AzTrials
AzTrials

Endotracheal IntubationNCT06525662

Stylet Shape in Simulated Endotracheal Intubation by Medical Students

A study testing Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with a 30 degree straight to cuff shape and Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with an arcuate cuff shape in people with Endotracheal Intubation and Medical Education, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Endotracheal intubation is a life saving procedure where a tube is placed into a person's windpipe to help them to breathe. This is a study of which shape of tube would lead to improved success in this procedure. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Endotracheal Intubation, Medical Education
What is being tested?
Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with a 30 degree straight to cuff shape and Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with an arcuate cuff shape
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
268 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
10 Jul 2024to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Final year medical students in the Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, undergoing their simulation posting. Endotracheal intubation is a procedure that is taught during this posting.

Who cannot join

  • Injuries precluding performance of endotracheal intubation. Non exhaustive examples include arm injuries.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Matthew JW Low, MBBS contact

6908 2222

mlow@nus.edu.sg

Singapore1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore

    Singapore

    Matthew JW Low, MBBS

    Recruiting

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Randomised Controlled Trial of Stylet Shape in Simulated Endotracheal Intubation by Medical Students

Endotracheal intubation is a life saving procedure where a tube is placed into a person's windpipe to help them to breathe. This is a study of which shape of tube would lead to improved success in this procedure.

Read the detailed description

Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a lifesaving procedure. It involves placing a tube in the patient's airway to maintain ventilation and oxygenation.

Simulation has been shown to be effective for medical procedural skills training. Medical simulation literature now focuses on instructional design (ID) features that improve learning.

There are multiple aspects of ETI technique and ID that can be modified to improve successful ETI. Patient positioning, mastery learning, and dyad rather than solo practice are examples for which evidence exists to guide instructors. Despite this, ETI complication rates are substantial.

Thus, areas for continued improvement in ETI ID should be explored. One area is the optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) shape, achieved using a stylet, for novices learning ETI, for which there is limited evidence.

The straight to cuff (STC) shape has been postulated to optimise views of the airway compared to an arcuate shape. These shapes have only been directly compared as subgroups among multiple other comparisons in ETI technique in difficult intubations in one study. This does not generalise well to educating novices such as medical students, where intubations at normal difficulty are within the learner's zone of proximal development, and findings from subgroup comparisons are hypothesis generating rather than definitive evidence

This study will compare which shape is most likely to lead to successful endotracheal intubation, when performed by novices (medical students) learning this procedure on mannequins.

Being tested
Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with a 30 degree straight to cuff shape, Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with an arcuate cuff shape
Keywords
Medical education, Simulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with a 30 degree straight to cuff shapeProcedure or surgery

    Placement of an endotracheal tube into a simulated trachea in a mannequin using the abovementioned shape

  • Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with an arcuate cuff shapeProcedure or surgery

    Placement of an endotracheal tube into a simulated trachea in a mannequin using the abovementioned shape

Study groups in NCT06525662
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
30-degree straight to cuffExperimentalThe endotracheal tube to be used for endotracheal intubation will have a stylet inserted into it and manipulated into a shape that is straight from its proximal end to the cuff. At the cuff, there will be a 30 degree anterior bend.
Receives: Procedure: Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with a 30 degree straight to cuff shape
ArcuateActive comparatorThe endotracheal tube to be used for endotracheal intubation will have a stylet inserted into it and manipulated into an arcuate shape, and thus curved throughout the length of the tube.
Receives: Procedure: Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with an arcuate cuff shape

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time to successful intubation

    Defined as the time between insertion of the laryngoscope to successful placement of the tube in the trachea

    Measured: Outcome assessment will occur within 2 weeks of endotracheal intubation being taught to participants, and immediately upon randomisation to a specified shape to attempt endotracheal intubation under video recording

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Proportion of participants who successfully intubate on first pass of laryngoscope

    Defined as successful placement of the tube into the trachea with only one insertion of the laryngoscope blade into the mouth

    Measured: Outcome assessment will occur within 2 weeks of endotracheal intubation being taught to participants, and immediately upon randomisation to a specified shape to attempt endotracheal intubation under video recording

  2. Proportion of participants who successfully intubate on first pass of endotracheal tube

    Defined as successful placement of the tube into the trachea with only one insertion of the endotracheal tube into the mouth

    Measured: Outcome assessment will occur within 2 weeks of endotracheal intubation being taught to participants, and immediately upon randomisation to a specified shape to attempt endotracheal intubation under video recording

  3. Proportion of participants who perform an oesophageal intubation

    Defined as placement of the endotracheal tube into the oesophagus as the end state of the participant's attempt

    Measured: Outcome assessment will occur within 2 weeks of endotracheal intubation being taught to participants, and immediately after their intubation attempt under video recording

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jul 2024
  2. Study start10 Jul 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Mar 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Design: Randomised controlled trial with 2 parallel groups Population: Final year medical students in NUS Medicine learning endotracheal intubation (ETI) with direct laryngoscopy using a Macintosh blade via simulation. These students have limited exposure to ETI and are novices in this procedure. Intervention: 30-degree STC styleted endotracheal tube (ETT) Comparator: Arcuate styleted ETT
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Care provider
Enrolment
268 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06525662
Sponsor's protocol ID
NUS-L2023-08-01
Status last verified
Jul 2024
First submitted
8 Jul 2024
Last updated
29 Jul 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: No plan for this, as this was not a part of the approved IRB application

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with a 30 degree straight to cuff shape and Endotracheal intubation using an endotracheal tube with an arcuate cuff shape in people with Endotracheal Intubation and Medical Education, run by National University Hospital, Singapore at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jul 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Matthew JW Low, MBBS (6908 2222, mlow@nus.edu.sg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time to successful intubation (time frame: Outcome assessment will occur within 2 weeks of endotracheal intubation being taught to participants, and immediately upon randomisation to a specified shape to attempt endotracheal intubation under video recording). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jul 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in