglycemic thalassemic patients | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring systemGlucose metrics characteristic: (Time above range≥140 mg/dl: ≤ 6%) |
| Hyperglicemic thalassemic patients | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Continuous glucose monitoring systemGlucose metrics characteristic: (Time above range≥140 mg/dl: >6%) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- They were affected by transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT)
- They had a history of at least 10 years of therapy with red blood cell transfusions (transfusion frequency less than one months) and iron chelation therapy
- They tested negative for diabetes mellitus screening tests (fasting glycemia, OGTT).
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Continuous glucose monitoring systemAll participants (subjects and controls) applied a Medtronic Guardian4 sensor for seven days. | Diagnostic test | Euglycemic thalassemic patients, Healthy controls, Hyperglicemic thalassemic patients, Thalassemic patients |
Primary outcome
Number of participants with pre diabetes in Transfusion dependent patients
Time frame: Seven days
Transfusion dependent patients were studied using a continuous glucose monitoring system with the aim to show condition of dysglicemia (prediabetes)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2024.
- Background: PubMed 8999784Naberezhnykh GA, Khomenko VA, Krasikova IN, Kim NIu, Solov'eva TF. [Cooperative interaction between protein-porin and lipopolysaccharide]. Bioorg Khim. 1996 Sep;22(9):671-7. Russian.
- Background: PubMed 23687960De Sanctis V, Soliman A, Yassin M. Iron overload and glucose metabolism in subjects with beta-thalassaemia major: an overview. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2013 Jul;9(4):332-41. doi: 10.2174/1573399811309040005.
- Background: PubMed 3712382Karlen A, Johansson AM, Kenne L, Arvidsson LE, Hacksell U. Conformational analysis of the dopamine-receptor agonist 5-hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin and its C(2)-methyl-substituted derivative. J Med Chem. 1986 Jun;29(6):917-24. doi: 10.1021/jm00156a008.
- Background: PubMed 37306445Miller E, Polonsky WH, Miller K. What Role Might There Be for Continuous Glucose Monitoring in the Assessment of Diabetes Risk? Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Jun;25(S3):S14-S20. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0136.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. We could share our data via a shared folder in the cloud
Related trials for Prediabetic State
Recruiting
Effects of Lean Pork Loin Intake on Protein Homeostasis and Glucose Regulation in Prediabetic Adults
Hyperglycaemia (Non Diabetic), Prediabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Food-i-Sense Analytics: Integrating AI Into Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Analysis for Precision Nutrition.
Prediabetes (Insulin Resistance, Impaired Glucose Tolerance), Artificial Intelligence Mobile Application
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron in Participants With Overweight at Risk of Development of Obesity-Related Complications or Progression to Class 1 Obesity
Overweight, Prediabetic State
Enrolling by invitationEarly Phase 1
Truway Diagnostic Tools in Primary Care
Chronic Disease, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Obesity, Overweight
Recruiting
CGM-Enhanced DPP to Prevent Type 2 Diabetes in Adults With Prediabetes
PreDiabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Angela Zanfardino principal investigator
University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Continuous glucose monitoring system in people with Prediabetic State, run by University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of participants with pre diabetes in Transfusion dependent patients (time frame: Seven days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06533618, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2024.