Anesthesia ComplicationNCT06498076
Management of Postspinal Anesthesia Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section: Baby Norepinephrine Versus Ephedrine
A study testing Norepinephrine and Ephedrine in people with Anesthesia Complication and Vasopressor, run by Hopital Charles Nicolle at 1 site in Tunisia.
Trial summary
Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 38 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Anesthesia Complication, Vasopressor, Cesarean Section Complications
- What is being tested?
- Norepinephrine and Ephedrine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 196 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTunisia
- Study dates
- 1 Aug 2024to 25 Jan 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 38 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Who cannot join
- Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contrindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.
- They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. The common method of treating hypotension includes fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. It presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections.
Patients and methods : After local Ethical Commitee approval, this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis. After obtaining informed written consent, singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be randomly divided into two groups. Group N : patients receive norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients receive ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are monitored. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of vasopressor boluses used in each group are recorded and considered as the primary outcomes of the study. Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting are recorded. We also record neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes. These parameters are considered as the secondary outcomes of the study.
Read more
Statistical study:
Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS software version 25.0. We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Analytical study: We'll use the Pearson chi2 test or Fischer's exact test, whichever appropriate, for the comparison of categorical variables. T test of Student and Mann Whitney U-test will be employed for comparing Continuous variables. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p less than 5%.
Read the detailed description
Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Among the feared complications, hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. In this perspective, several preventive and curative means have been studied to optimize maternal and fetal homeostasis. The common methods include fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. Due to its low agonist activity of the ß receptor and its powerful α adrenergic agonist activity, it presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections.
Patients and methods : After approval from the Local Ethical Commitee of the Hospital (N° FWA 00032748) , and after obtaining informed written consent this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis.
Inclusion criteria : Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia are included in the study.
Non inclusion criteria : Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contraindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.
Exclusion criteria : They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.
Patient groups :
Sample size : It was calculated by (https://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss2M.html), by adjusting a power of 80%, confidence level of 95%, and margin of error of 5%. The primary outcome variable of our study is to compare the number of vasopressor boluses to maintain mean blood pressure ≥ 80% between the groupes, which was estimated from the study conducted by Elnabtity and Selim. The least number of patients required in each groupe with a standard deviation of 2 is 63.
A total of 126 parturients are randomly divided into two equal groups by an investigator not directly linked to the study.
Group N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension.
The syringes will be labeled as syringe A and syringe B and the anesthesiologist who will give the bolus cannot know if it is ephedrine or norepinephrine.
The preparation of diluted norepinephrine is done by two dilutions: first dilution: 1ml of norepinephrine 2 mg/ml is diluted to 50 ml with 0.9% normal saline to have a concentration of 40 µg/ml. The second dilution: 1ml of norepinephrine 40µg/ml is diluted to 10 ml with 0.9% normal saline in 10 ml syringe prepared as final concentration of 4 µg/ml.
Ephedrine is prepared in 10 ml syringe at a concentration of 3 mg/ml. Preoperative period : A preanesthesia consultation is performed for patients included in the protocol. The modalities of the young preoperative, the anesthetic technique, the protocol of the study are explained to the parturients. Written and signed informed consent by the patients included in the study is obtained.
Intraoperative setting : On arrival to the operating room after a Check list, The parturient is positioned on the operating table in the supine position with left uterine displacement. We use a standard monitoring including non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oxymeter (SpO2) and electrocardiogram (ECG). We record three values of systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure and heart rate before any patient stimulation. An intravenous canula 18 G is inserted and antibiotic prophylaxis is administered 30 minutes before surgical incision using 2 g of cefazolin or 900 mg of clindamycin in case of allergy to penicillins.
Induction of spinal anesthesia: Co fluid loading 10 ml /kg of crystalloids is commenced. In the sitting position, under all aseptic precautions, introduction of spinal needle 25 gauge at L3-L4 or L4-L5 vertebral interspace. After obtaining free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, a standard mixture of anesthetic product : 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (08 mg if parturient's size ≤ 160 cm) with 2.5 µg of sufentanil and morphine 0.1 mg is injected. After intrathecal injection, parturients take quickly their initial position and the first prophylactic bolus of the vasopressor (2 ml) from syringe A or syringe B is administerated. Oxygen is administred by ventimask at rate of 3 l/min till the delivery of the baby. The level of sensory block is evaluated by pin prick test. Successful sensory block is defined as block reaching T4 dermatomal level. If after 20 minutes the sensory block level remains < T10, a conversion to general anesthesia is performed and the patient is excluded from the study.
Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are recorded every minute for the first 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia and every five minutes until the end of the intervention.
Management of hypotension : When systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases to ≤ 20% of baseline, a rescue bolus of vasopressor (2 ml of syringe A or syringe B) is given. Reinjection of the same bolus is repeated after 1 minute if hypotension persists. Administration of boluses is stopped when the value of the SBP finds ≥ 80% of the baseline.
After clamping of the umbilical cord, Oxytocin is given as an initial bolus of 10 UI over 3 minutes followed by slow infusion of 15 UI in 0.9% normal saline. Neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes is recorded.
Primary outcome : Number of vasopressor boluses used in each group to treat hypotension (SBP decreases to ≤ 20% of baseline) is recorded.
Secondary outcomes : Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension (SBP ≥ 20% of baseline), tachycardia (Heart rate ; HR ≥ 120 beats/min), bradycardia (HR ≤ 60 beats/min), nausea and vomiting are recorded. We'll also recorded neonatal APGAR score of the first and 5th minute.
Statistical study:
Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS version 25.0 software We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Descriptive study: Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Continuous quantitative variables not following a normal law will be expressed by their median and interquartile [25%-75%]. Qualitative variables will be expressed as simple frequencies (n) and relative frequencies as a percentage. Analytical study: For the analysis of the association between two qualitative variables, we will use the Pearson chi-2 test for the comparison of two frequencies under verified application conditions and the Fischer test otherwise. For the analysis of the association between a qualitative variable and a quantitative variable, we 'll use the T test of Student for the comparison of two means and the non-parametric test of Mann Whitney otherwise. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p 5%. In the multivariate study, risk will be calculated by the Odds Ratio (OR) with a retained confidence interval of 95% (95% CI).
- Conditions
- Anesthesia Complication, Vasopressor, Cesarean Section Complications, Hypotension During Surgery
- Being tested
- Norepinephrine, Ephedrine
- Keywords
- spinal anesthesia, cesarean section, complications, hypotension, ephedrine, norepinehrine
- Medical subject headings
- Hypotension
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NorepinephrineDrug
Also called Group N
injection of prophylactic norepinephrinebolus after spinal anesthesia induction. If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient.
EphedrineDrug
Also called Group E
injection of prophylactic ephedrine If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group E: ephedrine | Active comparator | Group E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention (systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline). Receives: Drug: Ephedrine |
| Group N: norepinephrine | Active comparator | Group N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline Receives: Drug: Norepinephrine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
number of boluses of vasopressor during surgery
number of boluses of norepinephrine in Group N and number of boluses of ephedrine in Group E, to maintain systolic blood pressure more than 80% of the baseline
Measured: number of boluses in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Secondary outcomes (5)
Incidence of hypertension
Hypertension is defined as systolic blood pressure ≥ 20% of baseline
Measured: number of hypertension in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of tachycardia
tachycardia : Heart Rate ≥ 120 beats/min
Measured: number of tachycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of bradycardia
bradycardia : Heart Rate ≤ 60 beats/min)
Measured: number of bradycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
Nausea vomiting is recorded in each group
Measured: the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Neonatal APGAR score
Neonatal APGAR score is recorded at 1 minute and five minutes
Measured: the first hour
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jul 2024
- Study start1 Aug 2024
- Primary completion10 Jan 2025
- Study completion25 Jan 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Anesthesia ComplicationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Groupe N : parturients are received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Groupe E : parturients are received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention.
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 196 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hopital Charles Nicolle
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, jebri alia, Hopital Charles Nicolle
- Investigators
- Alia Jebri, MD, Study director, Charles Nicolle Hospital Tunis
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06498076
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HCharlesNicolle
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 13 Jun 2024
- Last updated
- 23 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, Priola V, Maggio Savasta L, Guzzo M, De Vivo D, Mancuso A. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23(10):1114-8. doi: 10.3109/14767050903572158.
PubMed 20088721Sklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. SPINAL ANAESTHESIA-INDUCED HYPOTENSION IN OBSTETRICS: PREVENTION AND THERAPY. Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(Suppl 1):90-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13.
PubMed 31741565Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, Moufouki M, Banu F, Hanaf A, Edouard D, Roger-Christoph S. [Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 27. French.
PubMed 17590565Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS. Vasopressors in obstetrics: what should we be using? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;19(3):238-43. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192816.22989.ba.
PubMed 16735804Heesen M, Stewart A, Fernando R. Vasopressors for the treatment of maternal hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: past, present and future. Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):252-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13007. Epub 2015 Jan 13. No abstract available.
PubMed 25583307Mohta M, Dubey M, Malhotra RK, Tyagi A. Comparison of the potency of phenylephrine and norepinephrine bolus doses used to treat post-spinal hypotension during elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
PubMed 30685301Ali Elnabtity AM, Selim MF. Norepinephrine versus Ephedrine to Maintain Arterial Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Double-blinded Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):92-97. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_204_17.
PubMed 29628561Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):636-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x.
PubMed 15960713
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Management of Postspinal Anesthesia Hypotension During Elective Cesarean Section: Baby Norepinephrine Versus Ephedrine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06498076
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HCharlesNicolle
- Conditions
- Anesthesia Complication, Vasopressor, Cesarean Section Complications, Hypotension During Surgery
- Keywords
- spinal anesthesia, cesarean section, complications, hypotension, ephedrine, norepinehrine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 196 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hopital Charles NicolleUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Aug 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Jan 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 25 Jan 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. The common method of treating hypotension includes fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. It presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections.
Patients and methods : After local Ethical Commitee approval, this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis. After obtaining informed written consent, singleton full-term pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia will be randomly divided into two groups. Group N : patients receive norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients receive ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension. Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are monitored. Number of episodes of hypotension and number of vasopressor boluses used in each group are recorded and considered as the primary outcomes of the study. Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension, tachycardia, bradycardia, nausea and vomiting are recorded. We also record neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes. These parameters are considered as the secondary outcomes of the study.
Statistical study:
Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS software version 25.0. We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Categorical variables will be expressed as frequencies and percentages. Analytical study: We'll use the Pearson chi2 test or Fischer's exact test, whichever appropriate, for the comparison of categorical variables. T test of Student and Mann Whitney U-test will be employed for comparing Continuous variables. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p less than 5%.
Detailed description
Background : Spinal anesthesia emerges as the preferred anesthesia technique for elective cesarean section . It offers a preferable alternative to general anesthesia because it provides better maternal safety and neonatal outcomes. However, spinal anesthesia is not free of inherent risks. Among the feared complications, hypotension remains the most common complication which threats both mother and child. In this perspective, several preventive and curative means have been studied to optimize maternal and fetal homeostasis. The common methods include fluid loading and the use of vasopressors such as ephedrine and phenylephrine. One promising approach is the administration of diluted norepinephrine. Due to its low agonist activity of the ß receptor and its powerful α adrenergic agonist activity, it presents a good alternative to preserve maternal blood pressure while minimizing adverse effects on the mother and fetus. Thus, our study proposes to evaluate the efficacy and safety of diluted norepinephrine boluses compared with ephedrine on the management of post- spinal anesthesia hypotension during scheduled cesarean sections.
Patients and methods : After approval from the Local Ethical Commitee of the Hospital (N° FWA 00032748) , and after obtaining informed written consent this prospective randomized double -blind study will be undertaken from August to October 2024 in the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive care and Gynecology and Obstetric department of Charles Nicolle Hospital of Tunis.
Inclusion criteria : Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia are included in the study.
Non inclusion criteria : Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contraindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.
Exclusion criteria : They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.
Patient groups :
Sample size : It was calculated by (https://statulator.com/SampleSize/ss2M.html), by adjusting a power of 80%, confidence level of 95%, and margin of error of 5%. The primary outcome variable of our study is to compare the number of vasopressor boluses to maintain mean blood pressure ≥ 80% between the groupes, which was estimated from the study conducted by Elnabtity and Selim. The least number of patients required in each groupe with a standard deviation of 2 is 63.
A total of 126 parturients are randomly divided into two equal groups by an investigator not directly linked to the study.
Group N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Group E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotension.
The syringes will be labeled as syringe A and syringe B and the anesthesiologist who will give the bolus cannot know if it is ephedrine or norepinephrine.
The preparation of diluted norepinephrine is done by two dilutions: first dilution: 1ml of norepinephrine 2 mg/ml is diluted to 50 ml with 0.9% normal saline to have a concentration of 40 µg/ml. The second dilution: 1ml of norepinephrine 40µg/ml is diluted to 10 ml with 0.9% normal saline in 10 ml syringe prepared as final concentration of 4 µg/ml.
Ephedrine is prepared in 10 ml syringe at a concentration of 3 mg/ml. Preoperative period : A preanesthesia consultation is performed for patients included in the protocol. The modalities of the young preoperative, the anesthetic technique, the protocol of the study are explained to the parturients. Written and signed informed consent by the patients included in the study is obtained.
Intraoperative setting : On arrival to the operating room after a Check list, The parturient is positioned on the operating table in the supine position with left uterine displacement. We use a standard monitoring including non invasive blood pressure (NIBP), pulse oxymeter (SpO2) and electrocardiogram (ECG). We record three values of systolic, diastolic, and mean blood pressure and heart rate before any patient stimulation. An intravenous canula 18 G is inserted and antibiotic prophylaxis is administered 30 minutes before surgical incision using 2 g of cefazolin or 900 mg of clindamycin in case of allergy to penicillins.
Induction of spinal anesthesia: Co fluid loading 10 ml /kg of crystalloids is commenced. In the sitting position, under all aseptic precautions, introduction of spinal needle 25 gauge at L3-L4 or L4-L5 vertebral interspace. After obtaining free flow of cerebrospinal fluid, a standard mixture of anesthetic product : 10 mg of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% (08 mg if parturient's size ≤ 160 cm) with 2.5 µg of sufentanil and morphine 0.1 mg is injected. After intrathecal injection, parturients take quickly their initial position and the first prophylactic bolus of the vasopressor (2 ml) from syringe A or syringe B is administerated. Oxygen is administred by ventimask at rate of 3 l/min till the delivery of the baby. The level of sensory block is evaluated by pin prick test. Successful sensory block is defined as block reaching T4 dermatomal level. If after 20 minutes the sensory block level remains < T10, a conversion to general anesthesia is performed and the patient is excluded from the study.
Heart rate, systolic, diastolic and mean blood pressure are recorded every minute for the first 15 minutes after spinal anesthesia and every five minutes until the end of the intervention.
Management of hypotension : When systolic blood pressure (SBP) decreases to ≤ 20% of baseline, a rescue bolus of vasopressor (2 ml of syringe A or syringe B) is given. Reinjection of the same bolus is repeated after 1 minute if hypotension persists. Administration of boluses is stopped when the value of the SBP finds ≥ 80% of the baseline.
After clamping of the umbilical cord, Oxytocin is given as an initial bolus of 10 UI over 3 minutes followed by slow infusion of 15 UI in 0.9% normal saline. Neonatal APGAR score at 1 minute and five minutes is recorded.
Primary outcome : Number of vasopressor boluses used in each group to treat hypotension (SBP decreases to ≤ 20% of baseline) is recorded.
Secondary outcomes : Complication during the surgery as incidence of hypertension (SBP ≥ 20% of baseline), tachycardia (Heart rate ; HR ≥ 120 beats/min), bradycardia (HR ≤ 60 beats/min), nausea and vomiting are recorded. We'll also recorded neonatal APGAR score of the first and 5th minute.
Statistical study:
Data entry and analysis will be performed by SPSS version 25.0 software We will use Excel 2019 software to edit the charts. Descriptive study: Continuous quantitative variables following a normal distribution will be expressed by their means and standard deviation. Continuous quantitative variables not following a normal law will be expressed by their median and interquartile [25%-75%]. Qualitative variables will be expressed as simple frequencies (n) and relative frequencies as a percentage. Analytical study: For the analysis of the association between two qualitative variables, we will use the Pearson chi-2 test for the comparison of two frequencies under verified application conditions and the Fischer test otherwise. For the analysis of the association between a qualitative variable and a quantitative variable, we 'll use the T test of Student for the comparison of two means and the non-parametric test of Mann Whitney otherwise. We 'll retain a significance threshold for p 5%. In the multivariate study, risk will be calculated by the Odds Ratio (OR) with a retained confidence interval of 95% (95% CI).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Groupe N : parturients are received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline. Groupe E : parturients are received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group E: ephedrine | Active comparator | Drug: EphedrineGroup E : parturients will received ephedrine boluses (6 mg) ; systematic bolus after the induction of spinal anesthesia and therapeutic boluses if hypotention (systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline). |
| Group N: norepinephrine | Active comparator | Drug: NorepinephrineGroup N : patients will received norepinephrine boluses (8 µg) ; prophylactic bolus immediately after spinal anesthesia induction and therapeutic boluses when systolic blood pressure falls to ≤ 20% of baseline |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 38 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Singleton full-term consenting pregnant females of ASA grade II, aged 18-38 years, scheduled for elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Any parturient falling in the category ASA grade III and IV, contrindications to spinal anesthesia, preeclampsia, chronic hypertension, comorbidity with diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disorders and psychiatric illness are non included.
- They are excluded the case of failure of spinal anesthesia, conversion to general anesthesia, post-partum bleeding, and failure to follow protocol.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NorepinephrineAlso: Group Ninjection of prophylactic norepinephrinebolus after spinal anesthesia induction. If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient. | Drug | Group N: norepinephrine |
| EphedrineAlso: Group Einjection of prophylactic ephedrine If hypotension at any time during surgery, administration of rescue bolus of the same vasopressor to each patient. | Drug | Group E: ephedrine |
Primary outcome
number of boluses of vasopressor during surgery
Time frame: number of boluses in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
number of boluses of norepinephrine in Group N and number of boluses of ephedrine in Group E, to maintain systolic blood pressure more than 80% of the baseline
5 secondary outcomes
Incidence of hypertension
Time frame: number of hypertension in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of tachycardia
Time frame: number of tachycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of bradycardia
Time frame: number of bradycardia in the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Incidence of nausea and vomiting
Time frame: the first hour after spinal anesthesia
Neonatal APGAR score
Time frame: the first hour
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 20088721Mancuso A, De Vivo A, Giacobbe A, Priola V, Maggio Savasta L, Guzzo M, De Vivo D, Mancuso A. General versus spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean sections: effects on neonatal short-term outcome. A prospective randomised study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Oct;23(10):1114-8. doi: 10.3109/14767050903572158.
- Background: PubMed 31741565Sklebar I, Bujas T, Habek D. SPINAL ANAESTHESIA-INDUCED HYPOTENSION IN OBSTETRICS: PREVENTION AND THERAPY. Acta Clin Croat. 2019 Jun;58(Suppl 1):90-95. doi: 10.20471/acc.2019.58.s1.13.
- Background: PubMed 17590565Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP, De la Dorie A, Moufouki M, Banu F, Hanaf A, Edouard D, Roger-Christoph S. [Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: fluid loading, vasopressors and hypotension]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2007 Jul-Aug;26(7-8):688-93. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2007.05.003. Epub 2007 Jun 27. French.
- Background: PubMed 16735804Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS. Vasopressors in obstetrics: what should we be using? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2006 Jun;19(3):238-43. doi: 10.1097/01.aco.0000192816.22989.ba.
- Background: PubMed 25583307Heesen M, Stewart A, Fernando R. Vasopressors for the treatment of maternal hypotension following spinal anaesthesia for elective caesarean section: past, present and future. Anaesthesia. 2015 Mar;70(3):252-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.13007. Epub 2015 Jan 13. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 30685301Mohta M, Dubey M, Malhotra RK, Tyagi A. Comparison of the potency of phenylephrine and norepinephrine bolus doses used to treat post-spinal hypotension during elective caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2019 May;38:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2018.12.002. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
- Background: PubMed 29628561Ali Elnabtity AM, Selim MF. Norepinephrine versus Ephedrine to Maintain Arterial Blood Pressure during Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Double-blinded Trial. Anesth Essays Res. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):92-97. doi: 10.4103/aer.AER_204_17.
- Results publication: PubMed 15960713Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid-base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia. 2005 Jul;60(7):636-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2005.04223.x.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Anesthesia Complication
Not yet recruiting
Bispectral Index-Guided Propofol Sedation During Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Deep Sedation, Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM), Obstetric Anesthesia
RecruitingObservational study
The Impact of Fast-Track Anesthesia on Postoperative Neurocognitive Function in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery
Delirium - Postoperative, Cardiac Surgery
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Prophylactic Dexamethasone vs Placebo on Airway Dimensions Assessed by Ultrasonography in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Airway Edema, Postoperative Complications
Not yet recruiting
Magnesium Sulphate as an Adjuvant in Combined Costoclavicular Block and Suprascapular Block Versus Interscalene Block for Ambulatory Shoulder Arthroscopy
Postoperative Pain, Shoulder Arthroscopy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alia Jebri, MD study director
Charles Nicolle Hospital Tunis
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Norepinephrine and Ephedrine in people with Anesthesia Complication and Vasopressor, run by Hopital Charles Nicolle at 1 site in Tunisia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Tunisia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
number of boluses of vasopressor during surgery (time frame: number of boluses in the first hour after spinal anesthesia). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06498076, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2026.